Other Sellers on Amazon
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Outright Barbarous: How the Violent Language of the Right Poisons American Democracy Paperback – May 1, 2008
Purchase options and add-ons
“Outright Barbarous turns the spotlight on the rhetorical thuggery of the Right, exposing how the verbal excesses are being perpetrated not just by media blowhards like Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh but by conservative thought leaders. But Feldman does more than point fingers; he offers practical steps for cleaning up our too-often-toxic political discourse.”—Arianna Huffington
“Since 9/11, America has been contaminated by the violence of right-wing language, in the speeches of Republican politicians and the rantings of the talking heads on Fox News and on conservative talk radio. Jeffrey Feldman’s insightful and important book cuts through the violence, and shows how we can restore the democratic ideals that America was founded upon.”—Thom Hartmann
“Jeffrey Feldman warns us to ignore the right wing noise machine at our own peril. Backed by right-wing think tanks, foundations and millionaire families, conservative standard bearers will continue to enrich themselves at the cost of a more civil, equitable society. Read Outright Barbarous to find out what they're really saying, and how we can stop it!"—Sam Seder
Since September 11, 2001, most attempts at reasoned political debate in America have been severely limited by the violent language of the Right. In books and on television, it has become a regular ritual for conservative pundits and intellectuals to infuse violence—particularly against Democrats or liberals—into discussions of the major issues of the day, such as terrorism, immigration and gun violence. The result is the creation of a shrill discourse that silences opposition and destroys any chance for serious, civil debate.
In Outright Barbarous: How the Violent Language of the Right Poisons American Democracy, political language expert Jeffrey Feldman analyzes the words of leading conservative figures Ann Coulter, Dinesh D’Souza, James Dobson, Wayne LaPierre, Pat Buchanan and Bill O’Reilly to show how the Right’s language of violence is polluting our public discourse and limiting the free exchange of ideas. In addition to exposing the conservative obsession with violence, Feldman also shows how the civic discussion in America can be reshaped without the use of violent language, creating a healthier political climate.
An expert on language and political messaging, Jeffrey Feldman is the author of Framing the Debate: Famous Presidential Speeches and How Progressives Can Use Them to Change the Conversation (and Win Elections.) He is also editor of the influential blog, Frameshop(http://frameshopisopen.com), and teaches at New York University.
About the Author
- Print length224 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherIg Publishing
- Publication dateMay 1, 2008
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.4 x 8.2 inches
- ISBN-100978843150
- ISBN-13978-0978843151
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Product details
- Publisher : Ig Publishing (May 1, 2008)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 224 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0978843150
- ISBN-13 : 978-0978843151
- Item Weight : 8.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.4 x 8.2 inches
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

I was born and raised in the midwest, educated overseas and in Virginia, and now live in New York City.
I hold a Ph.D. in Cultural Anthropology, teach college classes, and blog everyday.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Feldman and his fellow anti-Christian ethnic supremacist and champion of censorship Jeremy Waldron show no proximate cause, much less examples of any calls for violence. Contrast this with Jewish Bolsheviks' murder of millions of Christians, a holocaust Jewish supremacists deny, incessant dehumanization of Gentiles - whether the WASPs who saved Jews from Catholic Fascism, or the Palestinians ethnically cleansed at gunpoint and regularly barraged by white phosphorus IDF artillery.
Remember John Avlon's and the rest of the mainstream media's hand-wringing about the gay rights gunman Floyd Lee Corkins shooting up the Family Research Council in DC with a Southern Poverty Law Center list in hand, left-wing gunman Chris Dorner's manifesto praising Hillary and gun control, and the environmentalist manifesto-writer unibomber Ted Kaczynski? Yeah, neither do I. By this reasoning, the mainstream media, gay and environmental movements, anti-Christian bigotry jewish supremacist groups like the $PLC, ADL, ACLU and Simon Wiesenthal Center bear responsibility for those acts.
There is no proximate cause, but the Left's ideology's irreconcilability with our Constitution's proscriptions against tyranny are never more manifest than by totalitarian Avlon's use of the banal tactic of renaming censorship as measures regarding hate speech, antisemitism, homophobia, "incitement."
================================
http://news.yahoo.com/photos/police-officers-killed-in-las-vegas-shooting-spree-1403814712-slideshow/
Thank John Locher for his brilliant legal mind. Online rants and criticism of rulers is proximate cause of a policeman's shooting. John Locher wants censorship of whatever John Locher deems inciteful. No doubt it will mirror every other totalitarian system's censorship: government ministers of Truth like John Locher will tell the subjects what they need to know. Everything John Locher dislikes will be deemed hate speech, antisemitism, homophobia, incitement, anti-revolutionary, extremist. Who will John Locher declare enemies of the state?
Remember John Locher's, the AP's and the rest of the mainstream media's hand-wringing about the gay rights gunman Floyd Lee Corkins shooting up the Family Research Council in DC with a Southern Poverty Law Center list in hand? How about left-wing gunman Chris Dorner's manifesto praising Hillary and gun control? Recall the environmentalist manifesto-writing unabomber Ted Kaczynski? Yeah, neither do I. By this reasoning, the mainstream media, gay and environmental movements, anti-Christian bigotry of jewish supremacist groups the $PLC, ADL, ACLU and Simon Wiesenthal Center bear responsibility for multiple more acts.
There is no proximate cause, but John Locher's and the Left's ideology's irreconcilability with our Constitution's proscriptions against tyranny are never more manifest than by totalitarian Locher's use of the banal tactic of renaming censorship as measures regarding hate speech, antisemitism, homophobia, "incitement."
