Customer Reviews: Resurrection from the Underground: Feodor Dostoevsky (Studies in Violence, Mimesis, & Culture)
Amazon Vehicles Fall Reading 2016 Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it Songs of Summer Fire TV Stick Health, Household and Grocery Back to School Totes Amazon Cash Back Offer conj2 conj2 conj2  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis Kiss Rocks Vegas Shop Now STEM

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on January 9, 2012
This short but rewarding essay on Dostoevsky is one of Girard's best works, and one of his least known and read. This re-issue of the original edition by Michigan State University Press, with an updated foreword by translator James Williams, should please those who wanted a copy of this book but didn't want to pay dearly to get their hands on one. Girard's essay was written just after he published his first book on five major European novelists (Dostoevsky included) and can be read as a companion piece to Deceit, Desire, and the Novel. It's an extended meditation on the interplay between an author's life and his writing, and the way Dostoevsky made use of life experiences, traumas, and love affairs, translating his personal anguish into masterful fiction. At the heart of this book is the idea that by comparing Dostoevsky's early work (now rarely read, even by literature professors) to his widely-known masterpieces, we can see that somewhere between The Insulted and the Injured and Notes from the Underground, something unexpected happened--rather than interpreting his own perversely jealous tendencies as magnanimous generosity, as he had done in such early works as White Nights, Dostoevsky suddenly became incredibly self-aware, and in satirical short novels such as Notes and The Eternal Husband as well as in his great masterpieces (Crime and Punishment, Demons, etc.) he gradually worked out the patterns and structures in which he had been imprisoned and exorcised demon after demon, ultimately triumphing over all Manichean temptations in his final, crowning novel, The Brothers Karamazov. Girard offers a compelling account of how a novelist uses his writing to explore the obsessions and questions that grip him, and he shows that Dostoevsky was engaged in an admirable but dangerous quest to test the limits of the human condition by successively embodying and then describing virtually every one of the individualistic poses and Promethean postures of 19th and 20th century intellectual and ideological life. Gathering together the disparate tendencies of his own personality, Dostoevsky left blind bipolarity and one-sided Romanticism behind, de-essentializing good and evil and presenting us with human beings who seem so real because it is their freedom to choose, enmeshed in the network of human relationships, that makes monsters or saints out of them, and not some Manichean predisposition. An illuminating afterword puts the essay in an explicitly "mimetic" perspective and adds some valuable insights about the paralyzing and self-destructive "obstacle addiction" that characterizes many of Dostoevsky's most vivid characters, while speculating that if we expel Dostoevsky from the cultural scene because of his reactionary journalistic writings, this may be a way for us to maintain our denial of the disturbingly Dostoevskyan bent of our contemporary world. This book will convince you that to be a great writer means more than mastering a literary technique--it means embarking on a quest for truth and self-expression that has led some of our greatest authors, Dostoevsky foremost among them, to the brink of madness and (in this case at least) back again. If you want increased appreciation for the miracle that is Dostoevsky's oeuvre, this book is for you.
0Comment| 16 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on February 6, 2012
Although now an emeritus professor at Stanford, Girard published this work in 1963 in his native French. It was translated in 1996 by Williams, and now reissued in this edition.

There are introductions to both the original edition and this reissue by the translator, and these put me off a bit. They struck me as the overly tangled but ultimately empty prose that too often passes as literary criticism. Fortunately he didn't translate Girard into similar prose, but let the author's voice come through.

That is not to suggest for even a second that this book is an easy read. Girard is intense and thoughtful, and I may need to reread some of Dostoevsky to fully appreciate his arguments. By the way, if you have not read at least the major novels of Dostoevsky you will be lost in this book.

Dostoevsky's later works set up a succession of men trying to lay out a path to a life above the mundane, with failure as the general result. Girard ties these efforts back to the narrator of "Notes from the Underground". The problem Dostoevsky struggles with is how to escape from the "underground", how to avoid the snares that modern life sets for us. As he lays out Dostoevsky's struggle with this question he also explores the great author's struggle with his own beliefs.

An afterword by Girard briefly covers an additional thirty years of his thinking on the matter, and also notes how relevant the questions Dostoevsky wrestled with remain today.

While definitely a book for a hardcore Dostoevsky lover, it is a richly insightful one. Girard says more in fewer than ninety pages than some writers say in hundreds. This is not a book you can skim. These dense and thought provoking pages take time to ponder and digest.
0Comment| 7 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on July 5, 2012
My knowleged of Dostoevsky was largely limited to "The Brothers Karamazov" which I've read and re-read many times over several decades. This book opened my eyes to the wider picture of Dostoevsky's literary work, and even his "evolution" as a writer. So the list of books to read before I die has become even longer, as I stop to pick up novels I've previously overlooked! Now to read more Dostoevsky AND more Girard!!!
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on September 24, 2014
This translation is pathetic. James Williams could barely speak French. There are some things that are very subtle in French that are so butchered here that it would be literally impossible for a reader to guess Girard's meaning without referring to the original French version of the book. Some of the lines come off so stilted and bizarre they barely seem like English. "In the universe structured by the Gospel revelation, individual existence remains basically imitative even, and above all, perhaps, when one rejects with horror any thought of imitation." Huh? Terrible hack job. A book about underground pride translated by someone apparently consumed by it. What a shame, too, because this is a great book about Dostoevsky by a great writer.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on December 14, 2012
The analysis of character in the novels of Dostoevsky based on his life experiences in Russia and Germany remind me of how frequently law enforcement adopts absurd tactics of Russian nihilism. I was recently surprised to read that Dostoevsky's father had been killed by peasants crushing his testicles. Note 19 at the end of this book is about a rumor started by a landowner who wanted to buy the property of the deceased father of Dostoevsky. Dostoevsky's father was a medical man who acquired the property and died of apoplexy as anyone who was born with a brain in a Russian society was likely to do. If you don't believe me, try reading Lenin's Private War: The Voyage of the Philosophy Steamer and the Exile of the Intelligentsia.

Think and grin:

Americans have been most productive as a cartoon market for people raised by Mad Magazine. Dostoevsky found love and gambling as themes that could compete with crime and revolution for the kind of underground character who resents law enforcement based on an ethic that wants to slaughter animals as the scapegoat for things people do. Nobody who could not triumph over being considered a slave was of any interest to Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, or people who took lithium long enough to become apathetic and lethargic.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse