Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Presidency of Andrew Johnson (American Presidency Series) Hardcover – October 17, 1979
Enhance your purchase
Johnson has always been an enigma: much is known about what he did, little about why he did it. He wrote few letters, kept no diary, and rarely confided in anyone. Most historians either admire or despise him, depending on whether they consider his Reconstruction policies right or wrong. Castel achieves an objective reassessment of Johnson and his presidential actions by examining him primarily in terms of his effectiveness in using power and by not judging him—as most other scholars have—on moralistic or ideological grounds.
The book begins with an overview of America at the end of the Civil War and a description of Johnson's political career prior to 1865. Castel recounts the drama of Johnson's sudden inheritance of the presidency upon Lincoln's death and then examines how Johnson organized and operated his administration. Johnson's formulation of a Reconstruction policy for the defeated South comes under special scrutiny; Castel evaluates Johnson's motives for that policy, its implementation, and its reception in both North and South. He descries and analyzes Johnson's quarrel with the Republican-dominated Congress over Reconstruction, the triumph of the Republicans in the election of 1866, the president's frustrated attempt to remove Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton from office, his bitter dispute with General Ulysses S. Grant, and his impeachment by Congress. Johnson's impeachment trial is covered in detail; Castel explains how it was that Johnson escaped conviction and removal from office by the narrowest possible margin. The book concludes with a discussion of Johnson's place in history as judged by scholars during the past one hundred years.
This study sheds light on the nation's problems during the chaotic period between 1865 and 1869 and contributes a great deal to a much improved understanding of the seventeenth president.
- Print length272 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherUniversity Press of Kansas
- Publication dateOctober 17, 1979
- Dimensions6.25 x 0.75 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-100700601902
- ISBN-13978-0700601905
Frequently bought together

- +
Products related to this item
Editorial Reviews
Review
"It is a pleasure to welcome a book about Andrew Johnson to which the word ‘balanced’ can be fairly applied."—American Historical Review
"Castel’s interpretation is challenging. It is bound to be widely read and discussed."—Journal of American History
"A provocative account."—Historian
"Specialists will be intrigued by Castel’s interpretation. For everyone else, Castel’s clear, concise rendering of a tangled plot will be appreciated and admired. This book will undoubtedly become the standard short treatment of the period."—Library Journal
About the Author
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : University Press of Kansas; 4th Pr edition (October 17, 1979)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0700601902
- ISBN-13 : 978-0700601905
- Item Weight : 1.21 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 0.75 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,046,191 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,295 in United States Executive Government
- #4,680 in US Presidents
- #99,863 in United States History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I don’t envy anyone writing a biography of Andrew Johnson’s train-wreak of a presidency. There is little about the man that is sympathetic. Historian Albert Castel, however, has done an admirable job in trying. He looks past Johnson’s flawed character to reveal a complex flesh-and-blood individual who overcame social disadvantages and through force of will rose to the top of American politics. Like Lincoln, Johnson had very little formal education. Unlike Lincoln, he was not a man of letters. He seldom corresponded nor kept a journal. As a result he left very little in the way of a paper trail and therefore not much to go on as to understanding his innermost thoughts. Johnson’s means of expression was in public speaking, especially in debating, at which he had few peers. Writes the author: “In debates he ‘cut and slashed right and left . . . running his opponents through and through with a rusty jagged weapon; chopping to mincemeat and grinding to powder his luckless adversary.’” This served him well at the state level, but would undermine his effectiveness as president. Johnson served one term in the Tennessee state legislature, five consecutive terms in the House of Representative, and as governor pushed through a law establishing Tennessee’s first public school system. He was a member of the U.S. Senate when the South seceded in 1861. He returned home in a vain attempt to stop Tennessee from doing likewise. Johnson’s valiant struggle won him the acclaim of the North. In early 1862, when Ulysses S. Grant drove the Confederates out of Tennessee, and at Lincoln’s behest, Johnson went to Nashville as military governor. His conduct so favorably impressed Lincoln that he made him his running mate in the 1864 election. Several months later, after Lincoln was assassinated, Andrew Johnson was sworn in as the 17th president of the United States.
