Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$21.36$21.36
FREE delivery: Monday, Dec 11 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: ISHOPONLINE LLC
Buy used: $8.40
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America's Police Forces Hardcover – July 9, 2013
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $105.00 | — |
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
Today's armored-up policemen are a far cry from the constables of early America. The unrest of the 1960s brought about the invention of the SWAT unitwhich in turn led to the debut of military tactics in the ranks of police officers. Nixon's War on Drugs, Reagan's War on Poverty, Clinton's COPS program, the post9/11 security state under Bush and Obama: by degrees, each of these innovations expanded and empowered police forces, always at the expense of civil liberties. And these are just four among a slew of reckless programs.
In Rise of the Warrior Cop, Balko shows how politicians' ill-considered policies and relentless declarations of war against vague enemies like crime, drugs, and terror have blurred the distinction between cop and soldier. His fascinating, frightening narrative shows how over a generation, a creeping battlefield mentality has isolated and alienated American police officers and put them on a collision course with the values of a free society.
- Print length400 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPublicAffairs
- Publication dateJuly 9, 2013
- Dimensions6.25 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-101610392116
- ISBN-13978-1610392112
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
For all my cop's quibbles with Rise of the Warrior Cop, I was struck by how much I found to agree with in the book. Balko makes a compelling case that in America today there are too many SWAT teams operating with too little accountability, further exposing the country to the dangers this magazine identified in 1996. No, America today isn't a police state,' he writes in the concluding chapter. Far from it. But it would be foolish to wait until it becomes one to get concerned.' One need not be a libertarian to appreciate the warning.”
Diane Goldstein, Huffington Post
Rise of the Warrior Cop asks many questions about the proper role of law enforcement and the effect of the drug war, America's longest war, on our communities Balko interweaves history, the Constitution, and case law to create an account of how the massive expansion of SWAT teams occurred as the perfect storm of politics, ideology and federal fiscal coercion.”
New York Journal of Books
This historic review of America's police and police tactics is clear and direct in its nondismissal narrative. This is not an anti-police book, but a serious look at the growth and use of SWAT and military style tactics, at America's war on drugs, and the financial incentives that created the new community police force” This book is highly recommended for the historic value of the information; it is clear, concise, and well argued. Whether you are a lifetime, card carrying member of the ACLU or the newest law and order politician The Rise of the Warrior Cop provides a clear timeline and important information making it a must read.”
Publishers Weekly
'Are cops constitutional?' It's a bold and provocative question, and the more Balko delves into the history of law enforcement, the more that question seems worth considering. After reading Balko, you'll be aware, alrightand scared.”
Ilya Somin, Volokh Conspiracy
The best new book on a law-related topic I have read so far this year”
Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union
Excessively militarized policing is easy to ignore when a SWAT team is ramming down someone else's door or tear-gassing someone else's protest. What makes Rise of the Warrior Cop so important is that Mr. Balko makes police militarization real for all of us. This is a meticulously researched history book that casts needed light on a central civil liberties issue. Police militarization is something we should all care about, and Rise of the Warrior Cop will show you why.”
Arianna Huffington, president and editor-in-chief, Huffington Post
With his thorough reporting and compelling storytelling gifts, Radley Balko builds a powerful narrative of the militarization of our police forces, which both liberals and conservatives have allowed to flourish. And he shows the chilling results of both parties' unwillingness to stand up to increasingly aggressive police tactics that often pit cops against those they are sworn to protect.”
One of Gizmodo's Best Books of 2013
Sarah Stillman, NewYorker.com
A fascinating and at times wrenching new book.”
The Economist
Mr Balko manages to avoid the clichés of both right and left, and provokes genuine outrage at the misuse of state power in its most brutal and unaccountable form: heavily armed police raiding the homes of unarmed, non-violent suspects on the flimsiest of pretexts, and behaving more like an occupying army in hostile territory than guardians of public safety. Rise of the Warrior Cop”, Mr Balko's interesting first book, explains what policies led to the militarisation of America's police. To his credit, he focuses his outrage not on the police themselves, but on politicians and the phoney, wasteful drug war they created.”
American Conservative
Rise of the Warrior Cop diagnoses a grave threat to our constitutional rights. If Americans still possess the wisdom of our Founders, we will heed Balko's warning and turn back our drift towards a police state.”
Charleston (WV) Gazette
For Americans who care about their core political liberties, Balko's book is a must-read.”
