Quicksand: America's Pursuit of Power in the Middle East
Comprar nuevo
US$38.99US$38.99
Entrega entre el 6 - 28 de enero
Enviado por: Amazon Vendido por: Chapel Books
Devolver gratis este producto
Las devoluciones gratis están disponibles para la dirección de envío que elegiste. Puedes devolver el producto por cualquier motivo, en estado nuevo y sin usar: no se aplican gastos de envío.
Más información sobre las devoluciones gratis.- Ve a tus pedidos y empieza el proceso de devolución
- Seleccione su opción de envío gratis preferida
- Entregar y marcharse
Detalles de envío y tarifa
| Precio | US$38.99 |
| Envío de AmazonGlobal | US$16.47 |
| Depósito de cuotas de importación estimadas | US$0.00 |
| Total | US$55.46 |
Ahorra con Usado - Muy Bueno
US$8.92US$8.92
Entrega el lunes, 13 de enero
Enviado por: Amazon Vendido por: Blue Frog Provisions
Devolver gratis este producto
Las devoluciones gratis están disponibles para la dirección de envío que elegiste. Puedes devolver el producto por cualquier motivo, en estado nuevo y sin usar: no se aplican gastos de envío.
Más información sobre las devoluciones gratis.- Ve a tus pedidos y empieza el proceso de devolución
- Seleccione su opción de envío gratis preferida
- Entregar y marcharse
Detalles de envío y tarifa
| Precio | US$38.99 |
| Envío de AmazonGlobal | US$16.47 |
| Depósito de cuotas de importación estimadas | US$0.00 |
| Total | US$55.46 |
Detalles del libro
- Número de páginas720 páginas
- IdiomaInglés
- EditorialPenguin Press
- Fecha de publicación1 Abril 2010
- Dimensiones6.5 x 1.5 x 10 pulgadas
- ISBN-101594202419
- ISBN-13978-1594202414
Geoffrey Wawro approaches America's role in the Middle East in a fundamentally new way-by encompassing the last century of the entire region, rather than focusing narrowly on a particular country or era. The result is a definitive and revelatory history whose drama, tragedy, and rich irony he relates with unprecedented verve. Wawro combed archives in the United States and Europe and traveled the Middle East to unearth new insights into the hidden motivations, backroom dealing, and outright espionage that shaped some of the most tumultuous events of the last one hundred years. Wawro offers piercing analysis of iconic events from the birth of Israel to the death of Sadat, from the Suez crisis to the energy crisis, from the Six-Day War to Desert One, from Iran-contra to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the rise of al- Qaeda. Throughout, he draws telling parallels between America's past mistakes and its current quandaries, proving that we're in today's muddle not just because of our old errors, but because we keep repeating those errors.
America has juggled multiple commitments and conflicting priorities in the Middle East for nearly a century. Strands of idealism and ruthless practicality have alternated- and sometimes run together-in our policy. Quicksand untangles these strands as no history has done before by showing how our strategies unfolded over the entire century and across the entire region. We've persistently misread the intentions and motivations of every major player in the region because we've insisted on viewing them through the lens of our own culture, hopes, and fears. Most administrations since Eisenhower's have adopted their own "doctrine" for the Middle East, and almost every doctrine has failed precisely because it's a doctrine-a template into which events on the ground refuse to fit. Geoffrey Wawro's peerless and remarkably lively history is key to understanding our errors and the Middle East-at last- on its own terms.
From Booklist
Biografía del autor
Sobre los autores
Sigue a los autores para recibir notificaciones de sus nuevas obras, así como recomendaciones mejoradas.History has always fascinated me, for it marks and foreshadows the never-ending follies and triumphs of man. As a military historian, I was trained to think in terms of governments, armies, fleets, and sweeping change, but, as a practitioner, up to my elbows in the dust of archives, I glimpsed something new. History is made by individuals, not masses and movements. Read my books on the German Wars of Unification or World War I, and you'll see how distracted, dilettantish or simply inept human beings fumbled away great opportunities, and let "forces of history," that might otherwise have been reversed or contained, sweep over them. I've always augmented research on these wars with visits to the battlefields, in places like the Czech Republic, France, Poland, Ukraine, Serbia, Syria, Israel, Lebanon or Egypt. Only there, on the proverbial "captain's hill," can the historian finally put all of the pieces together, and see how victory or defeat was achieved.
