| Kindle Price: | $9.99 |
| Sold by: | Penguin Group (USA) LLC Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
-
-
VIDEO -
The Once and Future King Kindle Edition
Once upon a time, a young boy called “Wart” was tutored by a magician named Merlyn in preparation for a future he couldn’t possibly imagine. A future in which he would ally himself with the greatest knights, love a legendary queen and unite a country dedicated to chivalrous values. A future that would see him crowned and known for all time as Arthur, King of the Britons.
During Arthur’s reign, the kingdom of Camelot was founded to cast enlightenment on the Dark Ages, while the knights of the Round Table embarked on many a noble quest. But Merlyn foresaw the treachery that awaited his liege: the forbidden love between Queen Guenever and Lancelot, the wicked plots of Arthur’s half-sister Morgause and the hatred she fostered in Mordred that would bring an end to the king’s dreams for Britain—and to the king himself.
“[The Once and Future King] mingles wisdom, wonderful, laugh-out-loud humor and deep sorrow—while telling one of the great tales of the Western world.”—Guy Gavriel Kay
- Reading age12 years and up
- LanguageEnglish
- Lexile measure1080
- PublisherAce
- Publication dateNovember 1, 2011
- ISBN-109781101657546
- ISBN-13978-0441020836
Customers who bought this item also bought
Perhaps we all give the best of our hearts uncritically—to those who hardly think about us in return.Highlighted by 747 Kindle readers
It is so fatally easy to make young children believe that they are horrible.Highlighted by 618 Kindle readers
Besides, he admired Kay and was a born follower. He was a hero-worshipper.Highlighted by 613 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Certain books offer pleasures so rich and enduring, they become part of what defines us. The Once and Future King is like that for me. It manages—by some miracle—to be about its own time, and a distant, legendary time, and about today. It mingles wisdom, wonderful, laugh-out-loud humor and deep sorrow—while telling one of the great tales of the Western world. I envy the reader coming to it for the first time.”—Guy Gavriel Kay
“White took hold of the ultimate English epic and recast it in modern literary language, sacrificing none of its grandeur or its strangeness in the process, and adding in all the humor and passion that we expect from a novel. What was once as stiff and two-dimensional as a medieval tapestry becomes rich and real and devastatingly sad.”—Lev Grossman
“Touching, profound, funny and tragic.”—Los Angeles Times
“Richly imagined and unfailingly eloquent and entertaining, its appeal is timeless and universal. If a reader reads only one Arthurian tale, let this be it.”—Booklist
“The Once and Future King is full of insights, scenes and flourishes that are really quite astonishing.”—The Guardian (U.K.)
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B00AEDDSQG
- Publisher : Ace (November 1, 2011)
- Publication date : November 1, 2011
- Language : English
- File size : 2268 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 654 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #281,955 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #350 in Arthurian Fantasy (Books)
- #422 in Mythology (Kindle Store)
- #2,302 in Fairy Tale Fantasy (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Terence Hanbury "Tim" White (29 May 1906 – 17 January 1964) was an English author best known for his sequence of Arthurian novels, The Once and Future King, first published together in 1958. One of his most memorable stories is the first of that series, The Sword in the Stone, published as a stand-alone book in 1938.
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Photo by Burns Library, Boston College. [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.
