Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Philosophy and Real Politics Hardcover – August 17, 2008
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
"[Geuss's] intention in Philosophy and Real Politics, his short, sharp new book, is . . . to introduce a note of realism into contemporary philosophical debates about justice, by force if necessary."--Adam Kirsch, City Journal
"A manifesto for a new political philosophy. . . . Geuss's realist proposal brings forcefully to the contemporary political discussion the idea that philosophy is an engaged discipline, both in the sense of engagee, of directly speaking to the political issues of the day, and in the sense of having its own historical cultural commitments firmly in view."--Katerina Deligiorgi, The Philosopher's Magazine
"Philosophy and Real Politics is an impressive and provocative essay on contemporary Anglo-American political philosophy theory."--Christoph Konrath, Law and Politics Book Review
"[G]iven the current trends in political philosophy, Geuss's book is both timely and extremely important. One of Geuss's many virtues as a political philosopher is his ability to effectively confront philosophical complacency, and this superb book is surely successful in this regard."--David Sherman, Social Theory and Practice
"A slim, devastating critique of the flight towards abstraction and pristine idealism in contemporary liberal political thought--a path led by the late John Rawls. Geuss's work deserves to be far better known."--Sunil Khilnani, Outlook India
From the Back Cover
"In this new study, Raymond Geuss mobilizes the strength of analytical philosophy to subvert the theoretical premises of contemporary political philosophy. He replaces its fixation on ideal norms and its abstraction from real confrontations with an orientation toward contexts of action and a rigorous concentration on the importance of political power. It is fascinating to see the result: a political philosophy that is once again a kind of intellectual craft, historically situated and locally engaged."--Axel Honneth, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt
Raymond Geuss is the most sophisticated and subtle philosopher who takes seriously the tradition of critical theory. His critique of formal political philosophy--including in neo-Kantian philosophy like that of the late John Rawls--that shuns the crucial roles of power, historical context, and political action is powerful and persuasive. This grand text is an intellectual breath of fresh air."--Cornel West, Princeton University
"Raymond Geuss's short, brilliant, and provocative book forces on political philosophers questions that we often prefer not to raise, let alone answer. Geuss takes seriously the disturbingly untidy character of many political transactions and the dangers of idealized abstractions. His ruthlessness toward Nozick and Rawls is in striking contrast to the attitudes of most of their critics. And Geuss lives dangerously, prescribing remedies drawn from Lenin, Nietzsche, and Weber that may have unpredictable side effects."--Alasdair MacIntyre, University of Notre Dame
"This is a small gem of a book. With his other recent work, it establishes Geuss as a unique voice in political theory. Not everyone will find his arguments persuasive, and some will doubtless take offense, but there is something interesting, perceptive, and thought provoking on every page. It will stir debate."--Glyn Morgan, Harvard University
"There is much to learn from and disagree with here. This book is vigorous in its arguments, displays an impressive historical sweep, and on several occasions gets in the perfect skewering criticism."--Leif Wenar, University of Sheffield
Top Customer Reviews
In the West that I inhabit, our political discourse is polluted with half-baked stereotypes and cynicism. Guess approaches this dangerous swamp and does what analytic philosophers do best, which is stop and ask, "Hey, what are we really talking about here?" I firmly believe that this is always a useful exercise. Fortunately, Guess also makes it an enlightening and enjoyable one.
Now for a little futurism: I say this book is a sign of the times because I believe that contemporary philosophy (especially political philosophy) is moving into a new era. The long, paralysing, and divisive postmodern era is coming to an end. Anti-Kantian, realist thought is emerging in both Continental and Anglo-American philosophies in response to the pressing realities of politics and the continuing radical evolution in technology and the natural sciences. Now is an excellent time to do just what Guess has done here, which is to attempt to define the terms of the debate.
[Readers should also know that Princeton University Press has posted the introduction from this book online.]
I have two basic objections:
1. The book could have been reduced to a long, easy to read essay of twenty or thirty pages instead of inflated into a small book of 102 pages.
2. As it stands, it reads more like a summary of a graduate seminar or political philosophy conference than a book for general readers.
I imagine that the author himself would agree with me and, in fact, that it was the publisher 'who made Geuss do it' in hopes of selling some books.
I wish I could refer the general reader to a New York Review of Books book review of the book but I can't find one.
Guess's ideas are perennial but, unless you have unlimited funds, check this book out of your local university library, and even then be prepared to skim over a lot of ahems and umms.
Still, as I said, Guess makes the only sense out of the modern political scene that (alas?) it is possible to make and I have no criticism of the content, only the form.
First, politics is not a kind of applied ethics. Political agents have values and beliefs but what they actually act might not mean they act on values and beliefs they hold. There is constant flux and fundamental indeterminacy in values, thought, desire, and action in human life.
Second, politics is an exercise of a craft or an art. Political agents exercise skills or political judgment in a flexible way in response to a given circumstance with the result that action can be enhanced or facilitated. Accordingly, politics should be context dependent and historically located.
Third, politics is about "Who Whom" or "Who does what to whom for whose benefits". It is concerned with agency, power, and interests and the relations amongst these. Studying politics with complete absence of taking the influence of power into account can lead to deficiency and ignorance.
Fourth, there is no single ethics such as justice, equality, and fairness which possesses uncompromising priority and can be universally applied to all political agents. Individuals have intuitions and common sense which consists of constrains on actions and ideal goals to be pursued but they have different priorities over all political and moral values.Read more ›