Kindle
$2.99
Available instantly
Paperback
$9.99
Kindle Price: $2.99

Save $7.00 (70%)

Promotions apply when you purchase

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

Read with our free app
You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Buy for others

Give as a gift or purchase for a team or group.
Learn more

Buying and sending eBooks to others

  1. Select quantity
  2. Buy and send eBooks
  3. Recipients can read on any device

These ebooks can only be redeemed by recipients in the US. Redemption links and eBooks cannot be resold.

Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Overcoming Obamacare: Three Approaches to Reversing the Government Takeover of Health Care Kindle Edition

by Philip Klein (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
3.7 3.7 out of 5 stars 37 ratings
See all formats and editions
Opposition to Obamacare is stronger than ever, but critics of the law will need to unite around an alternative if they want to move the nation’s health care system in a free market direction. In Overcoming Obamacare, the Washington Examiner’s Philip Klein, one of the leading conservative health care writers, takes readers inside the fierce debate on the right on how to overhaul the health care system in the wake of Obamacare. Drawing on eight years of experience reporting on the issue, dozens of interviews with prominent health policy experts, and conversations with Republican political leaders including Bobby Jindal and Paul Ryan, Klein articulates a free market vision for health care and presents three competing paths to getting there. Whether you’re a conservative fighting to repeal Obamacare or a liberal wondering how Republicans may go about unraveling it, this book is a must read.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Philip Klein is commentary editor of the Washington Examiner, where he writes about domestic politics and policy and runs the opinion section. He has emerged as one of the leading voices on health care policy on the right. His work has been cited by a diverse spectrum of media outlets, from syndicated talk radio host Mark Levin and columnist Michelle Malkin to publications including the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, among many others. He formerly served as Washington correspondent for the American Spectator and a financial reporter for Reuters news service. He is a graduate of George Washington University, where he earned degrees in history and economics, and also holds a master's degree in journalism from Columbia University. He is the author of Conservative Survival in the Romney Era.
Previous slide of product details
  1. Print length
    114 pages
  2. Language
    English
  3. Sticky notes
    On Kindle Scribe
  4. Publication date
    January 12, 2015
  5. File size
    1020 KB
  6. Page Flip
    Enabled
  7. Word Wise
    Enabled
  8. Enhanced typesetting
    Enabled
  9. See all details
Next slide of product details

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Philip Klein is commentary editor of the Washington Examiner, where he writes about domestic politics and policy and runs the opinion section. He has emerged as one of the leading voices on health care policy on the right. His work has been cited by a diverse spectrum of media outlets, from syndicated talk radio host Mark Levin and columnist Michelle Malkin to publications including the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, among many others. He formerly served as Washington correspondent for the American Spectator and a financial reporter for Reuters news service. He is a graduate of George Washington University, where he earned degrees in history and economics, and also holds a master's degree in journalism from Columbia University. He is the author of Conservative Survival in the Romney Era.

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B00RO6JHV6
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Washington Examiner (January 12, 2015)
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 12, 2015
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 1020 KB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 114 pages
  • Customer Reviews:
    3.7 3.7 out of 5 stars 37 ratings

Customer reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
37 global ratings

Customers say

Customers find the book easy to read and clear with lots of footnotes. They also appreciate the informative exploration of practical, common sense, and politically feasible ways to implement free-market reforms for healthcare.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more
ReadabilityFeasibility
6 customers mention "Readability"5 positive1 negative

Customers find the book easy to read, concise, and short. They appreciate the degree of detail and discussion of strategy.

"...This book does that in a mildly partisan way. I also appreciate the degree of detail and the discussion of strategy that the book provides...." Read more

"...This timely book -- a quick read -- could potentially have great impact." Read more

"...NOT COMPREHENSIVE INSIGHTS, BUT COMPREHEENSIBLE. FAIRLY CONCISE AND SHORT READ." Read more

"A clear and concise summary of various proposals for implementing free-market reforms for healthcare in the post-ACA political landscape...." Read more

4 customers mention "Feasibility"4 positive0 negative

Customers find the book informative, practical, and smart. They also say it's a solid read that summarizes the political obstacles each approach would need to overcome.

"...I also appreciate the degree of detail and the discussion of strategy that the book provides...." Read more

"...He wins arguments the old fashioned way: with smart, accurate, factual reporting and...better arguments! This is a must read...." Read more

"This is the clearest, most informative exploration of the practical, common sense, politically feasible ways in which the GOP leadership can reform..." Read more

"...I appreciated the most about this book is that it summarizes the political obstacles each approach would need to overcome in order to be implemented." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

