The Phantom Public (Library of Conservative Thought) 1st Edition
by
Walter Lippmann
(Editor)
|
Walter Lippmann
(Editor)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
ISBN-13:
978-1560006770
ISBN-10:
1560006773
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Only 9 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
More Buying Choices
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Lippmann's clear exposition of the simple truths of democratic politics offers an excellent example of the value of carefully fashioned political theory to the undestanding and practice of governing. . . [The Phantom Public] serves as a much needed caution to public officials that effective leadership cannot be based on the swirling currents of public feeling."
—Robert Heineman, The University Bookman
About the Author
Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) was the author of many books on political thought and was widely considered America’s most distinguished syndicated columnist. In addition to being awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, he won two Pulitzer Prizes for his newspaper column “Today and Tomorrow,” which appeared in the New YorkHerald Tribune.
Start reading The Phantom Public on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Routledge; 1st edition (January 30, 1993)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 244 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1560006773
- ISBN-13 : 978-1560006770
- Item Weight : 9.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5 x 0.51 x 8 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,746,653 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #28 in Medical Home Care (Books)
- #1,685 in Media Studies (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.9 out of 5 stars
4.9 out of 5
14 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on June 25, 2016
Verified Purchase
Very interesting read. Great insight and observations to consider when making political judgments. Lippman committed his life to political observer. Many questions in the book allow the reader to formulate their own opinion.
Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2021
Verified Purchase
An essential book for those interested in government, society, and the crazy ways in which they . It's aged like fine wine. Meow, I am not a cat
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2013
Verified Purchase
The book arrived on time and in excellent condition. This is one of series of reprints of books long out of print. I am grateful for that.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 27, 2005
Unfortunately this text is not nearly as popular as Lippmann's precursor work "Public Opinion". It's a classic of the elite nihilistic attitude towards the masses, astoundingly pessimistic, Lippmann puts into language suited for the very common person a total denunciation of that person's abilities. His logic is not very strong though on many occasions, such as when he goes on about how we are expected to make decisions about such and such one day and such other trivial matter the next... he oversimplifies to draw his sought after conclusions.
One should read this though to get a good grasp of how the elite members of government and media learned to treat the public.
One should read this though to get a good grasp of how the elite members of government and media learned to treat the public.
68 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 26, 2009
Lippmann is usually taken to be a pessimist about democracy. Those who see him this way (and perhaps that would include Lippman himself) fail to consider that Lippmann's diagnosis of the failed citizen and his convincing argument that the citizen simply lacks the inclination and capacity for genuine democratic participation is most convincing only if people consider big, centralized and increasingly intrusive government as an inevitability. It isn't. Further, those who consider it an inevitability generally argue that it is so because it is a necessity. Society, they argue, has become so complex and intertwined and thus delicate that decision making must by necessity be in the hands of those who can recognize and handle its complexity. In other words, experts. This is the view that justifies dictatorships of the proletariat, a talented tenth and bureaucracy. Further, starting from the pretense that people are bad decision makers, those who actually govern the society need to be isolated from the democratic process. If society is to be managed, it must be managed without having to answer to all the fools clamouring for the irrational through their legislative representatives.
The idea things are so complex that ordinary men can't really govern reminds me of the Hobbesian notion that people are inherently corrupt and driven to abuse power for their own unseemly purposes and thus we need to concentrate power in the hands of a monarch. In other words: all people are corrupt, so let's give total power to a person.
The real folly is not that the ordinary citizen is too ill informed to manage society; the real folly is that people are capable of being well informed enough to manage much more than their own lives. Just as the average citizen can't really vote rationally on complex matters involving untold numbers of people and circumstances, so the planner cannot really understand, much less actually know, all of the information needed for a truly informed decision.
In other words, the more complex a society becomes, the more simple and limited its government must become. People are not rendered incapable of governing; they just need to have their input limited to their immediate set of circumstances. Here, their decisions won't always yield the results anticipated, but they are certainly in a better position to know why.
Thus, the idea that Lippmann's view of the democratic citizen to effectively manage the United States is depressing only if you think that it can't manage itself. It can. It's called a free market. As for the people's voice in government, they remain perfectly capable of directing state and local governments towards desirable ends. What Lippmann really proves it that the anti-Federalists were right. Local government governs best.
"Average" people can govern the children's schools, the local police - but, the real point evaded by both Lippmann and his critics is that people can govern their own lives quiet well and experts know infinitely less about the consequences of policy on an individual's life than the individual does.
In other words, Lippmann's critics suffer the same fatal conceits they accuse Lippmann of having: an elitist presumption of knowing what's best for people they don't even know and a refusal to entertain letting people run their own lives for fear that the results would actually be good and thus give visible evidence of the superiority of free markets and human liberty and forever condemn statism to the ashheap of history.
The idea things are so complex that ordinary men can't really govern reminds me of the Hobbesian notion that people are inherently corrupt and driven to abuse power for their own unseemly purposes and thus we need to concentrate power in the hands of a monarch. In other words: all people are corrupt, so let's give total power to a person.
The real folly is not that the ordinary citizen is too ill informed to manage society; the real folly is that people are capable of being well informed enough to manage much more than their own lives. Just as the average citizen can't really vote rationally on complex matters involving untold numbers of people and circumstances, so the planner cannot really understand, much less actually know, all of the information needed for a truly informed decision.
In other words, the more complex a society becomes, the more simple and limited its government must become. People are not rendered incapable of governing; they just need to have their input limited to their immediate set of circumstances. Here, their decisions won't always yield the results anticipated, but they are certainly in a better position to know why.
Thus, the idea that Lippmann's view of the democratic citizen to effectively manage the United States is depressing only if you think that it can't manage itself. It can. It's called a free market. As for the people's voice in government, they remain perfectly capable of directing state and local governments towards desirable ends. What Lippmann really proves it that the anti-Federalists were right. Local government governs best.
"Average" people can govern the children's schools, the local police - but, the real point evaded by both Lippmann and his critics is that people can govern their own lives quiet well and experts know infinitely less about the consequences of policy on an individual's life than the individual does.
In other words, Lippmann's critics suffer the same fatal conceits they accuse Lippmann of having: an elitist presumption of knowing what's best for people they don't even know and a refusal to entertain letting people run their own lives for fear that the results would actually be good and thus give visible evidence of the superiority of free markets and human liberty and forever condemn statism to the ashheap of history.
60 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
BWB
5.0 out of 5 stars
Important text at the start of neo-liberalism
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 23, 2019Verified Purchase
Not that I agree with anything he's saying, but this is a founding text in the mindset that gave rise to neo-liberalism's opposition to government by the people in favour of government by the market. Read it alongside Lippmann's Public Opinion.
Bruce Mullen
5.0 out of 5 stars
Lippmann tells it like it is
Reviewed in Canada on January 16, 2016Verified Purchase
Lippmann tells it like it is, warts and all, in the most readable, clear, beautiful prose imaginable.
His thoughts on the almost possible task of making the so called democracies function as they all claim to, particularly the USA, is so wise, so correct, so heartbreaking. It never will be explained better. 56
His thoughts on the almost possible task of making the so called democracies function as they all claim to, particularly the USA, is so wise, so correct, so heartbreaking. It never will be explained better. 56
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1