Customer reviews
Our goal is to make sure every review is trustworthy and useful. That's why we use both technology and human investigators to block fake reviews before customers ever see them. Learn more
We block Amazon accounts that violate our community guidelines. We also block sellers who buy reviews and take legal actions against parties who provide these reviews. Learn how to report
Reviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
There is a certain irony in the fact that perhaps the three most influential authors of modern fantasy lived about the same time an in the same area. Indeed, two of them were colleagues and friends, T.H. White died in 1964, and C.S. Lewis passed in 1963 to be followed by J.R.R. Tolkien in 1973. And all called England home. The impact of the tales of Arthur and Merlyn, Narnia, and Middle Earth are undeniable, all are well cherished by their followers and all resulted in significant film adaptations. Indeed, thanks to Peter Jackson in far off New Zealand no less than six epic films have been created to relate the tales of Middle Earth. Lewis and Tolkien lectured at Oxford University and regularly met in local pubs with pipes in hand. White was more of a solitary and quite troubled individual whose personal grappling with the immorality of war caused him to find some kind of refuge in neutral Ireland. All three were products of their time the turbulent first half of the twentieth century and the two World Wars. And all three proved masters of their craft. Aside from the common thread of fantasy in general, all three were singularly affected by the legends of Arthur and Camelot, principally from Mallory who is not only referred to constantly in White but actually takes the stage as a very important character to end The Once and Future King, young Tom of Warwick.
First to the novel's strengths, and there are many. The first strength of the novel is the character of Lancelot. He is by far the most fleshed out character in the text, and White creates as real a person as I have come across in literature. The reader knows Lancelot's mind and heart and White is able to give us access to this information in a manner that also pushes the story forward. Lancelot is a deeply realistic character, and most of the text's touching and truly human moments involve him.
I also greatly enjoyed the style of "The Once and Future King". White writes the book in the voice of a modern person telling the story, perhaps to a child. As a result the persona of the storyteller creeps into the text once in a while, and inserts a modern reference or point. Although many readers dislike this device, I enjoyed it. It put me in the mood of the oral tradition and the importance that storytelling and myths have held over mankind since the beginning.
This leads me to what I dislike about the work. Many of the modern references the persona interjects are very thinly disguised progressive ideological beliefs. To each his own, but can we keep modern politics out of an ancient legend? Please! Mr. White's personal indulgence in this regard cost him readers and admirers. That is a fit punishment.
Another weakness is the character of Arthur. After "The Sword in the Stone", the first book in the quartet that comprises "TOAFK", Arthur quickly diminishes to little more than a philosophical medieval Hamlet. His dialogue gets didactic and self important and the reader can be forgiven for beginning to dislike this most noble of literary creations.
"The Once and Future King" also served as the inspiration for the musical "Camelot", but even if you are familiar with the musical, the book still deserves your attention. It is vastly superior and as with most adaptations, the musical leaves out many of the more pertinent and interesting aspects of the story.
This is a nice and accessible version of the Arthurian legends. It will take you to a world that can only exist in the mind, and it is worth the trip.
While the humor is kind of an odd addition at first, it is sometimes laugh-out-loud funny. This is a pretty complete look at the Arthur legend. Most complete including the La Morte D'Arthur (don't make me look up the French spelling okay.) I have read five or six books on the legend. I like this best. Well-written. If you don't want to tackle something that is not the Hobbit or Lord of the Rings (read them too and love them)--don't. This author made no attempt to copy them so I am a little unsure why people thought this book would be similar. White took his time and added some humor to a legend that is based on the lopping off of heads and cleaving skulls without much let up. Character development was not present in most of the legend-based books I have read on this subject.
Assigned this in school? If you would rather be reading Conan the Barbarian (yes, I read them too) nothing anyone can say will make this Conan or a superhero. Classics are sometimes a little tedious to modern readers. Then again, there aren't that many classics being written anymore.
Wait until you have to report on War and Peace, a wonderful book by the way, but again, a tad tedious at times.
You know, building tension in a story is really an art. Tolkien did it in his visit to the Elves. Not much happened there, but on the outside of that Idyllic paradise, lurked a real danger we couldn't ignore. The book had to move forward from that place. That said, men and women, real or imagined, go through hell for lovers or greed or honor.