My latest book is Sons of Freedom: The Forgotten American Soldiers Who Defeated Germany in World War I. It is a riveting book that shows just how crucial the A.E.F. was to Allied victory in 1918. Without the U.S. intervention and hard fighting, the British and French would have been unable to win the war, and would probably have lost it -- as the book demonstrates. My book A Mad Catastrophe: The Outbreak of World War I and the Collapse of the Habsburg Empire is a deep dive into the shambles of the Habsburg Empire in its waning years and its truly abysmal performance in the Great War. My two books on Bismarck's wars, The Austro-Prussian War and the Franco-Prussian War, are fascinating reexaminations of the two most consequential wars in nineteenth century Europe. They are deftly written and based on a wealth of archival research, distinguishing them from other histories based on less reliable and revealing published sources. Warfare and Society in Europe 1792-1914 was required reading in West Point's History of the Military Art course for several years. The U.S. Military Academy chose it, over many competitors, because of the taut and interesting way in which it presents the interplay of politics, society, diplomacy, technology, and military decision-making in the action-packed years between the French Revolution and World War I. Read it to see why it was the choice of the Army's service academy before they transitioned to an online curriculum.
My book on the Middle East -- Quicksand -- is a highly readable history of the Middle East from the Balfour Declaration to the Bush Doctrine. Sourced in British and American archives -- using much previously classified material -- it does something new: it explains how the U.S. emerged in the years between Woodrow Wilson and Barack Obama as the dominant power in the Middle East, but with such burdensome, debilitating liabilities. It explains how and why we crafted alliances that don't even benefit us, and a regional dominance that erodes us.
History is eye-opening. It's the enemy of sentiment, and the shovel that digs up the truth. Follow me on: geoffreywawro.com
Roger Lowenstein (born in 1954) is an American financial journalist and writer. He graduated from Cornell University and reported for the Wall Street Journal for more than a decade, including two years writing its Heard on the Street column, 1989 to 1991. Born in 1954, he is the son of Helen and Louis Lowenstein of Larchmont, N.Y. Lowenstein is married to Judith Slovin.
He is also a director of Sequoia Fund. His father, the late Louis Lowenstein, was an attorney and Columbia University law professor who wrote books and articles critical of the American financial industry.
Roger Lowenstein's latest book, America's Bank: The Epic Struggle to Create the Federal Reserve (The Penguin Press) was released on October 20, 2015.
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Comprados juntos habitualmente
Comprados juntos habitualmente

También podría interesarte
-  
-  
-  
-  
Funciones y detalles
Características
- Used Book in Good Condition
Información de producto
| Editorial | Penguin Press; Primera edición (1 Abril 2010) |
|---|---|
| Idioma | Inglés |
| Tapa dura | 720 páginas |
| ISBN-10 | 1594202419 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-1594202414 |
| Dimensiones | 6.5 x 1.5 x 10 pulgadas |
| Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon |
nº913,668 en Libros (Ver el Top 100 en Libros)
nº486 en Política Africana
nº1,088 en Política de Medio Oriente
nº2,590 en Historia de Oriente Medio (Libros)
|
| Opinión media de los clientes | 4.5 de 5 estrellas 39Opiniones |
Los clientes que compraron este producto también compraron
También podría interesarte
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
Opiniones destacadas de los Estados Unidos
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaOutstanding!Calificado en Estados Unidos el 25 de junio de 2011Geoffrey Wawro, director of the Military History Center at the University of North Texas professor of history, has written an important book on US foreign policy in the Middle East. A professional historian, Wawro did his homework: he read all the relevant literature and... Ver másGeoffrey Wawro, director of the Military History Center at the University of North Texas professor of history, has written an important book on US foreign policy in the Middle East. A professional historian, Wawro did his homework: he read all the relevant literature and accessed all the relevant archives.
