Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery 1st Edition

4.4 out of 5 stars 18 customer reviews
ISBN-13: 978-0521290388
ISBN-10: 0521290384
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Buy used
$18.50
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: This is a used book with no highlights & markings. Former owners name on inside cover. I want to thank you for looking at my item.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
40 Used from $4.00
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.
More Buying Choices
6 New from $34.00 40 Used from $4.00
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Prime Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


The Numberlys Best Books of the Year So Far
click to open popover

Editorial Reviews

Review

'For anyone interested in mathematics who has not encountered the work of the late Imre Lakatos before, this book is a treasure; and those who know well the famous dialogue, first published in 1963-64 in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, that forms the greater part of this book, will be eager to read the supplementary material ... the book, as it stands, is rich and stimulating, and, unlike most writings on the philosophy of mathematics, succeeds in making excellent use of detailed observations about mathematics as it is actually practised.' Michael Dummett, Nature

'The whole book, as well as being a delightful read, is of immense value to anyone concerned with mathematical education at any level.' C. W. Kilmister, The Times Higher Education Supplement

'In this book the late Imre Lakatos explores 'the logic of discovery' and 'the logic of justification' as applied to mathematics ... The arguments presented are deep ... but the author's lucid literary style greatly facilitates their comprehension ... The book is destined to become a classic. It should be read by all those who would understand more about the nature of mathematics, of how it is created and how it might best be taught.' Education

Book Description

A novel introduction to the philosophy of mathematics, mostly in the form of a discussion between a group of students and their teacher. It combats the positivist picture and develops a much richer, more dramatic progression.
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

The latest book club pick from Oprah
"The Underground Railroad" by Colson Whitehead is a magnificent novel chronicling a young slave's adventures as she makes a desperate bid for freedom in the antebellum South. See more

Product Details

  • Paperback: 188 pages
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press; 1st edition (January 1, 1976)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0521290384
  • ISBN-13: 978-0521290388
  • Product Dimensions: 5.4 x 0.5 x 8.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 9.1 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (18 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #953,628 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

By Vin de Silva on October 2, 2001
Format: Paperback
I want to add a few words to the brief comment by the reader in Monroe (who gave this book one star). I tend to agree that "Proofs and Refutations" isn't a primer in mathematical proof-writing; it's certainly not a textbook for beginning mathematicians wanting to know how to practice their craft.
However, for those readers (including beginning mathematicians) who are interested in the broader picture, who are interested in the nature of mathematical proof, then Lakatos is essential reading. The examples chosen are vivid, and there is a rich sense of historical context. The dramatised setting (with Teacher and students Alpha, Beta, Gamma, etc) is handled skilfully. Now and then, a foolish-seeming comment from one of the students has a footnote tagged to it; more often than not, that student is standing in for Euler, Cauchy, Poincare or some other great mathematician from a past era, closely paraphrasing actual remarks made by them. That in some ways is the most important lesson I learned from this book; "obvious" now doesn't mean obvious then, even to the greatest intellects of the time.
Although "Proofs and Refuatations" is an easy book to begin reading, it is not an easy book per se. I have returned to it repeatedly over the last ten years, and I always learn something new. The text matures with the reader.
Comment 29 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
Definitions, examples, theorems, proofs -- they all seem so inevitable. But how did they come to be that way? What is the role of counterexamples? Why are some definitions so peculiar? What good are proofs?

In this brilliant and deep -- yet easy to read -- book, Lakatos shows how mathematicians explore concepts; how their ideas can develop over time; and how misleading the "textbook" presentation of math really is.

Fascinating for anyone who has seen mathematical proofs (even high-school Euclidean geometry) and essential for anyone studying mathematics at any level.

If you'd like to read more discussion about Lakatos and the intellectual context of P&R, you'll be interested in Brendan Larvor's "Lakatos: An Introduction".
Comment 29 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
I would recommend that anyone interested in mathermaics or indeed anyone interested in human activities read Imre Lakatos's seminal book 'Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery'.
Lakatos direcctly makes the distinction between formal and informal mathematics. Formal mathematics is contained in the proofs published in mathematical journals. Informal mathematics are the strategies that working mathemeticians use to make their work a useful exercise in mathematical discovery.
The proof provided for the four colour theorm which was derved in the 1970's relied heavily on the sue of computers and brute force technqiues. It was extremely cotroversial not because it was invalid but because of the issues which Lakatos so clearly describes in this book.It was undoubtedly a valid formal proof. However it did nothing to advance the cause of mathematics beyond this.
The reason that Lakatos equates proofs and refutation in his title is his contention that it is the refutations that are developed that show mathematicians the deficiencies and indeed teh possibilites in their theories. A refutation does not necessarily discredit a theory. Instead it provides insights to the theory's limitations and possibiliites for future development. It is their attempts to deal with unwanted and unexpected refutations - to preserve a valuable theory in the face of imperfect axioms and proof methods - that teach mathemeticians the true depths of their conceptions and to point the way to new and deeper ones.
Lakatos shows this by an account of the historical development of the concept of proof in mathematics and by showing in historical detail how certain valuable 'proofs' were preserved in the face of refutation.
Read more ›
1 Comment 22 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
Definitions, examples, theorems, proofs -- they all seem so
inevitable. But how did they come to be that way? What is
the role of counterexamples? Why are some definitions so
peculiar? What good are proofs?

In this brilliant and deep -- yet easy to read -- book,
Lakatos shows how mathematicians explore concepts; how their
ideas can develop over time; and how misleading the "textbook"
presentation of math really is.

Fascinating for anyone who has seen mathematical proofs
(even high-school Euclidean geometry) and essential for
anyone studying mathematics at any level.
Comment 11 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
As a lay reader of mathematics, I am prone to read for more for analogy and thought methods instead of, for example, the real implications of variations on Eulers Formula: for any convex polyhedron, the number of vertices and faces together is exactly two more than the number of edges.
Displaying solid content with artful execution, this book interested me in both the math of the thing and the acompanying thought processes.
Content: This book has near-poetic density and elegance in arguing a non-linear approach to mathematical development and, for me, to just plain thinking. Our tendency (as born worshippers of linearity and causality) is to discover a brick for the building then immediately look for the next to stack on top. Lakatos contends that PERHAPS you have discovered a brick worthy of the building, now let's see what truly objective tests we will put to this brick and before giving it a final stamp of approval. It seems obvious to say "always question", but the exercise in this book will take you through the process and show you what you may take for granted in this simple concept. For example, do you observe HOW you question? See his discussion throughout on global vs. local counterexamples, just as a start.
Execution of the text: This is the beautiful part. Mr. Lakatos has written this book as theater: characters with definite identities, plot, drama. The narrative flows in the voices of students and a professor who proves to be a sound moderator, intervening at timely points, i.e. those where questions may be crystallized or thoughts prodded to that point. This is where learning takes place, in a heated, moderated debate over Euler's formula.
Read more ›
Comment 7 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews