Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-24% $18.94$18.94
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Acceptable
$9.23$9.23
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World Paperback – January 1, 2003
Purchase options and add-ons
New York Times Editors’ Choice
Winner of the PEN Hessell Tiltman Prize
Winner of the Duff Cooper Prize
Silver Medalist for the Arthur Ross Book Award
of the Council on Foreign Relations
Finalist for the Robert F. Kennedy Book Award
For six months in 1919, after the end of “the war to end all wars,” the Big Three—President Woodrow Wilson, British prime minister David Lloyd George, and French premier Georges Clemenceau—met in Paris to shape a lasting peace. In this landmark work of narrative history, Margaret MacMillan gives a dramatic and intimate view of those fateful days, which saw new political entities—Iraq, Yugoslavia, and Palestine, among them—born out of the ruins of bankrupt empires, and the borders of the modern world redrawn.
- Print length624 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRandom House Trade Paperbacks
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2003
- Dimensions6.06 x 1.28 x 9.18 inches
- ISBN-100375760520
- ISBN-13978-0375760525
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

Similar items that ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
—The New York Times Book Review
“MacMillan’s book reminds us of the main lesson learned at such a high cost in Paris in 1919: Peace is not something that can be imposed at the conference table. It can grow only from the hearts of people.”
—Los Angeles Times
“Beautifully written, full of judgment and wisdom, Paris 1919 is a pleasure to read and vibrates with the passions of the early twentieth century and of ours.”
—San Francisco Chronicle
“MacMillan is a superb writer who can bring history to life.”
—The Philadelphia Inquirer
“For anyone interested in knowing how historic mistakes can morph into later historic problems, this brilliant book is a must-read.”
—Chicago Tribune
From the Inside Flap
New York Times Editors? Choice
Winner of the PEN Hessell Tiltman Prize
Winner of the Duff Cooper Prize
Silver Medalist for the Arthur Ross Book Award
of the Council on Foreign Relations
Finalist for the Robert F. Kennedy Book Award
For six months in 1919, after the end of ?the war to end all wars,? the Big Three?President Woodrow Wilson, British prime minister David Lloyd George, and French premier Georges Clemenceau?met in Paris to shape a lasting peace. In this landmark work of narrative history, Margaret MacMillan gives a dramatic and intimate view of those fateful days, which saw new political entities?Iraq, Yugoslavia, and Palestine, among them?born out of the ruins of bankrupt empires, and the borders of the modern world redrawn.
From the Back Cover
"New York Times Editors' Choice
Winner of the PEN Hessell Tiltman Prize
Winner of the Duff Cooper Prize
Silver Medalist for the Arthur Ross Book Award
of the Council on Foreign Relations
Finalist for the Robert F. Kennedy Book Award
For six months in 1919, after the end of "the war to end all wars," the Big Three--President Woodrow Wilson, British prime minister David Lloyd George, and French premier Georges Clemenceau--met in Paris to shape a lasting peace. In this landmark work of narrative history, Margaret MacMillan gives a dramatic and intimate view of those fateful days, which saw new political entities--Iraq, Yugoslavia, and Palestine, among them--born out of the ruins of bankrupt empires, and the borders of the modern world redrawn.
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Woodrow Wilson Comes to Europe
On december 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.
On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson¹s own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."
Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?
Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.
Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life‹in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.
In the next eight years Wilson transformed Princeton from a sleepy college for gentlemen into a great university. He reworked the curriculum, raised significant amounts of money and brought into the faculty the brightest and the best young men from across the country. By 1910, he was a national figure and the Democratic party in New Jersey, under the control of conservative bosses, invited him to run for governor. Wilson agreed, but insisted on running on a progressive platform of controlling big business and extending democracy. He swept the state and by 1911 "Wilson for President" clubs were springing up. He spoke for the dispossessed, the disenfranchised and all those who had been left behind by the rapid economic growth of the late nineteenth century. In 1912, at a long and hard-fought convention, Wilson got the Democratic nomination for president. That November, with the Republicans split by Teddy Roosevelt's decision to run as a progressive against William Howard Taft, Wilson was elected. In 1916, he was reelected, with an even greater share of the popular vote.
Wilson's career was a series of triumphs, but there were darker moments, both personal and political, fits of depression and sudden and baffling illnesses. Moreover, he had left behind him a trail of enemies, many of them former friends. "An ingrate and a liar," said a Democratic boss in New Jersey in a toast. Wilson never forgave those who disagreed with him. "He is a good hater," said his press officer and devoted admirer Ray Stannard Baker. He was also stubborn. As House said, with admiration: "Whenever a question is presented he keeps an absolutely open mind and welcomes all suggestion or advice which will lead to a correct decision. But he is receptive only during the period that he is weighing the question and preparing to make his decision. Once the decision is made it is final and there is an absolute end to all advice and suggestion. There is no moving him after that." What was admirable to some was a dangerous egotism to others. The French ambassador in Washington saw "a man who, had he lived a couple of centuries ago, would have been the greatest tyrant in the world, because he does not seem to have the slightest conception that he can ever be wrong."
