For me, for better and worse, there has almost always been D&D.
In a sense, Dungeons and Dragons has been grafted by doing it, Lamarck-like, into my DNA. Though I haven’t played it since I was 15, and though I think it a flawed and problematic stew of player self-aggrandizement and referee rule-mayhem, I can’t escape it. It’s family. Like a deranged grandfather who refuses to die, but whose life story basically makes me, qua me, possible, I am a descendant of D&D.
I probably first set my hands on the “basic set” of D&D within a year of its publication in 1977. In a box with flimsy game manual, strange dice, and a few odd geomorphic maps, this thing came into my hands full-born. Why bother where it came from? This was when I was no older than 12, after all. That’s too early for genealogy.
The key tacit assumption of my game-playing experience, grown from a life in playing and refereeing role playing games is after all that, whatever I think about it, because I lived it from earliest age, D&D is a thing without history. Indeed I know it to BE history. After D&D comes everything I find more interesting or challenging, games of imagination from the table top horrors of Call of Cthulhu to the digital worlds of Fallout. D&D’s presence in the world APPEARS, in this sense, self-explanatory.
D&D was, when I came upon it, a handful of tools, which I first took out for creative test-work, accompanied by a willing band of equally unprepared friends. These would propel me to some of my strongest and warmest, and certainly most long-lasting, personal relationships. It would also afford me creative opportunities that surely would not have thrived in the absence of such an imaginative toolset. D&D was the first push towards a life in the empathetic arts in a sense, a discipline I recognize in my passive struggling appreciation for theater and cinema today, but also as I actively pursue them as a social scientist, speaker and writer. This is because D&D is not simply a call to ego (which it is) but a call to empathy (which it became). The magic of D&D isn’t simply that you pick up a sword in your mind and slay things, but that the person you occupy in the process has aspirations, however primitive and acquisitive in nature, and the ability to LEARN and ADVANCE.
This is way beyond folk-story telling. It’s something new. It was THIS that would be bequeathed to its better and more sober descendants: a GAME where ANYTHING was possible and the details would be sorted out as you go. A game where story-telling allowed the fantasist in you to live, for a while, in the skin of another person… and live not just a moment, but the hints of a full life, with failures that continue to haunt you and successes you brag about later.
As a referee (or “GM”), D&D gave me the opportunity to write worlds and richly entertain those who entered them. It is the perfect game from someone who would later become a failed playwright. That I would adopt – and later help to invent - whole new worlds of role-playing games, matters little. What matters, is that there was ALWAYS D&D. Despise it, revere it, reflect on its impact on my development as a person, it always WAS.
But of course: it wasn’t. Not always.
Jon Peterson’s “Playing at the World” takes this last revelation seriously.
If D&D at some point wasn’t, then it wasn’t inevitable. While human beings have been role playing since they marched out of Africa, early fire users did not set aside their Thursday nights with a set of formal rules to adjudicate their fantasies and folk tales. They didn’t throw dice to tell a story. And surely, even if they had, they wouldn’t pick a Tolkien-addled, but judiciously balanced, system for experiencing imaginary worlds.
Only D&D would do that… and so late in our civilization’s history. It simply can’t be taken for granted… it MUST be explained!
Flight may have been inevitable in the development of human technology, after all, but the rise of the bicycle, and its most adventurous engineers, are no small part of the trip from an Ohio garage to Kitty Hawk. The details matter about both the innovation, and to understand the habits of the technology that would both hinder and advance human beings in the air for decades. The same thing goes for the weird adventure of inventing role playing games. Why 1970? Why fantasy? What game technologies made it possible or hindered its advance? In the absence of serious history, it’s simply impossible to answer these questions.
Enter Jon Peterson.
Peterson’s book, an intense and lengthy work of bizarre and doting historical effort, seeks to do the following:
1) Explain why D&D, in its first formulation, appeared as it did, when it did.
2) Explain why the game emerged to simulate fantasy (i.e. Tolkien-esque) adventure, rather than some other imaginative world.
