- Paperback: 398 pages
- Publisher: Sky's Edge Publishing (April 17, 2012)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0984986707
- ISBN-13: 978-0984986705
- Product Dimensions: 6.7 x 0.9 x 9.6 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 72 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #341,601 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.75 shipping
+ Free Shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Rethinking Madness: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Our Understanding and Treatment of Psychosis Paperback – April 17, 2012
|New from||Used from|
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
"Every page of this book was exciting to me . . . This book should be a part of the training of every physician, psychiatrist, and pastoral counselor, and owned by the family and friends of every mentally ill person as well as the sufferers themselves." - Joanne Greenberg, bestselling author of I Never Promised You a Rose Garden
"A book of profound illumination both for the scholar and the person struggling for his or her psychical life. I highly recommend this book to all those who are touched by the psychotic experience, which really means all of us--and to find out why, just read this book!" - Kirk Schneider, Ph.D., author of Awakening to Awe
"Deceptively easy to understand, yet thought provoking and challenging, his work offers plausible reasons to overcome the too simple historical medical approaches that ignore the richness of the human experience and the positive potential inherent in one's journey through madness." - Ronald Bassman, Ph.D., author of A Fight to Be
"In a clear manner, Dr. Williams lays out the evidence for a 'paradigm shift' in our thinking that, at its core, would offer people who experience madness both hope and the knowledge that robust recovery is possible, and, with the right support, quite common." - Robert Whitaker, author of Mad in America and Anatomy of an Epidemic
"Rethinking Madness provides not only a compelling critique of the pessimistic and damaging 'medical model' that has dominated mental health services and research for far too long, it offers some hopeful alternatives." - John Read, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology, Editor of Models of Madness and the scientific journal Psychosis
About the Author
Dr. Paris Williams offers the very rare and powerful perspective of someone who has experienced psychosis from both sides--as a practicing psychologist and researcher, and as someone who has himself struggled with psychotic experiences. In his late 20's, while in the midst of a very successful career as a hang gliding instructor and competition pilot (winning a World Champion title and multiple National Champion titles), Paris Williams suddenly found himself plunged into a profound struggle with experiences that would have likely resulted in the diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. Fortunately, he managed to avoid becoming entangled within the psychiatric system, and he instead embarked upon a journey of healing and self discovery, working to resolve his own personal crisis while aspiring to support others going through similar crises. He has since spent over a decade deeply exploring both Eastern and Western understandings of mind and consciousness, studying intensive meditation from a number of different masters around the world, earning a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology, working in numerous settings supporting people struggling with psychosis and other challenging and extreme experiences, and conducting a series of pioneering research studies at Saybrook University on recovery from schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. He continues to work as a psychologist in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Try the Kindle edition and experience these great reading features:
72 customer reviews
Review this product
Read reviews that mention
Showing 1-5 of 72 reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Williams' critique of the medical-model is carried out thoroughly, with a firm basis in scientific evidence. The first part of the book includes a review of a lot of the current scientific literature on madness and concludes that there is very little evidence supporting the medical-model and a lot of evidence contradicting it. For example, the medical-model views things like schizophrenia as degenerative brain diseases. If that model were correct recovery would be impossible. There are, after all, no reported cases of people recovering from genuine degenerative brain diseases like Alzheimer's, but there are lots of cases of people recovering from schizophrenia (21) (41). Paris Williams also examines studies that suggest a strong genetic component to schizophrenia, he offers some critiques of those studies, and he cites a study that discovered that environmental influences (family dysfunction, etc.) have seven times more explanatory power than genetic predisposition (30). Williams also cites a study by the BPS that questions the validity of diagnostic categories like schizophrenia. There is almost no statistical clustering of symptoms which suggests that categories like "schizophrenia" might be social constructions (36-38). Williams also presents lots of evidence suggesting that the use of anti-psychotics is often more harmful than helpful in the long-term (42-57).
