Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$21.00$21.00
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Dec 13 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: PioneerStore
Buy used: $8.67
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $4.94 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
-
-
-
VIDEO -
-
The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry Hardcover – May 12, 2011
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $21.99 | — |
Purchase options and add-ons
The Psychopath Test is a fascinating journey through the minds of madness. Jon Ronson's exploration of a potential hoax being played on the world's top neurologists takes him, unexpectedly, into the heart of the madness industry. An influential psychologist who is convinced that many important CEOs and politicians are, in fact, psychopaths teaches Ronson how to spot these high-flying individuals by looking out for little telltale verbal and nonverbal clues. And so Ronson, armed with his new psychopath-spotting abilities, enters the corridors of power. He spends time with a death-squad leader institutionalized for mortgage fraud in Coxsackie, New York; a legendary CEO whose psychopathy has been speculated about in the press; and a patient in an asylum for the criminally insane who insists he's sane and certainly not a psychopath.
Ronson not only solves the mystery of the hoax but also discovers, disturbingly, that sometimes the personalities at the helm of the madness industry are, with their drives and obsessions, as mad in their own way as those they study. And that relatively ordinary people are, more and more, defined by their maddest edges.
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRiverhead Books
- Publication dateMay 12, 2011
- Dimensions5.75 x 1.25 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-101594488010
- ISBN-13978-1584505808
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you
It is an awful lot harder, Tony told me, to convince people you’re sane than it is to convince them you’re crazy.Highlighted by 583 Kindle readers
‘If people like you, you can manipulate them to do whatever you want them to do!’Highlighted by 441 Kindle readers
Psychopaths get bored easily. They need excitement. They migrate to the big cities.Highlighted by 431 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
Review
“A rollicking, page-turner of a book... no ordinary piece of investigative journalism… Ronson’s storytelling skills are strong enough to enliven even the necessary reflections that would be one yawn after another if entrusted to a lesser writer.” -- San Francisco Chronicle
“…A book that manages to be as cheerily kooky as it is well-researched.” -- Los Angeles Times
“Engagingly irreverent…” -- New York Times
“[A] fascinating and humane book…” -- Washington Post Book World
“…Both terrifying and hilarious.” -- O, The Oprah Magazine
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Riverhead Books (May 12, 2011)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1594488010
- ISBN-13 : 978-1584505808
- Item Weight : 14.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.75 x 1.25 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #484,754 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #781 in Medical Social Psychology & Interactions
- #1,085 in Popular Social Psychology & Interactions
- #1,283 in Popular Psychology Pathologies
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Jon Ronson is an award-winning writer and documentary maker. He is the author of many bestselling books, including Frank: The True Story that Inspired the Movie, Lost at Sea: The Jon Ronson Mysteries, The Psychopath Test, The Men Who Stare at Goats and Them: Adventures with Extremists. His first fictional screenplay, Frank, co-written with Peter Straughan, starred Michael Fassbender. He lives in London and New York City.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Ronson’s book is not a rigorous academic look into psychopaths, but that might one of the secrets of why it is so enjoyable. He presented the topics in a fascinating way and often covers topics in ways you may expect journalists (which he is) to write about them. He is always looking for the “story” behind a topic, which leads to a half a dozen investigations, which he loosely weaves into a book on the “Madness Industry” (using his words).
Another aspect of the book that is refreshing is that Ron seems to have no agenda or pre-conceived views on the topics he is writing about. He does not hold himself out as an expert, but just someone who is curious on the topic (as I was). As he goes through his investigations you see how he draws his conclusions on a topic but then as he learns more his views change. In this way you are able to see both “sides of the coin” on many of the topics in the book. Also, this storytelling approach really pulls the reader along.
The bonus is that Ronson has an extremely dry British self-effacing humor that runs throughout the book and it was hard not to chuckle at times as he tried to describe his own dysfunctions.
If you want to get a flavor of Ronson and this book, you can watch this 18 minute talk he gave at a “TED” talk about the book [...]
One way to think of this book is an entertaining documentary on the topic, since he tends to meander around the topics and at times seems to have no clear direction. However, it is definitely a fun read and when you are done, you will have an excellent idea of what a psychopath is and is not. You will also gain a sense of some of the issues surrounding applying a label like psychopath to people.