3) Explain why the rules of that game would take the (arguably problematic) forms that it did
4) Explain why it found an immediate and willing audience when, for all purposes, such a game had never meaningfully existed before
The answers that Peterson provides are a labyrinth of history, geeky detail, and exhaustive analysis of a mail-based social world. Should you read it? I dunno. I did; 632 pages later, I’m not sure I understand any better my own relationship to role play, though I do better appreciate its fabulous novelty… the sense that it is a contingent rather than necessary product of middle class history. As such, it makes me better revere its innovators.
So what does the book actually try to do?
Taking a studiously historical approach to the history of D&D, Peterson’s book limits its explanation to only this: explaining the existence of the 1st edition 3-book publication of D&D in 1974, along with its most immediate supplements (i.e Blackmoor, Greyhawk, Eldritch Wizardry, and Gods, Demi-Gods and Heroes) ending around 1975.
In the process, Peterson refuses to use later reflections or oral narratives to sort the facts (i.e. stuff someone says Gary Gygax told them one time at a convention). Instead, he burrows into the deep history of the hobby, mostly using the sprawling record of fanzines that filled the gaming community network in the 1960s. Only primary written narrative would suffice in Peterson’s effort; half-remembered conversations were ignored.
This means Peterson distances himself from the dark wrangling over ownership and copyright, along with crisis in ownership and the solvency of key firms, which emerged in the late 1970s and early 1980s. All Peterson wants to explain is why D&D exists, on its own historical terms, not that of people who contended its legacy afterwards. The book is meticulously footnoted and fastidiously documented.
The implications for this approach are that Peterson does nothing more or less than explain the product that I laid my hands on in 1978.
And he does so convincingly. In the process, he leaves the tumultuous history of role playing games that would FOLLOW in the late 1970-s and 1980s, from The Fantasy Trip to Runequest to Call of Cthulhu, to another author. His interest is GENESIS, and so he goes deep into the genetic code of gaming itself, starting with nothing less than the creation of Chess in ancient India (!) but mostly focusing on wargames of central Europe, table top miniatures of the 1950s and 60s, and gaming conventions in the early 1970s.
As such, Peterson makes the history of D&D a study of the history of wargaming, because D&D is so closely tied to the kreigspiel of German pre-modernity, that even a casual player would have to be stubborn not to recognize D&D’s “to hit” tables from the innovations of table top German impresarios of the 1700s. This game’s roots are in places most role players would only recognize when seeing them in exacting detail. Peterson paints such portraits of detail by plumbing apparently incongruous genealogies, poring over the minutes of clubs dedicated to naval wargaming, the Society for Creative Anachronism (!) and of even stranger communities of fantasy immersion. This is a book of history, which rises and falls on the tedium and insight that footnotes provide the diligent reader. This is not the screed of a casual fan or a kiss-and-tell about dysfunctions of the industry: it’s a meticulously detailed blow-by-blow about the birth of the modern role-playing hobby.
The book is broken down into a largely non-chronological set of chapters as a result. In chapter 1, Peterson reveals all you need to know about an especially eager upper Midwest gaming community in the US to demonstrate that D&D is an outgrowth of a small and widespread geeky international tribe, but centered on a very local set of wargaming people in Lake Geneva and Minneapolis. In Chapter 2, he provides us as good a history of fantasy fiction as you are likely to get in a succinct 120 pages. That account should make you recognize that “fantasy”, a novel creation in itself, was the most likely setting for any early role play. Chapter 3 explains how the rules of D&D emerged, and in the process provides one of the best single histories of wargaming I have ever read. It provides a lovingly detailed history of German kreigspiel and a brief survey of America’s troubled Avalon Hill. Chapter 4 muses on the very emergence of a game set around roles and character immersion, with some interesting antecedents in games like Diplomacy and the experiments in Game Theory being advanced for nuclear conflict at the RAND corporation.
There are important epilogues and other details but basically… that’s it… the book’s incredible and startling detail is located in four lengthy empirical chapters.