Pacific Standard
Fascinating and sometimes terrifying”
StoptheDrugWar.org
In Balko's hands, an entertaining and illuminating story as well as depressing and frightening told with verve and gusto, meticulously researched, and filled with telling historical detail Rise of the Warrior Cop is an important book and deserves to be read by small government conservatives, civil libertarian liberals, police commanders, and politicians alike.”
Simple Justice blog
It's critical to appreciate the history of policing, to understand that what we now see as normal and inescapable wasn't always the case. For most of our history, this country did not have a group of people with shields and guns who wandered the streets ordering people about. If there is any hope of changing the course of the militarization of law enforcement, it will come from a greater understanding of why this was never meant to be the internal norm of this country, and that it doesn't have to be. Radley Balko has done an exceptional job of making the case. Every person who hopes to preserve the integrity of his Castle from dynamic entry needs to read The Rise of Warrior Cop.”
Ron Paul, former Texas congressman and Republican presidential candidate
Rise of the Warrior Cop is a comprehensive look at the reasons for, and the results of, the increasing militarization of law enforcement. Civil libertarians on the left and limited government conservatives on the right should pay especially close attention to Radley Balko's examination of the link between the the war on drugs' and law enforcement's increased use of police state tactics.”
Norm Stamper, thirty-four-year police veteran and police chief of Seattle, Washington, 19942000
A rich, pertinent history, with unexpected but critically important observations of the increased militarization of American policing. And so well presented: clear, lucid, elegantly crafted. Rise of the Warrior Cop should be on the shelves of every police chief, sheriff, and SWAT commander in the country. A huge contribution.”
Glenn Greenwald, constitutional lawyer, Guardian columnist, and New York Times-bestselling author
Vibrant and compelling. There is no vital trend in American society more overlooked than the militarization of our domestic police forces, and there is no journalist in America who is more knowledgeable and passionate about this topic than Radley Balko. If you care about the core political liberties of Americans, this is a must-read.”
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : PublicAffairs; 1st edition (July 9, 2013)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 400 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1610392116
- ISBN-13 : 978-1610392112
- Item Weight : 1.38 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,235,365 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #971 in Law Enforcement (Books)
- #1,240 in Law Enforcement Politics
- #3,820 in Criminology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
How has this become a part of "to serve and protect," the stated mission of many police departments?
This book takes the reader through the process which in the last 30 years has militarized the police into agents of punishment and terror. It all started with SWATT teams and the drug wars.
The idea of the SWATT team was developed in L.A. by Daryl Gates during the turbulent 1960's as a way to deal with extreme situations that might involve stand-offs and hostages. The original purpose of the team was lost as they became more popular. By 2005 there were approximately 50,000 to 60,000 SWATT raids in the U.S. that year. Most often they were used to serve warrants for non-violent crimes.
With no small part played by the media, in 1968 a majority of Americans feared the country was headed towards anarchy although only 28% felt that crime was up in their own community.
Nixon's cynical fear mongering proved useful to his political purposes; even more useful was to tie all crime to drugs. This focus on drugs in Reagan's years became good vs. evil and those born evil only fit to be controlled and punished. Clinton had to prove the Democrats were not soft on crime and Obama has continued the policies of his predecessors.
Presidential rhetoric resulted in specific policies that helped turn us-cops into battles with them-criminals.
In 1988 the Byrne grant program sent billions to police departments as a way for the White House to impose it's crime policy on local law enforcement. It created regional narcotics task forces that drew cops from all agencies within a jurisdiction. There was no oversight or accountability; the task forces became roving bands of drug cops. (In '89 more task forces were formed that coordinated the military with law enforcement; SWATT teams were often trained by active duty military.)
Clinton's COPS program in 1994 was talked up as providing community policing but there was no definition of what this would look like. Funds were used mostly to militarize.
The 1033 Program, part of the 1997 Pentagon Bill, was set up to provide military equipment to police departments. There was even a 800 number and a catalog to show what the military could provide. In FY 2011 half a billion dollars of military property was "reutilized" this way. (L.A. county has 4 semi-trailers on standby to beat other police departments to the gear made available.)
Equipment included M-16 rifles, grenade launchers, night-vision goggles; airplanes and helicopters were offered as well as armored personnel carriers. Even communities between 25 and 50 thousand people would obtain this military equipment in the spirit of macho me-too-ism.
Drugs were money makers for police departments when forfeiture laws started giving state and local agencies who cooperated with the Feds a cut from the sale of confiscated assets after drug convictions.
