- Paperback: 258 pages
- Publisher: Contemporary Books (February 2000)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0809226022
- ISBN-13: 978-0809226023
- Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
- Shipping Weight: 12.8 ounces
- Average Customer Review: 4 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,473,630 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Playmasters: From Sellouts to Lockouts-An Unauthorized History of the Nba Paperback – February, 2000
See the Best Books of 2017
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the best books of the year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
The goal of The Playmasters is two-fold: to explore the evolution of the NBA from the dusty gyms of the pre-TV George Mikan era to the razzle-dazzle, MTV-paced, in-your-face, overmarketed thrill show that spun around Michael Jordan, and then to examine how the league has come to find itself balanced precariously on a ledge created by its own success and hubris. The NBA might cry foul at the charge, but sports lawyer Eldon L. Ham keeps muscling in with an argument that names names and scores points.
The NBA has evolved from humble beginnings into an 800-pound gorilla, Ham writes, "a sports macrocosm of money, marketing, collusion, show business, and--above all--a swarm of id-driven egos racing out of control in what appears to be a reckless quest for self-identity." And he's not just talking about the players. He's talking about what he calls the playmasters--Commissioner David Stern, owners like Jerry Reinsdorf and Ted Turner, agent David Falk, the Nike juggernaut, even television. Through fine reporting, analysis, and anecdotal detail, Ham suggests all have succumbed to their own arrogance and plotting, conspiring to create an economic and ethical nightmare of outrageous fortunes, equally outrageous behaviors, and a fan base applying for second mortgages just to afford their seats. This is strong stuff, but basketball may need a few solid elbows to bring it back to reality--and sporting health--in the post-Michael, post-lockout era. --Jeff Silverman
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Now, the bad. The man is a Chicago homer with a capital "H." He tries to tell the history of the NBA from 1979-1998 and he tells it from memory, and his memory is lacking. In two chapters, I found 9 errors. For instance, on page 120 while recalling the 1991 finals, he said, "back in Chicago for the fifth game." The fifth game was in L.A. The Bulls had home court advantage (and he correctly refers to the series opening in Chicago), and the finals' format is 2-3-2, instead of the 2-2-1-1-1 played in previous rounds. Another error is on page 122, while talking about the 1993 playoffs, he says "Meeting last season's finalist Lakers in the first round, the Suns had their work cut out for them..." The Lakers were finalist two seasons before. The season before, they were defeated in the first round Portland went on to the finals. A more serious error can be found on page 130, where he talks about the Clyde Drexler trade to Houston, he says, "Clyde would play 35 games for Houston...complementing Olajuwon, Vernon Maxwell, Otis Thorpe (who only played in 36 games), Kenny Smith, Robert Horry, Sam Cassell, and Mario Elie." This shows that he was probably looking off something like a Sporting News NBA Guide. Otis Thorpe only played 36 games because he was traded for Drexler!!! Drexler did not complement Thorpe in Houston, he supplanted him. This style of analysis is common, as you see him refer to a team as strong, citing players on the roster, yet some of the players were minor contributors at that point in their careers (for instance, Eldon Campbell on the 1991 Lakers...and no, he wasn't using this line in context of the finals, where Campbell had a very good game 5).
He also tries to use Chicago teams (Bears, Cubs, Bulls, Blackhawks, White Sox) to illustrate points. He screws some facts with them, also, claiming that Bears assistant coach Buddy Ryan was fired (he took another job) and that linebacker Wilber Marshall and Bulls coach Phil Jackson were "dumped" (Jackson resigned and Marshall signed as a free agent). He even makes this error in non-Chicago teams by saying that Shaquille O'Neal was "shipped off to the Lakers" (p. 132), when in reality, O'Neal left as a free agent, and Orlando tried desperately to re-sign him.
While in the middle of his Bulls-love fest, he claims comparisons of the 1996 Bulls to great teams (and he lists some, from the 1960s Celtics, to the 1986 Celtics and 1987 Lakers) are unfair, yet he goes on to compare the 1960s Celtics and try to spell out an argument why the Bulls are better. He refused to compare them to the other teams he mentioned (perhaps because the Bulls are obviously inferior?), and disagrees with most experts opinions that the 1996 NBA was a watered-down league...of course, he tries to argue this on a 1960 vs. 1996 platform, instead of a 1986 to 1996 platform (must be hard justifying that one).
He also writes these passages unprofessionally, referring to the Bulls' players as "Michael", "Scottie", "B.J.", etc, instead of by their last names, as he does other players from other teams. He also takes multiple digs at Jerry Krause, sounding just like too many Bulls fans who think Krause did nothing right and Michael Jordan won in spite of him.
Furthermore, he depends too heavily on individual stats to base team judgments, usually players in the top 10 of a statistical category, while not realizing that defense cannot be measured on a stat sheet and that stats are not all-telling.
In these aspects, he comes across as a very unknowledgeable "expert." Instead, he comes off as an Ahmad Rashad clone. Fortunately, his ignorance is only flaunted in four chapters, out of 18. After spewing off his twisted recollection and love for "da Booolz", he goes back into what he does best: legal analysis, and covering the alleged conspiracies in the NBA. He concludes with the "sins" of the NBA, and he hits most of these on the head.
If you tear out 4 chapters of this book and read it, it is an excellent book. As it stands, because of its uniqueness, it's still very good. If not for the 4 chapters, this book would be 5-star quality.
For further information about how, when and why the NBA along with the NFL, NHL and American and National Leagues in MLB, became prominent and successful sports organizations in the U.S., see "American Sports Empire: How the Leagues Breed Success." Published by Praeger Publishing in 2003, this book documents how member teams, franchise owners, team players, the media and various government entities have collectively contributed to the progress and wealth of each sports league in the twentieth century. After reading "American Sports Empire," sports fans, team administrators, owners, coaches and players, and business journalists and historians will appreciate the significance and role of professional sports as a component of the culture in American society.