Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-51% $18.04$18.04
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: iWatch LLC
Save with Used - Good
$15.20$15.20
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Zoom Books Company
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Reporting Vietnam: Media and Military at War Paperback – October 30, 1998
Purchase options and add-ons
Reporting Vietnam is an abridgment and updating of Hammond's massive two-volume work issued by the Government Printing Office. Based on classified and recently declassified government documents—including Nixon's national security files—as well as on extensive interviews and surveys of press war coverage, it tells how government and media first shared a common vision of American involvement in Vietnam. It then reveals how, as the war dragged on, upbeat government press releases were consistently challenged by journalists' reports from the field and finally how, as public sentiment shifted against the war, Presidents Johnson and Nixon each tried to manage the news media, sparking a heated exchange of recriminations.
Hammond strongly challenges the assertions of many military leaders that the media lost the war by swaying public opinion. He takes readers through the twists and turns of official public affairs policy as it tries to respond to a worsening domestic political environment and recurring adverse "media episodes." Along the way, he makes important observations about the penchant of American officials for placing appearance ahead of substance and about policy making in general.
Although Richard Nixon once said of the Vietnam war, "Our worst enemy seems to be the press," Hammond clearly shows that his real enemies were the contradictions and flawed assumptions that he and LBJ had created. Reporting Vietnam brings a critical study to a wider audience and is both a major contribution to an ongoing debate and a cautionary guide for future conflicts.
- Print length376 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherUniversity Press of Kansas
- Publication dateOctober 30, 1998
- Dimensions6.05 x 0.87 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100700609954
- ISBN-13978-0700609956
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Hammond succeeds in puncturing much of the mythology about the media— and doing so in a readable and thorough fashion."—Washington Post Book World
"Hammond depicts the tension between the armed services and the media as a game of strategy, one-upmanship, and high-stakes jockeying. Drawing on a thorough examination of military documents and newspaper and broadcast reports, he explains how the press allowed the military to bring back tear gas for use in the war, how various news organizations contradicted themselves and one another in describing the war’s unfolding, and how much of the American public came to feel that the war was a hopeless effort."—Publishers Weekly
"Today’s military professional can see throughout this text the birth of our modern public affairs doctrine. . . . a must read for any military officer or member of the national security community responsible for developing plans or strategies that may have an impact on public opinion."
—Naval War College Review
"Few issues have aroused more controversy than the role of the news media during the Vietnam War. Hammond demystifies the subject in a book that is scrupulously researched, authoritative, and, above all, readable."—Stanley Karnow, author of Vietnam: A History
"Reporting Vietnam is a classic journalism history and an essential work in helping understand America’s most controversial foreign conflict. It is not only the definitive account of Vietnam war reporting, but also an engrossing read."—Peter Arnett, CNN correspondent and author of Live from the Battlefield
"By far the best study of the press and armed services yet written."—Stephen E. Ambrose, author of Citizen Soldiers
From the Back Cover
"Few issues have aroused more controversy than the role of the news media during the Vietnam War. Hammond demystifies the subject in a book that is scrupulously researched, authoritative, and, above all, readable."--Stanley Karnow, author of Vietnam: A History
"By far the best study of the press and armed services yet written."--Stephen E. Ambrose, author of Citizen Soldiers
"Hammond depicts the tension between the armed services and the media as a game of strategy, one-upmanship, and high-stakes jockeying. Drawing on a thorough examination of military documents and newspaper and broadcast reports, he explains how the press allowed the military to bring back tear gas for use in the war, how various news organizations contradicted themselves and one another in describing the war's unfolding, and how much of the American public came to feel that the war was a hopeless effort."--Publishers Weekly
"Reporting Vietnam is a classic journalism history and an essential work in helping understand America's most controversial foreign conflict. It is not only the definitive account of Vietnam war reporting, but also an engrossing read."--Peter Arnett, CNN correspondent and author of Live from the Battlefield
About the Author
From The Washington Post
Product details
- Publisher : University Press of Kansas; Revised ed. edition (October 30, 1998)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 376 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0700609954
- ISBN-13 : 978-0700609956
- Item Weight : 1.14 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.05 x 0.87 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #998,323 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,790 in Vietnam War History (Books)
- #3,109 in Communication & Media Studies
- #3,888 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
As his method of investigation, Hammond chose to read U.S. government files for the relevant years. He chose that particular archive because he was not necessarily interested in any and all news reports, but especially those that "drew the attention of officials in the United States and South Vietnam, especially when they conflicted with the official line on an event." Because he wanted to identify the points of friction between the military and the media, news reports that government officials thought were worthy of note became "the points of departure" for Hammond's case studies. Most of the news items had been originally published in the so-called "elite press," newspapers like the New York Times, and magazines like U.S. News & World Report. But some were written by various editorial writers and syndicated columnists, selected because these pieces "sometimes sustained the issues far longer than the news itself would have and provided the spur that prompted some action or reaction on the part of officials" (x).