Wawro focuses on the US relationship with Saudi Arabia and Israel. It's in his handling of the latter that he is likely to draw fire from unconditional supporters of Israel who can not accept anything less than the fact that Israel can do no wrong and is the victim of Palestinian and Arab aggressors. So this book is definitely not destined for Israel's apologists who are looking for a work to use as a propaganda tool. For those I suggest work like From Time Immemorial: The Origins of the Arab-Jewish Conflict over Palestine (a hoax that provides good propaganda material) and The Case for Israel, a very good lawyer's brief, by Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz.
Not that the book is a defense of the Palestinians, Wawro is not interested in taking sides he just lets the facts speak for themselves.
Wawro is likely to please neither apologists for Israel nor those of the Palestinians. I will provide some quotes from the book to make that clear:
" Life in "Israel" (...) continued much as it had for centuries. It was a largely Arab place in which a steady trickle of European Jews mixed with the several thousand Sephardim who had lived in Palestine since their removal from Spain and North Africa in the fifteen's century" p.19
"But there are Arabs in Palestine!" Herzl's early collaborator and ally Max Nordau had famously expostulated. "I did not know that! We are committing an injustice!" Other Zionists had no such qualms: "Outside Palestine," Ahad Ha'am wrote in 1891, "we are accustomed to believe that the Arabs are all wild beasts of the desert, a people akin to jackasses who do not know what is going on around them" p. 19
"Although Herzl had cautioned Zionists "to expropriate gently..., discreetly and circumspectly," his followers took a harder line" p. 19
"Turkey's decision to ally with Germany against Russia, France and Britain in WWI nearly extinguished Zionism (...) the Turks in 1914 began expelling Russian Jews from Palestine (...) Palestine's Turkish military governor, closed Zionist newspapers (...) voided Jewish land titles and incited Arabs to raid Jewish farms and shops" p.21
"Arab nationalists despised the Jewish national home" p.31
"Though there were half as many Jews as Arabs in Palestine -623,000 Jews vs 1.3 million Arabs-The Jews nevertheless received the bulk of Palestine from the UN" p 100.
"In Haifa Arab demonstrators rallied to "throw the Jews into the sea" before they could "take our land"" p.103
"The Jews publicly praised the partition, but secretly plotted to seize all of Palestine" p. 103
"South of Bethlehem, four Jewish settlements were surrounded and wiped out by the Jordanians , who accepted the surrender of the settlers and then slaughtered them in cold blood, screaming "kill the Jews"" p. 104
"in each attack" Prime Minister Ben Gurion told his commanders bluntly , it's necessary to give a decisive blow, ruin the place, kick away the inhabitants" p 106
"The Arabs planned to destroy Israel" p. 110
These quotes should be enough to show that author is not interested in taking sides he just goes where the facts take him.
Overall this an excellent book both informative and entertaining. For anyone who wants to understands US involvement in the Middle East this is the book to read.I can't recommend it highly enough.
Geoffrey Wawro, director of the Military History Center at the University of North Texas professor of history, has written an important book on US foreign policy in the Middle East. A professional historian, Wawro did his homework: he read all the relevant literature and accessed all the relevant archives.
Wawro focuses on the US relationship with Saudi Arabia and Israel. It's in his handling of the latter that he is likely to draw fire from unconditional supporters of Israel who can not accept anything less than the fact that Israel can do no wrong and is the victim of Palestinian and Arab aggressors. So this book is definitely not destined for Israel's apologists who are looking for a work to use as a propaganda tool. For those I suggest work like From Time Immemorial: The Origins of the Arab-Jewish Conflict over Palestine (a hoax that provides good propaganda material) and The Case for Israel, a very good lawyer's brief, by Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz.
Not that the book is a defense of the Palestinians, Wawro is not interested in taking sides he just lets the facts speak for themselves.