After critiquing the medical-model Williams summarizes a whole host of alternative models of madness. There is a lot of overlap between the various alternative models. They all tend to view madness as a result of seemingly irresolvable existential dilemmas. Many of the alternative models of madness see madness as part of the psyche's self-healing dynamics. A lot of the alternative models view madness as the psyche's last resort in attempting to deal with an unacceptable existential situation. In the third section Williams presents his own DUI model of madness which incorporates aspects of the alternative models presented in the second section. Williams sees a dialectic operating at the heart of our being between isolation anxiety and engulfment anxiety. As unique individuals we all have different windows of tolerance in relation to each and we swing between them. The psyche tries to maintain itself within its window of tolerance. There is also a tension between our standard cognitive constructs, which tend to reinforce our dualistic views about the world, and the ultimately non-dualistic nature of reality that manifests itself in "transliminal experiences".
Madness generally occurs when the dialectical tension between isolation anxiety and engulfment anxiety becomes unbearable, the window of tolerance shrinks to zero, and, there is a corresponding instability in a person's cognitive constructs, so that they become particularly open to transliminal experiences. Madness is the psyche's attempt to fundamentally alter a person's cognitive constructs in a way that will reduce the dialectical tension and the untenability of the person's existential situation. That is an overly simplistic summary of Williams' model that does not really do it justice. However, Williams' model is able to explain a lot that the standard medical-model is unable to explain. It is able to explain why there is a high recovery rate. It is able to explain why so many of the people who have experienced periods of psychosis claim that the experiences were ultimately beneficial in terms of their overall psychic health. It is able to explain why environmental factors are more predictive than genetic factors. It is also able to explain why the use of anti-psychotics often does more harm than benefit since they tend to short-circuit the psyche's natural healing processes.
Ultimately, there is still a lot of work that needs to be done in attempting to understand madness. Williams intersperses six case histories throughout the book to support his model. They are all quite interesting and Williams' model is able to make sense of a great deal of their experience. However, all the case histories were people who experienced a very precise period of onset for their psychosis and they were all people who ultimately recovered. There are, in other words, a lot of similarities in the case histories. I would like to see the case histories expanded to see how Williams' model would apply to people who do not fit that profile. I have a family member who has suffered from psychosis her whole life. I have talked to family members who have known her since she was a child. I asked them if there was ever a time when she was "normal", for lack of a better term, and they said no. There was not, therefore, any particular moment when her psychosis started to manifest itself. She has just always been that way, even when she was a small child. I am curious how her experiences would fit into Williams' model. I would also be curious to see how Williams' model would account for people who experience a specific period of onset but never successfully recover.
I would like to see Williams' model expanded to account for these cases. Any successful model of madness, of course, is going to have to be able to account for all the diversity in onset times, recovery rates, etc.. Part of the difficulty with models of madness is that they all tend to leave anomalies out. For example, there is some scientific evidence of brain abnormalities in schizophrenics. The problem with that evidence, as Williams himself points out in this book, is that some people who are schizophrenic do not have the brain abnormalities, and, I believe, though I could be remembering this part incorrectly, some people have them but are not schizophrenic. I think those kinds of anomalies suggest there is something wrong with the basic model. I am not suggesting that there is anything wrong with Williams' model. I think it would definitely be possible to work out Williams' model in a way that would account for people who did not have any particular point of onset or who never recovered. That to me, would be the next logical step. There is, obviously, still a lot of research to be done, but I think Williams' book is a great first step.
The book offers an interesting theory that psychosis is a self-protective mechanism of the patient whose world view collapses and can no longer survive unless that world view collapses and a psychotic world view takes over to allow the patient to continue living - an alternative dreamland when the patient's reality is unbearable. Dumbing down with anti-psychotic medication is like a chemical lobotomy that makes the patient quiet and docile, convenient for the family and state but takes away the patient's ability to digest and reconstruct his/her worldview into one that is more attuned to reality in which he/her can recover into and possibly thrive after jettisoning the baggage of the discarded worldview.
Our mental health system is not equipped to give most patients the care and protection to continue in psychosis with the hope that they eventually recover. The book says 45 days give or take is the period necessary but this is not a scientifically based study result.
I don't think the book's treatment regime is complete but I believe it is one important step towards a deep questioning of the currently failed approaches to mental illness and a loud cry for more open minded approaches.
More significantly, the implications of this book can really change what you recommend or don't recommend for your clients, so more than just having a greater appreciation of what "mental illness" is or may be, this book has pragmatic value.