Buy new:
$23.83$23.83
$3.99
delivery:
Sep 21 - 25
Payment
Secure transaction
Ships from
KARAMAN58
Sold by
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Buy used: $10.34
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
72% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
66% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: The Deluxe Heirloom Edition (Quirk Classics) Hardcover – Bargain Price, October 1, 2009
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Spiral-bound
"Please retry" | $23.80 | — |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $7.09 | $7.95 |
Purchase options and add-ons
“It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.” So begins Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, an expanded version of the beloved Jane Austen novel featuring all-new scenes of bone-crunching zombie mayhem. This deluxe heirloom edition includes a new preface by coauthor Seth Grahame-Smith, thirteen oil painting illustrations by Roberto Parada, and a fascinating afterword by Dr. Allen Grove of Alfred University. Best of all, this limited special edition features an incredible 30 percent more zombies—via even more all-new scenes of carnage, corpse slaying, and cannibalism. Complete with a satin ribbon marker and a leatherette binding designed to endure for generations, this hardcover volume honors a masterpiece of classic zombie literature.
- Print length368 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherQuirk Books
- Publication dateOctober 1, 2009
- Dimensions5.53 x 1.16 x 8.23 inches
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Jane Austen isn't for everyone. Neither are zombies. But combine the two and the only question is, Why didn't anyone think of this before? The judicious addition of flesh-eating undead to this otherwise faithful reworking is just what Austen's gem needed." —Wired
"Has there ever been a work of literature that couldn't be improved by adding zombies?" —Lev Grossman, Time
"Such is the accomplishment of Pride And Prejudice And Zombies that after reveling in its timeless intrigue, it's difficult to remember how Austen's novel got along without the undead. What begins as a gimmick ends with renewed appreciation of the indomitable appeal of Austen's language, characters, and situations. Grade A." —The Onion A.V. Club
Review
<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:Cambria; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073741899 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Cambria","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria; mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->
<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:Cambria; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073741899 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:"Book Antiqua"; panose-1:2 4 6 2 5 3 5 3 3 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Cambria","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria; mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->
“A delectable literary mash-up…might we hope for a sequel? Grade A-.”
—Lisa Schwarzbaum of Entertainment Weekly
“Jane Austen isn't for everyone. Neither are zombies. But combine the two and the only question is, Why didn't anyone think of this before? The judicious addition of flesh-eating undead to this otherwise faithful reworking is just what Austen's gem needed.”
--Wired
“Has there ever been a work of literature that couldn't be improved by adding zombies?”
--Lev Grossman, Time
“Such is the accomplishment of Pride And Prejudice And Zombies that after reveling in its timeless intrigue, it’s difficult to remember how Austen’s novel got along without the undead. What begins as a gimmick ends with renewed appreciation of the indomitable appeal of Austen’s language, characters, and situations. Grade A.”
--The Onion A.V. Club
About the Author
Roberto Parada is a freelance illustrator whose work has appeared in Time, Esquire, Rolling Stone, and Sports Illustrated. A graduate from Pratt Institute, he has received awards from The New York Society of Illustrators, Communications Arts, and American Illustration. Mr. Parada is also a bone marrow transplant survivor.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
“Why would anyone add gratuitous scenes of violence, carnage, and cannibalism to one of the greatest novels of Western civilization? Somewhere in the nave of Winchester Cathedral, we imagine that Austen’s corpse, though presumably dead, must be rolling.”
“Provincial English readers understood that their world of genteel gallantry and tea parties was under threat by sweeping social changes and violent revolutionary forces.”
“Gothic authors frequently reworked existing novels with new and sensational supernatural machinery. And although zombies have been popular only in recent decades, their presence in Pride and Prejudice and Zombies makes explicit what Austen constantly implies: Elizabeth Bennet’s world of aristocratic gentility was under attack not just by fortune hunters like Wickham and fortune abusers like Lady Catherine de Bourgh, but also by larger and sometimes more violent and terrifying social and political forces.”
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
“Jason Rekulak was the only editor I’d ever worked with. So when I heard him say, ‘Hey Seth, it’s Jason,’ I knew something was up at once. This was the voice of a man possessed, a man struck by a lightning bolt of inspiration. That or he’d suddenly developed a raging OxyContin habit. ‘OK. . . . I just need you to listen,’ he began. Just listen, and tell me if I’m crazy. All I have is a title. It’s just a title—but I can’t stop thinking about it. Just promise me you’ll wait a minute before you say anything, OK?’ I promised. The next words out of his mouth were Pride and Prejudice and Zombies.”
“It’s worth noting that Jason Rekulak and I have yet to meet in person (ah, the Digital Age). When we finally do, I’ll shake his hand and thank him for that phone call. For his lightning bolt of inspiration. For the five words that changed my life. And then I’ll eat his brains.”
