Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Polar Bears: Outstanding Survivors of Climate Change Paperback – December 31, 2016
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length56 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateDecember 31, 2016
- Dimensions8 x 0.14 x 10 inches
- ISBN-101541139712
- ISBN-13978-1541139718
Popular titles by this author

Fallen Icon: Sir David Attenborough and the Walrus DeceptionSusan J CrockfordPaperback$10.68 shipping
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (December 31, 2016)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 56 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1541139712
- ISBN-13 : 978-1541139718
- Item Weight : 6.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 8 x 0.14 x 10 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,773,750 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #459 in Biology of Bears
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Top reviews from other countries
As she, and many others, have since explained, she is certainly not the only scientist to have fallen foul of the "consensus" fiction, and will certainly not be the last, alas. More recently she was instrumental in demonstrating - via her knowledge of the behaviour of other Arctic mammals - that the "Our Planet" documentary producers, along with the narrator, David Attenborough, were distorting facts yet again. The world desperately needs real scientists to be allowed to do real science, unconstrained by the threat of losing their jobs.
L'ours polaire étant devenu pour le grand public la victime surmédiatisée du réchauffement climatique, les thèses de l'auteure s'accordant avec celles des "peuples premiers" mais pas avec les thèses majoritaires chez les autres scientifiques, celle-ci a été mise à l'index.
Je suis bien incapable de trancher dans cette controverse mais cette mise à l'index me semble mal venue et une mauvaise façon de la trancher d'autant que les arguments de S.J. Crockford n'ont rien de farfelu et que quoi qu'en dise Le Monde ou certains censeurs, elle est une spécialiste de la question et une paléozoologiste réputée. Ce n'est pas de cette façon que les sciences pourront progresser.
Je recommande donc vivement la lecture de cet ouvrage.
I have really read this without bias since it was the first book I had read on polar bears before going on a polar bear trip to Canada. (It was not the last book.) So I could not assess the facts presented at the time, only the way it was written, and it showed all the warning signs of bad science writing. It shows an impressive list of references in the back, but does not directly reference them in the text, 'for better readability'. Seriously? That's what footnotes are for, so that readers can fact check what the author is saying without interrupting the flow of language for those who don't. No first year student would get away with this for the first paper she hands in, you show where you take the data from, discuss differring opinions, and explain your own opinion - that's science writing 101, for scientific publications as well as for a broader audience. Mrs Crockford presents facts out of context, and framed in a different context.
Her final argument that polar bears are fine with climate change is pathetic at best. Warmer climate means less sea ice, seasonal ice as well as permanent, which means less habitat. Also, bears are deeply affected by the late arrival of seasonal ice. If you read this book as a layman, as I did, you have no way to check what is true in it and what isn't and what is a true fact framed in a misleading context. If you want to see how climate warming affects polar bears, go to Hudson Bay in Manitoba and watch the bears waiting longer and longer for the sea ice, ask the locals about it, and ask them about the average number of cubs they see with their mothers. You will hear that bears have to wait longer and longer, which means going longer without food, and that the number of cubs is now usually one, not two, showing that mothers would not be in good enough shape to sustain more (delayed implantation depending on the mothers state).
As for the wonderful numbers that polar bear population is up? They were nearly extinct due to merciless overhunting, so claiming they are thriving now is like arguing that war is good for people because populations rebound after the war. 25000 is NOT a lot for a species of such a range, specialisation, and subpopulations.
Finally, I have read in old newspaper articles that Mrs. Crockford was receiving a monthly check from a climate denying un-think-tank. I can not assess if it's true or false, but it's clearly a no no for any scientist that wants to be taken half seriously.
And, finally finally, her rant on polar bear scientists working in the field with the bears is a bit strange. Doesn't it help to understand animals if you spend time with them and watch them?