The war had settled the question of Southern independence and had emancipated the slaves. But when, and under what terms would the Confederate states rejoin the Union? The Republicans controlled Congress but were divided over what the policy of Reconstruction should be. At first, everyone welcomed Johnson’s accession to the presidency, Republicans and Northern democrats alike. That changed, however, once Johnson’s Reconstruction policy became clear. He wanted to punish the South and hang “traitors” like of Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee, but backed off thanks to Grant’s intervention. Ultimately, he wanted to restore the Southern states and transfer the political power from the aristocracy of landed wealth to the democracy of “plebians and mechanics.” Where Johnson got in trouble was his failure to read the sentiments of most Northerners who favored basic civil rights for African Americans, including the right to vote. Historians agree that Johnson’s greatest political blunder was his rejection of the Civil Rights Bill of 1865, which destroyed public support in the North and in congress united moderates and radicals against him.
Whatever remained of Johnson’s credibility was ruined by an ill-advised speaking tour of Northern states in the summer of 1866. Known as the “Swing Around the Circle,” it was meant to establish a coalition of voters who would support Johnson in the upcoming midterm congressional elections. Whatever hope he had of creating public support was destroyed by his vitriolic and inflammatory speeches (“oratorical self-intoxication” the author calls it) and repeated confrontations with hecklers. As a result, the midterm elections led to veto-proof Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. The last straw was Johnson’s clumsy attempt to fire Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, who had been a thorn in his side since day one. Stanton had been a voice a reason in the Johnson Administration, a man Congress counted on for support of Reconstruction legislation. When word reached congress of Johnson’s repeated attempts to have Stanton replaced, the legislature responded with articles of impeachment.
As a summing of Johnson’s ill-fated presidency, the author quotes Civil War historian David Donald’s take on Johnson as a man who suffered from a “chronic lack of discretion,” who “lacked political sagacity,” whose “mind was immovably closed,” and who “played into his enemies hands” by his crude pugnacious conduct. At the root of that conduct was a blatant disregard for the civil rights of African Americans. As president, it poisoned nearly everything he did. Unfortunately for America, Johnson threw away a magnificent opportunity to achieve a reconstruction that would have been fair to North and South, black and white.
There are several reasons why I think this book stands out from the others which I read, or tried to read.
First, Castel tries to be objective. I have been reading books on the reconstruction period in order to understand what happened, and why events happened as they did. Unfortunately many authors judge historical figures by modern ethical standards, and some are blatantly trying to make a political point rather than trying to understand history. The racial polemics in the horrible "biography" of Johnson by Annette Gordon-Reed provide an extreme example. However, objectivity is particularly difficulty when describing the reconstruction period because race relations are an emotional political issue in modern times. A word like "racism" is emotionally loaded, and the term "African-American" is a modern political term; both are anachronistic and misleading when discussing society in the middle 1800s. Castel uses the terms "white superiority" and "negro" which lack the modern connotations and help to provide a more dispassionate picture of things as they were. As Castel points out on p. 224, at that time the vast majority of Americans, both north and south, regarded negros as inferior to whites. This is understandable since negros were emerging from a society of slavery, and most were uneducated and illiterate. The subsequent evolution of this "white superiority" attitude through the Jim Crow period and into modern racism is an important subject, but not relevant to understanding why events transpired as they did.
Secondly, some "biographies" include only Johnsons presidency, but, from my readings, I think it is impossible to understand Johnsons tenure as president without a description of his early years, i.e. a full biography. His experiences as a young man, and the reasons for his success in Tennessee politics, shaped his behavior as president. What worked in Tennessee obviously did not work for the country as a whole.
Thirdly, the final chapter on the evolution of attitudes toward Johnson was an excellent description of the evolution of racial attitudes through the early 1900s up to the time when the book was published (1979). Books in the American Presidency Series often have a chapter on historiography, which is one of the things I really appreciate about the series, but I found this one by Castel to be especially illuminating. Castel does take the opportunity in the final chapter to provide his own opinion on Johnsons successes and failures, and the reasons for them. I very much appreciate his effort to separate his personal opinions from the basic historical narrative.
Fourth, the book is relatively short because it deals primarily with the basic facts and the political motivations of the key players rather than devolving into rambling philosophical musings on social attitudes; the book by McKittrick is painful in this regard.
Finally, I would like to note that I thought the biography of Andrew Johnson on wikipedia was also excellent. It has all the things I look for in a biography, objectivity, biography of his early years (such as can be known from existing records), analysis of contemporary attitudes, description of his presidency, and historiography. I do not know who the author was but I highly recommend that biography as well as the one by Castel.


