Buy new:
$28.99$28.99
FREE delivery:
Tuesday, Nov 8
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used:: $11.46
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
87% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
+ $3.99 shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Rise of Modern Science Explained: A Comparative History 1st Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
- ISBN-101107545609
- ISBN-13978-1107545601
- Edition1st
- PublisherCambridge University Press
- Publication dateNovember 12, 2015
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.98 x 0.69 x 8.98 inches
- Print length301 pages
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
Robert S. Westman, University of California, San Diego
"The Needham Question, first formulated by the leading biochemist and sinologist Joseph Needham in 1969, asks why modern science only emerged from Western Europe after the Renaissance and why it did not emerge from earlier civilizations whose scientific knowledge had been far in advance of the Latin West, such as China and the civilization of Islam. There has been no satisfactory answer until this book. In a brilliant tour de force, H. Floris Cohen not only solves Needham's puzzle but also provides a superb account of the so-called Scientific Revolution … Cohen's account does not rely on a supposedly simple 'key' to understanding the complex interactions between science and civilization, but depends upon a rich and complex series of connected developments. It is a final testament to the excellence of this book that Cohen’s guidance through the complexities is always clear, easily understood, and entirely persuasive."
John Henry, University of Edinburgh
"Covering a period that stretches from classical antiquity to the seventeenth century, H. Floris Cohen explains to a wide readership how modern science emerged in Europe as a result of a series of historical contingencies. Cohen is to be applauded for writing a highly accessible account of one of Europe's greatest intellectual adventures."
Steffen Ducheyne, Free University of Brussels
'… Cohen’s work is also designed for a popular, if learned, audience and should be on the bookshelf of every early modern historian.' Charles Gunnoe, Renaissance Quarterly
'Given the ambitious and challenging nature of Cohen’s endeavor, it really should stimulate many responses - and even some alternative explanations of the rise of modern science.' John Henry, Isis
'It’s a satisfying read and a coherent and exciting interpretation of the classic Scientific Revolution that thinks boldly about global and comparative perspectives. Cohen is an excellent storyteller.' William Eamon, Metascience
'This is a brilliant retelling of a complex and vexing episode, historically sensitive, which asks many of the right questions. It will have historians and nonspecialists alike talking about the Scientific Revolution with renewed vigor for years to come.' Lesley B. Cormack, Metascience
'This is truly an impressive feat of scholarship … The project that Cohen has offered to us is enormously engaging and stimulating. This volume will lead some readers back to his previous two works to explore these questions in more detail.' Babak Ashrafi, Metascience
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Cambridge University Press; 1st edition (November 12, 2015)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 301 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1107545609
- ISBN-13 : 978-1107545601
- Item Weight : 1.08 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.98 x 0.69 x 8.98 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,613,796 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #848 in History of Engineering & Technology
- #1,919 in History of Technology
- #6,916 in History & Philosophy of Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Few people realize just how unlikely the development of science was. China has been the most advanced civilization on the planet for over 2,000 years (only because it had the largest population), but China never had anything remotely like science. It developed magnificent technology through endless trial and error, and Chinese scholars made lots of acute observations about the natural world, but they never came close to anything like rigorous analytical science as produced by the Scientific Revolution. The result was a little Western punk armed with modern firearms pushing around a mature and sophisticated civilization in the nineteenth century. Only in the last forty years has China learned to embrace Western science to realize its full potential, and they still have some catch-up to do.
Western science was the result of a long, long sequence of events that (in my opinion) began with the depredations of the Sea Peoples over 3,000 years ago. This led to the rise of a unique civilization in Greece. Here Mr. Cohen picks up the story, explaining in some detail the two competing philosophical styles that dominated Greek thought on natural phenomena. The first, which he calls the 'Athenian school' was a top-down, theory-first style. The second was a bottom-up, data-first style, which he called the 'Alexandrian school'. Unfortunately, the text here is a bit muddled; I had difficulty grasping exactly what Mr. Cohen meant in his explanations of these two schools. He added to the confusion with his extensions of the schools by referring to "Athens-plus" and "Alexandria-plus". I think that he would have done better to simply talk about these two basic threads (theory versus empiricism) and their development over the course of time. He also introduces a third thread, which I never really understood. I suspect that part of the problem arises from the inevitable difficulties of translating sophisticated ideas from one language to another.
There were a number of places in the text where I sensed that Mr. Cohen's grasp of the underlying science was weak; I cannot fault him here, because mastering the historical material is all by itself a Herculean achievement. But if Fate were to grant him a second youth, I'd love to see what he could accomplish by adding a strong education in science to his already impressive credentials.
This book requires some previous knowledge of the subject material. If you don't already know the basic contributions of Aristotle, Ptolemy, Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, and Newton, then you will have difficulty grasping the key material.
This is an excellent summary for the layman of the author's magisterial previous book "How Modern Science Came Into the World" which I previously reviewed. Of all the books on the origin of modern science which I have read to me these two books stand head and shoulders above in giving a comprehensive overview of the subject. Highly recommended.