NOTES
With that conclusion I end my review of the book and what follows is some of the more interesting things I noted when reading the book (and topics I plan to read more about):
DSM Guide
The bible for psychiatrists and psychologists is the DSM guide (“The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders”). The DSM is the place where experts in the field try to classify all mental disorders. The DSM is an attempt to define a set of consistent labels and terms for disorders and thus give a common and consistent reference point to allow for more accurate communications and documentation. Of course any project to describe and categorize anything as complex as human personalities and disorders is not going to be perfect. Also, any labeling system has some negative unintended consequences and this seems to be the case with the DSM manual as well. The manual was first published as DSM-1 in 1952, but existed under different names going back to 1870.
DSM and Psychopath
This DSM manual does not use the term psychopath, but instead uses the term “personality disorder” (I guess the term psychopath became politically incorrect).
The manual describes a personality disorder as follows:
“This disorder, by enduring antisocial behavior, diminished empathy and remorse, and disinhibited or bold behavior. As an aspect of personality, it represents scores on different dimensions of personality found throughout the population in varying combinations.”
The idea of a psychopath type personality has been around since the early 19th century, but it has only been tightly defined in the last 40 years.
Psychopath Test
Though the DSM’s definition is vague, there is a relatively test to determine if someone is a psychopath that is not in the DSM guide. One of the most popular psychopath testing methods was developed by Bob Hare, who is a professor from Vancouver’s University of British Columbia (the school I graduated from). The test was developed by Hare in the 70s and is often referred to as the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R).
Before 1970 there was a general agreement among criminologists that criminals were the result of an unfortunate environment (how they were brought up or other negative life events). There was a belief that there was no such thing as a person who was just born “bad”. Over the next 20 years Hare’s studies resulted in a change in this status quo belief.
Hare was interested in studying psychopaths, however at the time there was no definitive way to determine who was and was not a psychopath. The idea of a psychopath personality had been around for a long time, but more as a general understanding. He knew as long as there was no definite way to “diagnosis” a person as a psychopath they could not be studied, so he set out to define a method to test a person for the psychopath personality type.
Hare hypothesis was that psychopaths were people who were wired “bad” at birth. The idea was that since these people had defective personalities there would likely be no real cure for them. Consequently he postulated that psychopath criminals would have much higher recidivism rate when being released from prison. Hare did not assume that every criminal who was incarcerated in a high security prison was a psychopath. He accepted that many of the prison population would have been lead to a life of crime by their unfortunate environmental circumstances.
For Hare to test his theory, he knew the first thing he would have to do was come up with a scientific way to classify a person a psychopath (or not). To come up with a test he would have to be able to work with a population where there may be a high concentration of psychopaths. To this end he successfully sought permission to do his studies at a local penitentiary. He was given access to prisoners in the only western Canadian maximum security federal prison: The BC Penitentiary in New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada. This BC Penitentiary, that house up to 750 prisoners, started in 1878 and was finally decommissioned in 1980. I grew up close to this prison so was very familiar its notorious reputation. It had housed many notorious and violent prisoners and was in the news often due to riots and hostage takings. When the prison closed in 1980 they opened the facility to the public for a short period of time before it was torn down and replaced by condos and I still have vivid memories of my tour of the buildings there.
To get subjects for his study Hare asked for volunteers from the inmate population at the prison. He was not sure how many “takers” he would get, but he quickly learned that the prisoners where extremely bored and his offer to study them was a chance for them do something different. Also, one of his first volunteers was a “King Pin” inmate and after he met Hare, he told the general population that this was a good guy and you should all volunteer to be tested by him. From that point on, Hare had no shortage of inmates to study.
The first test Hare performed on his subjects was to connect them to both an ECG monitor an electrical shocking device. He then informed the subject that at the count of 10 he would zap them with a very strong electrical shock. He would then start to count … 1, 2, 3. As was expected many of the prisoners became noticeably anxious as he approached 10 and their ECG strip clearly matched their external reaction of fear. However, the psychopaths registered almost nothing until the point of the actual shock. When the electrical shock was applied all subjects responded in a similar fashion, with a loud yell of pain (since the shock was severe). Sometimes he would then immediately repeat the test with the same subject and of course the non-psychopaths would now be extremely anxious because they knew exactly what was happening. However in this second test, again, the psychopaths would have no measurable reaction before the point of the shock. Hare wrote up these results in an academic paper, but he could find no one to publish his work. The feedback he received from the journals was that their review boards believed he had faked the results. When they reviewed the ECG results they did not think any person could possibly have no reaction before the point of the shock (or in other words the results were not human). Unfortunately for Bob Hare (but maybe a good thing for society) they government banned the use of shock treatments or testing on the prisoner population. This means Hare was back to ground zero on his project to accurately classify psychopaths. This blocked path lead them in the direction of a check list approach that became the Psychopath Test of today.