Wawro is likely to please neither apologists for Israel nor those of the Palestinians. I will provide some quotes from the book to make that clear:
" Life in "Israel" (...) continued much as it had for centuries. It was a largely Arab place in which a steady trickle of European Jews mixed with the several thousand Sephardim who had lived in Palestine since their removal from Spain and North Africa in the fifteen's century" p.19
"But there are Arabs in Palestine!" Herzl's early collaborator and ally Max Nordau had famously expostulated. "I did not know that! We are committing an injustice!" Other Zionists had no such qualms: "Outside Palestine," Ahad Ha'am wrote in 1891, "we are accustomed to believe that the Arabs are all wild beasts of the desert, a people akin to jackasses who do not know what is going on around them" p. 19
"Although Herzl had cautioned Zionists "to expropriate gently..., discreetly and circumspectly," his followers took a harder line" p. 19
"Turkey's decision to ally with Germany against Russia, France and Britain in WWI nearly extinguished Zionism (...) the Turks in 1914 began expelling Russian Jews from Palestine (...) Palestine's Turkish military governor, closed Zionist newspapers (...) voided Jewish land titles and incited Arabs to raid Jewish farms and shops" p.21
"Arab nationalists despised the Jewish national home" p.31
"Though there were half as many Jews as Arabs in Palestine -623,000 Jews vs 1.3 million Arabs-The Jews nevertheless received the bulk of Palestine from the UN" p 100.
"In Haifa Arab demonstrators rallied to "throw the Jews into the sea" before they could "take our land"" p.103
"The Jews publicly praised the partition, but secretly plotted to seize all of Palestine" p. 103
"South of Bethlehem, four Jewish settlements were surrounded and wiped out by the Jordanians , who accepted the surrender of the settlers and then slaughtered them in cold blood, screaming "kill the Jews"" p. 104
"in each attack" Prime Minister Ben Gurion told his commanders bluntly , it's necessary to give a decisive blow, ruin the place, kick away the inhabitants" p 106
"The Arabs planned to destroy Israel" p. 110
These quotes should be enough to show that author is not interested in taking sides he just goes where the facts take him.
Overall this an excellent book both informative and entertaining. For anyone who wants to understands US involvement in the Middle East this is the book to read.I can't recommend it highly enough.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaAn Excellent Presentation of the Historical Record.Calificado en Estados Unidos el 21 de octubre de 2015When an author, in his introduction, quotes Edmund Burke on the study of history you have every right to expect exacting attention to the historical record. Professor Wawro does not disappoint. Wawro does an outstanding job presenting the history of American involvement... Ver másWhen an author, in his introduction, quotes Edmund Burke on the study of history you have every right to expect exacting attention to the historical record. Professor Wawro does not disappoint. Wawro does an outstanding job presenting the history of American involvement in the Middle East from the start of the Zionist movement to the date of publication (2010). This is by far the best book on the history of US involvement in the Middle East that you can read today. If you read this book you will understand why we have the problems in the Islamic world in general, and the Middle East in particular, that we do today. Some may fault the the author for being a bit hard on the political class, but considering the grief they have caused the American people they have it coming. Yes, he is particularly hard on Republicans, but that is only because the Democrats have not been up to quite as much mischief as of late. Yet.
I recommend this book as a follow on to "A Peace to End All Peace" by David Fromkin. The two books together give the reader a strong understanding of the modern Middle East.
A final disclaimer. I was two years ahead of Professor Wawro in high school, which means I would have paid absolutely no attention to him back then. I had no contact with him since then until I read his book and sent him an email telling him how much I enjoyed his book.
Carl Blondin
Stillwater, Minnesota
When an author, in his introduction, quotes Edmund Burke on the study of history you have every right to expect exacting attention to the historical record. Professor Wawro does not disappoint. Wawro does an outstanding job presenting the history of American involvement in the Middle East from the start of the Zionist movement to the date of publication (2010). This is by far the best book on the history of US involvement in the Middle East that you can read today. If you read this book you will understand why we have the problems in the Islamic world in general, and the Middle East in particular, that we do today. Some may fault the the author for being a bit hard on the political class, but considering the grief they have caused the American people they have it coming. Yes, he is particularly hard on Republicans, but that is only because the Democrats have not been up to quite as much mischief as of late. Yet.
I recommend this book as a follow on to "A Peace to End All Peace" by David Fromkin. The two books together give the reader a strong understanding of the modern Middle East.
A final disclaimer. I was two years ahead of Professor Wawro in high school, which means I would have paid absolutely no attention to him back then. I had no contact with him since then until I read his book and sent him an email telling him how much I enjoyed his book.
