Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$25.75$25.75
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Jan 10 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Chapel Books
Buy used: $15.30
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Only Words Paperback – March 1, 1996
Purchase options and add-ons
Review
“Professor MacKinnon offers a lucid and compelling account of how lawyers and judges have used the First Amendment to transform the terrorist acts of pornographers and racist vigilantes into political speech. Only Words should be required reading for every true civil libertarian.”―Charles R. Lawrence III, Georgetown University
“Only Words shows the keen power of Catharine MacKinnon's immensely challenging intellect.”―Patricia J. Williams, Columbia University
“Anyone inclined to dismiss anti-pornography legislation as zealotry, or as short-sighted interference with individual rights, should read Only Words. MacKinnon states her case in prose that is as distinctive and as trenchant as Orwell's.”―Richard Rorty, University of Virginia
“This little book might as well come with a fuse and matches, lighting a fire as it does under the complacent acceptance of pornography and inequality, racial and sexual, in this country.”―Susan Salter Reynolds, Los Angeles Times
“Only Words is a deftly crafted indictment of an absolutist free-speech doctrine that is applied hypocritically and inconsistently to protect pornography and other acts of inequality.”―Amy Willard Cross, Toronto Globe & Mail
“Only words, yet look at the responses, look at the rage directed toward the professor. These responses and the anger and fear that lurk within them have in a sense become part of the text of Only Words; to read them is to read a part of what MacKinnon aimed to show...MacKinnon's words have engendered real abuse, directed at her as a woman. In short, she has proved her point.”―David C. Dinielli, Michigan Law Review
“MacKinnon's book is an eloquent plea to Americans to move beyond what she sees as the prejudiced limitations of current doctrine, in particular of current liberal doctrine.”―Bernard Williams, London Review of Books
“[This book] will almost certainly reconfigure the national debate over pornography, harassment, free speech, and equality. It merits careful study by scholars in rhetoric, communication, free speech, women's studies, and law--in fact, by anyone wishing to participate in the political and legal process as an informed citizen.”―Lester Olson, Quarterly Journal of Speech
“In Only Words, [MacKinnon] presents the most lucid and concise presentation of her argument that porn is more than just words...Her argument is making significant legal inroads and, to understand where she would like to take us, Only Words provides a clear road map.”―San Francisco Chronicle
“Three passionate, intellectually fascinating essays...[MacKinnon's] ideas are original and gripping, her references are wide-ranging, her legal logic is provocative--and her latest is must reading for anyone interested in either fairness or free speech.”―Kirkus Reviews
“In Only Words...Catharine MacKinnon makes a compelling, lucid and concise argument for reframing the debate [over limiting pornography].”―Nina Schuyler, California Lawyer
“In this thoroughly documented work, MacKinnon traces America's obsession with expressive freedom to the trauma of the McCarthy era...An entertaining read as well as a challenge to take another look at what constitutes freedom of expression.”―American Bookman
About the Author
- Print length160 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarvard University Press
- Publication dateMarch 1, 1996
- Dimensions4.98 x 0.43 x 7.44 inches
- ISBN-100674639340
- ISBN-13978-0674639348
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- Publisher : Harvard University Press (March 1, 1996)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 160 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0674639340
- ISBN-13 : 978-0674639348
- Item Weight : 6.1 ounces
- Dimensions : 4.98 x 0.43 x 7.44 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #487,386 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #460 in General Constitutional Law
- #878 in Feminist Theory (Books)
- #971 in General Gender Studies
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
She makes a number of logical leaps that just don't make sense.
As i read I found myself shaking my head in agreement because she states her theories extraordinarily well and grounds them in truths most readers will be familiar with and able to recognize. Like a sign saying "Whites Only" is not considered "free speech" but is considered in itself an act of discrimination, breaking through the porn fundamentalist's tired excuse of "it's only words/images". Words have the power to promote prejudice, and in the modern technological age these words are a terrific force indeed.
Words and images contain real social content that can be really damaging to the humanity of certain classes of people when those with more power promote hate speech through them. That the legal system is set up by men for men's benefit comes across clearly with the history of rape law MacKinnon provides.