The Hare check list test uses a scoring system were a test score of 30 or more (out of 40) results in the subject being deemed a psychopath. The test consists of 20 questions and for each question you can score a zero (0) if your answer is “no”; or a one (1) if your answer “maybe”; or a two (2) if our answer is “yes”. Thus the lowest score is zero (if all our answers are no) and the highest score is 40 (if all our answer is yes). To be considered accurate a certified and trained expert must administer the test. The tester must independently verify certain answers (like the juvenile delinquency record). The twenty questions in the Hare test measure for these personality traits:
• glib and superficial charm,
• grandiosity
• need for stimulation
• pathological lying
• cunning and manipulating,
• lack of remorse
• callousness
• poor behavioral controls
• impulsiveness
• irresponsibility
• denial
• parasitic lifestyle
• sexual promiscuity
• early behavior problems
• lack of realistic long-term goals
• failure to accept responsibility for own actions
• many short-term marital relationships
• juvenile delinquency
• revocation of conditional release
• Reckless disregard for safety of self or others
The average “normal” person scores 3 to 6 on the Hare test and an average non-psychopath criminal scores 16 to 22. A non-criminal psychopath average score is 30 to 34 where criminal psychopaths score from 30 to 40 points.
The 20 traits are broken down into two major factors:
Factor # 1 -- Interpersonal, Moods and Feelings factors (example: glibness, grandiose self-worth, pathological lying, manipulative, lack of remorse, lack of empathy and failure to accept responsibility).
Factor # 2 – Lifestyle and Antisocial behavior (poor control, lack of realistic goals, irresponsibly, need for stimulation, impulsivity, poor control, early behavioral problems).
A couple factors that do not fit into #1 and #2 factors are Short-term marital relationships and promiscuous sexual behavior.
Psychopath Recidivism
Once Hare finished his testing he was able to classify the inmate population into psychopath and non-psychopath and started studying statistics from the two groups.
The results of these tests were striking in that the psychopath’s recidivism rate of violent crimes was dramatically higher. When these results were published criminologists and prison systems around the world became very interested in the Hare test. Experts realized that Hare’s test could be used to determine (statistically) which inmates would likely re-offend if released and thus could be a powerful tool for parole boards.
At first Hare did not make the details of his testing method public. Hare was concerned that his test could be used to incorrectly label people. However, after a period of time he was pressured into releasing the full details of the test. Today his check list is used by the majority of prisons systems around the world to classify some of their inmates as psychopaths. In the Ronson book he points out that most people who achieve this label have extreme difficulty in ever being paroled from prison, since no one wants to be the person who sign off on allowing the psychopath to be released. Today, much of the criticism of the Hare test surrounds this same issue of miss-labeling an individual as a psychopath.
In Ronson’s book he investigates a particular prisoner and how he was housed in Broadmoor Hospital for the Criminally Insane in England. This prisoner was trying to be released because he claims he was incorrectly classified as insane or a psychopath. Ronson leads us through the journey of meeting this inmate and his subsequent thinking on this individual.
Oak Ridge – Dr. Elliott Barker
Ronson covers a fascinating experiment by Dr. Elliott Barker who tried to cure psychopaths in the Oak Ridge hospital for the criminally insane (now known as the Mental Health Centre Penetanguishene in the town of Town of Penetanguishene, which is about 100 miles north of Toronto). Dr. Barker believed he could cure psychopaths through therapy sessions that also included the patients taking LSD. He based his belief on what he had learned on a worldwide tour and other treatments he had observed. With this flimsy background he requested and gained permission from the Canadian government to administer his experimental treatments at Oak Ridge. The patients (prisoners) were then put through a bizarre set of “encounter sessions” where he would encourage them to get their anger and feelings out (all while high on LSD). Sometimes these sessions would be done with no clothes on. He also encouraged peer counseling between prisoners. These sessions could go on for days while the subjects were encouraged to confess their innermost feelings and act out any way they wanted. When the study ended there was some optimism that it may have had a positive impact, but follow up studies showed that many of the subjects who were released became repeat offenders with some extremely grizzly and violent crimes. Thus in the end the experiment was a failure and became another plank in the argument that psychopaths cannot be rehabilitated.
