Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.48 shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
87% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Author
OK
The Origins of Modern Science Paperback – April 1, 1997
Enhance your purchase
In The Origins of Modern Science Professor Herbert Butterfield argues that past scientific achievements cannot be viewed through the filter of 20th century eyes, but can be understood only in the historical and political context of an era.
- Print length256 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFree Press
- Publication dateApril 1, 1997
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.8 x 8.44 inches
- ISBN-100684836378
- ISBN-13978-0684836379
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Products related to this item
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Free Press; Revised edition (April 1, 1997)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0684836378
- ISBN-13 : 978-0684836379
- Item Weight : 11.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.8 x 8.44 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,319,001 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,617 in Russian History (Books)
- #6,430 in History & Philosophy of Science (Books)
- #49,865 in World History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This is the best explanation of Descartes I have found. Descartes thinking reversed! Butterfield continues . . .
''Furthermore, everything hung on this existence of a perfect and righteous God. Without him a man could not trust in anything, could not believe in a geometrical proposition, for He was the guarantee that everything was not an illusion, the senses not a complete hoax, and life not a mere nightmare.'' (124)
'He was the guarantee'. If God disappears - reason, even geometry, disappears. As good as any explanation of the modern antipathy to rationality!
Butterfield is easy to apprehend, speaks with humility - without avoiding profound ideas. This work reads like a talk, because it was. It was delivered in Cambridge in 1948. He explains the lectures ''were produced in the hope that they would stimulate in the historian a little interest in science, and in the scientist a little interest in history.'' (7)
Why 'origin of science'?
''Since that 'scientific revolution' overturned the authority in science not only of the Middle Ages but of the ancient world - since it ended not only in the eclipse of scholastic philosophy but in the destruction of Aristotelian physics - it outshines everything since the rise of Christianity and reduces the Renaissance and the Reformation to the rank of mere episodes.'' (7)
Butterfield renowned for this striking conclusion. Most, if not all, have adopted this opinion since. Huge change in evaluating, understanding and explaining history. Why is this so significant, so important? . . .
''Since it changed the character of men's habitual mental operations even in the conduct of the non-material sciences, while transforming the whole diagram of the physical universe and the very texture of human life itself, it looms so large as the real origin both of the modern world and of the modern mentality that our customary periodisation of European history has become an anachronism and an encumbrance.'' (8)
Wow. This emphasis on the role of science and scientists places them in the drivers seat to modernity. Fascinating!
1 The historical importance of a theory of Impetus
2 The conservativism of Copernicus
3 The study of the heart down to William Harvey
4 The downfall of Aristotle and Ptolemy
5 The experimental method in the seventeenth century
6 Bacon and Descartes
7 The effect of the scientific method on the non-mechanical sciences
8 The history of the modern theory of gravitation
9 The transition to the philosophe movement
10 The place of the scientific revolution in the history of western civilization
11 The postponed scientific revolution in chemistry
12 Ideas of progress and ideas of evolution
Butterfield also recognizes the role of religion in the beginnings of science. He explains . . .
''One thing is clear: not only was there in some of the intellectual leaders a great aspiration to demonstrate that the universe ran like a piece of clockwork, but this was itself initially a religious aspiration.'' (131)
Kepler was the exampler of this motive.
''Kepler, inaugurating the scientist's quest for a mechanistic universe in the seventeenth century, is significant here - his mysticism, his music of the spheres, his rational deity, demand a system which has the beauty of a piece of mathematics.'' (131)
Butterfield highlights the role of Fontenelle in introducing scientific/mathematical thinking into the broader culture, especially politics. Notes his essay - ''The Utility of Mathematics''. . .
''The geometrical spirit is not so tied to geometry that it cannot be detached from it and transported to other branches of knowledge. A work of morals or politics or criticism, would be better if it were done in the style of a geometer. The order, clarity, precision and exactitude which have been apparent in good books for some time might well have their source in this geometric spirit.'' (185)
This worship of mathematics leads to believing that only things measurable are important, or even real. Atoms, bodies, money, cars are measurable. Love, faith, hope, conscience are not.
