1 new from $8.99

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Classic Ice Cracker

3.0 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

Available from these sellers.
1 new from $8.99

Off to College

Product Description

ice cracker

Product Information

Product Dimensions 12 x 3 x 0.1 inches
Item Weight 2.9 ounces
Shipping Weight 0.8 ounces
ASIN B000684HYQ
Customer Reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #378,360 in Home & Kitchen (See Top 100 in Home & Kitchen)
#142 in Kitchen & Dining > Bar Tools & Glasses > Ice Crushers
#19,516 in Kitchen & Dining > Kitchen Utensils & Gadgets > Bar & Wine Tools
Date first available at Amazon.com December 2, 2006

Warranty & Support

Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Feedback

Would you like to give feedback on images?
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
50%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
50%
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

I bought this ice cracker after acquiring a new refrigerator with an non-adjustable ice maker that makes big ice crescents. I found this ice cracker and it breaks up the crescents easily and quickly. After using it frequently for about three years, the head came off the wand part because the hole it was inserted into got too big. I made the hole smaller with a tiny piece of duct tape pierced with a smaller hole, and now the head stays on fine. This is a very useful implement.
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
For a product that is supposed to be used to hit ice, the circular tapper portion is not securely attached to the metal bar. After only a couple of uses the 2 parts came apart and now the tapper is useless.
Comment 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse