Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-49% $14.91$14.91
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: RoseBookz
Save with Used - Very Good
$9.99$9.99
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Price of Politics Paperback – September 17, 2013
Purchase options and add-ons
Bob Woodward’s freshly reported, thirty-five-page Afterword to his national bestseller, The Price of Politics, provides a detailed, often verbatim account of what happened in the dramatic “fiscal cliff” face-off at the end of 2012 between President Obama and the Republicans.
Now it’s happening again. In fall 2013, Washington faces a new round of budget and fiscal wars that could derail the American and global economies.
“We are primarily a blocking majority,” said Michael Sommers, Speaker John Boehner’s chief of staff, summarizing the House Republican position.
It was the land of no-compromise:
On health care cuts over ten years, Boehner suggested to Obama, you are $400 billion, I’m at $600 billion. “Can we split the difference here? Can we land at $500 billion?”
“Four hundred billion is it,” Obama replied. “I just can’t see how we go any further on that.”
After making $120 billion in other concessions, Obama pleaded with Boehner, “What is it about the politics?”
“My guys just aren’t there,” Boehner replied.
“We are $150 billion off, man. I don’t get it. There’s something I don’t get.”
The Price of Politics chronicles the inside story of how President Obama and the U.S. Congress tried, and failed, to restore the American economy and set it on a course to fiscal stability. Woodward pierces the secretive world of Washington policymaking once again, with a close-up story crafted from meeting notes, documents, working papers, and interviews with key players, including President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner. Woodward lays bare the broken relationship between President Obama and the Congress.
- Print length497 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateSeptember 17, 2013
- Dimensions6.13 x 1.25 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-101451651112
- ISBN-13978-1451651119
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

Similar items that ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
"A very revealing, insightful book." --Sean Hannity, Fox News, "Hannity"
"Required Reading" --Elizabeth Titus, Politico
"A highly detailed dissection of the debt-limit negotiations. ... A remarkable achievement. ...Woodward, being Woodward, digs deeper and draws more out of the protagonists than anyone else has." --Jeff Shesol, "The Washington Post"
"Almost every bookshelf in the U.S. capital holds a thin volume called "13 Days", Robert F. Kennedy's account of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Memo to Washington: Make room on those shelves for Bob Woodward's latest behind-the-scenes book, "The Price of Politics", which might as well have been called "44 Days". The centerpiece is a riveting account of the tedious negotiations to reach a 'grand bargain' on the federal budget." --David M. Shirbman, Bloomberg Businessweek""
"Bob Woodward, in characteristic fashion, does his competitors one better by filling in blanks and providing even finer detail." --Miranda Green, "The Daily Beast"
"Groundbreaking" --David Gregory, NBC's Meet the Press
"Takes us inside the room once again." --Charlie Rose
"Fabulous book and great reporting." --Norah O'Donnell, CBS This Morning
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The lavish dinner at the Capital Hilton Hotel in downtown Washington on the evening of Saturday, March 11, 2006, was about the last place you would expect to find him. But there was Barack Obama, age 44, the junior senator from Illinois for only the last 14 months, in formal white-tie with tails and very much at ease in the crowd of 600. His trademark smile, broad and infectious, dominated his face as I met him for the first time.
We were at the annual Gridiron Club dinner—a rite of passage for national political figures such as Obama. The crowd included President George W. Bush and most of the major politicians in Washington. It was one of Senator Obama’s maiden voyages into the unsavory belly of the Washington beast. Bush was to speak for the Republicans, and Obama had been selected to speak for the Democrats.
Founded in 1885, the Gridiron—named because its motto was to “singe but not burn”—had the reputation of being an old-school event of in-jokes, skits and music that seemed more fitted to a bygone era.
“You’re from Wheaton, Illinois,” Obama said to me, referring, unprompted, to the small town where I was raised in the late 1940s and ’50s. Wheaton, 25 miles west of Chicago, is home to Wheaton College, best known for its alumnus evangelist Billy Graham, whose influence permeated the town.
“I’ll bet you didn’t carry Wheaton,” I said confidently, referring to his Senate race 16 months earlier. A bastion of Midwestern conservatism and country-club Republicans, Wheaton was the most Republican town in the country in the 1950s, or at least regarded itself that way.