“After rereading the original, I re-reread it, making notes in the margins, jotting down ideas, and working out the logistics of weaving a zombie uprising into one of the most celebrated novels in the English language.”
“Eight months later, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies was an international best seller, and we all looked like geniuses. Best of all, the book was (mostly) well received. If there was any consistent criticism, it boiled down to ‘We want more zombies!’With this new edition, that’s exactly what you get. I’ve gone back and added new words, lines, paragraphs, and all-new scenes of ultraviolent mayhem throughout. There are also some incredible new paintings by Roberto Parada. Throw in a faux-leather binding and a new cover by Quirk’s Doogie Horner, and you’ve got yourself one helluva collector’s item or, at the very least, something with enough heft to be used as a weapon in the event of a zombie uprising.”
Product details
- ASIN : B005GNJJJO
- Publisher : Quirk Books; Deluxe edition (October 1, 2009)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 368 pages
- Item Weight : 1.3 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.53 x 1.16 x 8.23 inches
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Seth grew up in Connecticut reading Stephen King from a way-too-early age and forcing his friends to be in homemade horror movies. He’s written three New York Times Bestselling novels (and another one that kind’ve flopped but got good reviews). He occasionally writes or produces movies. The ones you like the most are probably THE LEGO BATMAN MOVIE and IT. He's currently working on a GREEN LANTERN series for HBO Max. Please stop asking him when it comes out. He’s a partner in Katzsmith Productions, a film and television company based in Los Angeles. He has a lovely wife, two fine sons, and two comically dumb dogs. Visit him at: sethgs.com
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
And I have to add these sexual innuendos, and he thinks to get a laugh. I groaned. @63% (Mr. Darcy has shot some zombies on Pemberley grounds while Elizabeth and the Gardiners are visiting.) “She remembered the lead ammunition in her packet and offered it to him. ‘Your balls, Mr. Darcy?’ He reached out and closed her hand around them, and offered, ‘They belong to you, Miss Bennet.’” Out of the blue – Really? And when Jane asks Elizabeth when she realized she was in love with Darcy “…I hardly know when it began. But I believe I must date it from my first seeing the way his trousers clung to those most English parts.”
Then must you additionally portray Mrs. Gardiner as having adulterous behavior? @ 64% “…she set off in quest of her former acquaintance, and (unbeknownst to the sleeping Mr. Gardiner) her evening was spent in the satisfactions of intercourse renewed after many years’ discontinuance.” Is this really necessary? It, again, adds NOTHING to the plot! The Gardiners have always been favorites of mine and I don't like to see this written of her.
There are so many WONDERFUL variations written in JAFF and if you want to use one with paranormal characters and stories I can easily find others which are not only the author’s own creations but also a better story line; not this man’s simple adding to the best of stories. Oh, I do know why a paranormal tale was selected by Hollywood: what with Twilight, Grimm, Vampire Diaries, Once Upon a Time, etc, being so popular but it seems the fact that this author wrote Tim Burton’s Dark Shadows simply gave him the connection and the Hollywood crowd took the easy way of finding a Jane Austen tale with paranormal shades.
Elizabeth in this tale is a different character: she refers to herself as the bride of death. And she has some grim thoughts when confronted by annoying or even bad behavior: thoughts of chopping off a sister’s head, of both cutting out Darcy’s heart and cutting off his head to present to Jane as revenge for how he separated Bingley from Jane.
The activity with the zombies does not provide a grand adventure, a teaming up of ODC to win a battle, but rather some occasional skirmishes: walking into Meryton, visiting a church, the Netherfield Ball, etc. our characters are beset upon by the undead and they use their skills to dispatch one and all. There is some argument about whether having trained in China or in Japan has provided the best Masters and there is also the matter of the architecture at Pemberley being rendered in the Oriental manner.
So do you have to read this book to anticipate the movie? NO. As most is Jane Austen’s canon you know what to expect. Way over priced as it is not creative at all.
Also, this book is illustrated! I enjoyed the art in it, even if some of the costumes depicted weren't completely true to the era, they were far more fitting for the level of fighting that was going on in the book.
If you mean to enjoy this book you have to take it in the spirit it was written in. Be prepared to laugh at over the top absurdness, far fetched plot lines, insatiable blood-lust, and super human abilities. And, we haven't even gotten to the zombies yet. Elizabeth and her sisters are warriors, trained in China to be sworn protectors of the crown of England and defenders of Hertfordshire in general and Longbourn in particular, Lady Catherine de Bourgh is a great and mighty warrior with a small highly trained army of ninjas at her command, and Mr. Darcy rides to the rescue with a Brown Bess and Katana at his side, ready to shoot and be-head any of Satan's servants that cross his path.
The ridiculous I can forgive, the disbelief that I had to suspend could be attained, almost always, but I have to say that there were times when the story went a bit too far even for the lark that this book was intended to be. There were also times when I wish that I was a trained ninja myself just so that I could karate kick the editor that did such a shoddy job on this book.
Normally I can forgive a typo here, an awkward sentence there, and even occasions where the author managed to forget what time and place he was talking about and so changed the name of it... once. All of these things happened far too often to be forgiven in this novel. There was an awkward sentence where some bad splice editing resulted in, "she would never see him again, on good terms again." What? Also the author was attempting to convey the great honor Mr. Darcy and his sister did to Elizabeth by visiting the day of her arriving and not the day after as originally planned. This was done by saying she would arrive the day after, saying she did arrive the day after and then saying afterwards that it was so nice of her to arrive the day of. What? And, finally, the place of Wickam's banishment was changed several times from Kilkerry to Kilkenny to Kilkerry to Kilkenny again. It's Kilkenny, by the way.
My other problem with the book is that the author clearly didn't comprehend the scenes he was editing. What was being said, why it was being said, or what was really going on in a given scene seemed to go right over his head. There were numerous examples of that throughout. Also during some scenes he wrote in stuff gratuitously just to satisfy what a modern day person would want to say or do in a given situation, not what would have been done in the times it was written, zombies not withstanding. Yes, we all wanted to blast Wickam when he came home to Longbourn with Lydia on his arm. Elizabeth had more wit and class than to actually do it, though.
But, other than that, if you are in for a book of silliness, zombies, and some old Pride and Prejudice favorites mixed up in a way that's sure to have Austen spinning in her grave then give Pride and Prejudice and Zombies a whirl. As long as you don't have high expectations you won't be disappointed.
Top reviews from other countries
In all honesty, I could eat alphabetti spaghetti and poop out a better novel than this.
Don't get me wrong, the book is alright, but that's it, it's just alright! And this is a real shame because this book could have been spectacular, a real twist on a classic, a fantastic merging of today's thirst for horror with yesterday's classic.
The writing is Jane Austen's with parts changed or adapted to fit in the zombies and it's cleverly done. You still the classic 'Pride And Prejudice' and you still get Jane Austen's style of writing. It's just been mashed up with a bit of horror. It's not even a bit of horror, it's less than that it's more like a speck of horror.
The problem I have with the book is that there isn't enough zombie action in it. Where is the blood and guts? I was expecting zombies to start feeding on Mr. Bingley's brains or dragging Mrs. Bennett off to their zombie lair by her legs. And ok, Charlotte Collins turns into a zombie and Mr. Darcy and the Bennett sisters are zombie slayers which is kinda cool, but still, the book could have been better. If you are going to mash up a classic like 'Pride And Prejudice' with load of zombies you might as well do it properly.
Darren Shan should have written this book, that dude knows what horror is! I can just imagine how awesome this book would have been had he written it.
So anyway, the zombies in this book are just a bit of a nuisance really, stopping people from travelling, dragging themselves around the countryside and affecting other day to day activities. But they don't cause wisdespread chaos. I was expecting 'I Am Legend' or something and all I got was a couple of zombies caausing a bit of an inconvenience. The zombies don't exactly jump out of the page at you and I certainly wouldn't say this book was scary.
And there are some good chuckles in it which makes the book quite fun but I wouldn't say it was laugh a minute.
So all in all, 'Pride And Prejudice And Zombies' is ok, it's alright but this book wouldn't be top of the list on my recommendations. I have read worse books.
Anyway I realise I've written mostly negatives, but actually this is a good book and I enjoyed reading it. If you like Austen and Zombies (or at least Austen and fantasy, as I do) then you're you'll have a good ride ... with the odd bump. So four stars.
Myself, however, loved this quirky interpretation. Seth Grahame-Smith made an excellent job of incorporating the prospect of a zombie threat into Austenesque times, and did so with flair. His biggest saving grace, as I'm sure most readers would agree, was to do very little in terms of character overhaul or writing style. With the exception of two or three characters, Smith did very little to change the actual outcome of most of the characters. And the improvisations he did make were most wholly welcome - in fact, dare I say, I preferred these certain circumstances better than the original novel (which I love!).
The fact that he didn't try to 'modernise' the dialogue or writing style was very clever and added authenticity to the story - if he'd tried to set the Bennets in some 21st century apartment complex, and provided them with some "chav-tastic" speeches then I would have downright refused to read it. Though a few veiled sexual references between Elizabeth and Darcy were downright hilarious, and not unwelcome.
I really did love this interpretation and would absolutely recommend it to anyone looking for a quirky, light-hearted version of a celebrated classic. You know, just in case your feeling too lazy for the original. Or would like a few more laughs!