The terror inflicted by SWATT teams has been made possible by the Supreme Court which over 30 years has virtually gutted the protections of the 4th Amendment. Essentially, all SWATT team entries are no-knock and as violent and brutal as the cops like.
There are many, many "mistakes" -- wrong addresses, misinformation from informants (whose tips are not checked), careless incompetence. When innocent people end up dead in these raids there's no liability for the police even when millions are then paid in wrong-full death cases. Because no records are kept, the extent of the botched deployment of SWATT teams is not known; nor if they are even effective by any measure.
Experts say that those who want to be on SWATT teams are the very people to keep off because the attitude on many teams is: "Why serve an arrest warrant to some crack dealer with a .38? With full armor, the right s*** and training, you can kick ass and have fun!" As one team member said: "You get to play with a lot of guns. That's what's fun."
In pursuit of that fun it's open season on peoples' pets. Dogs are wantonly killed even when chained or leashed. Cops will "kill pets while merely questioning about a crime in the area."
A few police officials won't use SWATT teams. They know that for most drug related arrests it's safer and more effective to not invade buildings. But they are the rare exception.
The SWATT teams have to justify their existence so they are now routinely used for victimless, non-violent situations: friendly poker games, massage parlors, strip clubs. They are now even part of the enforcement of regulatory laws (Consumer Protection Agency has it's own SWATT team). It's called mission creep but what is does is "it creates violence out of non-violent crimes."
The author shows how out of control this cops-as-soldiers situation is by describing a drug policy conference at the Hoover Institution moderated in part by Joseph McNamara who as police chief of San Jose, California had the lowest crime rate with the smallest per capita police department in America.
The information McNamara elicited from participating officials -- mayors, police chiefs, DAs, judges -- showed systems where no one had overall authority or responsibility to require accountability as the community's law enforcers became increasingly militarized and brutal.
This conference that showed a self-perpetuating system was held in 1997; in the 15 years since then the situation has not improved.
The author makes clear that he's not anti-cop or anti-SWATT team. He just raises the concern of where this blurring of policing with the military can lead. He worries that the U.S. is perhaps already a "police state writ small" since police officers' power and authority is near complete. (How else describe a recent occurrence in Rochester, New York when 3 youths waiting for a bus to a school event were arrested when they wouldn't dispurse at the command of a cop.)
The book ends with some suggestions for how to reign in the police but the author is not sanguine that this can happen without people becoming better informed and outraged. He's certainly doing his part in spreading the word.
A SWAT team is meant to be used in emergency situations, when there is a hostage situation, an rampaging shooter, or a riot. There should be few cases in which a SWAT team is ever used and probably only larger jurisdictions really need one, particularly since small city police forces may not have the resources or personnel or properly train or equip a SWAT team. Why are SWAT teams increasingly found to be necessary by small town police departments and why are they being used to perform what ought to be routine, non-violent duties such as serving warrants or making arrests in drug possession cases or illicit gambling rings? Why are various federal departments using armed agents to enforce administrative regulations?
The fourth amendment to the constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and guarantees that any searches and seizures cannot occur without a warrant issued after a demonstration of probable cause. Generally, this has meant that the police are not to enter a residence without knocking and identifying themselves as law enforcement. Why are no-knock raids complete with flash-bang grenades becoming ever more common and accepted as appropriate procedures? Why are there more and more cases of the police raiding the homes of innocent persons, injuring and perhaps killing people, without a word of apology or accountability?
We are supposed to be a nation of equal justice under the law. How is it that police officers can assault and kill with impunity, can steal under the cover of civil forfeiture, and generally act as if they are above the law they are tasked to enforce? When did the friendly neighborhood policeman become the warrior cop?
Radley Balko attempts to answer these questions in his book, Rise of the Warrior Cop. Balko traces the history of law enforcement in the United States from the beginning, noting that before the American Revolution and for the first few decades after independence there were no police forces in the United States or, for that matter in Britain. There were country sheriffs, but their role was largely serving court warrants. Law enforcement depended on social pressure in small communities and informal, volunteer town watches and posses. As the population grew and became more urbanized, it became necessary to adopt a more formal approach to law enforcement and the first police departments were organized in the 1830's. This was controversial, both in America and Britain, as the political cultures of both nations were strongly against having a standing army of soldiers patrolling the streets and care was taken to make a clear distinction between the newly formed police forces and the army.
