Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ Free Shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
A Republic No More: Big Government and the Rise of American Political Corruption Hardcover – February 10, 2015
Curated Collections of History Books
Browse through handpicked collections of rare, vintage and antiquarian history books. Learn more on AbeBooks.com.
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
"In explaining "corruption as a permanent, institutionalized feature of our government," Jay Cost has made a major contribution to American history and political science. His narrative is detailed and lively, accessible to citizens and scholars alike. And he makes a case for reform while suggesting its limits. A real tour de force." -William Kristol. Editor, The Weekly Standard
About the Author
Jay Cost has been a top political analyst for nearly a decade. Currently a writer for the "Weekly Standard," he got his start writing at RealClearPolitics.com. His work has been featured in the "Wall Street Journal," the "New York Post," "National Review," FoxNews.com, "National Affairs" and "Policy Review." His first book, "Spoiled Rotten," was a critical history of the Democratic party published in 2012 by Broadside Books. He received a B.A. with High Distinction in government and history from the University of Virginia and an M.A. in political science from the University of Chicago. He resides in Western Pennsylvania with his wife and two children.
Browse award-winning titles. See more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
The Introduction is a precise tour through his rationale for the thesis of this book: "the growth of governmental power beyond its initial boundaries, without corresponding shifts in its institutions, has altered the original design of the constitutional system ... In other words, it creates the opportunity for corruption."
The first eight chapters provide a thorough, compressed history of how Cost's four principle themes support the relentlessly growing corruption up to the end of World War II. These four themes are: 1) an incompetent Congress, in the sense of not having the institutional structure or power to control the forces of the growing bureaucracy and its attendant corruption, 2) a denuded republican principle that invited corruption, 3) a partisanized presidency resulting from the popular election of the president, and 4) the explosion of ad hoc institutions created by the complex laws passed by Congress and the inability of Congress to oversee them.
I found Chapter Eight most revealing. Jay Cost describes the history of how factionalism became a necessity of politicians in general, but the president in particular, in large part due to what he calls the democratization of the presidential election. In other words, the opening up of the election to the general voters instead of adhering to state-chosen electors as specified in the Constitution.
Chapters Nine through Thirteen take readers through the staggering maze of the modern American bureaucracy. In Chapter Nine, the multi-level system of subsidies to farmers, mostly to large corporate farmers, illustrates the direct-subsidy corruption. Chapter Ten is no kinder of an analysis of pork-barrel projects. Chapters Eleven, Twelve, and Thirteen highlight the vast corruption in Medicare and entitlements, corporate taxation, and Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac. The details of how these systems evolved provide a fresh and comprehensive level of understanding of just how overwhelming the corruption has become in the Federal Government.
Jay Cost has made some fundamental philosophical errors in defining the problem of corruption and has left out the reality of the Constitution. This has corrupted his conclusions even though his definition and discussion of the history and extent of our modern Government corruption is excellent and highly educational.
The Problem of Government Size
In the book's Conclusion, Cost says, "As we have noted at many points, our objection is not with these governmental powers per se, but rather with the aggrandizement of power without a revision of the structure."
The author is clear on this throughout the book. The problem is not that Government has become so colossal, but simply that Congress has not evolved with Government growth to properly administer it. The ratifiers of the Constitution would differ with him on that. The Declaration of Independence, the American Revolution, and the U.S. Constitution all made limitation of government power the main event.
Cost maintains that Government is corrupt because it is not controllable by the institution of Congress because Government has outgrown Congress. The reality is that Government is corrupt because it is largely in violation of the Constitution as it was written and clearly in violation of the assurances made by the Federalists to the anti-Federalists about so many legal issues that the anti-Federalists were concerned about during ratification.
In Robert Natelsons excellent book, "The Original Constitution," he writes:
"During the ratification debates advocates of the Constitution publicly listed examples of activities over which the federal government would have no authority. They did so to inform and reassure Ratifiers and members of the general public about the limited scope of federal power. Among the activities listed as within the exclusive sphere of the states were marriage, divorce, and other aspects of domestic relations; manufacturing (necessarily including labor relations); other business enterprises; agriculture and other land use; land titles and conveyancing; property outside of interstate trade; commerce wholly within state lines; state and local government; the regulation of most crimes and civil suits; social services; training the militia and appointing militia officers; religion; and education."
We see in this list the Federalists' promises that the Federal Government would never contain: a Department of Labor, a Small Business Administration, a Department of Agriculture, a Department of the Interior, a Department of Commerce, a Department of Housing and Urban Development, a Department of Health and Human Services, a Department of Education, and probably over a hundred other agencies.
The U.S. Constitution would not have been ratified without these assurances by the Federalists about the actual meanings of many of the constitution's clauses. Invariably those concerns were about the constitution being interpreted to give too much power to the central government or deny it to the states and the people. The Federalists responded by promising that the Anti-Federalists' suspicions of too much power to the central government would never happen, using arguments that stressed the established social and legal traditions and the clear meanings of the words used. Nine of thirteen states ratified the Constitution on condition of those Federalist assurances. Size and power of Government is critical to the U.S. Constitution and to the foundational principles of America.
The Living Constitution
The modern, progressive doctrine that the Constitution is a "living document" that can be interpreted in terms of modern political reality dominates the American jurisprudence system. This doctrine has been championed because of the politicization of the Supreme Court (or maybe vice versa). This is probably the main reason that the Court has defended the growth of Government. Cost blames so much of our corruption on the politicization of the presidency but mentions the living constitution only once briefly in passing in the Introduction. Given that all of this Government growth has been endorsed by the Supreme Court,it is hardly reasonable to call special attention to the politicization of the presidency without doing the same for the Supreme Court.
In Jay Cost's Conclusion, he writes:
"Could not disinterested liberals and conservatives put aside temporarily their eternal war, for instance, on the top marginal tax rate to focus on cleaning out the corruption in the corporate tax code? How about suspending temporarily their disagreements about food stamps, and in general the interminable debate about social welfare for the poor, to cut flagrant corporate welfare from the farm bill?"
Does Cost think that making temporary peace between conservatives and progressives over a few issues will really solve anything? This is why it matters how you frame the basic problem. If the problem is that Congress has not evolved with Government, maybe Cost's proposal has merit. But if the problem is that Government is too big PERIOD, his proposal is just another "let's all get along" arrow that falls short of the target.
He goes on to say the real issue with this is that it can be shown that the lobbying process often greatly distorts the efficient allocation of natural resources resulting in significant net losses (huge waste) to the nation as a whole, and the intended purposes of the original programs do not materialize as they were designed. The tweaking represents a subversive, backdoor redistribution of wealth. The special interest groups can gain big time at the expense of the public. The tools, methods, and techniques politicians employ to alter legislation are quite varied, sneaky, secretive, and sleazy. This is not a new revelation, but the depth and degree of this process today is, well, good grief!
The author indicates that all political parties (past and present) are equally guilty of these transgressions. The general public must dean part of the blame via apathy or indifference. It seems almost as though that corruption is what drives our system and it has mutated into "Plunkitt of Tammany Hall" on steroids; hence the title of the book " A Republic No More". Government as described in this book acts more like a legalized form of organized crime than it does a free market democratic system; and it has gotten worse over time.
Cost says this form of corruption started back in the late 1770's in a battle between Alexander Hamilton, who favored more government involvement in national affairs, and James Madison, who wanted very limited government as originally promulgated by the Constitution. Hamilton's ideology won out. The Framers did not foresee these developments and had not designed an institutional mechanisms for controlling this abuse of power.
Once special interests influence became entrenched, momentum grew and the process became institutionalized and could not be mitigated despite efforts to do so; re-election, greed, and self-interest are the driving forces. Could it be "the people who wrote the laws like it that way?" Cost proposes solutions, but I did not get the impression he was all that hopeful.
Enough of my bloviating; the book is really a good read. I cannot do justice here. The author covers, in detail, how this all evolved and became standard operating procedure over time and he employees plenty of examples (names, dates, events, programs, etc.) and numerous supporting references; well written.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Fwd: Book Review of A Republic No More....
by Copyright c Samuel A. Nigro, MD, April 2015
Book Review of A Republic No More--Big Government and The...Read more