Buy new:
$9.99$9.99
FREE delivery: Thursday, April 6 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $8.99
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
97% positive over last 12 months

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.


The Rightful Place of Science: Disasters & Climate Change Paperback – August 31, 2018
Enhance your purchase
This fully revised second edition of Disasters & Climate Change features updated data, analysis, and peer-reviewed science related to understanding recent weather-related disasters in the United States and around the world. The updated volume also offers an inside look at Roger Pielke Jr.'s most recent experiences on the front lines of the bitter climate debates as he has sought to share consensus scientific understandings with the public and policymakers. He concludes with a proposal for a pragmatic way forward on climate policy, one that recognizes the importance of both evidence and politics.
- Print length128 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateAugust 31, 2018
- Dimensions5 x 0.29 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100999587749
- ISBN-13978-0999587744
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes; 2nd edition (August 31, 2018)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 128 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0999587749
- ISBN-13 : 978-0999587744
- Item Weight : 4.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5 x 0.29 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #752,351 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,012 in Environmental Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
1) climate change has human causes
2) it poses risks for life on Earth
3) policy makers should take action to reduce emissions
4) there should be a carbon tax
5) extreme heat and intense rainfall may be increasing due to increasing concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases.
So he is in the AGW camp. However, he includes passages from the IPCC reports which state that a signal of human causation/attribution for the extreme weather events (e.g. hurricanes and flooding, and more) cannot be found. Still, he believes that CO2 caused by fossil fuel burning is driving unusual global warming. I don't understand why he didn't reference data going back thousands of years which show that the warming is not unusual. Also, he never mentions water vapor as the most powerful greenhouse gas - one of the real drivers of climate. In Chapter 6, What About Climate Policy and Politics, he gets into what seems to be his real interest. Though, he states that the climate debate is over as the AGW crowd have the data and have won. This doesn't make any sense given the amount of fraud in the published climate studies and Climate Gate. He also states there is a consensus that climate change is human caused, but this has never been proven - except amongst the religionists of AGW. At one point in the book, he states that a carbon tax and making fossil fuels more expensive wont dissuade the public from using more of these energy sources, but in Chapter 6 he says that he is for the tax and increasing the price of fossil fuels. He believes that wind and solar will eventually solve the demand for energy worldwide, but this is not supported in reality. Lastly, he states that policies should be put forward and enacted to mitigate global warming and eliminate fossil fuel use, but this is relying on politicians worldwide to solve the alleged problem - it is they who created the mess in the first place!
I strongly DO NOT recommend the book! There are much better truthful books available from Amazon in paperback and kindle.
Raphael Ketani
Sunnyside, NY
Top reviews from other countries

OVERVIEW. An expert on climate-related disasters has been forced to move to a different field because he persists in coming up with conclusions different from the ones desired.
DETAIL.
The author, a professor of environmental science, supports the IPCC on all aspects of climate change and global warming, including the long-term rise in global temperatures and the effects of CO2. But he has been described as a climate change denier, wrongly accused of being a shill for oil companies, and eventually forced out of his field after a vicious delegitimisation campaign. Why?
The author's area of expertise is not in meteorology or the physical sciences, but in the effects of disasters related to climate, which is of interest to politicians, insurance companies, and others. The scientific question addressed in the book is: Have disasters become more costly because of human-caused climate change?
Firstly, the author (and the IPCC) look at long-term records of disaster, and have not so far discovered evidence of any upwards trends. Although it is of course easy to find such trends if one looks at short term data starting in a period of a low number of disasters.
Secondly, the author looked at the records of insurance companies. It is the financial losses caused by extreme weather events - mostly floods and different varieties of windstorm - that are the best documented pointer to extreme weather effects. These losses have indeed increased dramatically, but after subtracting the effects of increase in human population, encroachment into more dangerous areas such as flood plains, and other factors, no residual trend is detected.
The obvious conclusion to the scientific question is : No, human-caused climate change has not made disasters more costly.
However, that is heresy to most of the workers in the climate field. They believe they know that the data will eventually point the other way (although that will take a fair number of years at the current rate - it will not change just because of a particularly bad year of extreme events, or maybe even several bad years). They appear to believe that is right to misrepresent the evidence, in order to do down the sceptics and show the "right" way to think. This is what political scientist Aynsley Kellow calls the "Noble cause" in corrupting science.
For example, the Fourth US National Climate Assessment (2017) found that there is no robust evidence of increase in a number of weather events except for winter storms. Michael Mann in the New York Times represented the Assessment's list of increasing extreme events as including heat waves, hurricanes, drought, and floods. No-one wants to blow the whistle because he is doing the right thing, isn't he?
The author finishes by arguing that, with increasing world population, losses will increase and only innovative technology will get us out of trouble.
This short book is written well, in good English, and surprisingly without rancour. There are a few graphs but no maths. There is no index.



Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on July 3, 2019


He claims and shows that there is no significant connection between the global warming and extreme weather like hurricanes, floods, droughts etc. You do not even need to read the book, and you certainly need no PhD in climate science. Just look at the diagrams. Easy. If you are a minimalist, the Figure 6.1 page 80 is enough. The curve of disasters just goes up and down randomly. No trend. No climate change induced disasters.
---
Ein sehr wichtiges und lehrreiches Buch. Ein Grund, Englischkenntisse abzustauben. Man braucht nicht viel, nur ein paar Bilder im Buch anzuschauen. Figure 6.1 Seite 80 ist genug. Man sieht sofort, dass uns keine weltweite Klimakatastrophe droht. Der Author ist ein (nach Anfeindungen, Schikanen und Umwegen) anerkannter Forscher.