“I carried DuPage County by 60 percent!” Obama responded, beaming that incandescent smile. Wheaton is the county seat of DuPage.
I said that seemed utterly impossible. That couldn’t be the Wheaton or DuPage I had known.
Obama continued to smile me down. The certainty on his face was deep, giving me pause. Suddenly, I remembered that Obama’s opponent for the Senate seat had been Alan Keyes, the conservative black Republican gadfly. Keyes had substituted at the last minute for the first Republican nominee, who withdrew from the race when divorce and child custody records revealed that he had taken his wife to sex clubs in New York, New Orleans and Paris.
“Well, everyone who runs for office should have Alan Keyes as their opponent,” I said, trying to hold my ground.
Obama smiled some more—almost mirthful, yet unrevealing. The conversation turned to Illinois politics, and Obama ticked off the areas where he had strong support—Chicago, the labor unions—and weak support, downstate and the farm areas. He defined the categories skillfully, expanding on the state’s interest groups and voting blocs. He made it clear he knew where he had work to do.
He sounded like a graceful old-fashioned pol. Though he had carried DuPage by 60 percent, he had won 70 percent of the statewide vote.
His wife, Michelle, stood by his side in a stunning gown. But the focus and the questions from people crowded around were all directed at the dazzling new star.
• • •
When he appeared at the podium several hours later, Obama stood perfectly erect, projecting radiant confidence.
“This is a true story,” he said.1 “A friend sent me a clip about a new study by a psychologist at the University of Scotland who says sex before a public speaking engagement actually enhances your oratorical power. I showed this clip to Michelle, before we arrived here tonight. She looked it over, handed it back and said, ‘Do the best you can!’ ”
The laughter ignited instantly.
“This appearance is really the capstone of an incredible 18 months,” he said, citing the keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention in 2004, cover of Newsweek, a best-selling autobiography, Dreams from My Father, a Grammy award for reading the audiobook. “Really what else is there to do? Well, I guess . . . I could pass a law or something.”
The self-deprecation played well.
Referring to Senator John McCain’s positive treatment by the press up to that point, Obama said, “Some of my colleagues call John a prima donna. Me? I call him a role model. Think of it as affirmative action. Why should the white guys be the only ones who are overhyped?”
The self-awareness played smooth.
Noting the speculation that the 2008 presidential campaign could come down to McCain, a maverick Republican, versus Senator Hillary Clinton, he said, “People don’t realize how much John and Hillary have in common. They’re both very smart. Both very hardworking. And they’re both hated by the Republicans!”
This played bipartisan.
Obama turned toward President Bush, who was on the stage nearby. “The president was so excited about Tom Friedman’s book The World Is Flat. As soon as he saw the title, he said, ‘You see, I was right!’ ”
The joke played confident.
“I want to thank you for all the generous advance coverage you’ve given me in anticipation of a successful career. When I actually do something, we’ll let you know.”
The audience clapped and hooted in delight.
After dinner the buzz was like a chain reaction. Not only could this young Obama tell a joke on himself, with the required self-effacement, but he had remarkable communications skills. An editor at The Washington Post once said that journalists only write two stories: Oh, the horror of it all, and Oh, the wonder of it all. Obama was the wonder of it all that night and he basked in the attention he had captured. Rarely have I seen anyone manage the moment so well. He had frankly and forthrightly trumpeted his lack of accomplishment, and the roomful of egos ate it up. But if he had done nothing much so far, why was he there? Why the buzz? The approbation? What exactly was being measured?
It was the dramatic impact he was having on his audience. The triumph was the effect.
Twenty-five years earlier in 1981, I had attended a Gridiron dinner where the speaker for the Democrats was Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the bookish intellectual who had served in prominent posts in both Republican and Democratic administrations. Moynihan, then 53, made some good jokes, but his theme was serious: what it means to be a Democrat. The soul of the party was to fight for equality and the little guy, he said. The party cared for the underdogs in America, the voiceless, powerless and those who got stepped on. It was a defining speech, and the buzz afterward was that Moynihan was going to be president. He wasn’t, of course. That was then, this was now.
Obama had not once mentioned the party or high purpose. His speech, instead, was about Obama, his inexperience, and, in the full paradox of the moment, what he had not done.
