This is a well-written book, larded with intellectual plums, so even if you don't follow the main line of argument, you will enjoy its details. However, following the main argument is not terribly difficult. Ridley really makes a single point and draws an important conclusion: whatever else we are we are by nature cooperators, yet key forms of cooperation are thwarted by the conditions of modern life.
We are 'groupish'; we form teams and do our part, and disapprove of those who don't do their parts. We form friendships based on mutual favors, and our accounting of who owes whom what and how much is exquisitely honed and compulsively indulged. We have first-class cheat-detectors, and we use our miraculous language abilities mostly to gossip about others, and whether they are holding up their ends, are free-riders, or perhaps do more than their share, blaming and praising and so keeping everyone more or less in line.
These behaviors were 'designed' by evolution to aid us; those who got along with others by being generous, friendly, and trusting, yet also firmly punishing betrayal, tended to do better in life and to leave more offspring of the same ilk. These behaviors do not always translate into being 'nice', and certainly hardly ever translate into a universal love of mankind. But they do lead us to get along with those we feel are a part of our group of the moment.
Anyway, given this constellation of reciprocal altruism/cheat detection along with our always-vigilant looking out for Number One, it seems that we do have within us the makings of a workable social mechanism that can deliver benefit to everyone without requiring lots of police. We can, it turns out, avoid The Tragedy of the Commons and the 'war of each with each'. Most people are willing to give the benefit of the doubt in dealing with strangers -- to trust them and be honorable towards them -- if the social climate encourages this. So people all over the world have always been able to deal with common resources in the only way that really assures they can be profitably and sustainably exploited: by making them private properties.
Much of the first part of this book was adequately covered in Robert Wright's book "The Moral Animal". I don't think Ridley adds anything new there, but his discussion of the consequences of reciprocity, or reciprocal altruism, is much more extensive than Wright's. He discusses groupishness, our tendency to operate in groups, which to him is not the same thing as submerging ourselves into some group identity. We cooperate, we trade, we work together by means of groupishness and reciprocity: they explain trust, retribution, gifts, and sharing; they allow us to gain greatly from trading with each other.
He notes, amusingly, that we seem to have a built-in dislike of hoarding, and that this sits uncomfortably with the vast possibilities for hoarding of property that modern societies provide. At the same time, private ownership is the engine that has ramped up our prosperity so spectacularly. People work for themselves directly and also for things that they can own. At the same time, people sort themselves into groups of similar levels of resources [that is, of wealth] so as to not have to deal with the hoarding taboo.
I think this book makes an important political point in a novel way. And its conclusions can be applied to other than the economic sphere. For example, laws enforcing political correctness often have the unintended consequence of reducing the tacit cooperation that would otherwise enforce community morals.
Anyway, Ridley basically is saying that we should use some aspects of our innate nature to control other aspects and get to the good society. Cooperation and trust, properly employed, can do more than squadrons of police to keep people in line. It's an uplifting message. I wonder how many will believe it?
Other Sellers on Amazon
$11.52
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
Little Horse Books
Sold by:
Little Horse Books
(8817 ratings)
97% positive over last 12 months
97% positive over last 12 months
Only 2 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$11.48
+ $4.51 shipping
+ $4.51 shipping
Sold by:
American University of Sovereign Nations Books
Sold by:
American University of Sovereign Nations Books
(8 ratings)
100% positive over last 12 months
100% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$17.10
FREE Shipping
on orders over $25.00
shipped by Amazon.
FREE Shipping
Get free shipping
Free shipping
within the U.S. when you order $25.00
of eligible items shipped by Amazon.
Or get faster shipping on this item starting at $5.99
. (Prices may vary for AK and HI.)