Amygdala
Experts believe that the part of the brain that does not work “normally” in a psychopath is the amygdala. The amygdala controls fear and since the psychopaths have less fear, the thinking goes, that they likely have a malfunctioning amygdala.
The amygdala is a small part of the brain that is sometimes described as an olive shaped blob behind your ears. The amygdala inputs information from you body’s sensors (things like temperature, sound or shocking images). Outputs of the amygdala are messages to be sent to other parts of the brain to take action based on the amygdala inputs. For example the first time the amygdala “learns” that feeling a hot temperature is often followed by pain, the second time it receives a message that your body is contact with a very high temperature it can tell another part of your brain “this is really going to hurt so do something quick”. When the other parts of the brain receive this message from the amygdala they can send messages to take specific action to address the inputs, like quickly moving your hand off a hot stove burner. Because fear is one of the easiest human emotions to study, the amygdala is one of the most studied parts of the brain. Fear is tied to human survival and easy to study because of the short period between input and reaction. An example of this was Hare’s electrical shock experiment. You can postpone the reaction to the feeling of hunger by not eating for an hour or you can drive a few more miles after feeling exhausted, but when you lose your balance while on top of a 25 foot ladder, you cannot delay your reaction and live.
The theory is that the psychopath’s amygdala does not correctly translating its input senses to output action signals and thus they are more immune to fear.
Top reviews from other countries
Ronson gives an account of the parade of charlatans whose views have led to the incarceration of anti-social criminals whose diagnoses of psychopathy are questionable to say the least & of those with an agenda to discredit what they view as a mental health industry. Thought provoking & very readsable.
The initial premise of this well-written book starts out looking like something far-fetched from The Celestine Prophecy - a mysterious manuscript which has been sent to various academics, one of whom asks Ronson to investigate where it came from and what it means. These investigations lead him into looking at the sort of personality which might be inclined to want to manipulate others, and quite quickly he gets drawn into that journey, looking particularly at psychopathic behaviour, what a psychopath is. Most of us probably consider psychopaths to be people who commit horrific crimes such as rape and murder, but as Ronson discovers, there is a continuum in reaching the diagnosis, and there are many 'normal' people in society, who do not rape and murder, but nonetheless have certain character traits and behaviours which may be part of the check-list of a clinician who is trying to ascertain 'is this person a psychopath?' Ronson's journey takes a look at some of the history of psychiatric medicine - including some of the excesses of the anti-psychiatry movement of the 60s and 70s, and the backlash of overdiagnosis and that checklist of the DSM - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. There is also the teasing throwaway that though psychopathic tendencies may exist in about 1% of the population at large, there are a statistically larger number of these 'members of the general population' with psychopathic tendencies to be found as CEOs of major organisations. Makes a horrid kind of sense really, given the cultivation of ruthlessness which seems to be required, fostered and encouraged in programmes like 'The Apprentice'
Ronson making his own journey a central part of this exploration of mental health and psychopathy in particular, has both great strength - but also weaknesses. The strengths are an immediacy of having an engaging, articulate, witty companion as your guide, as you read the book, who asks some of the questions which you, the reader might have, as you try to gain some understanding of what a psychopathic personality might be. The weaknesses are that there are interesting questions raised,which don't really go anywhere, and he doesn't really follow through with them. Such questions as: what 'normal' is; why both 'empathy' and its lack, might exist; the strengths and the weaknesses of having an 'artist's' view of mental health (analysis, therapy, allowing the story/the gestalt of a person to happen ) versus the scientific/statistical 'observed' presentations of the DSM. There's a teasing nod to this in his account of a partial conversation with his friend Adam Curtis, the documentary film maker, who is critical of the direction Ronson is taking in his investigations for this book - looking at how inevitably the investigator gets drawn into investigating the 'on the edge' peculiarities, the weirdly extreme, so that the investigator (and the reader/viewer) can feel safely superior, without really looking at aspects within oneself. I probably wanted Ronson to be closer to Curtis, and to look more at what all this means for society at large - how the attempt to over-diagnose mental illness has led to a flattening of what it means to be human, a tighter and smoother and more conformist view of 'normal', and mass medication, via the pharmaceutical industry, of normal, human variation. Perhaps the difference is that Curtis is a man with an agenda, and Ronson may not be. Curtis's libertarian stance may give him a certain blinkered vision, but it also brings focus and cohesion. Ronson is more scattergun, not quite following through.
