Other Sellers on Amazon
FREE Shipping
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy Revised ed. Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
"[A] passionate, compelling, and disturbing argument that the ills of democracy in the United States today arise from the default of its elites." ―John Gray, New York Times Book Review (front-page review)
In a front-page review in the Washington Post Book World, John Judis wrote: "Political analysts have been poring over exit polls and precinct-level votes to gauge the meaning of last November's election, but they would probably better employ their time reading the late Christopher Lasch's book." And in the National Review, Robert Bork says The Revolt of the Elites "ranges provocatively [and] insightfully."Controversy has raged around Lasch's targeted attack on the elites, their loss of moral values, and their abandonment of the middle class and poor, for he sets up the media and educational institutions as a large source of the problem. In this spirited work, Lasch calls out for a return to community, schools that teach history not self-esteem, and a return to morality and even the teachings of religion. He does this in a nonpartisan manner, looking to the lessons of American history, and castigating those in power for the ever-widening gap between the economic classes, which has created a crisis in American society. The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy is riveting social commentary.
- ISBN-100393313719
- ISBN-13978-0393313710
- EditionRevised ed.
- PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
- Publication dateJanuary 17, 1996
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.9 x 8.3 inches
- Print length276 pages
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company; Revised ed. edition (January 17, 1996)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 276 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0393313719
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393313710
- Item Weight : 10.3 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.9 x 8.3 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #83,077 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #4 in Political Ideologies
- #96 in Sociology of Class
- #100 in Democracy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Unlike the old aristocratic ruling class with their noblesse oblige, however, today’s cosmopolitan elites lack that sense of moral obligation, priding themselves on being suis generis meritocracy of the intelligent. As Lasch put it:
Although hereditary advantages play an important part in the attainment of professional or managerial status, the new class has to maintain the fiction that its power rests on intelligence alone. Hence it has little sense of ancestral gratitude or an obligation to live up to responsibilities inherited from the past. It thinks of itself as a self-made elite owing its privileges exclusively to its own efforts.
In effect, globalization has turned the new class of elites into tourists in their own countries. According to economist and former U.S. labor secretary Robert Reich, the new elite see themselves as “world citizens, but without accepting . . . any of the obligations that citizenship in a polity normally implies” because without national attachments, people have little inclination to make sacrifices or to accept responsibility for their actions. Their ties to the international culture of work, information and leisure render the new elites indifferent to the prospect of national decline. Instead of financing public services and the public treasury, the new elite invest their money in “self-enclosed enclaves” of private schools, private security guards, and even private systems of garbage collection. Having removed themselves from the common life, many of them have ceased thinking of themselves as nationals—as Americans, British, French, or Italian—altogether.
Then there is the new elite’s unqualified contempt for the masses. Some elites go beyond contempt to a spitefulness toward their fellow countrymen—the viciousness of which takes one’s breath away—for no reason other than a difference in policy preference. As Christopher Lasch put it, when confronted with resistance to their ideas, the elites “betray the venomous hatred that lies not far beneath the smiling face of upper-middle-class benevolence. . . . Simultaneously arrogant and insecure, the new elites, the professional classes in particular, regard the masses with mingled scorn and apprehension.”
There is another dimension in the elites’ treatment of the masses which is more troubling than contempt and which puts democracy in peril. Ortega y Gasset had described the uppity masses as oppressively intolerant, “crushing” beneath them “everything that is different,” and imposing their banal notions on the elite with the “force of law.” In our time, however, Ortega’s characterization is more indicative of the elites’ attitude toward those who hold contrary beliefs and values.
The proper functioning of a democratic polity depends on pluralism or marketplace of ideas, wherein a variety of beliefs and opinions freely are aires, jostling and competing in the public arena. From this competition, the best ideas are most likely to emerge and triumph. It is that pluralism that is compromised by the elites’ intolerance for populist movements and their concerns.