Two and a half years later, he was president-elect of the United States.
Product details
- Publisher : Simon & Schuster; Reprint edition (September 17, 2013)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 497 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1451651112
- ISBN-13 : 978-1451651119
- Item Weight : 1.25 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.13 x 1.25 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,431,426 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,148 in Political Parties (Books)
- #1,863 in United States Executive Government
- #2,978 in Economic History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Bob Woodward is an associate editor of The Washington Post, where he has worked since 1971. He has shared in two Pulitzer Prizes, first in 1973 for the coverage of the Watergate scandal with Carl Bernstein, and second in 2003 as the lead reporter for coverage of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
He has authored or coauthored 18 books, all of which have been national non-fiction bestsellers. Twelve of those have been #1 national bestsellers. He has written books on eight of the most recent presidents, from Nixon to Obama.
Bob Schieffer of CBS News has said, “Woodward has established himself as the best reporter of our time. He may be the best reporter of all time.”
In 2014, Robert Gates, former director of the CIA and Secretary of Defense, said that he wished he’d recruited Woodward into the CIA, saying of Woodward, “He has an extraordinary ability to get otherwise responsible adults to spill [their] guts to him...his ability to get people to talk about stuff they shouldn’t be talking about is just extraordinary and may be unique.”
Gene Roberts, the former managing editor of The New York Times, has called the Woodward-Bernstein Watergate coverage, “maybe the single greatest reporting effort of all time.” In listing the all-time 100 best non-fiction books, Time Magazine has called All the President’s Men, by Bernstein and Woodward, “Perhaps the most influential piece of journalism in history.”
In 2018 David Von Drehle wrote, “What [Theodore] White did for presidential campaigns, Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward has done for multiple West Wing administrations – in addition to the Supreme Court, the Pentagon, the CIA and the Federal Reserve.”
Woodward was born March 26, 1943 in Illinois. He graduated from Yale University in 1965 and served five years as a communications officer in the United States Navy before beginning his journalism career at the Montgomery County (Maryland) Sentinel, where he was a reporter for one year before joining the Post.
Photos, a Q&A, and additional materials are available at Woodward's website, www.bobwoodward.com.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the information in the book great and relevant. They describe the narrative as fascinating, interesting, and suspenseful. Readers praise the journalistic quality as fantastic and well-told. They describe the book as high-quality, fair, and intelligent. However, some customers feel the leadership is problematic and inept. Opinions are mixed on readability, with some finding it great and well-written, while others say it's tedious at times and repetitive.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the information quality of the book great, relevant, and remarkable. They say it's well-researched, full of substantiated details, and intelligent reporting. Readers also mention the book provides invaluable clues regarding conversations, actions, and motives of many politicians.
"...If one reads this carefully reported, and painstakingly unbiased , book with a basic understanding of our nation's dire fiscal straights, the reader..." Read more
"...However, his book, The Price of Politics, shows fine work on a very complicated subject. It's good! It's an easy read, well documented...." Read more
"...The book is well-researched and simply written in narrative form so the reader has a fly-on-the-wall view of the Budget Control Act of 2011..." Read more
"...I was surprised that he seemed more reasonable and less ideological in the book. Similarly, I was surprised and impressed with Joe Biden's role...." Read more
Customers find the narrative quality fascinating, excellent, and disturbing. They say the background is compelling, suspenseful, and revealing. Readers also mention the book horrifies and explains the ins and outs of the process.
"...The story is harrowing. The serious national issues continue to fester...." Read more
"...a writing style that reads quickly and effortlessly, and it is very interesting to hear some of the "inside stuff" of what actually goes on in these..." Read more
"...An excellent and disturbing book." Read more
"...Fast paced, very suspenseful , well written by Mr Woodward. I kept hoping the almost agreement and conflict would end differently...." Read more
Customers find the journalistic quality of the book excellent. They mention it's well-documented, well-told, and a display of fantastic reporting skills and sources. Readers also appreciate the fine, well-sourced political narrative and in-depth interviews. They say the author has a good idea of insider narration, and great investigative journalism.
"...He is an excellent researcher and reporter. You can pretty much count on what you read is true...." Read more
"I found the book fascinating and a display of fantastic reporting skills and sources. The amount of "first hand" information was remarkable...." Read more
"...and gives us a factual, interesting, well documented and extremely well told insight into the world of "the ruling class" in America and how they..." Read more
"...Gives a great look at our national politics, and the specifics of this historic failure...." Read more
Customers find the book high-quality, fair, and intelligent. They say it's well-sourced, balanced, and unbiased. Readers also appreciate Woodward's sources and depth of knowledge.
"...If one reads this carefully reported, and painstakingly unbiased , book with a basic understanding of our nation's dire fiscal straights, the reader..." Read more
"...of the affair here, but will say that they seem reasonable and unbiased with plenty of blame to go around...." Read more
"The previous reviewers ere right: Woodward gives us high-quality, fair, and intelligent reporting of last year's budget-is-policy negotiations, but..." Read more
"...refreshing to see a journalist write a book that is very thorough and unbiased. He lets the "cards fall where they may"...." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the readability of the book. Some mention it's great, well-written, and engaging. Others say it's tedious at times, repetitive, and convoluted.
"...Woodward's book is an excellent read for those who truly want to understand the depth of our problems, and a balanced look at a disfunctional..." Read more
"...To me, who has been in the crucible, it's great reading! There is NO doubt about its being factual...." Read more
"...story this way is designed to demonstrate that Obama does not possess the proper skill set...." Read more
"...The book is well-researched and simply written in narrative form so the reader has a fly-on-the-wall view of the Budget Control Act of 2011..." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the look of the book. Some mention it's fascinating and well-presented, while others say it's surprisingly unimpressive and less compelling than Woodward's recent books.
"...As well-detailed as this book was, it was ultimately superficial and wonky at the same time...." Read more
"...If you can follow the action/negotiations, it's compelling, frightening, maddening." Read more
"...However, this book seems rushed, insubstantial, and lacking the substantive details that the subject requires...." Read more
"...Doesn't anyone keep their mouth shut? This book is a fascinating inside look at the political process and shows why the people in Washington can't..." Read more
Customers find the leadership in the book problematic. They say the president is inept, feckless, and amateurish. Readers mention there's incompetence in the government.
"...The president doesn't take the lead. His habit is to LECTURE the members of Congress and the Senate on why HE is right and THEY are wrong...." Read more
"...The government is broken because the President does not know how to neogitate or to do politics...." Read more
"...It was revealing, partisan political theater...." Read more
"...First is an obviously inept executive, when a new president, inaugurated just a few days before and enjoying enormous public goodwill, is unable to..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
There are lots of (sometimes tedious) details in Woodward's account of this widely dramatized time in our history, but the reader must open the book with the understanding that that economics and fiscal matters are, by their very nature, dry. While savvy readers will relish the detail, many readers might be overwhelmed expecting something closer to Cable TV's 3-minute "analysis" of villains and victims. (Did you ever wonder how Rachel Maddow, who praises government stimulus while standing proudly in front of the Hoover Dam reconciles her big-government economic views with her ecological sensibilities and protective instincts regarding the endangered Snail Darter ?)
The problem is that our politicians and the electorate want simple solutions to what are complex and long-standing problems, and the voters (and, based on some of the low-rating reviews, apparently some of Woodward's readers) don't want to take the time to consider the messy details.
It is much easier for our politicians to decry their foes as mean, stingy, or even "racist" if they can convince the populace to disregard the fact that we are spending money that we don't have, and have no hopes of raising.......ignoring the very real problem that the US government is borrowing 40 cents of every dollar we spend.
For example, it is more dramatic for cable TV "reporters" to repeat charges that the Republicans are conducting a "war on women" when Paul Ryan questions the long-term fiscal sustainability of promising things like unlimited access to "free" birth control . It is too difficult to have an honest debate about the proper way to deploy scarce resources, especially when political discourse has degenerated into name-calling. They scream "Chauvinist ! Racist ! Hater !", but how about "prudent" or "fiscally responsible" or simply "mathematically competent" ?
