- Hardcover: 296 pages
- Publisher: Oxford University Press; 1 edition (March 4, 2004)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 019515679X
- ISBN-13: 978-0195156799
- Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 1.2 x 6.3 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,674,241 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Preaching Eugenics: Religious Leaders and the American Eugenics Movement 1st Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
"Quite aside from the intellectual and religious arguments that Rosen canvases, her book offers a panoply of colorful personalities (many of them appear in portrait photographs) that help to show how eugenics was sold to the public. The minibiographies of the eugenics star, so to speak, help to make this an enteraining as well as an instructive work of scholarship." --Magill's Literary Annual
"Preaching Eugenics is not simply revealing history, but an insightful commentary on contemporary debates."--Claremont Review of Books
"...this book takes an important first step in grappling with the role that religious leaders during the twentieth century played in public discussions concerning the regulation of childbirth."--American Historical Review
Browse award-winning titles. See more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top customer reviews
There are problems with this book.The main problem is to be so weak, about the eugenics' fall.And there are some half-trues on this book.To example, on page 19:"Numerically, rabbis' participation in the eugenics movement was far lower than Protestants, but they were nonetheless, a significant presence, especially during the 1920s."
The author doesn't tells us, that nazism was the force broking the eugenics movement in USA, during the 1930s.American eugenics movement really fell in 1930s, but this happended because of Hitler, not because of rabbis or bible followers.
About adventist's founder, Mrs. Ellen G. White, there's just a line, almost nothing, about her link to a doctor.In fact, she was an eugenist and of course, a racist too.
As I told you, the main problem of this book is to be so weak, about eugenics' fall.
In fact, eugenics didn't fell.
Eugenics just exchange its name, from eugenics to mathusianism and then, to its new name today:ecology.Just new masks for the same thing:racism, prejudices, politics, stupidity,etc.
How linked are religious eugenists from the past, to religious abortionists of our times?This book has nothing, about this link.
Until the eugenics' fall, this book is good, but about eugenics' fall, it is very weak.
Even so, this remains a regular to good introduction, about this subject.
The relation between science, religion and morality is extremely important and the eugenics movement, which sprang up almost in concert with Darwin's Descent of Man, (the founder of eugenics was Darwin's cousin, in fact) represents just how wrong they can all go. The book makes the point that if the Depression had not happened, forced sterilization of the "degenerate" may be accepted practice to this day, as it was by the late 1920s.
A few points, though.
First, I have no idea why the previous reviewer, Perry, repeatedly mentions Victoria Woodhull, since she nowhere appears in this book.
One flaw that I found disappointing is the complete absence of any discussion of race in this book. Only by outside reading have I been able to confirm that eugenics was at its core thoroughly racist.
Another is that the only clergy mentioned are of a liberal bent -there is little sense of how eugenics was received by more mainstream or conservative Christians. Unlike what the previous reviewer reports, there is no point in this book at which the eugenic debate is portrayed as like today's abortion/anti-abortion movement -the supporters seem all to be liberal and educated, and only one mention is made of fundamentalist opposition -and that was in opposition to compulsory sterilization, not to the essentially racist and classist nature of eugenics.