Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Oppositions Reader: Selected Readings from a Journal for Ideas and Criticism in Architecture 1973-1984 Hardcover – November 1, 1998

4.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Price
New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$694.18 $161.03

Best Books of the Year So Far
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the Best Books of the Year So Far in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
click to open popover
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

China
Engineering & Transportation Books
Discover books for all types of engineers, auto enthusiasts, and much more. Learn more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 720 pages
  • Publisher: Princeton Architectural Press; 1 edition (November 1, 1998)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 156898152X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1568981529
  • Product Dimensions: 1 x 1 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 5.1 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #4,193,339 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

5 star
0%
4 star
100%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover
a great project, a necessary book to understand the Seventeens, not only in the architecture, not only for architects.
Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse