
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

OTHER MINDS- HB Hardcover
Price | New from | Used from |
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial |
Hardcover | $106.28 | — | $25.39 |
Digital
"Please retry" |
—
| — | — |
- Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 3 million more titles $11.99 to buy -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your Audible trial - Hardcover
$106.28 - Paperback
$13.99 - Digital
—
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS
- Dimensions6.26 x 1.1 x 9.45 inches
- ISBN-10000822627X
- ISBN-13978-0008226275
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
- The chemistry of life is an aquatic chemistry. We can get by on land only by carrying a huge amount of salt water around with us.Highlighted by 500 Kindle readers
- In an animal like us, a large proportion of the energy taken in as food, nearly a quarter in our case, is spent just keeping the brain running.Highlighted by 362 Kindle readers
- They are smart in the sense of being curious and flexible; they are adventurous, opportunistic.Highlighted by 361 Kindle readers
Product details
- Language : English
- ISBN-10 : 000822627X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0008226275
- Item Weight : 1.12 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.26 x 1.1 x 9.45 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #225,994 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

PETER GODFREY-SMITH is a professor in the School of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Sydney. He is the author of Metazoa and the bestselling Other Minds: The Octopus and the Evolution of Intelligent Life, which was shortlisted for the 2017 Royal Society Science Book Prize and has since been published in more than twenty languages. He is also the author of four other books, including Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science and Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection, which won the 2010 Lakatos Award for an outstanding work on the philosophy of science.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2021
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It is not simply about octopuses and squids though. It is about using those life forms to explore bigger things like intelligence, consciousness and how animals including humans understand their environment. The author explores evolutionary possibilities about how animals come to relate to conspecifics, predators and prey. There are others which do not fit any of those categories.
As a book written for a popular audience it is not replete with scientific jargon and when new words or concepts are introduced, they are explained in understandable language with very good examples to provide perspective. Maybe the thing I appreciated the most was that it was written using a lot of questions and humble suggestions rather than offering grand new theories. It made for a far more thought provoking read than some others in the genre. Those questions and suggestions are too many for a book review but below a few will be presented.
It is nearly an aside here, but a philosopher who does field research by scuba diving off the coast of Australia with scientists and whose research reveals not raw data for laboratory testing but philosophical insight, makes the author himself a very interesting character. Some of his experiences can be viewed here.
Early in the book the reader is introduced to cephalopods by way of the scuba diving anecdotal stories of their engagement with the humans. In particular, he means the interactions with the author. Certainly the cephalopod does not recognize that object as we do but something like a dark animal with no face, four arms and many bubbles exuding from them. Nevertheless the author experienced them reaching a tentacle or arm out to tactilely probe the object of this encounter-to the point of attempting to pull them into the lair. This behavior suggests the importance of feel to the cephalopod’s repertoire of resources that help it survive and bring forth spawn.
He also observed their visual observance of everything around them. They watched the scuba divers but also their entire landscape for friend, foe and neutral bodies. Well maybe just for foe as the writer indicated often, these species are generally indifferent to their conspecifics. He did remark on variation from the rule here as he did whenever he was making a general statement about behaviors. Noting exceptions to the rule is critical to explanation and for the non-scientist reader, valuable.
He brought up the fact of the elaborate nervous systems of these animals and how that plays with the brilliant abilities for the animals to shape shift as if to conform to their surroundings which included immediate color changes. It is remarkable for many reasons but a couple include the fact that the colorations do not occur as if by one mechanism but instead by many yet it occurs so quickly it appears as if by simplicity. It is a three step process since they mechanisms occur at three different layers of skins. The details are in the book but not here. They are too fascinating for my own interpretation. He does provide an image however.
The other bizarre curiosity is that lab results strongly suggest that they are colorblind. Something within the nervous system that is not visual ignites the instantaneous processes that allow the color change and body morphing. He examines this through two different operations of the nervous systems one in which is the taking of sensory cues from the environment with the innate motor skills respond like autonomic reactions. The other is a simpler stimulus response action based on what occurs on the spot like the flight or fight response.
In this discussion he cited other philosophers of consciousness to remind us that interpretation involves a lot of questions. There is nothing certain and plenty that may be probable. In efforts to describe animal behavior from a non-anthropomorphic perspective, the observer may not always see the forest for the trees. Yet we are thrust into a situation where it is difficult to understand information and the processing of it from other than a human perspective. We also have to treat information as a physical thing-something to be measured. Is it? Or is it reducible to a binomial sort of impulse and response an immediate (and evolutionarily adaptive) reaction? This is a debated question amongst those examining what is meant by “consciousness”. In fact it remains sort of a Gordian knot and there are dualists who consider that consciousness is made up of a “functional” quality which is the 1s and 0s of binomial information. It also has a “phenomenal” essence that involves the interpretational or conscious experience. The former is said to control behavior and the latter simply is consciousness. It is these sort of issues that the author proposes not to find concrete answers but to ask additional questions.