Then there is the elites’ categorical rejection of and efforts to overturn electoral outcomes not to their liking. In the United States, Democrats refused to accept the results of the 2016 presidential election, insisting that Donald Trump fraudulently had won by conspiring with Russians. But on March 22, 2019, after a two-year, $25 million investigation, the long-awaited report from Robert Mueller, Special Counsel for the U.S. Department of Justice, concluded there was no evidence of a Trump-Russia collusion, nor had Trump committed any crime of obstruction of justice.
So alarmed was Christopher Lasch by the elites’ authoritarian impulse that he devoted his last work, Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy, to that subject as a warning to us that democracies are being endangered from within. In Lasch’s words:
Once it was the “revolt of masses” that was held to threaten social order and the civilizing traditions of Western culture. . . . Today it is the elites, however—those who control the international flow of money and information, preside over philanthropic foundations and institutions of higher learning, manage the instruments of cultural production and thus set the terms of public debate—that have lost faith in the values, or what remains of them, of the West. . . . “Diversity”—a slogan that looks attractive on the face of it—has come to mean the opposite of what it appears to mean. In practice, diversity turns out to legitimize a new dogmatism, in which rival minorities take shelter behind a set of beliefs impervious to rational discussion. . . . How much longer can the spirit of free inquiry and open debate survive under these conditions?
Sound familiar? The striking thing is that this is a posthumous publication, consisting of a number of previously-published pieces dating to the early 90's. In other words, Lasch was anxiously contemplating these present realities over thirty years ago. The reader should realize, however, that while the book announces a central thesis many of the pieces contained here are tangential to the principal subject. On the other hand, the abandonment of western values by the so-called elites is such an all-encompassing subject that the constituent parts of the book all bear some relation to the main subject.
Lasch is often labeled 'conservative' but he spares no one from his analyses and often adds a stinging tail to those analyses. (See, for example, his remarks—pp. 192-93—on the radicalization of the humanities. He notes that, ultimately, the 'radicals' are corporate beings, seeking tenure via shortcuts. Ultimately they threaten no real vested interests [except, of course, traditional scholarship] and fully participate in the corporatization of the university, what should be the true object of our concern.) He confronts controversial subjects head-on and inevitably has pungent things to say. On race, for example:
"The thinking classes seem to labor under the delusion that they alone have overcome racial prejudice. The rest of the country, in their view, remains incorrigibly racist. Their eagerness to drag every conversation back to race is enough in itself to invite the suspicion that their investment in this issue exceeds anything that is justified by the actual state of race relations. Monomania is not a sign of good judgment" (p. 90).
I would invite potential readers to utilize Amazon's "Look Inside" feature to survey the subjects of the book's 13 chapters. All are interesting. Lasch is never dull, he is always knowledgeable concerning his subjects and he always draws blood.
Highly recommended (with the caveat that this is largely a collection of separate essays).
Top reviews from other countries
Symbolic analysts, = bankers, advertising makers, government employees, those who think doing something on a laptop is ‘creative’ . In-person workers being those who have to be there: haircutting, care workers, nurses, shop assistants. Finally, at the bottom: repetitive workers, factory employees who do the same task over and over. Their reward amounts not neceeccessary in that order.
The author gives very good descriptions of the groupthink of the symbolic analysts, their world of whatever happens to be Correct at the moment, their nomadic enclaves around the world where they only meet others of the same views. The book describes how their cultural Marxism has taken over democracies with activists ensuring there is no other view on race, gender and sexuality: the only lenses any issue can be seen through.
If you want to read how this diaspora came about, the rise of the people now in charge, this is the book for you.
.
But that's not all. The Left, or what remains of it, has swallowed the same rat poison and joined the elites, abandoning ordinary people for elitist ideas and the gobbledegook of "isms" which have proliferated like weeds. Ordinary people simply don't count any more.
Not all of Lach's criticisms are fair: like a lot of Anglo-Saxons he doesn't really understand post-modernism, and looking back now, it's clear that it never had any real influence outside University literature departments.
That said, a book which is even more important today than it was when it was written, given that the elites have, pretty much, now won.