This side of Wilson¹s character was in evidence when he chose his fellow commissioners‹or plenipotentiaries, as the chief delegates were known‹to the Peace Conference. He was himself one. House, "my alter ego," as he was fond of saying, was another. Reluctantly he selected Lansing, his secretary of state, as a third, mainly because it would have been awkward to leave him behind. Where Wilson had once rather admired Lansing's vast store of knowledge, his meticulous legal mind and his apparent readiness to take a back seat, by 1919 that early liking had turned to irritation and contempt. Lansing, it turned out, did have views, often strong ones which contradicted the president's. "He has," Wilson complained to House, who noted it down with delight, "no imagination, no constructive ability, and but little real ability of any kind." The fourth plenipotentiary, General Tasker Bliss, was already in France as the American military representative on the Supreme War Council. A thoughtful and intelligent man who loved to lie in bed with a hip flask reading Thucydides in the original Greek, he was also, many of the junior members of the American delegation believed, well past his prime. Since Wilson was to speak to him on only five occasions during the Peace Conference, perhaps that did not matter.
The president's final selection, Henry White, was a charming, affable retired diplomat, the high point of whose career had been well before the war. Mrs. Wilson was to find him useful in Paris on questions of etiquette.
Product details
- Publisher : Random House Trade Paperbacks (January 1, 2003)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 624 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0375760520
- ISBN-13 : 978-0375760525
- Item Weight : 1.45 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.06 x 1.28 x 9.18 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #101,014 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #43 in International Diplomacy (Books)
- #95 in European Politics Books
- #100 in World War I History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Margaret MacMillan was the Warden of St Antony’s College and a Professor of International History at the University of Oxford from 2007-17. Her books include Women of the Raj (1988, 2007); Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World (2001) for which she was the first woman to win the Samuel Johnson Prize; Nixon in China: Six Days that Changed the World; The Uses and Abuses of History (2008); and Extraordinary Canadians: Stephen Leacock (2009). Her most recent book is The War that Ended Peace. She is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, Honorary Fellow of Trinity College, University of Toronto and of Lady Margaret Hall, St Antonys College and St Hilda’s College, University of Oxford, and is an Honorary Fellow of the British Academy. She sits on he editorial boards of International History, the International Journal and First World War Studies. She is a Trustee of the Imperial War Museum and of the Central European University.
She has several honorary degrees including from the King's College, the Royal Military College, Ryerson, Western Ontario, Calgary, Memorial, and the American University of Paris. In 2006 Professor MacMillan was invested as an Officer of the Order of Canada and in 2016 became a Companion. She became a Companion of Honour in 2018.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book well-written, objective, and non-partisan. They appreciate the detailed research and historical information that provides a foundational understanding of why certain issues exist today. Readers also appreciate the character descriptions and storytelling that commands their attention.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book well-written, amazing, and fascinating. They say it's objective, non-partisan, and expertly chronicled. Readers also appreciate the detailed explanation of the reasons for the decisions on Palestine. In addition, they say the author writes a remarkably clear and engaging account of Paris.
"...Added to this scale is an extraordinary richness of detail for the second tier players, the representatives of all the teeming masses seeking to..." Read more
"...I was impressed by the detailed explanation of the reasons for the decisions on Palestine. Lawerance, Balfour, Wilson, Lloyd George, Faisal, etc.,..." Read more
"n addition to being a superb and very readable account of events that transpired in 1919 and their aftermath, Margaret MacMillan's "Paris 1919:..." Read more
"...about this book is how well the author has been able to weave an incredible amount of detail into a mere 500 pages which read more like an action..." Read more
Customers find the book full of detailed research and important historical information. They say it offers a greater understanding of just how many with good intentions came together. Readers also appreciate the remarkable level of anecdotal stories that illuminate the characters. Overall, they describe the author as intellectual and well-versed in her subject matter.
"...In sum, a great survey through the initial draft of the last century's effort to create a "new world order"...." Read more
"...This is an important record of what happened at one of the most fateful diplomatic gatherings in modern history, and in that way, it serves as a..." Read more
"...In conclusion, a great source of information for history buffs interested in the personalities and the decisions they made in the Paris Peace..." Read more
"n addition to being a superb and very readable account of events that transpired in 1919 and their aftermath, Margaret MacMillan's "Paris 1919:..." Read more
Customers find the book excellent on personalities. They say it clarifies the importance of personalities and issues. Readers also mention the author draws fascinating pictures of key characters.
