Buy new:
$5.88$5.88
$3.98
delivery:
Dec 27 - 30
Ships from: Wildcat Media Sold by: Wildcat Media
Buy used: $4.95
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $4.41 shipping
98% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Reckoning: The Epic Battle Against Sexual Abuse and Harassment Hardcover – June 11, 2019
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, MP3 Audio, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $17.84 | — |
Enhance your purchase
Linda Hirshman, acclaimed historian of social movements, delivers the sweeping story of the struggle leading up to #MeToo and beyond: from the first tales of workplace harassment percolating to the surface in the 1970s, to the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal—when liberal women largely forgave Clinton, giving men a free pass for two decades. Many liberals even resisted the movement to end rape on campus.
And yet, legal, political, and cultural efforts, often spearheaded by women of color, were quietly paving the way for the takedown of abusers and harassers. Reckoning delivers the stirring tale of a movement catching fire as pioneering women in the media exposed the Harvey Weinsteins of the world, women flooded the political landscape, and the walls of male privilege finally began to crack. This is revelatory, essential social history.
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherMariner Books
- Publication dateJune 11, 2019
- Dimensions6 x 1.25 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-101328566447
- ISBN-13978-1328566447
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Hirshman has written a lively account of a social revolution that’s still in the making."—New York Times "In thirteen strong chapters, which move chronologically from 1969 to 2018, Hirshman examines major U.S. events in great detail and with a storyteller’s panache." —Bookforum "Ambitious and provocative." —?The Jewish Forward "Hirshman documents behind-the-scene details, political maneuverings, evidence that was presented or suppressed, truths that became apparent long after decisions went into effect, and how these developments affect current events. The unabated, continuing public outcry against sexual harassment is a reminder that resolution is long overdue."—Booklist, starred review “Inspiring… a tightly constructed narrative about how #MeToo became a cultural phenomenon will find it here, along with a celebration of the bold women who stood up for themselves to earn legal victories against harassment."—Publishers Weekly "In Reckoning, Linda Hirshman delivers a stirring, essential history for women of all ages. Prepare to meet the most important—and in some cases the most unsung—feminist heroes of the past fifty years.”—Alyssa Milano, actor and activist “An important and fascinating history of the intersection of sex and power, in the workplace and beyond. Hirshman’s new book reveals aspects of American feminist history many of us did not know, and provides important context around what we thought we did know. An inspiring, necessary, and perfectly timed work.”—Anna Holmes, writer and creator, Jezebel “Reckoning is a gripping account of the most profound cultural, political, and legal transformation of the past fifty years. Pulling no punches and sparing no hypocrites, Linda Hirshman speaks to all of us, men and women alike, in a voice at once urgent and entertaining, about the eternal double helix of sex and power.”—Laurence H. Tribe, Professor of Constitutional Law, Harvard Law School “A brisk, authoritative, and timely history.” —Kirkus Reviews —
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
She died slowly, gasping for the last pocket of air in the automobile sinking into the waters off Chappaquiddick Island. Mary Jo Kopechne, veteran of Robert Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign, twenty-eight years old and devoted to the Kennedy family, had left her purse behind and simply climbed into the car with Senator Ted Kennedy. Now she was drowning in tidal Poucha Pond, and he was nowhere to be seen.
Ten hours after the accident, dry and fully dressed, Kennedy walked into the police station in nearby Edgartown, Massachusetts. Kennedy, the only surviving brother in the legendary political clan, after Bobby Kennedy was killed in 1968 and President Jack Kennedy assassinated in 1963, was widely rumored as a contender for his party's nomination in the 1972 presidential election. He told the police chief that he had been driving the car when it went off the bridge. Somehow, Kennedy's story goes, after he drove into the pond, he got out of the sinking car and surfaced above the rushing water.
He was next seen at the nearby rental cottage where his group of five married men and six women had been partying. After emerging from the pond, he said, he walked back to the party to get his pals there to help. Along the way, he passed several houses, indicating the presence of people who could have helped. But he did not stop.
It was July 1969. Years later, the screenwriters of a documentary about the incident have Kennedy say, 'I'm never going to be President.' In his end-of-life memoir, he acknowledged that reality.