Revelations of note:
1) Peterson toys with a great many definitions of D&D and role playing but never does better than with the words that: “ANYTHING CAN BE ATTEMPTED… The advisability of an attempt is another thing…” Those words come from the rule book David Wesley’s Napoleonic war rules “Strategos N” written in 1967, but they are rooted in 18th century freeform kreigspeil traditions that rely heavily on a referee to adjudicate a free-flowing situation. Surely this is the core of any role playing game worth a damn…. Anything can be attempted…
2) D&D comes from the world of tabletop miniatures but probably never used them in its initial years at all, largely resting on paper and pencil adjudication until AFTER the lead figure industry caught up with demand.
3) “Fantasy” fiction – in its swords and sorcery version - turns out to be about as historically deep as the NFL. If it weren’t for Conan, and the various intellectual pirates who rewrote him over the decades, this brand of fiction would not precede Tolkien by very much. On the other hand, Lovecraft is given due in Peterson’s book not just for content but for innovating a mode of publishing that ALLOWED modern fantasy to emerge after Dunsanay.
4) The early emergence of a meta-game beyond the dungeon, where players could build castles, throw parties, hire henchmen, and count their spoils between adventures. Long before D&D formally existed, it was realized that the lives of characters OUTSIDE the dungeon is the only thing that made their advancement INSIDE especially interesting.
5) The tension between Monty Hall gaming and the “Tomb of Horrors” (whose specific genesis is hinted at in early Gygax monstrosities as Gencon). The balances between unchallenging, rewarding and punitive experiences are timeless ones, and rest at the very birth of the hobby.
Minor revelations are so many that I dare not attempt to cover them all. But for me, the interesting nuggets included:
A) The importance and persistence of H.G. Wells detailed rules for battle with miniature soldiers
B) The troubled history of table-top miniatures as a simulation in official military circles
C) The importance of Diplomacy as a wildly popular international play-by-mail phenomenon prior to the internet.
D) The importance of naval wargaming (a major area of innovation for David Arneson prior to D&D) for the roots of Hit Points and other fussy systems in play
E) The sad history of the family of Wilhelm von Tschischwitz, originator of many of the basic concepts of wargaming we know now (Combat results tables!)
F) The early struggle between systems that would distinguish being affected/damaged from how much one is affected/damaged.
But for those interested in these kinds of weeds… you’ll just have to read the book, which is as dense as it is physically heavy (I couldn’t find a digital copy).
Finally, the book emphasizes several timeless quarrels that anyone who has played games will recognize:
1) Realism versus playability, an argument known to early modern table-top generals in 18th century Vienna as much as it is to Euro-game advocates versus grognards at Origins in Ohio every year
2) Simulating versus being the character in a role playing or game, the implications of which haunt anyone who has tried to play someone stupider or smarter than they are.
3) Tension between homebrew innovators and game creators and sellers, including the welcoming and rejection of game innovations by fans and their relationship to “official” rules sponsored by capitalist and for-profit companies.
4) Having or not having a referee. This tug-of-war is so old it sits at the very roots of arguments in wargaming centuries ago.
Should you read this monster? Most fantasy readers will LOVE chapter 2, which chronicles the rise of the Gray Mouser and Conan and the rest of that stuff. Game geeks among us will certainly enjoy Chapter 3, as I did, because it shows the deep history of gaming itself. Chapter 4 is perhaps the least accessible part of the history, with its meditation on the other forms of “role play” that were brewing in the 1950s and 1960s. Ironically, only a very few of us may actually find the main topic of the book itself interesting: why does D&D exist?
But, as I’ve tried to stress, it’s that last question alone that can open windows onto more interesting explorations. We can only learn how our hobby ticks if we make the following assumption: it might not.
Then where would we be?
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
About the author
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 12, 2013
- Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2012
Top reviews from other countries
- GUILLAUMEReviewed in France on July 29, 2024
Masterpiece. must read for any RPG/wargame fan
-
- harlandskiReviewed in the United Kingdom on December 18, 2012
An excellent history of D&D
-
CAPITAN GARFIOReviewed in Spain on April 8, 2014
Los origenes de Dungeons & Dragons y mucho mas.
