Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Occult Hardcover – January 1, 1971
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRANDOM HOUSE
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 1971
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- ASIN : B0027U1XN4
- Publisher : RANDOM HOUSE; Book Club (BCE/BOMC) edition (January 1, 1971)
- Language : English
- Item Weight : 2.6 pounds
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,505,489 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #7,588 in New Age Mysticism (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Colin Henry Wilson (26 June 1931 – 5 December 2013) was an English writer, philosopher and novelist. He also wrote widely on true crime, mysticism and the paranormal. Wilson called his philosophy "new existentialism" or "phenomenological existentialism", and maintained his life work was "that of a philosopher, and (his) purpose to create a new and optimistic existentialism".
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Photo by Tom Ordelman Thor NL (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html), CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) or CC BY-SA 2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5-2.0-1.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Despite its' breadth, however, "The Occult" has one fatal flaw, and that is Wilson's inability to truly weigh competing points of view. For example, while Wilson provides rather lively portraits of Caligostro, Nostradamus, Mesmer, Pythagoras and the like, he uncritically reprints sensationalistic stories about them. Any historian of Greek philosophy can tell you that the stories Wilson shares regarding Pythagoras are most likely fiction, and any Freemason can correct Wilson's misconceptions about the Masons in his section on Caligostro. (Freemasonry is NOT a religion, despite Wilson's claims).
Still, this book deserves much praise. The Tarot is here, but so is the I Ching. Crowley is here, but so is Zen. The Kabbalah is here, but so are the Masons. And so on. While casting his net wide may open him up to charges of being a dillentant, it also saves this from being yet another collection of ghost stories and pseudo-myth. Don't buy this book because Halloween is coming. Buy it if you have ever cared about mystery, religion, philosophy, or spiritualism. You probably won't like everything about "The Occult" but I think you will be glad that you have read it and will probably want to read it again.
"Freemasonry is NOT a religion, despite Wilson's claims)."
With all due respect, Danno, you have misinterpreted Wilson. He nowhere claims that Freemasonry is a religion. On the contrary, he says what Masons themselves say: "The Freemasons are a 'secret society' of a religious nature, whose basic tenet is the brotherhood of man" (p.385 of the white paperback, Watkins Publishing edition, 2003). We can agree that the "religious nature" of Freemasonry has to do with theism and moral principles relating thereto. One of the requirements of being a Mason is belief in "a supreme being", for which reason it is possible for a Lodge to have a Christian, Muslim, or Jewish member. Nonetheless, it is not a religion. You are right in saying that Freemasonry is not a religion, and it has never claimed to be. When Wilson says (p.387) that "the Freemasons were virtually setting up an alternative church", I think you took this as meaning that for Wilson the Masons were, in fact, rivaling Catholicism on religious grounds and trying to be a religion. But this is not Wilson's meaning. He meant that the popularity of the Lodge, as well as it's distinctness, made it SEEM like a church unto itself, and that is why Wilson is careful to use the word "virtually". For hundreds of years people went to church. When freemasonry came on the scene, it felt like a fresh, distinctly different approach to spirituality. In other words, they looked like 'the next big thing," serious competition.
Is Wilson also implying that the Masons WANTED to be direct competition, to the point of recruiting Catholics, away from Catholicism? I don't believe so. If he is (and I believe he isn't), I doubt that that was the case, since Freemasonry makes a point of saying that 'Masonry doesn't seek men. Men seek Masonry". They also say, according to a website I saw, that if any Masonic members happen to be church members, such members should make church an even higher priority than the lodge. I don't know if this is true or not, but I wouldn't be surprised if it is true, because present-day freemasonry doesn't interfere with organized religion. And perhaps the freemasonry of old didn't either.
In any case, your review was a good one in all other respects, but I believe you misinterpreted Wilson on the Masons.
Top reviews from other countries
and the book is as it was described.
Very easy to read and I found it hard to put down. Read like a good conversation with an old friend. Very thought prevoking and inspiring. Recommended reading for anyone with an interest in life, the universe and everything.

