Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Buy Used
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Text appears unmarked. Moderate wear to dust jacket.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

In Praise of Hard Industries: Why Manufacturing, Not the Information Economy, Is the key to Future Prosperity Hardcover – September 9, 1999

4.3 out of 5 stars 15 customer reviews

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
New from Used from
"Please retry"
$12.26 $0.16

Ace the ACT.
Wiley Architecture, Construction, & Design Sale
Save up to 40% on select architecture, construction, and design guides during August. Learn more.
click to open popover

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

The supertanker is the image that has come to symbolize America's economic might over the last decade--rock solid and steady. Low inflation, high productivity, and a booming stock market have combined to help create one of the most prosperous periods in American history. But Eamonn Fingleton would argue that this ship is steering the wrong course, and that lurking just below the waterline are some troublesome leaks.

Fingleton argues that American business is sacrificing its once valuable manufacturing base in favor of the new economy, or postindustrialism--an umbrella under which he includes the service, software, information, and entertainment industries, among others. While he writes that he does not seek to dismiss the merits of postindustrialism--although he calls the financial-services industry a "cuckoo in the economy's nest"--Fingleton finds fault with the new economy in three areas: the mix of jobs it produces, its slow income growth, and the fact that postindustrial activities don't export very well. At the same time, he believes that modern manufacturing has become wrongly associated with low-wage or stagnant economies--Japan, in particular, which, he argues, is not the basket case that many believe it to be. At the heart of Fingleton's argument is the idea that postindustrial activities are relatively easy to pursue compared to manufacturing, which requires much more capital and know-how but offers far more upside in the long run. His prescription for revitalizing manufacturing includes boosting savings, directing much of it into industrial investment, and instituting a trade policy designed to allow manufacturing to thrive in the United States.

While Fingleton's dour assessment of the new economy seems overdone, his basic argument about the relative worth of manufacturing is well articulated. In Praise of Hard Industries is a good contrarian read for policymakers, managers, and anyone interested in a different view of both the U.S. and Japanese economies. --Harry C. Edwards

From Publishers Weekly

A former editor of Forbes and the Financial Times, Fingleton ably articulates a contrarian thesis, arguing that manufacturingAnot America's "postindustrial economy" based on services and information technologyAis best equipped to deliver high wages, low unemployment and a bedrock for future prosperity. His scathing, selective tour of the U.S. computer, financial services and entertainment industries turns up colossal waste, puny exports, mismanagement and hype. Noting that, since the dawn of the computer revolution in the early 1970s, America's rate of growth in productivity has actually fallen, Fingleton suggests that the Internet has done and will do remarkably little to benefit the U.S. economy. He joins a diverse band of critics of laissez-faire globalism, including James Fallows, Patrick Buchanan and Jerry Mander, adding his own unique slant on East-West relations and manufacturing conditions. He contends that, contrary to Western press reporting, Japan is not an economic basket case, but is instead an affluent dynamo poised to challenge the U.S. for global economic leadership (a theme he set forth in his 1995 book Blindside). Bolstered by close analysis and chock full of intriguing examples of manufacturing triumphs and untapped opportunities, Fingleton's sobering report deserves close scrutiny by CEOs, labor leaders and policy makers.
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.

The latest book club pick from Oprah
"The Underground Railroad" by Colson Whitehead is a magnificent novel chronicling a young slave's adventures as she makes a desperate bid for freedom in the antebellum South. See more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; First Edition edition (September 9, 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0395899680
  • ISBN-13: 978-0395899687
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.6 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (15 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,436,692 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

By James B. Brinton on March 14, 2002
Format: Hardcover
Fingleton's book has been out for a while now (it is March 2002 as I write) and the new economy has indeed proven to be a mirage, as he forecast. Interestingly, the key review of this book was from the Industry Standard, a new economy magazine which was forced to close. Its reviewer says: "Economic success continues to flow to nations with advanced manufacturing bases. And what looks like a sustained boom for information-based economies will in the end turn out to have been a mirage." He should have told his publisher. So--Fingleton is a prophet, right on the money, yet this insightful book has been largely overlooked. Too bad, because it could have saved investors billions if taken seriously, and it still should be on the reading lists of policy makers in NYC, DC, and Silicon Valley. I can't praise this book strongly enough, or its author.
It is now mid-2004 and Fingleton's book is still on target. Over the past four years, additional forcing factors have weakened the US economy: Outsourcing of manufacturing and -- increasingly -- service-sector jobs (weren't those supposed to be 'our future'?); tax cuts which have led to socio-economic polarization, huge amounts of federal borrowing (mostly from abroad), and a national debt that now appears difficult or impossible to retire. Meanwhile, our trade deficits have grown as our own ability to manufacture and satisfy our domestic needs has declined, just as Fingleton said they would. See Fingleton's most recent book, Unsustainable, for major insights into this. We would do well to remember that no nation is proof against failure; none of the great ancient or modern empires survive today, and most died because of failures of insight or leadership.
Read more ›
1 Comment 20 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
I've lived in Japan for over 5 years and worked in both the manufacturing and sales/marketing side for a technology company. I also speak and read Japanese. I know this culture - particularly the aspect that Japanese are both proud of and recognize as vital to prosperity - manufacturing, or, to include the craft trades, "thing making".

Reading "In Praise of Hard Industries" had me cheering, out loud sometimes. This guy hits it right on the head on every single aspect and effortlessly argues away the myths that Americans like to cling to as the economy falls into ruin - the viability of America's "service economy", superior American creativity, American wealth - all illusions that persist because Americans aren't educated enough or in the right way to be able to see the flimsiness of the financial channel commentators' arguments.

Were's so far out of the game in manufacturing technology - both in terms of skill and mindset - that I don't know if we can ever get back in. Throw on top of that the skills in market resesarch and product marketing and sales and the prospects look even worse. Japanese companies have honed all these razor sharp and are super competetive. And our measures would certainly be complicated by the fact that the strong penetration of Japanese companies into our country as *employers* brings them strong political influence within our own borders. It's the Trojan Horse! But whatever the measures, we have to start with an honest discussion of the facts - a look in the mirror, a wakeup call. This book, along with Fingleton's others and his website, are just that.
Comment 16 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
Fingleton's illuminating and detailed study takes a practical and anecdotal look at some of the New Economy's accepted wisdoms. Are we really in a boom economy. Many residents of the First World take that as a fact with little evidence from their personal lives. In many cases middle income families are working longer and harder to maintain their living standards. They work much harder than their parents but without the same job security and benefits. Big winners seem to be of windfall gains in a bloated and increasingly fragile stock market.
Nothing is more central to the vast expectations of the post industrial economy than those associated with software, telecommunications or financial services, which form its bulwark. Fingleton's analysis clearly shows that software is inherently transitory and unstable. Telecommunications is touted as a vehicle for a vast expansion of consumer markets, yet as became painfully clear in the dot.com collapse, there is little proof of that potential. Gambling and porn remain the internet's most profitable commodities. Financial services has devolved into deregulated boutiques speculating in exotic currency and equity instruments, in markets trading at unheard of multiples and expansion. All these 'industries' employ a specific type of intellect and skill set, which might apply to a highly educated 20% of the labour force. Nothing is reviled more than the old 'rust' belt industries in the free market ethos. Steel, ship building, textiles, that can offer capital intensive high technology enterprise integrated into well payed, labour intensive associated manufacturing are disappearing from the First World's economic arsenal.
Read more ›
Comment 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews