- Paperback: 320 pages
- Publisher: Bantam (August 28, 2007)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0553384368
- ISBN-13: 978-0553384369
- Product Dimensions: 5.2 x 0.7 x 8.2 inches
- Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 45 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,055,337 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ Free Shipping
+ Free Shipping
One For Sorrow: A Novel Paperback – August 28, 2007
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
From Publishers Weekly
Death forges a supernatural bond between two lonely teenage boys in Barzak's well-intentioned and morbid first novel. Fifteen-year-old Adam McCormick is haunted by the earthbound ghost of his murdered classmate, Jamie Marks. Boy and ghost are drawn to one another by their shared outsider status at school, with the ghost providing support (and a surprising homoerotic romance subplot) for Adam as he survives a disastrous relationship with the sexually predatory Gracie (the classmate who discovered Jamie's body), a scary encounter with the ghost of a murderess and a troubled home life with his older brother and constantly arguing parents. Adam and Jamie's ghost eventually run away and find shelter in an abandoned church, where Adam is tempted to join Jamie, and Jamie delays moving to the next level in the afterlife. Barzak admirably defies convention by not having the two boys search for Jamie's killer, but the replacement plot—one of a bizarre coming-of-age—doesn't always meld well with the narrative's fantastical elements (closets, called dead space, are portals between worlds; ghosts burn memories to keep warm). The macabre tone won't work for readers looking for another Lovely Bones, but the novel's approach to familiar material is refreshing. (Sept.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Bookmarks Magazine
Christopher Barzakâs One for Sorrow is a rare thing indeedâ"a horror novel with heart. Itâs not often that such a book, particularly a debut (Barzakâs reputation comes from his short fiction), is described as "lovely, melancholy" (Village Voice). But Barzak balances his storyâs supernatural aspects, which he delivers with simple assuredness, with the uncertainties and complexities of adolescence. One for Sorrow has been compared to The Catcher in the Rye and Alice Seboldâs The Lovely Bones. In the case of the latter, though, Barzakâs book is quite a bit edgier and focuses little on the search for Jamieâs killer. Instead, Barzak develops the adolescent relationships into "a coming-of-age story, more melancholy than morbid and, by the end, profoundly hopeful" (Washington Post).
Copyright © 2004 Phillips & Nelson Media, Inc.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This book surprised me. Maybe I just wasn't expecting much because the book has some awful reviews on here, but in my opinion, those reviews couldn't be more wrong. This is a really unique story about friendship, love, finding ones way, and doing whats right (and how sometimes that's saying goodbye) The characters were rich, believable, and easy to relate to. The story its self is beautiful and thought provoking. The only thing i can think of that people might have a problem with is that the story ends with out Jamie's murder being "solved." I found this to further my ability to relate to it though. Life and death are not black and white, sometimes things happen, and we never know why. I don't believe the author ever set out to have the book be about solving a murder. Its how that murder affected the people left behind, even those he didn't know very well.
Another reviewer wrote about the possible gay under tones. I say if you let that keep you from reading this truly incredible story, then your loss. The story centers around two males with an unusual friendship (ones dead, the other living) the two guys become very close and do share a bed often and even a small kiss at the end of the book, but to me it honestly didn't come off sexual at all. Our society places labels on things way to quickly, with out understanding them. especially the males in our society tend to be a little more uncomfortable when it comes to closeness with a member of the same sex. The two boys in this story have a very pure, close bond, and i found it to be beautiful.
I have, honestly, mixed feelings about the book. I have rarely seen a writer who captures teenagers so very well (aside from Joss Whedon).I really enjoyed the quality of the prose. I am casting about in my mind for a good reviewing word to describe it, and can only come up with "elegant". The characters, both living and dead, are very well written. Francis has stuck in my mind since I finished the novel-- funny and sad, kind of an icon for refusing to let go when your tragedies are all that you own.
On the other hand, the pacing struck me as at least a little bit strange. The last section of the book collapsed in on itself like a telescope and a good deal of that section felt oddly false. I also wasn't always wild about how Barzak developed his concept of an afterlife, but that is more of a minor quibble.
I would certainly recommend the novel, with the minor reservations noted above. I liked it enough to circle back around and read some of the short stories which I was able to find online. He is a really talented writer, and I look forward to seeing more of his work.
I caught a trailer for Jamie Marks is Dead and it intrigued me, and then I discovered that the ghost story was based upon a novel. I went for the novel first and I am very glad I did.
The novel, One for Sorrow, is written by an author from Youngstown, Ohio, and is about the region I grew up in. College writing professor Christopher Barzak spins a delightfully tense tale that slips between the boundaries of drama, romance, and ghost story like a cold knife slipping between my ribs.
The story idea of course is about a small-town Ohio athlete who sees the ghost of a murdered town loser. I was drawn to the story because I have always cared about the idea of pariahs as it interacts with love, society, and the concept of belonging. Here is a ghost who tries to belong after his life is over. Here is the jock who never reached out who finds compassion too late, or is it?