"...She brings life to the narrative by providing character descriptions, but does not disparage or pass judgment...." Read more
"...She thoroughly disects the main characters; Wilson, Clemenceau, and Lloyd George; and to a lesser extent Italy's Orlando, giving a revealing glimpse..." Read more
"...She paints a thorough picture of the main characters, as well as dozens of bit players in this amazing drama...." Read more
"...Her thorough research has enabled her to draw fascinating pictures of the key characters, who ended up shaping the following one hundred years..." Read more
Customers find the storytelling riveting, entertaining, and well-paced. They also say the book is about a fascinating era.
"...The book is well-paced and perfectly organized so as to make clear who each of the stakeholders were, explaining their position and allegiances in..." Read more
"...well versed in her subject matter, who is also an excellent story teller. This book is very easy to read and understand...." Read more
"And extremely interesting story, and very well written. Usually I find nonfiction to be difficult to get through...." Read more
"Excellent telling of the immediate aftermath of the First World War...." Read more
Customers find the book's look excellent. They appreciate the vivid, colorful portraits and educational look at the entire peace process. Readers also mention the author is superb in painting context, characters, and perspective.
"...are all here. More than that, Macmillan provides vivid, colorful portraits . . .“..." Read more
"...And I found this book to be an excellent look at what issues the Big Four had to deal with, how and why they made the decisions that they did and..." Read more
"Absolutely wonderful , detailed, educational look at the entire peace process that went on in Paris at end of WW I. Things you would never know..." Read more
"What a beautiful magnificent book!..." Read more
Customers find the map content in the book lacking. They also mention the principals lack geographic knowledge.
"...If I have any complaint, it is a lack of maps to help illustrate how the former Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires were broken up...." Read more
"...Drawbacks:-lack of maps..." Read more
"...The absence of maps in the Kindle edition is a fatal flaw." Read more
"...The apparent lack of geographic knowledge the principals had; yet had the temerity to know where the borders, boundaries, and peoples should live..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
At one level, MacMillan's book represents an arguably significant revisionist view of the causal role of what happened in Paris in 1919. Her thesis is that what happened AFTER Paris in 1919 was every bit as responsible for the disaster of 1939 as the actions AT Paris. Indeed, she argues, the supposed harsh terms of the Peace Treaty were more valuable to Hitler as propoganda than they were actual burdens on the German people. The loopholes in the treaty's limits on commissioned officers were exploited by the simple expedient of multiplying the numbers of non-commissioned officers. Shell companies in foreign countries could build the prototypes of arms outlawed in Germany. The failure to enforce the breaches of the treaty by later leaders was as important a contributer to war as was the original, flawed charter. This is the revisionist thesis.
There is another notion buried in the subtext of this book -- the idea that even when not successful, some of Wilson's ideals have persisted to this day, and in fact triumphed, at least partially. If the folks in Paris in 1919 did not adequately perceive the folly, for instance, of distributing the Kurdish people over parts of Turkey, Iraq and Iran, the fact is that today the Kurds are beginning to receive implicit recognition of their entitlement to the protection of a national state, autonomous or semi-autonomous, that conforms in broad principle with the ideals Wilson advocated.
A personal anecdote underscores the point. Over the Christmas holidays of 1991, I spent my accumulated frequent flyer miles to travel with a 20 year old nephew to Warsaw, Prague, Budaphest and Istanbul. Twelve years later, the outstanding memory from the trip is sitting at various bars when, after the beers we ordered had already arrived, two more beers or two sandwiches or two whatever simply appeared. Invariably, the bar tender's response to our mystified expressions, was a finger pointing to some guy at the end of the bar, and the comment that he just wanted to say "Thank you."
Two half-baked, and anonymous but conspicuous, Americans were receiving a symbolic gesture of thanks from people who were inhaling freedom for the first time in half a century (or more). And they knew from whence that freedom had come. These guys were reaching across generations to say thank you to more than one generation of Americans for standing by them, thank you for paying the price, thank you for believing our lives were deserving of dignity. Leaving Prague by train, again I was struck by the acknowledgment of America's role, long term, in the multiple rebirths of Eastern Europe -- the obviously new sign on the train station read: "Woodrow Wilson Station". Men come and go, ideas endure.
Reading Margaret McMillan's "Paris 1919" it is easy to become engrossed by the warts of the individuals, and the rich, telling examples of cupidity, hypocrisy and simple stupidity, that drove some of the decisions made. This comment is not intended as a criticism but rather as a caveat to the reader to be mindful that the Paris peace conference was an extraordinary human undertaking, undertaken by, yes, all to ordinary humans.
MacMillan spends 494 pages chronicling, with humor and harshness, Clemenceau's blinding hatred of the Germans, Lloyd George's superficial grasp of history, and Wilson's inconsistent, and hypocritical, "principles", all of which led to frequent mistakes (and occasional successes) of the "Big Three". Her concluding paragraph, though, in an almost forgiving tone, acknowledges that the peacemakers had to deal with the real, not the ideal. That the reality they confronted was enormous. Beyond them, and beyond us. That we too are still grappling, all too feebly, with the same problems they addressed: Taming nationalism and religious passion that threatens peace. Outlawing war.