Top reviews from other countries
Reviewed in Brazil on February 27, 2024
The first part, The Sword in the Stone, is probably the most famous due to it being made into a movie by Disney studios. Also it isn’t too far removed from that movie. It covers Arthur’s early years, in which he is known as The Wart and is under the tutelage of Merlyn. Just like the movie Wart is turned into a fish and a bird amongst other creatures by Merlyn and just like the movie there is a lot of slapstick comedy. White even manages to squeeze Robin Hood and his Merry men into his version of the Arthurian legend! On the whole this first part is a delightful if somewhat juvenile read. I enjoyed it despite the liberties taken with the legend I knew and grew up with. I liked the way White portrays the world that Wart grows up in as idyllic, beautiful summers of sun and blue skies and winters of deep crisp even snow. It’s a stark contrast to what will come later. Wart even asks Merlyn ‘Why do people not think, when they are grown up, as I do when I am young?’
At the start of the second part, The Witch in the Wood, the change is apparent as we see Wart now as a young inexperienced King Arthur trying to grapple with the realities of the grown up world, including wars. There are some interesting points made here on that subject, especially when you consider when the book was published, 1939, the outbreak of World War II. The humour however is still there as it descends into pantomime farce at times, but the story has darker periods. Episodes involving cats and unicorns are particularly gruesome.
It is here and in particular the introduction of Lancelot that the stories from Le Morte D’Arthur also become clearer, although White still tweaks them and he quotes Malory a few times during his retelling. I also loved the way he compares situations in Arthur’s world with contemporary times, or as it was in his case, 1930’s and 40’s. It does give the book a bit of a dated feel but in a charming way.
By the third part of the book the humour as all but disappeared. This part deals with Lancelot, and White portrays him in an understanding and sympathetic way, especially concerning his relationship with Guenever. I think the complex character of Lancelot is T.H. White’s greatest achievement in The Once and Future King. This version of him is totally different from the Malory Lancelot. The Ill Made Knight is my favourite part in this book and Lancelot my favourite character.
The Candle in the Wind is the final part of The Once and Future King. This last part deals with the final days of Arthur. It’s the saddest part of the story. In it White contemplates Arthur’s New England and his achievements. As he does all through the book he again compares it with the contemporary world (i.e. the world of the 1930,s and 40’s). By the time this final book was published in 1958, White had lived through a World War, this is apparent in Arthur’s final assessment of his achievements and his dream of Camelot.
Endings are always a bone of contention. They never please everyone and it’s probably the area where people are most critical. It all depends whether the story ended the way you wanted it to. The ending of The Once and Future King is no different. It also has the added burden of living up to Malory’s Arthur as well as the version of Arthur we all have in our heads. The ending of White’s book is different to Malory but still holds some of its principles. I liked it. There is a passage with a page boy at the end, which I will not reveal as it would be a major spoiler, that I particularly loved, it was a nice touch.
This edition of The Once and Future King doesn’t end there though. Included here is The Book of Merlyn, a book as I have mentioned, that was published after White’s death and includes passages already included in The Once and Future King.
White's intentions were to find an antidote for war, something he felt was a major theme in Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur. He had wrestled with this idea all through the Second World War. In fact he had retreated to Ireland to avoid it, not wanting to be a coward or a hero. ‘It is generally the trustful and optimistic people who can afford to retreat. The loveless and faithless ones are compelled by their pessimism to attack.’ The book was rejected when he sent it for publication in 1941 because it was anti war, it was later published in 1977.
The Book of Merlin, although interesting, adds little to The Once and Future King. It is really more of an essay than a story. It is also heavy going. The condensed version of this book which was incorporated into The Sword and the Stone for me was enough on the subject. It made its point without losing the story (and the reader). The only real point of interest as far as Arthur’s story goes comes at the end when White offers an explanation of the fates of Arthur, Guenever and Lancelot. It might have been better to tack this last bit at the end of The Candle in the Wind (although without it I think the book is fine).
Despite The Book of Merlin I loved The Once and Future King. I found White’s retelling of the Arthurian legend masterful, it’s an enduring classic. His use of comedy offsets the later personal doom of Arthur and I loved his portrayal of all the major characters, especially Lancelot. In The Once and Future King T.H. White has produced a work of grandeur and charm worthy of its subject.



