What did Hammond's research reveal? His conclusion is that, early on in the war, news correspondents from the United States supported both the American soldier and the stated goals of the mission issued by U.S. officials. For their part, the military, in spite of consistent pressure from the Diem regime to restrict information, normally upheld and honored the rights of a free press. News people almost always stayed within the guidelines that had been designed by U.S. officials for the purpose of ensuring military security (291). In other words, at the beginning of the relationship between media and military, Vietnam largely resembled what had become standard during the two previous U.S. wars.
Hammond observes that growing, unprecedented hostility between media and military was rooted in the differences between Vietnam and earlier wars. Vietnam, he says, "was born in contradiction and grounded in ambiguity." Wanting to protect their political agendas, Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, "sought to enlist the military as spokesmen for their points of view." By 1972, the year in which President Nixon was elected to a second term, "many substantive news releases emanating from the military command in South Vietnam were drafted in Washington with only perfunctory input from agencies in the field" (292).
In neither case did this compromised tactic work for very long. By 1968, for example, President Johnson had issued statements that included so many inconsistencies, both the press and even some officials within the administration doubted General Westmoreland's report that the enemy had suffered many setbacks as a result of their Tet offensive. During the Nixon administration, claims of success led to hopes that were soon disappointed. Promises of an imminent withdrawal from Vietnam were followed by stories of escalation in Cambodia and Laos. As the press reported a conflicted U.S. stance and the inconsistencies that accompanied that stance, both the Nixon administration and the U.S. military almost completely withdrew from the media. In some instances, U.S. commanders took it upon themselves to fight back against the press. They refused, for example, to provide transportation for reporters in combat areas and either delayed or discontinued briefings. Effectively, "they demolished what remained of the military's standing with the press." By the end of 1972, "meaningful give-and-take had all but ceased on both sides" (294).
In such an environment, the U.S. government held at least a temporary advantage: the administration largely controlled the information on which the news media depended. Hammond says that what eventually broke the ensuing stalemate between the government and the news media was the American public, which chose to go "its own way." Americans, he says, followed "their own third course, exercising their own independence of mind, and displaying a substantial measure of contempt for all those in the press and government who had sought to manipulate them over the years." The American people, sick of the "many deaths and contradictions . . . moved to repudiate the earlier decision." When they did, it was relatively easy for the American press to follow. By contrast, the U.S. military "lacked the ability to do the same." Wanting to retain whatever honor they could and emotionally tied to the prospect of some sort of victory, leaders of the U.S. Armed Forces "fixed their anger on the press, the most visible element of the society that appeared to have rejected them" (296).
Hammond's research and the books he has written give a large measure of insight into why Americans hear the name "Vietnam" the way they do.
The US government did not intend to win the war. It was all politics and the military paid the price.
I cannot recommend this book highly enough. I wish I could give it six stars. It is a book that anyone who wants to understand anything at all about the Vietnam War simply has to read. The articles in the two volumes of the Library of America series provide valuable background for this book and I think they should be read first. But even without them any reader would get a great deal from this book.
There are nearly fifty pages of notes, and index, and a generous number of pictures of the main events and participants. Just a wonderful achievement. Thanks to Mr. Hammond!