But ten years later, Ted Kennedy thought he had finally been cleansed of Chappaquiddick. After he'd pled guilty to leaving the scene, an inquest had concluded with no new charges. Twice reelected by his adoring Massachusetts constituents, surrounded by supportive Senate colleagues, Kennedy decided that the 1980 election was now or never: the Democrat in the White House, Jimmy Carter, was at an unprecedented low approval rating. Polls showed Kennedy could take him in a primary and likely beat Republican front-runner Ronald Reagan in the general. Carter's self-righteous demeanor in the face of inflation and a stagnating economy had rendered him virtually unelectable against the Republicans. Once again, a Kennedy would save the party. Chappaquiddick? The tenth anniversary passed in July of 1979 with nary a murmur.
So television anchorman Roger Mudd seemingly caught the candidate by surprise with his question in the first interview of the 1979 campaign. The judge who presided over the hearing said he believed you lied about Chappaquiddick, Mudd began. Will anyone ever fully believe your explanation? Kennedy responded with a long string of utterly incoherent verbiage: 'the problem is, from that night, I, I found the conduct, the behavior almost beyond belief myself. I mean that's why it's been, but I think that's the way it was," he rambled. "But that happens to be the way it was," he finally concluded. And then, interview over, he waited. After all, the media had blithely ignored Kennedy's brother, the martyred President John F. Kennedy, sneaking himself and his various bedmates in and out of the White House, and his other brother, the martyred presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, stirring the sex pots with Marilyn Monroe before she died in scandalous circumstances, in that case a notorious suicide.
Not this time. From the moment Ted Kennedy set foot in the state of Iowa in 1979, it was clear that Iowa women'schoolteachers, plant workers'had not forgotten Chappaquiddick. Had voters been so inclined, reporters, from Tom Wicker of the New York Times to Jimmy Breslan of the New York Daily News, were ready to remind them of Kennedy's inadequate repentance. How about 'Bless me, Father, for I have sinned'? Breslin suggested, for starters. Unlike Jimmy Carter, liberal Ted Kennedy was publicly feminist. He supported Medicaid payments for abortions and the feminists' dream, a constitutional Equal Rights Amendment, still awaiting ratification by a few more states. But in the private world, there were no women in any serious positions on his staff. His reputation as a 'known womanizer' gave the head of the National Women's Political Caucus, Iris Mitgang, 'reason for pause," and female political reporter Suzannah Lessard 'the creeps.' Kennedy lost Iowa 59 percent to 31 percent; a few months later support for his candidacy collapsed in the Catholic precincts of Chicago. With all the pausing and the remembering, the Chappaquiddick survivor and philandering women's-policy ally Ted Kennedy lost the primary to the upright Jimmy Carter. You might call it a #MeToo moment.
Coda
But it was a #MeToo moment with a big cost to women's other interests. In November the sexually virtuous Carter lost in a landslide to conservative Republican Ronald Reagan.
Product details
- Publisher : Mariner Books; First Edition (June 11, 2019)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 336 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1328566447
- ISBN-13 : 978-1328566447
- Item Weight : 1.24 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.25 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,038,192 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #643 in Sociology Books on Abuse
- #6,544 in Women in History
- #15,092 in Historical Study (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

A retired labor lawyer and professor, Linda Hirshman, J.D., PhD, is an author specializing in revolutionary social movements. Her most recent book is The Color of Abolition: How a Printer, a Prophet, and a Contessa Moved a Nation (2022), which the NYT described as "fresh, provocative and engrossing." She has also written about the movement to end sex harassment (Reckoning), the Gay Revolution (Victory) and the feminist movement, both legal (Sisters in Law, A Woman's Guide to Law School) and cultural (Get to Work: A Manifesto for Women of the World; Hard Bargains: The Politics of Sex). She received her J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School and her Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Chicago and taught Philosophy and Women’s Studies at Brandeis University, specializing in the study of social movements. In recent years, she has appeared on 60 Minutes, Good Morning America, various NPR shows and the Colbert Report. She also has written for such publications as the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Atlantic, She lives in New York City and Arizona.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In 1969, when "Reckoning" begins, Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy wound up entangled in scandal when it became public that he had left a young woman to drown after driving off a bridge after a party while intoxicated. As portrayed by last year's movie "Chappaquiddick," this marked a shift in how the media covered such events. No longer would the media treat such events with kid gloves, as they had done in the era of JFK and prior. A few years later, Yale law student (and later professor and groundbreaking author) Catherine MacKinnon would make the discovery that sexual misconduct is illegal under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Later Mackinnon published "Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sexual Discrimination," and would eventually face a backlash when she took an anti-pornography stance that would cost her a secure job in academia. Meanwhile, several African-American women, including Mechelle Vinson, would make the brave decision to sue their supervisors for sexual misconduct. Strides were being made - including in Hollywood with the movie "9 to 5," but progress was still slow.
