| Kindle Price: | $0.99 |
| Sold by: | Random House LLC Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Paranoid Style in American Politics: An Essay: from The Paranoid Style in American Politics (Kindle Single) (A Vintage Short) Kindle Edition
A timely reissue of acclaimed historian Richard Hofstadter’s authoritative and unforgettable essay. First published in 1964 and no less relevant half a century later, The Paranoid Style in American Politics scrutinizes the conditions that gave rise to the extreme right of the 1950s and the 1960s, and presages the ascendancy of the Tea Party movement and, now, Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.
Fringe groups can and do both influence and derail American politics, and Hofstadter remains indispensable reading for anyone who wants to understand why paranoia, a persistent psychic phenomenon with an outsize role in American public life, refuses to abate.
An ebook short.
- Length
39
- Language
EN
English
- Kindle feature
Sticky notes
- PublisherVintage
- Publication date
2016
October 4
- File size7.9 MB
- Kindle feature
Page Flip
- Kindle feature
Word Wise
- Kindle feature
Enhanced typesetting
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- ASIN : B01KW9AWY2
- Publisher : Vintage (October 4, 2016)
- Publication date : October 4, 2016
- Language : English
- File size : 8126 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 39 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #304,214 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Ideology was the key word here and he rarely or never used it but what he presented was actually how people become blinded by their own ideology and defend it by showing how those they are opposed to it actually are part of a powerful cabal of conspirators designing political domination through feint and deceit. They also have uncanny skills as well as resources with which to pull their machinations off. There is brainwashing and seduction going on in order to sway minions to side with essentially the beast of an anti-Christ.
Hofstadter did not go into some of the details about how conspirators can convince so many people without even a one, breaking ranks to report their new found misgivings. Instead the book focused on the efforts that those who were on to any conspiracy detailed their “facts” and shepherded a path to avoid the apocalypse that loomed. The books he cited were replete with footnotes, curious photographs and statistics that were funneled into a viewpoint that was hard to deny by those already convinced.
While reading this book written over a half a century ago, I reflected on several events that bolster his claims and occur today. The first being “fake news”. Some of that comes from the likes of The Onion newspaper which never pretended to be otherwise. Jon Stewart who during his time as a comedy “news” host likewise never pretended to be offering the “truth”. We did witness during our recent presidential election, a host of “fake news” stories that obscured their falsity and presented information for people who were looking for exactly what the false news provided.
I also considered the ideas of Marshall McLuhan the media theorist and a contemporary of Hofstadter. I cited him much when I wrote a thesis many years ago. Both of these men wrote when the media was constricted to the “hot” forms such as radio talk shows and the “cool” media such as Atlantic Monthly. In the latter our emotions were intensified by sometimes preached screeds designed to convince the audience of what Hofstadter was describing in this book. The latter was read as its title suggests, by the month. It also cited sources that could be easily found and researched. Both of those forms continue to exist today but with technology that exacerbates “hot” media. Facebook, Twitter and all of the other means of making personal expression omnipresent, conspiracy concepts get plenty of play. Technology has made more “hot” media forms but no new “cool” ones.
I have read, heard and witnessed that American’s ability to think critically is very poor. It is likely that it always was and probably many evolutionary thinkers have explained how this is an adaptation. I do not disagree especially with its rampant nature. As disheartening as that idea is, it appears to simply be the case and that is where Hofstadter’s reference to Montaigne comes in handy. That 16th century writer brought a philosophy (of sorts) to bear by reminding us that people who voted for Trump or Britain’s Brexit might have paranoid delusion (and might not of course) but we have to live with them. In reality there is no “norm” rather there is a vague standard that is interpreted by everyone to suit their own needs. We individuals are generally determined that we are correct so in America we have about 300 million correct people.
The challenge now is that with all of the “information” hitting the vast mediums and screaming our beliefs everywhere, how do we remain civil. How do we have discourse that allows for people of general disagreement to learn from each other? Robert Dole referred to Bill Clinton as “an opponent, not an enemy” 20 years ago when they campaigned for President. As a nation we are a long way from that perspective. If we continue on the course of action that exists now…well I am glad to be old.