John Locher lacks honor, integrity, and respect for the role of a free press in a free society. John Locher has contempt for a free citizenry. To John Locher, tyranny is good; more tyranny is better. According to John Locher's mindset, the Founding Fathers were the bad guys and the totalitarians whose views John Locher seeks to impose on the US were the good guys.
=====================
http://news.yahoo.com/online-rants-rightwing-extremism-fuel-fears-for-us-cops-225012920.html?bcmt=comments-postbox
Thank Jason Sickles for his brilliant legal mind. Online rants and criticism of rulers is proximate cause of a murdering police officers. Jason Sickles wants censorship of whatever Jason Sickles deems inciteful. No doubt it will mirror every other totalitarian system's censorship: government ministers of Truth like Jason Sickles will tell the subjects what they need to know. Everything Jason Sickles dislikes will be deemed hate speech, antisemitism, homophobia, incitement, anti-revolutionary, extremist. Who will Jason Sickles declare enemies of the state?
Feldman omitted thus constructively censored, along with the AP's and the rest of the mainstream media, the gay rights gunman Floyd Lee Corkins shooting up the Family Research Council in DC with a Southern Poverty Law Center list in hand? How about left-wing gunman Chris Dorner's manifesto praising Hillary and gun control? Recall the environmentalist manifesto-writing unabomber Ted Kaczynski? Yeah, neither do I. By this reasoning, the mainstream media, gay and environmental movements, anti-Christian bigotry of jewish supremacist groups the $PLC, ADL, ACLU and Simon Wiesenthal Center bear responsibility for multiple more acts.
There is no proximate cause, but Jason Sickles' and the Left's ideology's irreconcilability with our Constitution's proscriptions against tyranny are never more manifest than by totalitarian Jason Sickles' use of the banal tactic of renaming censorship as measures regarding hate speech, antisemitism, homophobia, "incitement."
Feldman lacks honor, integrity, and respect for the role of a free press in a free society. He has contempt for a free citizenry. To Feldman, tyranny is good; more tyranny is better. According to Feldman's mindset, the Founding Fathers were the bad guys and the totalitarians whose views John Locher seeks to impose on the US were the good guys.
I've read Feldman for years on Daily Kos and elsewhere, and am always fascinated by the precise logic, crisp writing, and powerful "framing" that he brings to bear on just about any political subject.
Now, Feldman devotes a book to taking on leading "conservatives" like Ann Coulter, Dinesh D'Souza, James Dobson, Wayne LaPierre, Pat Buchanan, and Bill O'Reilly. Honestly, it's hard to know which of these characters is the worst, as Feldman lays out a strong case for why each is particularly heinous in their own unique and wondrous way.
Thus, LaPierre frames everything in terms of violence, the ever-present threat of violence, and the utter inability of law, government, or collective institutions of any kind to protect us from that (essentially inevitable) violence. Flowing from that bizarre worldview comes the only possible conclusion: you're on your own, they're coming to harm you, and you'd better be armed to the teeth when they do. As Feldman explains, "What LaPierre suggests is...a full-scale military escalation of civil society." Just as bad, LaPierre boils everything down to a false dichotomy -- a common strategy of right-wing political language - in which the only two choices are either "(A) we allow individuals the "right to carry" guns or (B) we allow criminals to make victims of more and more Americans." That's it, end of discussion. Which, come to think of it, is exactly what the Wayne LaPierres of the world wanted in the first place. How convenient.
And on and on it goes, from Pat Buchanan's "constant narrative on the death of American civilization at the hands of a new Barbarian invasion" (from Mexico, that is) to Ann Coulter's bizarre claim that "the American left had been fighting and concealing its designs to destroy America for over half a century," to - perhaps most disturbingly of all - James Dobson's violent, sex-obsessed and pain-laden "fear and punishment rhetoric" aimed at undermining any possibility of a "common good" in American society.
At this point, you might be thinking, "how depressing, why would I want to read this?" For starters, despite the disturbing subject matter, Feldman's skills as a writer make this is actually a highly enjoyable book to read - almost a "page turner," if you can believe it. Second, Feldman doesn't just lay out the evils of the right-wing pundits he discusses in his book, he also lays out "six suggestions to resolve the problem of violent language in the American political media." Finally, as Feldman writes at the end of his book, "[w]e cannot, as Orwell warned, 'change this all in a moment'" but "we can change one political debate at a time with the simple act of making new choices about how to write and speak." This book will help us do so.
That's why concerned citizens should read Outrageous Barbarous by Jeffrey Feldman: to know the extent of the right wing's reckless hyperbole, to understand why using language that "takes no prisoners" bullies the rest of us from thoughtful dialogue on paramount problems, and gives us insight on how to counter those efforts without resorting to the same tactics, or abridging anyone's speech.
Feldman's book is an excellent and clear essay on violent rhetoric as carefully documented on seven or eight key issues - rhetoric so extravagant and voluminous that it sweeps against the public like recurring tsunamis, and, like them, washes away collected reasoning and dry wit.
There are several key thoughts like `community', `pragmatism' and `common good' that Feldman develops to great advantage, but none so clarifying and poignant to describe that which is lacking in the right wing barrage as the word, 'deliberative'.
Recapturing the process of putting one foot ahead of another is this wonderful concept of deliberating, and the author shares some of his reasoned ideas in returning us to a deliberative process. A must read for those still reeling from Rambo rhetoric and for those who want to take steps for a "kinder, gentler America."

