- Paperback: 444 pages
- Publisher: Oxford University Press; 1 edition (June 3, 2016)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0190464135
- ISBN-13: 978-0190464134
- Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 1.1 x 6.1 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 4.9 out of 5 stars See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #728,761 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries Are Better Than Others at Science and Technology 1st Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Featured Springer resources in biomedicine
Explore these featured titles in biomedicine. Learn more
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
"[A] highly readable, well-documented, and well-argued contribution to the literature on comparative economic development, which many readers may find interesting and thought provoking."
--Journal of Economic Literature
"[A] well-written and exciting book that I read cover-to-cover as if it were a detective novel...The book is written for a very wide audience, for both scholars and laymen, both professors and policymakers. His knowledge of the literature, and of the history of science and technology, is commendable."
--Journal of Social Policy
"Taylor provides an excellent survey of current debate over the challenges of sustaining national innovation and adds the usefulness of a new empirical measure to the debate. Using an increasingly common approach among political scientists, he argues that leadership in national innovation depends upon the difference between external economic and military threats and internal political and economic tensions. Quite accessible for undergraduate and graduate students."
--R. B. Emmett, James Madison College, Michigan State University
About the Author
Mark Zachary Taylor is an Associate Professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology. With a background in strategic consulting, he specializes in international relations, political economy, and comparative politics. He has published research in Foreign Affairs, Security Studies, and Harvard International Review. Taylor holds a PhD in Political Science from MIT, an MA in International Relations from Yale, earned a BA in Physics from UC Berkeley, and attended university in Japan.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
Taylor’s answer, easily stated but robustly defended in close and detailed arguments, is that nations are prepared to pay the price, deferring comforts and investing in research, if they are in a state of “creative insecurity”. This requires a country to perceive external threats as more pressing and important than the politics of internal tension.
Taylor argues that far too many policy-makers assume that innovation is a black box, into which a state pours money, waiting expectantly by the exit valve for patents and innovation to come tumbling out. As his title implies, politics is a vital consideration in the way that innovation is funded, assessed and implemented, with Taylor offering as one example the old proverb about the four blind men feeling an elephant. All of them are observing quantifiable elements of the animal, but in academic terms, none of them are citing each other. They are ignorant of the discoveries being made elsewhere – their own hang-ups and blind-spots are preventing them from getting to the task in hand, which is understanding the elephant in the room.
The topic, of course, is a minefield of potential triggers for racism, triumphalism, imperialism, and misguided cultural relativism – even the opening question, of why some states are better at innovation than others, is open to abuse by demagogues and bigots, leading Taylor to predict and pre-empt mis-uses of his conclusions. He is swift to point out the likely abuses of his data, starting with the suggestion that the best way to run a successful science and technology policy is to scare citizens into believing their country faces a threat from Evil Foreigners. In fact, argues Taylor with touching faith, people are not liable to be that stupid, at least not for long, and an informed population will soon see through a manufactured bogeyman. He points out, more hopefully, that there is no reason for the external threat to be human – a state is just as liable to make leaps in invention and innovation if it embraces the challenge of, say, coping with climate change.
He also has some compelling things to point out about the environment most likely to foster creativity. Taylor has no truck with the suggestion that some races are just dumber than others, discounting data from third-world countries that have more pressing subsistence priorities than, say, semiconductor research. His remaining data presents a persuasive picture of those countries that spend on scientific and technical development, and those countries that reap quantifiable rewards from doing so. The two data sets are not exact matches, and his argument focuses on possible reasons for this discrepancy.
Hollywood-style, nobody knows anything. Taylor considers the likely elements of randomness that turn some research exercises into “Easter egg hunts” with unclear objectives and unpredictable returns. But he also considers the likely effects of such strange attractors as military funding, a definite contribution to innovation in his native United States, but no longer in Russia, despite the latter country’s still-large arms budget.
Taylor’s conclusions are immediately applicable in the modern world. In fact, they are so applicable that he is prepared to conclude with predictions for the likely national success stories, disappointments and close calls on the international stage in the next two decades. He has good news for Finland and Japan… bad news for Russia and Saudi Arabia. With such careful argument and confident suggestions as can be found in his book, one suspects that he will not be in academia for long, as true politics is likely to come calling.