This distinction began to become somewhat less clear in the twentieth century. Prohibition and later the War against Drugs with fights against well armed gangsters and later drug dealers seems to indicate a need for police officers to be more heavily armed, at least in certain special circumstances. The possibility that incriminating drug evidence could be hurriedly disposed of, seemed to make traditional procedures of knocking and waiting for a suspect to answer a door to be somewhat foolish. The upheavals and riots of the 1960's showed a need for a heavily armed and specially trained task force, or SWAT agents, to handle extreme circumstances.
Since the 1960's, tactics meant to be used rarely and under specific conditions have become routine. If one is fighting a war against drugs, than the drug dealers are not simply fellow citizens who have committed a crime, but the enemy who is working to bring down the country. One does not concern oneself too much with the civil rights of the enemy in time of war. After 9/11, terrorism began to take the place of drugs as the enemy and justification for police departments around the country to acquire cool military equipment.
There is much more to be said about this issue, and Radley Balko says it in his book. If you are at all concerned with civil rights, and our country's slow erosion into a police state, than I highly recommend Rise of the Warrior Cop, though you may be surprised and shocked to learn how widespread and serious the problem of police misconduct has become. Balko lists many, many examples is his book.
Some might accuse Radley Balko of being anti-police. He denies the charge and I believe him. As he notes, the vast majority of police officers are good people. The problem is not really with the cops. The problem is that the system we have in place tends to reward the bad cops and to create incentives for even good cops to behave badly, particularly in the sense that often develops in police departments that it is us (the department) against them ( the criminals and increasingly civilians). Balko does make suggestions for reforms at the end of the book, and I hope that someone in a position to do something will heed his warnings.
Top reviews from other countries
Balko startet sein Buch mit den verfassungsrechtlichen Grundlagen der amerikanischen Polizeiarbeit und einer kurzen Übersicht der britischen (als Ursprung) und amerikanischen Polizeipraxis Mitte des 19. bis Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts. Beides bietet ein (etwas mühsam zu lesendes) Fundament für den Hauptteil des Buches: Ab diesem Punkt bewegt er sich chronologisch durch die Jahrzehnte; von den 1960ern bis in die 2000er bildet jede Dekade ein Kapitel.
Dabei beschreibt der Autor ein ganzes Geflecht interdependenter Faktoren: Kulturelle wie politische Faktoren spielen ebenso eine Rolle, wie juristische Debatten und konkrete taktische Fragen. Dementsprechend bietet das Buch wesentlich mehr, als der Titel vermuten lässt. Bereits die Wurzel der Militarisierung ist multipel: Sie hat ihre Gründe sowohl in neue, konkreten polizeilichen Erfahrungen (Watts Riots, Texas Bell Tower Shooting etc.), als auch in kulturellen Auseinandersetzungen (counterculture) und deren Perzeption sowie den politischen Reaktionen auf beides (Nixonites, war on drugs) – und alle sind verknüpft. Neben der Gründung des ersten SWAT als konkrete Maßnahme geht es lange vor allem um die juristischen und politischen Debatten darüber, was diese neue Einheit, aber auch die Polizeien insgesamt können und dürfen sollen.
Diese ausgesprochen spannende jurstisch-politischen Kämpfe bilden eine Haupterzählung des Buches, weil auf dieser Ebene über die Jahrzehnte praktisch alle wichtigen Schranken und Grenzen des Staates gegenüber seinen Bürgen entweder durch die Politik oder den Supreme Court geschleift wurden – in einem Staat, der sich gegründet hat, um seinen Bürgern diese Rechte zu gewähren!
Von entscheidender Bedeutung ist die politisch gewollte Verknüpfung der neuen SWATs mit dem War on Drugs. Sie werden kaum eingesetzt, um ihre eigentliche Aufgabe zu erfüllen (high violence crimes wie Aufstände, Amok etc.), sondern um drug warrants durchzusetzen. Zu diesem Zweck pumpt die Bundesregierung jahrzehntelang enorme Summen Geld über Förderprogramme in die Polizeien, so dass SWATS sich flächendeckend verbreiteten, weil sie mit diesen Programmen nicht nur gegründet, sondern auch dauerhaft betrieben werden konnten. So hatten auch bald die kleinsten Dörfer in den USA solche Einheiten – die praktisch nie ihre ursprünglich definierte Aufgabe erfüllten, sondern eben den War in Drugs durchführten, indem sie ihre neu gewonnenen juristischen Freiheiten nutzten, um tausende Türen von Potrauchern und Kleindealern einzutreten. Denn da das System auf Zahlen setzte, wenn es um Bonusauszahlungen ging, wurden lieber hunderte kleine als wenige hochqualitative Arrests gemacht.