John C. Becker
4.0 out of 5 stars Just What I have been looking for.
Reviewed in the United States on March 8, 2015
Verified Purchase
I bought this book to get some background on alternative approaches to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This book does that in a mildly partisan way. I also appreciate the degree of detail and the discussion of strategy that the book provides. I have recommended it to others who are interested in this issue as I believe this is a conversation that is way over due.
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
David B
5.0 out of 5 stars REFRESHING DEPARTURE!
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2015
Verified Purchase
I follow Klein on twitter and find him a refreshing departure from conservative "red meat" flame throwers. He wins arguments the old fashioned way: with smart, accurate, factual reporting and...better arguments! This is a must read. The cliche conservative line a la "repeal Obamacare" just doesn't hold up anymore. Instead, to make a meaningful assault on this catastrophic law, we need to tweak and change it until it's dead, and simultaneously build something BETTER. Klein presents the options very clearly and backs them up. Every member of Congress should read this book: GOPers will see a clear path to get rid of Obamacare, Dems will (hopefully!) realize that there are thoughtful conservatives out there who actually want to fix the healthcare problem -- and that there may be better solutions than a govt takeover. This timely book -- a quick read -- could potentially have great impact.
12 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
William Bennett
3.0 out of 5 stars GOP-- party or dysfunctional confederation of reactionary white men?
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2015
Verified Purchase
Good review of the antagonistic tripartite divisions that hobbles the GOP in it's quixotic quest to throttle the ACA. Judging from their recent failures the USA is not in lethal hot water yet.
3 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
Paul Albert
2.0 out of 5 stars Short on detail and analysis; long on ideology. Overall a disappointment
Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2015
Verified Purchase
Mr. Klein's book was a disappointment as it mostly consists of a rehashing of conservative talking points: basically Obamacare is very bad and we would make things better if only given the chance. There is no depth here, no analysis of the problems in our group and individual markets, and little discussion of cost drivers aside from the tried and true malpractice costs.

Full disclosure. I am a reluctant ACA supporter. In my view the only thing worse than the ACA is no ACA. It has solved some problems, extended care to millions, and also attempts to make a start on addressing cost issues through some of the rules on readmissions, creation of ACOs, etc. I've read many books on health care/insurance issues, and have a pretty good understanding of how other countries long ago attacked and solved the problems (yes, it is an ongoing battle everywhere) so I looked forward to a conservative slant on solving the complicated, costly maze of health insurance in the United States.

The book is short on specifics. But one noteworthy proposal by Mr Klein had me shaking my head in agreement and that was to open up the individual markets to anybody with an employer-based plan. Employer-based plans enjoy tax free treatment both on the employer and employee side. Employees have little to no choice in a plan, the employer picks it for them. Allowing everybody to shop for their coverage, requiring employers to contribute to an HSA for the employee (yes HSA rules need to be changed), would increase choice and competition in the markets. It seems this should be a targeted improvement to the ACA but conservatives have been too hung up on slaying the beast rather than solving problems. Later in the book, Mr Klein pretty much shoots down this idea as being too disruptive when he discusses Gov. Bobby Jindel's ACA replacement proposal.

Mr Klein touches on all the familiar talking points. The ACA is a government takeover. Curiously he never mentions the fact the ACA was designed to work at the state level with each state taking responsibility for its own rules and exchanges. Typically this is a model that conservatives would rally around but instead governors and legislators deferred to the federal exchange.

Mr Klein mentions that insurance should be able to sold across state lines. The ACA specifically allows states to enter into agreements to form compacts allowing multi-state availability of plan.

Mr Klein blames the ACA on making insurance more expensive, decreasing choice with more limited networks, and forcing people to buy something they don't want. He documents polls declaring the vast majority of people don't like the ACA but then mentions how it only addresses a small subset of the population, individuals, and especially those individuals who had pre-existing conditions (aka Medical History) and could not obtain insurance.

Now this makes no sense because if the ACA only really affects a small segment of the population, then why is it so unpopular? Could it be politics? Why does anybody on Medicare hate the ACA? It doesn't affect them, but perhaps they don't like the 'government giveaway', which is pretty rich considering that Medicare is the ultimate subsidized, single-payer system. Those with employer-based plans are pretty much unaffected, that is if your plan had been somewhat comprehensive to begin with.

The reality is we've all been suffering with ever increasing premiums, higher co-pays, higher deductibles, and more limited networks (lack of choice) for the past 20 years and this is in the group markets where most of us get our insurance via our employer. Now the ACA has become an easy scapegoat for these continuing trends.

One of Mr Klein's examples of premium increase in also on the bogus side. He writes that premiums for the youngest, healthiest segment have risen to offset the cost of insuring the older groups. There is some truth to this in the individual markets but Mr Klein compares apples to oranges. He compares the cost of an average individual policy in NY in 2012 ($4260/yr) vs Pennsylvania ($2088). Pre-ACA, Pennsylvania did not have 'must issue' rules, meaning anybody could be turned down for insurance. Of course, the Pennsylvania rates were low, they could cherry-pick customers. NY had must-issue rules but without a mandate, this sent the individual market into a death spiral. The individual market crashed from over a million customers to around 35,000. Neither state had a solution. If you had any kind of medical history and needed an individual policy in Pennsylvania then you were out of luck. In NY, you had to pay absurd rates.