Carl Blondin
Stillwater, Minnesota
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA tour de forceCalificado en Estados Unidos el 25 de mayo de 2010Geoffrey Wawro is the General Olinto Mark Barsanti Professor of Military History at the University of North Texas; he hosted many programs on the History Channel, and he taught at the US Naval War College for years. [For the reviewer "Kava" to call his scholarship... Ver másGeoffrey Wawro is the General Olinto Mark Barsanti Professor of Military History at the University of North Texas; he hosted many programs on the History Channel, and he taught at the US Naval War College for years. [For the reviewer "Kava" to call his scholarship disingenuous means that "Kava" never picked the book up, much less bought it. Ignore him.]
For those who don't follow the US college ratings, the US Naval War College, where Wawro taught, is second to the US Army War College and both of them rank higher than Harvard, Stanford and the like. Wawro has a PhD in History from Yale. My book arrived earlier today, and I am whipping through it. This is a tour de force, heavily footnoted, and worth every minute spent reading it. Wawro has obviously spent years researching his subject and his erudition is exemplary.
Geoffrey Wawro is the General Olinto Mark Barsanti Professor of Military History at the University of North Texas; he hosted many programs on the History Channel, and he taught at the US Naval War College for years. [For the reviewer "Kava" to call his scholarship disingenuous means that "Kava" never picked the book up, much less bought it. Ignore him.]
For those who don't follow the US college ratings, the US Naval War College, where Wawro taught, is second to the US Army War College and both of them rank higher than Harvard, Stanford and the like. Wawro has a PhD in History from Yale. My book arrived earlier today, and I am whipping through it. This is a tour de force, heavily footnoted, and worth every minute spent reading it. Wawro has obviously spent years researching his subject and his erudition is exemplary.
- 4.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaBiased but goodCalificado en Estados Unidos el 9 de septiembre de 2010I just finished Quicksand. It is a good book, easy to read, well researched and achieves well the stated goal of providing a comprehensive overview of the Middle Eastern conflicts for the past century from an American perspective. Or I should say, from the perspective of... Ver másI just finished Quicksand. It is a good book, easy to read, well researched and achieves well the stated goal of providing a comprehensive overview of the Middle Eastern conflicts for the past century from an American perspective. Or I should say, from the perspective of an American history professor, which is not quite the same thing.
I imagine that is impossible to write a book on Middle Eastern politics and not to have strong views. I think that Quicksand is subjective and has a very clear opinion on the facts that it relates. As a matter of fact It is fun to see how, as history's timeline progresses and gets closer to our present time, bias and personal opinions are more and more protuberant. By the time we get to the Second Iraq war, we can see that Geoff cannot be described as a Bush 43 fan and that he is aligned with a certain way of thinking.
I am quite familiar with a lot of what was written on the Iraqi Freedom issue. And not only Monday morning quarterback's analysis, but I also remember very distinctively what was written at the time of the events. Based on that knowledge, I can say that what Geoff says pretty much echoes the version of history produced by the "bien pensant" crowd at the State Department, the DNC and elite academia. This doesn't mean that the book is inaccurate. As I said above is very well researched. But you only need to stress certain facts more than others and adjectivise enough to cast the people that you like or you don't like in a good or bad light to have that effect. For example. You can say that the Rumsfeld was a jerk because he didn't listen to the advice of his betters. But that advice was also flawed in many occasions, as Quicksand itslelf indicates. We can describe Bush as the "toxic Texan" stereotype and Cheney as Darth Vader until we turn blue, but the same account shows that at every step of the way, every administration, on both sides of the Atlantic got it "wrong" on the Middle East and for some reasond they don't deserve the type of scorn reserved for the hated Bush.