Learn more about free shipping
Sold by:
Blake Global Brands
Sold by:
Blake Global Brands
(250 ratings)
97% positive
97% positive
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation Paperback – April 1, 1998
by
Matt Ridley
(Author)
|
Matt Ridley
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
-
Print length304 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherPenguin Books
-
Publication dateApril 1, 1998
-
Dimensions5.1 x 0.7 x 7.8 inches
-
ISBN-100140264450
-
ISBN-13978-0140264456
New releases
Explore popular titles in every genre and find something you love. See more
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Poor Charlie's Almanack: The Wit and Wisdom of Charles T. Munger, Expanded Third EditionPeter D. KaufmanHardcover$61.99$61.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
The Lessons of HistoryPaperback$9.99$9.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
The Sovereign Individual: Mastering the Transition to the Information AgePaperback$17.99$17.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
The Compleat Strategyst: Being a Primer on the Theory of Games of Strategy (Dover Books on Mathematics)Paperback$10.95$10.95FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
Seven Brief Lessons on PhysicsHardcover$12.48$12.48FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves (P.S.)Paperback$10.99$10.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
How Innovation Works: And Why It Flourishes in FreedomPaperback$14.19$14.19FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human NaturePaperback$15.99$15.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
The Evolution of Everything: How New Ideas EmergePaperback$16.99$16.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
Genome: The Autobiography of a Species in 23 ChaptersPaperback$11.99$11.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
Sapiens: A Brief History of HumankindPaperback$11.20$11.20FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Sep 5
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Matt Ridley has worked as a science editor, Washington correspondent, and American editor for the Economist. A research fellow of the Institute for Economic Affairs and a Trustee of the International Centre for Life, he lives in Northumberland, England.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Penguin Books; 1st edition (April 1, 1998)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 304 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0140264450
- ISBN-13 : 978-0140264456
- Item Weight : 7.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.1 x 0.7 x 7.8 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#455,624 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #231 in Evolutionary Psychology (Books)
- #1,507 in Medical Social Psychology & Interactions
- #1,965 in Popular Social Psychology & Interactions
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
114 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on July 26, 2001
Verified Purchase
17 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2005
Verified Purchase
Ridley's purpose is not to be the ethicist, but to provide an interdisciplinary account of our constitutional foundations as homo sapiens, in order for a moral theory to reflect these innate foundations. He succeeds masterfully. Indeed, Ridley's "The Origin of Virtue" succeeds in a way that Robert Wright's "The Moral Animal" fails. Whereas Wright focuses only on the Modern Synthesis of evolutionary biology and molecular genetics, Ridley incorporates both and adds ethology, comparative psychology, sociology, politics, economics, game theory, and paleontology. Wright's scope is myopic, whereas Ridley's scope is expansive. The outcomes could not be more radically different.
I dismissed Wright's book - not because it failed to explain Darwinism (it does so very well) - but because it failed to provide any moral insight from the Modern Synthesis. Ridley does not make this mistake: He takes homo sapiens as we are, both one with Nature, yet tellingly distinct and unique as a social and rational species. Ridley does this by using a broader armamentarium from which to analyze the origins of human virtue. Consequently, Ridley accomplishes far more than Wright in half the space and time..
Ridley's territory is too sophisticated and nuanced to be summarized into several single propositions. But he leaves no stone unturned, examining a plethora of human dynamics, i.e., the innate characteristics with which we are born, the usual pattern of development after our birth, and what is factual about the real, rather than the metaphysical, world. Suffice it to say that reciprocal altruism, kin selection, unit cohesion, symbiotic collaboration, ostracism, imitation, contextualism, emotion, trade, personal property, and mutual trust all dovetail along with reason to produce a distinctive human reality.
While homo sapiens may be grounded in nature and motivated by self-interest, accepting these facts does not condemn us to a Hobbesian state of affairs. As Ridley poignantly observes, individual and collective interests break apart only when we are coercively removed from our finer instincts. We are not a blank slate, after all, but born and nurtured to do remarkably virtuous things. Ridley advocates no particular ethical theory, but shows what a theory must provide in order for it to be commensurate with our being human and to be compatible with our original innate predispositions. Wright [supra.] advocates a utilitarian ethic, not because of some intrinsic feature of utilitarianism, but, well, just because. It's no surprise then that the ethical theory Ridley most respects is the theory of moral sentiments espoused by David Hume, Adam Smith, and Francis Hutcheson in the eighteenth century. The link could not be more obvious: The theory of moral sentiments reflects on our empirical selves and how we are disposed to act towards others based on our own self-interests with benevolence.
Just because humans are genetically, physically, and biologically predisposed to act one way rather than another doesn't make such a predisposition ethically normative. Ridley avoids the naturalistic fallacy. His interdisciplinary account is intellectually and emotionally satisfying, because it draws on a plurality of disciplines to sort out our ethical origins and intuitions. Even though one does not get a complete ethical, political, or economic theory from Ridley, the implications are clear. For a fuller explication of his ideas, the reader will need to consult David Hume's "Treatise on Human Nature," Part III, or his "Enquiry into the Principles of Morals;" or Adam Smith's "Theory of Moral Sentiments;" or else Francis Hutchinson's numerous ethical essays. The political and economic implications of Ridley's account favors the writings of F.A. Hayek's "Constitution of Liberty," and other classical liberals.
At least Ridley opens the door between the Modern Synthesis and ethical, political, and economic theories. He does not have an overriding agenda (as in the Sociobiology debates), but clearly and articulately examines human nature from manifold perspectives - all grounded in empirical evidence. The result if refreshingly honest and candid; now it's up to us to decide what to do with this evidence. Highly recommended.
