Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$16.80$16.80
FREE delivery: Thursday, April 4 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $10.87
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
95% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Patriotism Is Not Enough: Harry Jaffa, Walter Berns, and the Arguments that Redefined American Conservatism Hardcover – February 21, 2017
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length296 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherEncounter Books
- Publication dateFebruary 21, 2017
- Reading age18 years and up
- Dimensions6.5 x 1 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-10159403883X
- ISBN-13978-1594038839
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
“Yes. He’s 95 and in poor health, but I think Walter and Harry [age 96] are seeing who can outlive the other as the last act in their long-running feud.”
I offered that whimsical speculation the week after Christmas in 2014 at a meeting at the Claremont Institute. About two weeks later, on Saturday, January 10, the Weekly Standard magazine was the first to publish on its website the sad news that Berns had passed away that morning. Jaffa, also in failing health, had gone to the hospital the day before. He was slipping in and out of consciousness, but intermittently awake enough to make the standard complaints about the usual defects of hospital life. His family and visiting students were guardedly optimistic; he had overcome several acute crises and hospitalizations before. But he took a turn for the worse, and when he passed away a few hours later, the comparison to Thomas Jefferson and John Adams passing on the same day in 1826 became inescapable.
Jefferson and Adams had been bitter political rivals, culminating in the close and initially inconclusive election of 1800 that could easily have ended in the ruin of the still infant nation. Abraham Lincoln taught, as Jaffa never tired of reminding students, that the election of 1800 was the first to prove that ballots could replace bullets as the means of changing a government.
Adams and Jefferson reconciled in later years, chiefly because the two giants of the American Founding shared the same basic political philosophy, which slowly dissolved the rancor of personal ambition and party spirit that dominated their poor relations for the better part of a decade. Some of their political and constitutional disputes had deep theoretical roots, turning on subtle shadings of how republican concepts should be understood and practiced. Jefferson had some radical inclinations at times, like that “God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion” musing he once made in a private letter, while Adams was the prototypical cautious conservative. Arguing politely and respectfully over their differences in a long correspondence became one of their favorite pastimes in retirement.
Jaffa and Berns never contested each other for political office, but their arguments over the course of a decade took on the bitterness and personal invective of partisan strife. “In your present state of mind,” Jaffa wrote in one public letter to Berns, “nothing less than a metaphysical two-by-four across the frontal bone would capture your attention.” One of Berns’s retorts began: “Who will rid us of this pest of a priest?” Unlike Jefferson and Adams, they never reconciled their intellectual differences, although the feud gradually burned itself out, and the two old giants did once sit together and talk cordially, if a bit stiffly, over lunch in Washington, a meal carefully brokered by the Claremont Institute around 2005. It wasn’t necessary to confiscate the forks and knives. By then Jaffa had turned his attention to new feuds with other targets, and Berns was happy to pass the bull’s-eye on his back to Allan Bloom, Robert Bork, Chief Justice William Rehnquist, and Justice Antonin Scalia.
Epic academic feuds are common, but are often about trivial or obscure matters. It is a mistake to explain the Jaffa-Berns quarrel as an example of the narcissism of small differences, or still less the simple pride or one-upmanship typical of most academic fights that have little consequence in the real world. But the differences between Jaffa and Berns and their allied camps that seem abstract or remote on the surface are connected to a serious question, perhaps the most serious political question of this or any time: What kind of country is America? What is the right or best basis for patriotism? Is democracy capable of being understood and conducted nobly? Above all, can these questions be answered without recourse to pondering deeply the nature and condition of the human soul?
Product details
- Publisher : Encounter Books (February 21, 2017)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 296 pages
- ISBN-10 : 159403883X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1594038839
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 1.3 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,190,001 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,142 in Nationalism (Books)
- #3,875 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- #9,030 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Overall, this book is a very funny treatment of the author's professional mentors, and the book is an attempt to reconcile these disagreements by a student who knew and loved both men. The author's writing style makes the subject matter come alive with humor and wit. The tome begins with a discussion of the two rival personalities. I cannot remember a book introduction that made me laugh out loud, but this one did. I was taking the book around the office to read portions to my office mates. Here is an example. From when professor Jaffa was selected as part of a jury pool, and was asked by the lawyer what he thought of expert psychiatric testimony, to which Professor Jaffa replied: "Anyone who would put credence in the testimony of a psychiatrist ought to have his head examined." Great!
I am sure the media / educrat / propaganda minsters will try to lower the ratings on this book. Be sure to check if the review is based on a verified purchase. Don't be misled -- this one is worth reading. If you are tired of surface treatments of important subjects, and want to really get a ringside seat into the minds of some great thinkers, this book is for you.
The book's most important purpose is to show that patriotism must be grounded in both reason and the passions--the mind and the heart. Though America is certainly based upon philosophical truths which are accessible to anyone with reason, America is also a nation made of up citizens who must be capable of a certain level of self-government. This is especially important today for both liberals and conservatives--the former who without a trace of irony ground patriotism upon such flimsy concepts as diversity and the latter who tend to think America is an idea simply.
Hayward has written a important volume that should be on the bookshelf of every patriotic American.