The book takes us through the machinations of the debt crisis struggle (I won't dignify the process by calling it "debate" or a "negotiation")......and while lawmaking is often compared to sausage making (in that it is a disgusting, but necessary process), it becomes clear from Woodward's reporting that our President doesn't seem to want to get his hands dirty. Nor be bothered with details like an unsustainable fiscal path, made infinitely worse by his having added a fouth major unfunded/underfunded entitlement to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security - Obamacare.
If one reads this carefully reported, and painstakingly unbiased , book with a basic understanding of our nation's dire fiscal straights, the reader can only conclude that honorable men can not accept "compromise" of principle with those who don't recognize that there are very real, and very near, limits to our ability to continue to fund unrestrained spending.
This, despite our President's efforts to draw a preposterous linguistic, moral, and budgetary equivalence between "taking" from those who have produced wealth, and "giving" to those who have not. Admirable charity it may be, but "fair" and "sustainable' can only be in the eye of our irresponsible, and fiscally naive, Progressive politicians.
And this endless and mindless discussion of "taxing the rich" as a panacea for our problems , and the resulting demonization of those who refuse to throw their hard earned money down a socialist-dream rat-hole, is doing nothing to solve the country's problems. Fiscal conservatives are missing a huge opportunity to call the President's bluff and put an end to his divisive rhetoric. During the next debt-ceiling debate, they should say "Fine, we'll agree to raise taxes on the "rich" with the following caveat. Considering that Congressional tax increases always stick, and spending cuts are overturned by the next Congress, we'll raise taxes ONE YEAR IN ARREARS of your IMPLEMENTED spending cuts (not reduction in the rate of growth). That ought to fix less than 10% of our fiscal problem. Where's the rest of your plan , Mr President ? "
Woodward's book is an excellent read for those who truly want to understand the depth of our problems, and a balanced look at a disfunctional government. But don't let my review influence you. Read this book with a modicum of fiscal awareness, and an open mind, and the conclusions above are irrefutable.
the-wool" Ultra Liberal reporter, notwithstanding his stellar investigative achievement on the Watergate Affair, bringing down President Richard Nixon. However, his book, The Price of Politics, shows fine work on a very complicated subject. It's good! It's an easy read, well documented.
Being from Nevada, it was interesting and informative seeing and hearing from one of our most unique characters, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. This book may not be interesting to people who don't like politics. Many might lose interest in it. The book might also make you mad. Readers should definitely have at least a basic understanding of politics, like the three branches of government and how they are supposed to be independent, but, in the case of the House of Representatives and the Senate---work together and compromise for the greater good of the American people.
Woodward should be gratified that he has earned the trust of so many of his sources who opened up so many closed doors,with names, dates and places, to a vital legislative process: To solve the huge debt crises facing our country, which threatens to bring us to our financial knees. It was obviously a mutual trust.
We are witnesses through Woodward's keen reportorial skill, to a very combative process; under the guise of politeness. The Price of Politics ratifies the old adage: "If you don't like watching sausage being made---you don't want to see laws being created!"
It was evident that during Obama's 3 3/4 years in office, he felt he had to DOMINATE congress. Several passages refer to this fact, but it is so pervasive, it needs repeating: The most important thing/issue/result to President Obama during the endless planning, behind-the-scenes talks, meetings and sessions on the Budget and Debt Crisis was: HIS Re-election; according to Woodward, from his interviews. The biggest and most shameful surprise of all coming out of Woodward's research: After Obama drumbeat the promise of "transparency," "openness," "public involvement," in his bright new administration---one of the most IMPORTANT issues ever to face America in our lifetimes, was discussed NOT in committee hearings on
C-SPAN,but in SECRET MEETINGS.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV),and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, weren't even told what was happening; until it failed! Also at work was "The Gang of Six," An unofficial group of senators, three Democrats and three Republicans. They too were developing a Tax & Deficit Reduction Plan. Then there were Sen.Alan Simpson and Sen.Erskine Bowles, Co-chairs of the President's Official Fiscal Commission, whose plan got "lost" in the shuffle. A "Doomsday" scenario from its inception. The economic problems of the mounting Tax & Debt Crisis were being "solved" behind closed Doors with NO public meetings, committee hearings or public input! A process that has been indelibly ingrained in our legislative procedures for the past two-hundred years!