"Reckoning" also examines two cases in the nineties that shaped how the public views this topic: the Monica Lewinsky scandal, in which Democrat supporters of President Bill Clinton were (sometimes) conflicted between his record of supporting women's rights and his history of being accused of personal harassment. The other is the nomination of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and how Anita Hill's allegations against him shaped the confirmation hearings (something that would later be repeated with Brett Kavanaugh and Dr. Christine Ford). Later on, the rising popularity of social media in this century, especially the use of Twitter and hashtags like MeToo, would prove potent in bringing formerly untouchable men, such as film producer Harvey Weinstein, not to mention over 200 others in media, politics, entertainment and sports down. The author also covers the Access Hollywood/Donald Trump scandal and the downfall of Fox News head, Roger Ailes. Finally, Hirshman devotes time to the "Scribbling Women" such as Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer, as well as journalists like Ronan Farrow who broke the Weinstein story.
The author does an excellent job of giving an overview of the legal, political and cultural history of women's struggle against sexual misconduct from the late sixties to the present. Some of the writing seemed alternately academic and oddly colloquial (though perhaps the latter is intended ironically). There does seem to be a liberal bias in some of the language used to describe the subjects (i.e. Donna Rice is referred to as a party girl), and the author remains convinced to the end that the GOP is the anti-women party and nothing good can come of it being in power (without explaining why there is now record unemployment lows for women and minorities under a Republican POTUS). I also wished that it would be more widely acknowledged that men also suffer sexual assault, as several in Hollywood at least, have come forward with their own allegations. But overall, there's much food for thought here.
I want to start my review by saying that as a political moderate, I was quite pleased with the reasonably objective view she presented in the majority of the book. She was just as quick to call out the abysmal behavior of the liberal/Democratic party leaders of the various times as she was the conservative leaders. I especially loved how she was realistic in her analysis of the entire Clinton/Lewinsky scandal in the 1990's and how that continued to influence the political landscape into the most recent election. Her writing of how Harvey Weinstein's years of abusive behavior were finally brought to light was eye opening to just how common this type of behavior is in our society and the lengths that will be gone to to cover it up. The book gives credit and tells the story of the journalists who made it happen. Hirshman was quick to point out the duplicity of these supposed "allies" to women- several of which are publicly known to contribute to women's issues yet are some of the biggest abusers behind the scenes.
I expected the author to have a somewhat liberal bias, and she does to an extent, but she did a good job for the most part of sticking to the point and not making the entire book about politics that were not relevant to her subject. My only issues with her writing are the views she perpetuates that one must be in favor of extreme and militant views on abortion in order to be considered a feminist and her constant denigration of white Republican women. Abortion in of itself is a complicated issue, that has many personal, social, ethical, and moral implications that are beyond the scope of her book (and this review). That being said, many people have more moderate views on abortion, and that in no way diminishes the fact that they are strongly against unequal treatment or downright harassment of women. Hirshman almost goes to the point of dismissing those who differ from her extreme views and discounts how much influence this large group of people do have on society and in pushing the interests of women ahead. On a similar note, women of all different ages, races, and backgrounds choose a political candidate or party affiliation for a myriad of reasons. Like all human beings, women are complex and multifaceted in making choices- her suggestion that women "vote with their husbands" or that they are unable to view the political landscape contrary to her without being an enemy to women's rights is sadly divisive. Her extreme views on ALL Republicans in the last chapter are too far fetched to be reality- especially in light of the fact that she spends a good portion of the book calling out "allies" (i.e. Democrats) that are really doing harm to women behind the scenes. Women need to unite- and this doesn't help the cause.
Overall, it was an enjoyable read that was very informative. This is an important story that needs to be told- and Hirshman writes in a way that will make the subject matter interesting and engaging to most readers. I recommend it with a grain of salt towards some of her more extreme views.

