Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ Free Shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
What Is Good? Paperback – February 5, 2004
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
"A plain man's guide to ethics, from Homer's warriors to Nietzsche's superhero via Plato and Renaissance Man, clearly and elegantly written." SUNDAY TELEGRAPH "This book reminds us that often the greatest disagreements are between priorities rather than principles." INDEPENDENT "Intelligent introduction... rewards your endeavours." -- Martin Tierney THE HERALD "The book is beautifully written and highly engaging and it contains no footnotes." TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT "This popular yet nonetheless highly accomplished philosopher examines the different ways in which to live a good life, as proposed from classical antiquity to the present day." IRISH EXAMINER
About the Author
A.C. Grayling is Master of the New College of the Humanities, and a Supernumerary Fellow of St Anne's College, Oxford. Until 2011 he was Professor of Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London. He is the author of numerous books, and is also a distinguished literary journalist and broadcaster. He has been a columnist for the Guardian and The Times, is a Contributing Editor of Prospect magazine, and Editor of Online Review London. He is a Fellow of both the Royal Society of Literature and the Royal Society of Arts. His website can be visited at www.acgrayling.com.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In this well-designed book, Grayling appeals to the THREE Enlightenments: (1) the Greco-Roman (2) Renaissance, and (3) 18th century, which he continues to believe expresses the very best of the humanist response to religious dogma and absurd doctrines. He admits that Greek ethics is not for everyone -- even Aristotle admitted as much -- but we have more recent naturalistically moral writers, such as Hucheson, Hume, and Smith, that provide us with reason, experience, and empirical foundations to make prudent decisions -- without consulting a Bible, the Oracle at Delphi, or an Imam at Mecca.
For readers made timid by philosophy, Grayling makes commonsense of natural wisdom as accessible as fruit in an orchard. All one has to do in choose which course of action, based on what values one esteems, and what facts we are certain. The rest is rather clearcut and straight forward, and the joys of a humanistic goodness may again one day reign supreme -- before we all kill each other in their god's name.
Grayling, of course, gets finally into his stride with religion and here he proceeds to indict Christianity with all the fervour and messianic conviction of a medieval zealot. The Bible is so packed with contradictions, inconsistencies, and hopelessly absurd improbabilities, he insists, that it is quite impossible to take seriously, let alone respect and believe in, such a ridiculous document. Evil is all too often ordained, excused or otherwise awarded divine sanction within it – how can this conceivably be reconciled with a striving for the Good? Petty doctrinal disputes have generated unprecedented intolerance, unleashing ruinous conflicts among warring parties; incalculable suffering has additionally been inflicted on dissenters by Church officialdom, e.g. the Inquisition. Much of Grayling’s argument is patently true – much of the history of Christianity is certainly not a pretty picture. But this is to ignore the obvious benefits to many of its adherents – the psychological reassurance afforded by the promise of salvation and an afterlife, the strict injunctions discouraging bad behaviour, the comprehensive array of explanations and answers to almost all life’s questions and dilemmas, the inspiring fellowship and support of other Church members etc. Above all, he fails to acknowledge the supreme importance of faith itself, the overpowering sensation of a true believer that a divine presence resides mysteriously within him, guiding and motivating all his actions - an overwhelming and inexplicable conviction impervious to all rational analysis.
The later chapters chart the development of modern Humanism, from its roots in the Italian Renaissance to its emergence as a distinct philosophy in the early 20th century. Here, the roles of scientific progress, increasing secularism and social liberalism in inducing us to accept fuller responsibility for managing our own lives - with ever diminishing subservience to a supreme deity - are discussed in detail, the values and virtues of this new outlook contrasted most favourably (and arguably unfairly) with those of traditional Christian teaching and morality. Religion and Humanism, it is implied, are mutually exclusive, it not being possible for the same individual to subscribe to both. But is this true? May one not choose to lead one’s daily life entirely in accordance with humanist principles, yet retain a belief in God when it comes to our spiritual thinking?
A final issue in ‘What is Good?’ is what constitutes the true role of philosophy itself. Here, Grayling delivers a withering attack on the still dominant position of analytic philosophy in English-speaking countries, especially its overriding obsession with highly abstract minutiae, arcane definitions and hair-splitting, trivial distinctions, especially in the areas of language, meaning and mathematics. All this is largely irrelevant to daily life, he maintains; rather, we should devote ourselves to the study of ethics, on how to lead good lives and come up with viable approaches to ameliorating human suffering and addressing our most urgent problems. But this superficially welcome proposal neglects the huge divergence in opinion on these matters: given this scenario, how are we ever to achieve a consensus on how to proceed? At least analytic philosophy, one might say, by virtue of its restricted focus and quasi-scientific methodology, offers the prospect of measurable progress, however meagre, in clarifying and helping to resolve the issues that it narrowly concerns itself with.