I dismissed Wright's book - not because it failed to explain Darwinism (it does so very well) - but because it failed to provide any moral insight from the Modern Synthesis. Ridley does not make this mistake: He takes homo sapiens as we are, both one with Nature, yet tellingly distinct and unique as a social and rational species. Ridley does this by using a broader armamentarium from which to analyze the origins of human virtue. Consequently, Ridley accomplishes far more than Wright in half the space and time..
Ridley's territory is too sophisticated and nuanced to be summarized into several single propositions. But he leaves no stone unturned, examining a plethora of human dynamics, i.e., the innate characteristics with which we are born, the usual pattern of development after our birth, and what is factual about the real, rather than the metaphysical, world. Suffice it to say that reciprocal altruism, kin selection, unit cohesion, symbiotic collaboration, ostracism, imitation, contextualism, emotion, trade, personal property, and mutual trust all dovetail along with reason to produce a distinctive human reality.
While homo sapiens may be grounded in nature and motivated by self-interest, accepting these facts does not condemn us to a Hobbesian state of affairs. As Ridley poignantly observes, individual and collective interests break apart only when we are coercively removed from our finer instincts. We are not a blank slate, after all, but born and nurtured to do remarkably virtuous things. Ridley advocates no particular ethical theory, but shows what a theory must provide in order for it to be commensurate with our being human and to be compatible with our original innate predispositions. Wright [supra.] advocates a utilitarian ethic, not because of some intrinsic feature of utilitarianism, but, well, just because. It's no surprise then that the ethical theory Ridley most respects is the theory of moral sentiments espoused by David Hume, Adam Smith, and Francis Hutcheson in the eighteenth century. The link could not be more obvious: The theory of moral sentiments reflects on our empirical selves and how we are disposed to act towards others based on our own self-interests with benevolence.
Just because humans are genetically, physically, and biologically predisposed to act one way rather than another doesn't make such a predisposition ethically normative. Ridley avoids the naturalistic fallacy. His interdisciplinary account is intellectually and emotionally satisfying, because it draws on a plurality of disciplines to sort out our ethical origins and intuitions. Even though one does not get a complete ethical, political, or economic theory from Ridley, the implications are clear. For a fuller explication of his ideas, the reader will need to consult David Hume's "Treatise on Human Nature," Part III, or his "Enquiry into the Principles of Morals;" or Adam Smith's "Theory of Moral Sentiments;" or else Francis Hutchinson's numerous ethical essays. The political and economic implications of Ridley's account favors the writings of F.A. Hayek's "Constitution of Liberty," and other classical liberals.
At least Ridley opens the door between the Modern Synthesis and ethical, political, and economic theories. He does not have an overriding agenda (as in the Sociobiology debates), but clearly and articulately examines human nature from manifold perspectives - all grounded in empirical evidence. The result if refreshingly honest and candid; now it's up to us to decide what to do with this evidence. Highly recommended.
36 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2013
Verified Purchase
I nearly gave up on this book at a little over the half way point. While he explores a number of interesting angles in the first half, it seems that all of them end up being blind alleys. It was worth staying with it, because his final answer comes (perhaps surprisingly) not out of biology or game theory, but anthropology. The first half is educational and interesting in its own right, but the latter half of the book is where he gets to his real points.
It's true that he does allude to political anarchism, or perhaps mini-anarchism, which I do not agree with (and which he does not make a particularly good case for anyway). But he does lay out a good case for free markets, which some of us strongly agree with.
Warning, if your political/philosophical leanings are at all left/socialist, you probably won't like this book very well....
It's true that he does allude to political anarchism, or perhaps mini-anarchism, which I do not agree with (and which he does not make a particularly good case for anyway). But he does lay out a good case for free markets, which some of us strongly agree with.
Warning, if your political/philosophical leanings are at all left/socialist, you probably won't like this book very well....
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Mustafa Kulle
1.0 out of 5 stars
A Poorly Written Mess by an Awful Writer
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 17, 2020Verified Purchase
I've been looking for a book that explains the origin of where we get our morals from and why we humans behave the way we do. I thought this book would have a good biological explanation to how all that came to be. What I got instead was drivel that went from one tangent to another in every chapter. It really pissed me off. It had me asking myself "What is this guy talking about?"
The sad thing is, the topics covered in this book would have been interesting had it not been full of the most dull writing I have ever come across.
In each chapter, he talks about several things that have nothing to do with each other. But all he had to do was focus on one of them and elaborate on one of them rather than throw random pieces of information into each chapter and call it a book on human biological history.
The book begins with a very good Prolugue about how a Russian Anarchist named Kropotkin escapes from a prison with the help of lots of people. It makes you wonder what compelled a group of people to risk their lives to get this man out of prison. I thought this book would give us a biological history of how we came to be. That's what I was hoping for. And that's what this book prepares you for.
But alas, from there it's all downhill. Every chapter that is followed has a variety of random things thrown in that are unreleted. Or maybe the writer did a terrible job at explaining how they are linked. Either way, nothing made any sense.
Chapter 1 talks about ants and bees. Then it talks about the selfish gene, and then ancient rome, and then the relationship between a fertilised egg and its mother. All the writer had to do was talk about the importance of collectivisim. But then even that wasn't clear.
Chapter 2 talks about how we humans have divisions of labour, how each and every one of us can do different tasks unlike ants that are either Worker Ants and Army Ants. But then he goes on about Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, using the Parable of the Pin Maker. I'm guessing the whole point of this chapter is about how specialisation makes us humans a better species. Again, another poorly written chapter.
Chapter 3 talks about Prisoner's Dilemma. Here he goes on about Maths, Economics and Morals. This was by far the most confusing chapter. I have no idea what he was trying to say here.
Chapter 4 was where I lost my patience with this book. First he talks about bats, the neocortex of the brain, it goes on and on about "Tit-for-tat" and then he talks about football.
I got fed up. I put the book down. That's not a good sign.
What does any of this have to do with the Prologue of the book?
None of the above explains nor give us a biological history of our morals or our behaviours.
It is books like this that really piss me off.
Maybe the author is very knowledgabel about biology, maths, economics and all that kind of stuff, but his wrting is terrible. He goes all over the place. I can't understand why anyone gave this book a 5-star review.
Until he gets an editor, I will never read another book by this author again.
Overall, a poorly written mess by an awful writer.
The sad thing is, the topics covered in this book would have been interesting had it not been full of the most dull writing I have ever come across.
In each chapter, he talks about several things that have nothing to do with each other. But all he had to do was focus on one of them and elaborate on one of them rather than throw random pieces of information into each chapter and call it a book on human biological history.
The book begins with a very good Prolugue about how a Russian Anarchist named Kropotkin escapes from a prison with the help of lots of people. It makes you wonder what compelled a group of people to risk their lives to get this man out of prison. I thought this book would give us a biological history of how we came to be. That's what I was hoping for. And that's what this book prepares you for.
But alas, from there it's all downhill. Every chapter that is followed has a variety of random things thrown in that are unreleted. Or maybe the writer did a terrible job at explaining how they are linked. Either way, nothing made any sense.
Chapter 1 talks about ants and bees. Then it talks about the selfish gene, and then ancient rome, and then the relationship between a fertilised egg and its mother. All the writer had to do was talk about the importance of collectivisim. But then even that wasn't clear.
Chapter 2 talks about how we humans have divisions of labour, how each and every one of us can do different tasks unlike ants that are either Worker Ants and Army Ants. But then he goes on about Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, using the Parable of the Pin Maker. I'm guessing the whole point of this chapter is about how specialisation makes us humans a better species. Again, another poorly written chapter.
Chapter 3 talks about Prisoner's Dilemma. Here he goes on about Maths, Economics and Morals. This was by far the most confusing chapter. I have no idea what he was trying to say here.
Chapter 4 was where I lost my patience with this book. First he talks about bats, the neocortex of the brain, it goes on and on about "Tit-for-tat" and then he talks about football.
I got fed up. I put the book down. That's not a good sign.
What does any of this have to do with the Prologue of the book?
None of the above explains nor give us a biological history of our morals or our behaviours.
It is books like this that really piss me off.
Maybe the author is very knowledgabel about biology, maths, economics and all that kind of stuff, but his wrting is terrible. He goes all over the place. I can't understand why anyone gave this book a 5-star review.
Until he gets an editor, I will never read another book by this author again.
Overall, a poorly written mess by an awful writer.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
fraxy
5.0 out of 5 stars
My second copy bought
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 13, 2017Verified Purchase
Matt Ridley always worth reading no exception with this one . Son nicked my copy as it's so good and I bought this one for friend to enlighten her with science of virtue
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Jessica Catchpole
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good, but not his best
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 17, 2014Verified Purchase
Very, very strong start, meandering middle, and delving into 1990s British politics at the end. I've got a lot of time for the author due to his other books, but this one strays a bit too far from science for me.
luke
5.0 out of 5 stars
brilliant
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 15, 2021Verified Purchase
can't put it down
Mr. C. J. Pegg
4.0 out of 5 stars
Four Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 11, 2016Verified Purchase
One or two chapters aside, a very engaging book.
Deals related to this item
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: origin of life, origins of life