SWAT-Einsätze sind aber komplizierte Einsätze, und während das in Großstädten sehr professionell abläuft, gibt es in Kleinstädten nicht annähernd genug Leute, um qualifiziertes Personal zu finden und angemessen trainieren zu lassen. Hier wird wirklich dem lokalen Chief Wiggum paramilitärisches Gerät und juristische Carte blanche gegeben – mit der Argumentation, den War on Drugs (oder eben heute: on Terror) durchzusetzen. Die Resultate sind gleichermaßen erwartbar wie schockierend.
Diese Art von Militarisierung schafft eine Mauer zwischen Polizei und Bürgern; es entsteht ein Freund/Feind-Denken, dass der Polizei ursprünglich wesenfremd ist. Gear porn und Maskulinitätsfetische tun ihr übriges, um die Situation zu verschärfen. Es ist spannend zu sehen, wie Balko hier auch alternative Modelle skizziert, wenn er Polizeichefs in großen Städten präsentiert, die sich dem Trend widersetzten und die ein ausdrückliches community policing befürworteten – mit hervorragenden Ergebnissen. Es ist auch interessant zu sehen, wie sich Politiker, Gesellschaft und Gerichte dem Trend auch lange widersetzten – wie er aber letztlich unter dem Banner der „Zwangsläufigkeit“ vollständig durchschlug. Wer heute hinterfragt, ob ein 1000-Seelen-Dorf wirklich einen Radpanzer mit .50-Drehturm braucht, wird direkt angeklagt, er würde offenbar das Leben von Cops nicht für schützenswert halten, weil er ihnen nicht das beste gönne.
Geradezu lächerlich großen Einfluss hatten dabei übriges auch die „asset forfeiture“ Gesetze, bzw. deren gezielte Reformen: Polizeien konnten Unmengen von Geld einfahren, weil sie Geld, Autos, Häuser und vieles andere als „Beute“ behalten konnten. Das System hat ebenso logische wie verstörende Konsequenzen: So wurden Konvois von Drogenbanden im Regelfall nicht mehr beim Einfahren in eine Stadt gestoppt, sondern beim Verlassen derselben – weil sie dann Bargeld statt Drogen dabei hatten, was den Polizeien mehr nutzte.
Balko skizziert all dies gut lesbar, analytisch aber prägnant, mit hunderten spannender Einzelfällen, um das ganze griffig und verständlich zu halten. Und er ist dabei immer fair, wie eingangs erwähnt.
Wenn er zum Beispiel beschreibt, wie die Machokultur der SWATs junge Polizisten verändert, so würdigt er die Polizisten dabei nicht herab, sondern zitiert lang einen kritischen Journalisten, der seinerseits entwaffend empathisch beschrieben hat, wie IHN trotz aller Distanz ein Probedienst bei einem SWAT fasziniert hat.
Wenn Balko beschreibt, wie die Verknüpfung von federal grants und asset forfeiture zu einem sich selbst erhaltenden ökonomischen System führen, das absurd wuchert, dann betont er, dass da kein böser Geist oder sonstwas dahinter steckt, sondern das nur ein organisatorisch logisches Folgeproblem falscher Anreizsetzung sei.
Wenn er deutlich werden lässt, dass „community policing“ aus seiner Sicht das deutlich bessere und nachhaltigere Prinzip sei, so bemüht er sich doch überzeugend darzustellen, warum die Militarisierung der Polizei aus Sicht ihrer Förderer sinnvoll und logisch erscheint.
Und wenn er abschließend deprimierend klar darstellt, wie die USA mittlerweile ein Orwell-Land geworden sind, in dem die Bürger kaum noch vor den 40.000 SWAT-Einsätzen pro Jahr geschützt sind; wie regelmäßig bei fehlgeleiteten Einsätzen sinnlos Hunde erschossen, Kinder traumatisiert und Eigentum zerstört wird; wenn er skizziert wie die militarisierte Polizeiarbeit so viele gute und produktive Traditionen der Polizeiarbeit unter sich begraben hat – dann ist das kein Lamento über „die böse Polizei“ oder „den bösen Staat“, sondern eine kühle und schonungslose Analyse, an die sich ein emotionales Plädoyer für eine Reform anschließt, die eine ganze Reihe konkreter Punkte aufweist, die ebenso sachlich wie durchführbar sind.
Hier ist kein heißblütiger Culture Warrior am Werk, der seine Weltsicht durchprügeln will, sondern eine abwägender Analytiker, der die Diskussion sucht. Chapeau!