I also would have liked to have seen something about where cultivating 'lack of empathy' may work to society's advantage - for example, within certain branches of medicine. It strikes me that the surgeon, if he or she allowed themselves to really engage with the pain and suffering of the patient, might be too overwhelmed to make that healing incision. There are professions where the fostering of empathy is crucial - nursing for example, and professions, like surgery, where it is most helpful if a certain ability to ringfence, or even inhibit, empathy is present
It is rather anecdotal in style, & some reviewers have complained of its rambling nature, or of a lack of gravitas, of insufficient information or paucity of examples of subjects under discussion. It is true that I was annoyed at first by the tendency to stray from one type of disorder to another rather suddenly, as this was disorientating & caused me to backtrack thinking I'd missed something; & having failed to notice the subtitle I had thought its sole subject was the psychopath. But I soon became used to this approach & felt it added rather than detracted from its interest.
As for the other criticisms: this is not & does not pretend to be a scholarly work; I found the amount of information given adequate, authoritative & informative, & this is equally true of examples.
The discussion of CEOs & other powerful people being more than averagely likely to be psychopathic must have presented a difficulty, because in spite of Ronson's chutzpah it's not easy to, effectively, invite subjects to 'out' themselves in this way. (though as Ronson demonstrates their grandiosity can tend to make them boastful & careless of opinion). In any case he succeeds in 'showing' as well as 'telling'.
Another criticism (although positive comments far outweigh negative ones) is that he is somehow being disingenuous in discussing his personal experience of mental problems along with the various other cases. Again, I disagree: he is a professional writer & so naturally presents his narrative in as attractive & immediate fashion as he can, but for me it works, as well as adding to the charm of the book; I do not doubt he is every bit as anxious, obsessive & downright neurotic as he portrays himself. Aren't we all..? (unless we are psychopaths;)
The subtitle refers to the 'madness industry' & the book has a great deal to say, much of it deeply shocking, about the abuses (intentional or unwitting) by these industries, whether institutional or pharmaceutical.
Ronson examines what makes a psychopath mostly in terms of neurology but he does touch on the development of the disorder. My own view is that whereas the normal infant learns its place as a human among a community of humans, observing & imitating others while developing empathy, psychopaths experience themselves as Central & singular, perceiving those outside themselves as objects, important only as they are useful ; they observe others solely for manipulative purposes, learning to imitate people's behaviour in terms of sociability, empathy etc. But this is an imitation of the behavioural signs only; there is no corresponding feeling.
A lot of what Ronson discusses eg, the Hare test, is not new to me; if you are reasonably observant & interested in what makes people tick you will probably already have indentified certain cases both among acquaintances & those who run the country & the world, whether politically or through influence. I certainly have, & this gives me a some satisfaction. But in fact it's dismaying to realise our fates significantly depend on such people, as Ronson's demonstrates.
This is a rather wry exposé of the nuttiness and/ or ruthlessness of people, but it is not the less serious for that. Ronson's makes it clear just how much damage these people can do, whether violent or cruelly manipulative, both in a domestic & universal setting.
Altogether an entertaining & worthwhile read if you are the slightest bit interested in the weirder outposts of the mind.
He gets to inverview some really interesting as well as important figures in the field, and his various digressions are always relevant and valuable. The chatty style doesn't obscure the fact he's really done his homework. In particular, he's really good on the tale of how professional rivalries and experimental treatments by various psychologists since the early 20th Century haven't always been to the benefit of a better public understanding of the condition, or better treatment of it.
His particular focus is the now almost universally used testing criteria for Psychopaths, which turns out to be not as perfect as you might hope considering a positive result can see people incarcerated for large portions of their life. He also investigates how 'Psychopathic' traits can actually be seen in many people who are successful in various fields and have never been involved in any violent crime. There's ultimately a suggestion here that the most terrifying thing about Psychopaths is that they're really not as different from us as we'd like to think, and it is quite possible that your neighbour, boss, political representative, or local policeman (psychopaths, it turns out, love jobs which give them positions of authority) could well be one.
Despite the troubling revelations here, it isn't a sensationalist book trading off shock value. Ronsons tries to understand the condition, which includes spending lots of time and in some cases getting uncomfortably close to diagnosed Psychopaths, and he is always open to dissenting voices. This is a book for the general reader rather than anyone with a professional interest in the topic, of course, but for all that it raises some really interesting questions and gives a better understanding of a topic which effects us as individuals and a society more than we might like to think.