I have often praised novels that have no distinctive stylistic merit. That does not mean I am insensate to the truly deft. Barzak’s narrator, Adam, has descriptive voice like autumn leaves in a chill wind: slightly dry, a little twisted from the standard, but ruggedly beautiful. Barzak never loses sight of the emotion of a scene, never chooses a maladroit word, and comes up with some truly astounding metaphors for simple moments of family, adolescence, nature, and society. There are three scenes of overt sexuality in the book and each one is so different in emphasis and detail that I might have thought a different author wrote each one. The truth is that Adam was in a different place mentally, emotionally, and relationally so the sequences are completely different.
Just as I enjoy fun tales without distinctive prose, there are some genuinely horrible novels with excellent technical craft. Barzak’s story is comfortably above average. There are two things that strike me as worthy of special mention.
The first is Balzak’s subtle weave of supernatural mythology. He has ghosts for a reason, and a reason that they are driven. In the film adaptation some hack eroticized Adam giving words to Jamie’s ghost. On film you simply see an actor shudder in a suggestive manner. In the books there are no shudders, but Jamie grows more real with each word he is given, and Jamie is trying to cling to reality that slips steadily away. Ghosts are cold, and they must burn memories to stay real, to keep from fading away into a dead place. Adam is giving meanings, thoughts, concepts, and the more Jamie burns them, the more they are lost to Adam who starts to feel more and more detatched from the world. At first this seems to be a blessing as the stresses and trials of a hard teenage life grow slightly more distant… but the process doesn’t stop, and a looming sense of foreboding grows with quiet tension like a storm front rolling across the sun. That is the real threat for both characters, an excellent metaphor for the encroaching burdens of adulthood that comes without trumpets or battlefields.
There was a lot to like about the mythology. Even seemingly mundane items are rich with imagery in Adam’s narrative. The ghosts alone would not be enough to keep me entertained, but there are concepts like dead spaces that link un-lived-in places together. There are more mundane ghosts, a couple images out of straight up nightmares, the real power of young love between Adam and his girlfriend has an interesting moment of transformation or two.
I particularly enjoyed the Jungian reversal that characters have literal shadows that reveal their hidden thoughts or secrets. Barzac takes the metaphorical and makes it literal, and then scatters hidden meaning across the physical. I am sorry to come across all highbrow about this book, but it is English major nerd candy to be sure.
Some critics talk about homoeroticism in the book, and for the most part I think that’s crap. There are a few moments that are awkward, but the growing connection only has overtly sexual connotations towards the very end, and that amounts to a kiss. Contrasted with the heterosexual content of the book that is small fish indeed. Barzak is quite open about sex when it is going on so I see no need to read a lot of sexual tension into subtle and quiet moments. Most of the personal connection with Adam and Jamie hearkens back to a freezing person trying to keep warm. Sure, that’s physically close but there isn’t really any sexual activity between the guys. It’s much more about fraternization than romance between the two main characters. Sympathy, compassion, love, and sacrifice do not need to be sexual. There is much more philadelphia than eros portrayed here.
To be blunt, the questions asked about who we love, how much, and how far we will go to sacrifice for them, endure their pain, and give for their comfort is not a question of gay or straight, but it is a fundamental question of the human condition. Beyond that, it is a question whose answer (though Barzak never overtly goes there) that finds its answer in the Cross.
I cannot determine Barzak’s take on Christianity here. An empty church becomes a very important scene later on in the book, as well as a brief visit to a full one. They seem to represent Adam’s growing choices between death (a quiet funereal church) and life in the bustling black Methodist worship. God does not make an appearance. There are neither devils nor angels hiding in the shadows. Unless, and I am still not sure, they hide so very well… Barzak’s symbolism can be deft enough that I cannot say for sure. Enough detail work comes together that I could see Barzak pulling a Book of Esther, placing God obviously behind a curtain but hidden enough that an anti-Christian academic and literary world would not see it. Particularly, the final choices that the characters face about surrender and sacrifice in love for the other have some worthwhile meanings.
Every critical review mentions the glaringly obvious fact that we never discover Jamie’s killer (though the film makes a ham-handed attempt to devalue the question), but they miss the point. This is not a story about two boys trying to right a wrong, or expose the guilty. It is a story of three or four lost souls who struggle to matter and persevere, and then find the courage to go forward. It may be presented in understated tones, but it is nothing less than a story about Hamlet’s age-old question, to be or not to be.
I am glad that I read the book before I saw the movie. The film was slightly creepy, but it did not have the depth or wonder that I enjoyed in the novel. Major characters and themes were stripped entirely away, and they were quite good ones. Adam’s constant recollections of his somewhat crazy Catholic aunt were a drumbeat keeping time with the story, and the book title is drawn from one of her more creepy rhymes. Adam’s conflicted relationship with his father, who is a failed laborer and yet whose sayings and mannerisms recur in Adam’s thoughts and unexpected moments, has no place in the story and is replaced by a single mom.
Both book and film capture the soul-destroying cruelty of humanity that lays so close to the surface among adolescents. There are deep questions about what matters most in life, and how to love someone when you cannot change their suffering (I may or may not be talking about the ghost). The book is highly recommended for the not-easily-offended, though it will probably never win a spot on Pat Robertson’s bookshelf. The film would be worth renting once, but I would not buy popcorn or pay theater prices for it.
Barzak’s intriguing story is now available in a literary and film version. I highly recommend the former over the later.
Most recent customer reviews
Though composed well by a competent writer. This book, intriguing me in its beginning lost both its focus and momentum as it...Read more