Godfrey-Smith ponders hard on the notion of consciousness saying “It’s sometimes hard to work out how these theories relate to my own target here: subjective experience in a very broad sense. I treat subjective experience as a broad category and consciousness as a narrower category within it— not everything that an animal might feel has to be conscious.” More important than defining consciousness, the author provides much to consider and the reader can take advantage of that.
Back to the animals, the author discovered several things that also make the reader think. With the knowledge that cephalopods have a very intricate nervous system it would seem that it would take years to develop and yet he informs us that these species have a very short life span. In most cases four years would be very long. He asks about the evolutionary benefit of this intricate structure to only exist for so short a time. They hardly have time to use their wondrous skills when they are replaced by the next generation.
They are semelparous meaning that they only reproduce once in a lifetime and in their case, the female dies right after spawning. They also use a deimatic display which is one of complete submission and the author examined this many times and offers suggestions as to why. These beasts are so capable of camouflaging for protection as well as to predate, why would they need a passive and subordinate display? It is not used when flight would work or an attempt to startle something it would eat. There is no clear answer but he believes it is used when a more aggressive conspecific appears.
There is much to learn about cephalopods and there is scarce information of them historically. Being soft bodied they do not preserve well so the fossil record is nearly non-existent. His own efforts at first hand observation are in coordination with biologists and other scientists. There is much study of them going on today. It is clear that the bounty of possible research is hindered by decreasing habitat. That is a problem that the study of any animal behavior faces. With climate change comes both a loss of habitat, but a change in behavior as well. Various species adapt differently to changing environment environments such as warming waters.
This was an easy book to not put down. The pace was lively and informative yet never certain. The book makes the curious reader intent on learning more of the subject matter. He provided lots of philosophical questions for the reader to ponder.
Octopuses sit on a very far branch on an evolutional tree from ours. Their common lifespan is said to be less than two years. Hawaiian account octopuses as lone survivors from an earlier world. Old science-fiction-novels features octopus like aliens without fail. Octopuses have lost their shell entirely during a long path of evolution, which gave them mobility, dexterity, and nervous complexity, and also a live-fast-die-young lifestyle. They have three hearts pumping blue-green blood, using copper as the oxygen-carrying molecule. Octopuses have proportionally big brains and the large nervous system, which runs all through their body. There is central control of the arm’s overall path, via the eyes, combined with a fine tuning of the search by the arm itself. Neurons in the arm have not only the sense of touch, but also the capacity to smell, or taste. The channel back to the central brain from each arm seemed pretty slim. Two forms of control, an ongoing interaction between commands from the center and decisions at the periphery, are working in tandem within their large nervous system. What is the point of building a large nervous system if the life is over in a year or two? What is all the brain power doing if you die less than two years after the birth? Godfrey-Smith sees consciousness as one form of subjective experience, even it’s not the only form. Sentience is brought into being through connection between sensing and acting, before consciousness arises. At some stage in evolution, some living groups have gradually acquired capacity to lead to subjective experience independently, perceptual constancies, integration of information, and a recognition of time and self. Ginsberg and Jablonka’s metaphor of “white noise” as the first form of subjective experience is interesting. Godfrey-Smith sees the octopus as a remarkable sentient being.
Godfrey-Smith writes it has bee getting clarified very complicated matter go on inside other animals without the help of speech. Efference copy gave rise to something so powerful at some stage of evolution. Inner speech, a monologue that accompanies much of our conscious life, is a familiar tool for our making complex thought, together with spatial imaginary tool, inner pictures and shapes. We often rely on our inner selves by building inner questions, commentaries, and encouragement, which support us fulfilling things we can’t do otherwise. Godfrey-Smith says cephalopods and smart vertebrates are independent experiments in the evolution of the mind. Through observation, Godfrey-Smith found octopuses are generally more social than people understand. Octopuses are more concerned with each other than had once been believed. They have a timeserving, inquisitive style of approach to the world. They are curious, chasing after novelties, having at least some perceptual constancies, phantasmagoric in behavior as well as in body. Once there was an octopus named “Paul,” who predicted the results of association football matches. Octopuses are good swimmers and are also good at navigation. Octopuses are superb at matching the color of their surroundings, for camouflage, by producing a color reflecting it back from outside. The magic skin, a thin sheet on top of a plain white body, can both sense light and also produce a chemical that affects the skin’s color. We don’t yet know whether the skin’s sensing is fed back to their brain, or whether the information is stored in local. Cephalopod displays have enormous expressive power, controlling millions of pixel-like sacs of color, but these displays are not embedded in a lot of looping feedback, and perhaps could never be. Since, most cephalopods are said to be color-blind. Most cephalopods have only one photoreceptors, while we humans having three, to make color vision. To whom octopuses sending a message by changing their color? Does any color has special meaning? Godfrey-Smith sees an unfinished area in evolution there.
Godfrey-Smith’s concern is turned to the situation of our making stress on the sea. In addition to excessive fishing, the sea faces its chemical change, acidification, and micro-plastic problem, much greater now. Our ability to manage this is hampered, Godfrey-Smith says, not just by greed and competing interests, but by the difficulty of getting a handle on the problem and understanding our own destructive capacities. Referring on Colony Collapse Disorder freshly reminds me of reading experience of Rowan Jacobsen’s “Fruitless Fall.” The mind evolved in the sea. The sea is the birth place of the minds, or at least of its first faint forms emerged in there. Before it becomes too late, we all need to consider this. His heart-rending cry, “the sea looks the same after the boats are gone,” sinks deeply into our mind.
Top reviews from other countries