The ACA has done away with community premium ratings. Younger employees in my company now pay less, in some cases far less, with our current policy. The older groups pay somewhat more, which is what Mr Klein proposes, except that he'd like older groups to pay even more than they are now. Cost of my current coverage is about $27,000/year. I'm 59 years old. How much more would he like me to pay?

Mr Klein says that the group markets work because of the larger pools which share risk. However, a robust individual market also shares risk and is larger than any small group that many of us belong to.

There is much discussion of subsidies and how conservative plans will replace those with tax credits and/or deductions. Most of the numbers cited are laughably small in relation to the cost of insurance so it is difficult to imagine how either a credit or deduction would help people afford insurance. Also, you can't pay an insurance bill with a tax credit that you won't see for a year or more.

I always shake my head in wonder at how conservatives have run away from every plan they had ever suggested prior to the ACA as subsidies and mandates were always part of their proposals. Who can forget the spectacle of Mitt Romney trying to disavow any responsibility for RomneyCare.

One thing about subsidies is at least there is a modicum of personal responsibility. Those receiving subsidies for the most part pay a portion of premium as well as co-pays and deductibles, etc. This should warm a conservative's heart. Because of subsidies and the increase in the number of insured here in New Jersey, the upcoming state budget reduces charity care payments to hospitals by about $150 million dollars. And this is a bad thing?

Mr Klein does have some moments of refreshing honesty. Early on he writes that Republicans ceded the health care/insurance issue after they failed to address it after defeating the Clinton initiative and gaining the White House. Beyond that, Republicans have had five years to come up with a credible detailed plan to fix the ACA but have offered nothing but generalities.

In the old days Congress would fight and claw at each other about major legislation. But once it passed there was general agreement to address problems and make improvements. This included the common-sense exercise of fixing typos or making clarifications. This is how the question of subsidies brought up in the absurd King vs. Burwell case would have been addressed. There is nobody in Washington who seriously believes that Congress meant to deny subsidies to people living in states covered under a federal exchange. Yet here we are.

One of the failings of the ACA is that it did little to deal with the cost side. What is the solution to drug companies being able to charge whatever they feel like, no matter how outrageous, for a drug? The excuse is always that if we didn't pay the extortionist rates then the drug companies and medical device manufacturers would just fold up shop. But they seem to do quite well in the rest of the world. Must we subsidize their profits? How about allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices. How about allowing Americans the freedom to import drugs from Canada? Never a mention.

How about creative ideas to relieve insurance companies of the burden of the very sick. Instead of creating a mish mosh of high risk pools why not just have the federal government be the reinsurer? Reinsurance is common practice in the private sector.

This is a short, easy read and there are lots of footnotes and sources to follow up on. It is not a serious attempt to delve into the problems and fixes for our health care/insurance mess. This book is really more about implementing legislation to satisfy the ideological leanings of the right. As Bobby Jindel said, “It is not about covering the most people, it is all about reducing costs.” Readers are expected to take it on faith that the conservative plans outlined in this book will solve any problem other than ridding them of the dread Obamacare.

Our 'system' is beset by mind-numbing complexity, plus a lack of transparency and competition. Access to care is often determined by the luck of the draw. Do you work for a company with 'good' insurance? How many insurance companies have decided to operate in your state and what do they offer? It is easy to throw rocks and break windows. It is much harder to solve problems that have developed over decades, all intertwined with another. Ideology does not solve problems but that seems to be the driving force behind this book and current conservative policies.
38 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
Dale B Mortimer, M.D.
4.0 out of 5 stars Great book title guaranteed to suppress the whining of members of the pity party and entitled whiners
Reviewed in the United States on June 9, 2015
Verified Purchase
A perfect book title to prominently display in the office of my solo, out–patient psychiatric private practice.
Having read the 2,400 pages or so of the so–called ObamaCare Act, it appears that Philip Klein writes like a journalist – who hasn't read the Act.
Oh, I see that Philip Klein is indeed a journalist.
Never mind.
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
Peter Lake
5.0 out of 5 stars Finally a common sense book on the woes and cures for Obamacare
Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2015
Verified Purchase
This is the clearest, most informative exploration of the practical, common sense, politically feasible ways in which the GOP leadership can reform the blunders and devils in the Obamacare law. details It should be must reading for everyone in the medical field, local state and national leaders and costumers who are floating in a sea of confusion about the law and watching their premiums skyrocket. Its a solid read, to the point and worth every penny
3 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
firsttime
1.0 out of 5 stars Very disappointing
Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2015
Verified Purchase
Very disappointing after all the positive reviews. A rehash of talking points without any consideration of the underlying issues surrounding healthcare. Buying healthcare is quite different from buying a normal consumer good.
8 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
Matthew Booher
4.0 out of 5 stars Required Reading
Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2015
Verified Purchase
Obamacare upped our family's premium on our high deductible HSA plan from $620 per month in 2014 to $2,190 per month in 2015. Mr. Klein's thoughtful and well-researched work gives Conservatives excellent options to consider.
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report

Report an issue


Does this item contain inappropriate content?
Report
Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Report
Does this item contain quality or formatting issues?
Report