I am from South America and I live in the Middle East and as such, I have my own opinion on all of these issues. I focus less on what the Western powers did right or wrong because I believe that each nation is able to create its own destiny. The book describes very well that the Zionists were probably bastards. But they were smart bastards. They played the system to their advantage. As I expect that anyone would do. On the other hand, if the Jewish had the advantage of unflinching US support, the Arabs had the advantage of incumbency. If the Jewish had money, the Arabs also had tons of money. If Jewish had weapons, Arabs had armies with many more soldiers. They could have won this battle all along if they had been half as smart as the Jewish. As it turns out they lost and they should recognize it. Nevertheless, If they prefer to keep on fighting, that is within their rights. But they cannot blame the other side for also battling on. As in South America, blaming the others is always the last resource of the looser and the best way of preventing that anything will ever be solved.
It is true that the neo cons were too optimistic. But in my opinion, they got it ultimately right. It is failed governments that produced failed people. And failed peoples cannot live in peace. Neither with themselves nor with their neighbors. I go back to Latin America to illustrate my point. There is not a big difference ethnically or culturally between Chile and Venezuela. Nevertheless, after 40 years of good enough governance, Chile is a responsible regional player that nobody can imagine starting a war with his neighbors. Venezuela, on the other hand, has had thirty years of disastrous governments and is now on the brink of starting a war with Colombia, exporting trouble to other Latin American countries, launching a weapons race with the support of Russia and Iran, etc. In my opinion, if countries in the Middle East turned more like Chile and less like Venezuela (as most of them currently are), a reasonable solution could be found to the Palestinian issue.
This was the reasoning of Bush and the neo cons, with which I agree.
Did they implement it in the best possible way? Certainly not. But, as Quicksnd illustrates, who ever does!
Has the Bush doctrine utterly failed? I believe that we need to wait a couple of decades before we are able to pass judgment.
More and more people around the world are realizing that they have been manipulated by their respective bureaucratic elites with the result of decadence and poverty. But as the Green revolution in Iran or the rebellion against taxation in Argentina shows, this model is in serious danger. The new element that in my opinion is the game changer is the Internet and the ability that people now have to see through the "official" narrative and make up their own minds. We will see how all of this plays out in the coming decade. But I see the future with a lot of hope and that includes the Arab world and my native South America.
I just finished Quicksand. It is a good book, easy to read, well researched and achieves well the stated goal of providing a comprehensive overview of the Middle Eastern conflicts for the past century from an American perspective. Or I should say, from the perspective of an American history professor, which is not quite the same thing.
I imagine that is impossible to write a book on Middle Eastern politics and not to have strong views. I think that Quicksand is subjective and has a very clear opinion on the facts that it relates. As a matter of fact It is fun to see how, as history's timeline progresses and gets closer to our present time, bias and personal opinions are more and more protuberant. By the time we get to the Second Iraq war, we can see that Geoff cannot be described as a Bush 43 fan and that he is aligned with a certain way of thinking.
I am quite familiar with a lot of what was written on the Iraqi Freedom issue. And not only Monday morning quarterback's analysis, but I also remember very distinctively what was written at the time of the events. Based on that knowledge, I can say that what Geoff says pretty much echoes the version of history produced by the "bien pensant" crowd at the State Department, the DNC and elite academia. This doesn't mean that the book is inaccurate. As I said above is very well researched. But you only need to stress certain facts more than others and adjectivise enough to cast the people that you like or you don't like in a good or bad light to have that effect. For example. You can say that the Rumsfeld was a jerk because he didn't listen to the advice of his betters. But that advice was also flawed in many occasions, as Quicksand itslelf indicates. We can describe Bush as the "toxic Texan" stereotype and Cheney as Darth Vader until we turn blue, but the same account shows that at every step of the way, every administration, on both sides of the Atlantic got it "wrong" on the Middle East and for some reasond they don't deserve the type of scorn reserved for the hated Bush.
I am from South America and I live in the Middle East and as such, I have my own opinion on all of these issues. I focus less on what the Western powers did right or wrong because I believe that each nation is able to create its own destiny. The book describes very well that the Zionists were probably bastards. But they were smart bastards. They played the system to their advantage. As I expect that anyone would do. On the other hand, if the Jewish had the advantage of unflinching US support, the Arabs had the advantage of incumbency. If the Jewish had money, the Arabs also had tons of money. If Jewish had weapons, Arabs had armies with many more soldiers. They could have won this battle all along if they had been half as smart as the Jewish. As it turns out they lost and they should recognize it. Nevertheless, If they prefer to keep on fighting, that is within their rights. But they cannot blame the other side for also battling on. As in South America, blaming the others is always the last resource of the looser and the best way of preventing that anything will ever be solved.