Secondly, 'Other Minds' is the kind of book destined to become a classic of its genre, as it has a tremendous - I would say life-changing - effect on the reader. This reader included; after reading about the startlingly high level of intelligence possessed by octopuses, I cannot ever see myself ordering octopus as food in a restaurant again. It just seems wrong; they are as characterful as dogs and cats, and I think it would simply be terrible to treat these amazing creatures as a foodstuff any longer. I do hope, given my love of bacon and chorizo, that Godfrey-Smith's next book is not on the topic of porcine intelligence...
And thirdly (for the sake of brevity - I could certainly go on in praise of this book), Godfrey-Smith makes a great case for the protection of the ocean environment. Overfishing and pollution have both taken their toll, and now that we understand how much intelligence - nay, sentience - is present in the depths, we owe it to our genetic relatives (by which I mean all species, in every shape and form) to do a better job of not destroying what life there is out there.

But how much do you know about octopuses (or, apparently, octopodes) and cephalopods in general?
The evolutionary tree and time scales are fascinating:
• 4,600 MYA: Earth formed
• 3,600 MYA: First single celled organism (perhaps earlier than this)
• 635 MYA, Ediacaran: Emergence first multicellular organisms and also the bilaterian body plan. Perhaps these animals also had simple light sensitive skin patches. Molluscs, the forbearers of cephalopods, split from rest of evolutionary tree during this period. ie common ancestor for humans and octopodes
• 542 MYA, Cambrian: explosion of body forms we see today
• 320 MYA: Bird and mammal common ancestor. A land dwelling lizard-like animal
• 164 MYA: First uncontroversial octopus fossil
• 6 MYA: Human and chimp common ancestor
• 1 MYA: Homo sapiens
Nervous systems developed independently (although from the same precursor protein), as did eyes. Whereas chordates (including us) have a centralised nervous system, cephalopods have a much more widely distributed nervous system: for instance their arms have enough "intelligence" to act semi-autonomously. Whereas there are many intelligent birds and mammals, cephalopods are the only intelligent molluscs. The common octopus has 500 million neurons, (similar to cats and dogs. This is four orders of magnitude greater than other molluscs ,a garden snail for instance has about 10,000 neurons.
There is an interesting discussion on the purpose of a nervous system. In simple animals it allows animals to do two things: respond to the environment (move toward food or away from pain), and to coordinate the animal's body. Looking after four feet whilst fleeing a predator is no mean feat. With larger brains animals can start to plan their actions, coordinate within a pack, and solve problems set by animal behaviourists.
Godfrey-Smith then attempts to make inroads into consciousness and self awareness. Without, I feel, much success.
Birds and mammals also demonstrate parallel evolution. Our common ancestor was probably a land reptile that roamed before the dinosaurs. Yet both us (as mammals) and birds have skin covering, are warm blooded, and have developed a level of intelligence. Although anatomically our brains are similar, birds and primates use their brains differently. A raven, as well as having a large brain for its weight, also uses that brain efficiently. The result is a surprisingly clever animal.
Why do cephalopods generate such fascinating skin colour displays? Especially as they're apparently colour blind, and they are not social.
Another interesting puzzle that Godfrey-Smith raises but doesn't entirely address: octopuses and cephalopods have comparatively large brains, yet only live for a couple of years. Why do they need such large brains for such a short life span? However the associated discussion on the evolutionary theories of senescence.
The book ends with a polemic on habitat destruction, which is fair enough but off-topic.
So despite the book's shortcomings, I learnt a lot. Hence a hearty 4 out 5.



His passion for octopuses also shines through and contributes to the readability of the book. The only reason it doesn't get five stars from me is that the prose is a tad try. Nevertheless, he does a great job of distilling complex concepts for the lay reader, and the book reads like a breeze, making it worthwhile for anyone with an interest in these kinds of subjects.


Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on May 25, 2018
His passion for octopuses also shines through and contributes to the readability of the book. The only reason it doesn't get five stars from me is that the prose is a tad try. Nevertheless, he does a great job of distilling complex concepts for the lay reader, and the book reads like a breeze, making it worthwhile for anyone with an interest in these kinds of subjects.