One of the most frustrating and recurring problems, during the months this book covers: after taking hours to negotiate a deal on some issue ALL parties would agree on. The next day, Eric Cantor, Virginia Congressman and House GOP Majority Whip, wrote in his notes---"It has been changed again!" The president rarely put anything in writing. The Democrats seldom put their proposals in writing. The Republicans most often would. The next day there would be MAJOR changes! Woodward had irrefutable proof that a great many of those changes were insisted upon by President Obama.
Why did this occur? President Obama's key, chief ultimate goal or result of any final agreement or bill---before he would agree to ANY concessions: It must contain---"Taxing the Wealthy!" "The Bush Tax Cuts must NOT be extended to THAT group!"
As we continue reading it may be true that only political activists will really enjoy this book. To me, who has been in the crucible, it's great reading! There is NO doubt about its being factual.
One key quote I had been searching for is the underlying "punch line" of the book. What Woodward found out. When he could ruminate on what message, if any, he could impart to the reader and the people of America, out of a very complicated and poorly understood subject--by the general public.
At one point Woodward commented, "It is increasingly clear that no one was running Washington." (Pg.313)
It is from one of Bob Woodward's many interviews with (GOP)Speaker John Boehner that some insight emerges. The Speaker's complaint--that here is NO outreach to the Majority (GOP) or to the Democrats, either. "There is NO outreach!" "The White House is dysfunctional!" (Pg.376)
Contrary to the constant flow of White House statements.
No Harry Truman's desk sign there: "The Buck Stops Here!" My words--C.P.author
CONCLUSIONS:
President Obama's method of leadership appears to be, letting others come up with the ideas, then he passes judgment on them. The president doesn't take the lead. His habit is to LECTURE the members of Congress and the Senate on why HE is right and THEY are wrong. He doesn't work well with other people. He has little or no use or respect for either the House Members or the Senators and at one point even cut Nancy Pelosi (still Minority Leader after being replaced as Speaker) and Harry Reid OUT of the process. Obama feels SUPERIOR to the Legislative Branch.
In comparing him with Ronald Reagan, with whom I am very familiar, RR kept his committments and practiced civility, courtesy, decorum, and honesty. Obama built NO bridges with the legislators. Both President Ronald Reagan and President Bill Clinton knew the value and importance of having both branches of government contributing something and working together! V.P. Joe Biden proved to be an asset in working with both Congress and the White House. The president seemed unable or unwilling to COMPROMISE, even for the good of the American people; no matter how many times he proclaimed he was attempting to do so.
Recommended reading! BUY THIS BOOK to read further REVELATIONS on who helped and who hindered the progress of this critical process.
Thanks again to B.W.
Top reviews from other countries
Many of the reviews on Amazon.com make similar criticism of Obama, as do many of the players in Woodward's book: Obama doesn't know how to negotiate, they say.
I disagree. It seems to me Obama was forced to negotiate with a bunch of Republicans holding by any standards prior to 2000 an extreme right wing position, who themselves felt hostage to the Tea party, a bunch of people who they said didn't care whether America defaulted all its debts, it didn't matter anyway. Presumably they felt the market was the only thing that mattered.
To me Obama did extraordinarily well in his refusal to compromise. He was after all dealing with the Republicans who to a man (not many women in this book) were not prepared to countenance the idea that the megarich should have to pay more than 28% tax to help the country nay world out of a jam. Even Obama's own people, some of them, like Reid and Pelosi seemed prepared to undercut him at times.
Woodward himself is quite critical of Obama in his brief judgment at the end, suggesting that if he had handled the Republicans more skilfully he might have got more out of them. To me that seems very unlikely. Someone towards the end of the book said the Republicans felt they needed to come out of the negotiations looking as if they had humiliated the president because that was the only outcome that would satisfy the Tea Party.
I don't agree with Woodward's opinions, but as always he does a great job of stating the play. The negotiations were incredibly protracted and tedious and you have to admire the stamina and resilience of all the players if not necessarily their motivation. However the things they were arguing about on day 25 were the same as day one, and as is often stated in this book it was all really just a game of chicken. At one point one of the politicos rings up the guys on Wall St., who were all having kittens, to say, "Chill, we're all just playing a game here."
Reviewed in Canada on September 19, 2020