The last chapter analyzes the preconceived assumptions that prepared the way for Darwin. These preceded Darwin by centuries. The 'great chain of being', Buffon, Lamarck and even the key role of Malthus is explained.
Butterfield and his insights changed the understanding of history. Anyone wanting a grasp of where modernity come from will be happy with this work.
Includes suggestions for further reading and a detailed index. No photographs.
(See also: "Modernity and the Holocaust'' by Zygmunt Bauman. Adds depth and breadth to Butterfield. Great!)
The book covers Copernicus and the development of the theory of gravitation. It also covers the study of the heart and general topics such as the history of the Philosophe Movement during the reign of Louis XIV, the place of the scientific revolution in the history of western civilization and the scientific revolution in chemistry. I particularly liked the section of gravitation as it covered the precursors to Newton and how Newton built on their work.
This book should be of most interest to those interested in the history of science, as opposed to a general audience.
As spelled out in the introduction, to the book based on his lectures in 1948 the Scientific Revolution, popularly associated with the 16th and 17th century, has started much earlier than the Renaissance. Butterfield advanced the notion of its eruption was caused by the 'destruction of Aristotaslian physics,' that was crucial to the development of science that was the basis of western civilization. This is the best praise for an Alexandrian scientist he never mentioned, the sixth century dean of the academy in Alexandria, John Philoponus.
Butterfield's Historiography:
Thomas Kuhn was a milestone in the historiography of science by studying in depth how science evolved with new established concepts and ideas and how these catalyzed displacing the old ways of thinking with brisk new methods. What one of Kuhn's obituaries noted, "We all live in a post-Kuhnian age," so more applies with Butterfield treatment, especially when it concerns origins of modern science, which was not one of his favorite subjects. In the words of a history of science reviewer, Butterfield's observations that better described the underlying reality of the fields of science he considered lacked a scientific analysis that weakened his historiographic conclusions.
The Impetus Theory:
Although he started logically with the historical importance of 'Impetus Theory,'as the point of breakthrough, on obsolesence of the body of Aristotalian physics, he failed to identify, while Kuhn did, to dig out who effectively attacked it into rubble in the sixth century. On the same year, he revised the 'Origins' in 1957 Kuhn in,'The Copernican Revolution', wrote on page 119 that, "John Philoponus, the sixth-century Christian commentator who records the earliest extant rejection of aristotle's theory, attribute his ... to Hippacrius."
Early on, in his Origins, he discusses Buridan (14th century), who elaborated on projectile dynamics, and quoted Philoponus, before Copernicus who read him, when he studied in the university of Padua, under or with Galileo who paid respect to John's pioneering thought in dynamics and astronomy. (Essays on Galileo & the History and Philosophy of Science, S. Drake)
He missed the point again when he discussed the 'Downfall of Aristotle and Ptolemy,' which in both cases the Alexandrian Genius was the major catalyst many centuries before. This being said, the volume of books that were published in the last years, in the UK after his death, made the flaw even more obvious.
Basic reading?
'The Origins of Modern Science' is basic reading, keeping in mind it was an original work on the history and philosophy of science. Butterfield's lectures described the prevailing milieu of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries but did not give enough attention to their origins in the great city of science: Alexandria, which made the book core idea not supported.
An in depth modern treatment of the subject, in the Johns Hopkins Studies in the History of Technology is; "Science and Technology in World History : An Introduction"
Herbert Butterfield:
Butterfield, a British historian and philosopher of history, mainly remembered for his work on Interpretation of History. He taught at Princeton University (1924/5) and at Cambridge from 1928 to 1979. Butterfield's main interests were diplomatic history and historiography, and was highly concerned with religious issues, but he did not believe that historians could uncover the hand of God in history.