The power of the book is, like the event it chronicles, simply the scale of the undertaking -- a litany of all that was attempted. Added to this scale is an extraordinary richness of detail for the second tier players, the representatives of all the teeming masses seeking to be free, who came to Paris on behalf of their people back home. You find yourself wishing that Wilson, Clemenceau and George had had MacMillan's information available at the time -- ah, the beauty of hindsight!
In sum, a great survey through the initial draft of the last century's effort to create a "new world order". And a useful, if cautionary, read for anyone pretending to undertake that task today.
No bones about it: this is a challenging book. It’s more scholarly than popular in style and it’s not the sort of book you’ll want to take on holiday. This isn’t a criticism, just a statement of fact. I admit to having approached it like a plate of broccoli; I didn’t finish it because I was enjoying it so much as I finished it because I felt it was good for me. The initiating causes of what we now call World War I are complex and the consequences of its aftermath more complex still. It might just be that there are no shortcuts if one really wants to have a firm grasp on it all. If you approach the subject with this attitude, you just might make it through all 494 pages of this book.
MacMillan’s text is best when she’s discussing the personalities behind the treaty negotiations, including the “Big Three”: America’s Woodrow Wilson, Great Britain’s David Lloyd George, and France’s Georges Clemenceau. Wilson is drawn in relatively unflattering terms as an exasperatingly stubborn and preachy moralizer, a man who relied on his own inflated sense of intuition rather than his experienced diplomatic corps, and someone who was naive about european politics. Lloyd George generally comes off well as a savvy politician, wit, and masterful orator (but who could at times show a shocking unfamiliarity with the geography of nations whose fate he was deciding). Clemenceau is described as a generally wise elder statesman who has the inside track on european affairs…and the motivations of his bitter historical rivals, the Germans. One gets the feeling that he was the realistic pragmatist to Wilson’s dreamy, half-informed naif. There are many other personages thrown into the mix as Paris was filled with petitioning leaders and aspiring leaders-to-be, all angling for their piece of a future Europe or one of its colonies.
Where I struggled with this book was in its repetitious chapters regrading the details of national borders, their geography, and the names of all of the small towns that comprised them. This is all important information if one wants to understand the facts informing the decisions made by the allied leaders, but it makes tough sledding for a reader with only moderate interest. This is where the book succeeds better as a scholarly record that a popular account. Many of these details are repetitiously sleep-inducing and one of the primary reasons that I thought I might not actually have the drive to finish it. Having said that, if you have the will to keep plowing ahead, you’ll generally be rewarded by the underlying drama.
Deliberations over where national lines should be drawn was really an impossible task that no group of men, no matter how wise and thoughtful, could have concluded satisfactorily. Their charge was to divide Europe and its colonial possessions in a way that served the need for justice, defuse the potential for future conflict, leave Germany economically viable and weak (but not too weak), and realign borders so that like people would be together. But what did “like people” even mean? How could groups of people be ordered in cohesive patterns when the contradictory criteria of ethnicity, shared culture, language, and religion are considered simultaneously? It turns out that there’s often no way to meet all of these conditions in a single solution. More often than not, the final decision resulted in two or more sides that were unhappy with the result. The history of European and Asia Minor is simply too complex to arrive at a univariate solution for binding people together under a single flag. Combined with this complexity was the fear that making the wrong decision could lead to political unrest that would drive new nations to revolution and into the waiting arms of the Bolsheviks—a very real and ominous concern which constantly shadowed the thoughts of the Big Three as they deliberated.
MacMillan draws some conclusions at the book’s finale when she flatly asserts that the Treaty of Versailles was not responsible for setting the stage of World War II. The reparations levies against Germany were not “crushing” as they are commonly described today. The treaty had provisions for payments that were conditional on Germany’s ability to pay and were tied to the country’s economic performance, and there were many “creative financing” tricks used to reduce the money owed. Further, the allies seemed to have little stomach for vigorously enforcing the terms of the Treaty as the years wore on. MacMillan believes that the idea that the Treaty was to blame for Germany’s misfortunes of the 1920s was mostly just convenient propaganda for Hitler and the Nazis.
There’s no doubt that MacMillan has completed a thorough reconstruction of what transpired at the 1919 peace conference—and I applaud her for her efforts to paint a detailed picture of events and discussions that took place almost a full century ago by carefully assembling thousands of disparate scraps. This is an important record of what happened at one of the most fateful diplomatic gatherings in modern history, and in that way, it serves as a valuable reference for historians everywhere. It just may not make for the most compelling casual reading, taxing the attention spans of all but the most dedicated reader.