It is true that the neo cons were too optimistic. But in my opinion, they got it ultimately right. It is failed governments that produced failed people. And failed peoples cannot live in peace. Neither with themselves nor with their neighbors. I go back to Latin America to illustrate my point. There is not a big difference ethnically or culturally between Chile and Venezuela. Nevertheless, after 40 years of good enough governance, Chile is a responsible regional player that nobody can imagine starting a war with his neighbors. Venezuela, on the other hand, has had thirty years of disastrous governments and is now on the brink of starting a war with Colombia, exporting trouble to other Latin American countries, launching a weapons race with the support of Russia and Iran, etc. In my opinion, if countries in the Middle East turned more like Chile and less like Venezuela (as most of them currently are), a reasonable solution could be found to the Palestinian issue.
This was the reasoning of Bush and the neo cons, with which I agree.
Did they implement it in the best possible way? Certainly not. But, as Quicksnd illustrates, who ever does!
Has the Bush doctrine utterly failed? I believe that we need to wait a couple of decades before we are able to pass judgment.
More and more people around the world are realizing that they have been manipulated by their respective bureaucratic elites with the result of decadence and poverty. But as the Green revolution in Iran or the rebellion against taxation in Argentina shows, this model is in serious danger. The new element that in my opinion is the game changer is the Internet and the ability that people now have to see through the "official" narrative and make up their own minds. We will see how all of this plays out in the coming decade. But I see the future with a lot of hope and that includes the Arab world and my native South America.
- 3.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA British military historian takes a crack at American Middle East policy.Calificado en Estados Unidos el 6 de julio de 2023The author, a military historian specializing in British military history in the Middle East, tries his hand at evaluating American foreign policy in the Middle East. He examines America's traditional role as an exporter of oil from the Gulf region and a... Ver másThe author, a military historian specializing in British military history in the Middle East, tries his hand at evaluating American foreign policy in the Middle East. He examines America's traditional role as an exporter of oil from the Gulf region and a protector/supporter of Israel. This book is a useful critique on American involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. But when it comes to the Arab-Israeli conflict it is hard to take seriously someone who either does not know which city is Israel's capital or is afraid to say so for fear of angering the Arabs or the Left. Israel's capital is located in Jerusalem not Tel Aviv and this has been the case since 1949.
The author, a military historian specializing in British military history in the Middle East, tries his hand at evaluating American foreign policy in the Middle East. He examines America's traditional role as an exporter of oil from the Gulf region and a protector/supporter of Israel. This book is a useful critique on American involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. But when it comes to the Arab-Israeli conflict it is hard to take seriously someone who either does not know which city is Israel's capital or is afraid to say so for fear of angering the Arabs or the Left. Israel's capital is located in Jerusalem not Tel Aviv and this has been the case since 1949.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaHaven't finished reading but already convinced this is a great read for anyone interested in how we (US) got ...Calificado en Estados Unidos el 8 de febrero de 2016Haven't finished reading but already convinced this is a great read for anyone interested in how we (US) got into such a quagmire - yet again... I served in VN and have been scratching my head ever since why we were there, what we were supposed to accomplish and what... Ver másHaven't finished reading but already convinced this is a great read for anyone interested in how we (US) got into such a quagmire - yet again... I served in VN and have been scratching my head ever since why we were there, what we were supposed to accomplish and what was accomplished. Socio-political reengineering is not our long suit, apparently. And our military is not the vehicle to use in any case. These aren't wars. After about a week, we have won the wars. What we can't seem to win is the peace that is supposed to follow. Remember the ubiquitous definition of insanity: Doing the same thing and expecting different results. Read this book and learn.