Isn't it odd that some people keep insisting snuff films don't exist without suggesting why men who videotape themselves raping women, killing animals, destroying property, etc. wouldn't videotape this crime as well? There are several court cases around the US where men have been convicted of murdering women and the videotapes they made doing it were entered as evidence at their trials. I've heard no cogent argument as to how, especially after Abu Ghraib, anyone could believe people really wouldn't do and record the horrors they visit on others.
This book is ahead of its time and should be considered must-read material for all lawyers and gender equity activists.
In some ways, *Only Words* is a success. She presents her viewpoints lucidly and passionately. She does indeed offer a thought-provoking analysis of pornography as hate speech (though I should note that in the legal statutes that she and Dworkin have drafted, she treats pornography not as hate speech, but as libel), and offers an insightful approach to hate speech. Philosophers reading this book will see the strong influence of J.L. Austin's concept of the speech act. The idea Austin offers us is that there are cases in which to *say* something is also to *do* something. For example, under the appropriate circumstances, to utter "I do" or "Guilty" just *is* to marry, and to convict a defendant, respectively. MacKinnon uses this idea to argue that to the extent to which pornography *says* something (she isn't entirely consistent on whether pornography expresses an idea or an ideology, often vaccilating between different conceptions of what pornography does as is needed to suit her immediate goals), it also *does* something. Pornography, she argues, *is* a form of violence against women.
But while her comitment and passion are indubitable, her evidence is not as well situated. In good lawyerly fashion, MacKinnon is more interested in convincing her readers than getting at the truth. She plays fast and loose with her data, and much of the book (especially part I) seems to be written according to the dictim: 'I know what I think, so don't bother me with the facts.
Some examples: (1) MacKinnon continuously claims that the production of pornography always abuses women. However, there is a large genre of pornography--erotic literature--for which this claim is simply not true. Perhaps, as MacKinnon contends, this form of pornography harms women when people *consume* it, but she is clearly overstating her case, and fully well knows it. (2) On several occasions, she appeals to the especially appalling case of the snuff film (where women are tortured and killed in the production of the film). However, there is no evidence that *any* such films exist. Even the film whose title, *Snuff*, gave this genre its name, has been known to be a hoax for 3 decades. (The actress allegedly killed on-screen herself came forward and admitted that the claims about her actually being killed was a publicity stunt for a failing movie.) (3) On pp.18-19, she treats a man who raed, killed and necrophiled a woman (allegedly) bcause he had watched snuff films as representative of porn users, when the available evidence suggests otherwise. Most sex offenders and murderers have used porn; but it is *not* the case that most, or even many, porn users become sex offenders or murderers. MacKinnon is just playing on a popular stereotype here--is this hate speech on her part? (4) Speaking of playing on popular stereotypes, MacKinnon claims (p.20) that women involved in the porn industry are typically sex abuse victims, drug abusers, etc., etc. This may be widely believed, but there is no evidence to support this. (5) MacKinnon appeals to the widely believed but unsubstantiated claim that porn *causes* sexual crimes. Her only evidence is to offer *one* case of someone who committed a rape after having looked at pronography. One might as well offer one case of someone who died of a heart atack after lookingat porn as conclusive evidence that porn uses causes heart disease. Anecdotes do not establish such strong claims, and one anecdote certainly not.
This, unfortunately, is not the end of MacKinnon's shenanigans. Twice (on pp.37 and 62) she argues that porn and hate speech, respectively, *are* harmful because it can't be shown that they *aren't*. As a lawyer, making this kind of argument is shameful. MacKinnon is claiming that porn and hate speech can be banned simply because they can't be proven harmless. She comes very close to reducing racism to sexual agression. She repeatedly speaks as if pornography were some omnipotent force--even once claiming that it has as much power as any government (pp.39-40). She repeatedly speaks of the acts pictured in pornography in ways that make them sound violent whether they are or not--penises, in MacKinnon's world, can only do one thing--"ramming" (pp.23-4). The list could go on, but I'll spare you further details.
One reviewer wonders whether MacKinnon is really a lawyer. I can assure you that she is. In fact, the problem is that she is *too much* a lawyer in this book. The book is written with the intention to convince its readers no matter what, and if the facts don't fit, or if we need to appeal to popular stereotypes, or if we need to use sloppy but rhetorically powerful language, so be it.