Haven't finished reading but already convinced this is a great read for anyone interested in how we (US) got into such a quagmire - yet again... I served in VN and have been scratching my head ever since why we were there, what we were supposed to accomplish and what was accomplished. Socio-political reengineering is not our long suit, apparently. And our military is not the vehicle to use in any case. These aren't wars. After about a week, we have won the wars. What we can't seem to win is the peace that is supposed to follow. Remember the ubiquitous definition of insanity: Doing the same thing and expecting different results. Read this book and learn.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaVery interesting book and highly recommended.Calificado en Estados Unidos el 4 de septiembre de 2014Confirmed my fears. As a former ASN (ASST Secretary of the Navy) once said, "the problem with spending so much time in Washington is that one starts believing they are more powerful than they should Be! " he went to jail for accepting bribes! (From the Israelis)... Ver másConfirmed my fears. As a former ASN (ASST Secretary of the Navy) once said, "the problem with spending so much time in Washington is that one starts believing they are more powerful than they should Be! " he went to jail for accepting bribes! (From the Israelis) Seems President 43's VP and SECDEF fell into the longevity Trap and knew more than anyone else! Said a different way, there end justified the nation's means! Very interesting book and highly recommended.
Confirmed my fears. As a former ASN (ASST Secretary of the Navy) once said, "the problem with spending so much time in Washington is that one starts believing they are more powerful than they should Be! " he went to jail for accepting bribes! (From the Israelis) Seems President 43's VP and SECDEF fell into the longevity Trap and knew more than anyone else! Said a different way, there end justified the nation's means! Very interesting book and highly recommended.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA Great and a Brave BookCalificado en Estados Unidos el 5 de mayo de 2014In a country so cowed and framed by the Jewish lobby as it is USA, it is a real accomplishment to write a book where a big factor of USA unhealthy involvement in Middle East is frankly and convincingly described as the result of the unbreakable support for Israel and his... Ver másIn a country so cowed and framed by the Jewish lobby as it is USA, it is a real accomplishment to write a book where a big factor of USA unhealthy involvement in Middle East is frankly and convincingly described as the result of the unbreakable support for Israel and his harsh policies with Palestinian people since before, but specially after WWII. Besides that, the rest of the constellation of forces that gradually pushed USA in the middle of the troubles it suffers today in that region are brightly examined. Still I no not know a book by Wawro which is not a master piece.
In a country so cowed and framed by the Jewish lobby as it is USA, it is a real accomplishment to write a book where a big factor of USA unhealthy involvement in Middle East is frankly and convincingly described as the result of the unbreakable support for Israel and his harsh policies with Palestinian people since before, but specially after WWII. Besides that, the rest of the constellation of forces that gradually pushed USA in the middle of the troubles it suffers today in that region are brightly examined. Still I no not know a book by Wawro which is not a master piece.
Opiniones más destacadas de otros países
- Traducir todas las opiniones al Español
Geoff Martin5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaThe whole region is complex and makes it challenging but fascinating to understandCalificado en Canadá el 20 de septiembre de 2021Well written, well researched, easy to read and full of information. You will not read this book quickly and will probably want to go through it a couple of times. It is a good reference as you build your library and understanding of the region. Having lived and worked in...Ver másWell written, well researched, easy to read and full of information. You will not read this book quickly and will probably want to go through it a couple of times. It is a good reference as you build your library and understanding of the region. Having lived and worked in the region in the energy sector and having friends from Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and Saudi Arabia, and having lived and studied in the US, a lot of pieces were connected for me with this book.Well written, well researched, easy to read and full of information. You will not read this book quickly and will probably want to go through it a couple of times. It is a good reference as you build your library and understanding of the region.
Having lived and worked in the region in the energy sector and having friends from Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and Saudi Arabia, and having lived and studied in the US, a lot of pieces were connected for me with this book.
A. Robson5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaFive StarsCalificado en Reino Unido el 10 de enero de 2018Excellent,thank you.Excellent,thank you.
steve5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaFive StarsCalificado en Reino Unido el 22 de junio de 2017A+A+
Escribir una opinión
Cómo funcionan las opiniones y calificaciones de clientes
Las opiniones de clientes, incluidas las valoraciones de productos ayudan a que los clientes conozcan más acerca del producto y decidan si es el producto adecuado para ellos.Más información sobre cómo funcionan las opiniones de clientes en Amazon






