|Print List Price:||$18.00|
Save $4.01 (22%)
Simon and Schuster Digital Sales Inc
Price set by seller.
The Road Less Traveled: A New Psychology of Love, Traditional Values and Spiritual Growth Kindle Edition
|New from||Used from|
An Amazon Book with Buzz: "The Four Winds" by Kristin Hannah
"A timely novel highlighting the worth and delicate nature of Nature itself." -Delia Owens Learn more
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
- ASIN : B0078XGEK2
- Publisher : Touchstone; Anniversary Edition (March 13, 2012)
- Publication date : March 13, 2012
- Language : English
- File size : 2055 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 324 pages
- Lending : Not Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #22,469 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
If this review helped you and you plan to experience the "The Road Less Traveled" journey, then have fun on this beautiful journey of greater self-understanding and spiritual growth.
If you're interested in spiritual growth, "The Road Less Traveled" may well help increase your level of consciousness..
There is one part of the work that really addresses this becoming one with God. It’s called the Odes of the Holy Trinity. I call it God’s discourse on mystical marriage. There are other mystics who have tried to describe this process, mystics like St. John of the Cross and St. Theresa of Avila. I personally find reading them difficult, not so the Odes. For example, in the Ode of the Father, He writes:
Scriptures say: "happy the pure in heart, they shall see God;" today, Vassula, everyone sees as far as they are able to see, but I am telling you all, you too could be counted among My saints who are fit to see Me if you allowed My Holy Spirit to pass through you to shatter all your impurities, and once purity is acquired, the vision of Myself will be given you;
It seems simple enough, invite the Holy Spirit to pass through us and shatter our impurities. How do we do that? What are our impurities? Maybe that’s what Scott was talking about, this work and struggle of life. Ah, but the reward is out of this world, to be one with God, to become Love itself. Veni Sancte Spiritus!
Top reviews from other countries
This book was recommended to me by two friends who are a couple, whilst at a party. After the party I spoke with others who had read the work, and received comments as far-reaching and contradictory as "life-changing" on one hand, and "utter garbage" on the other. Curious as to what kind of book would produce such vastly opposed opinions I decided to read it, and now I understand why it affords such diverse reactions.
In truth, I think the attitude of the reader, and his or her and reason for reading the book has as much to do with its perceived merit as the content itself. Personally, I am 47 years old, I hold one combined undergraduate degree in philosophy and psychology, which I did not enjoy studying for at all, and another in computer science, the latter now being my professional vocation. My second degree was a first class honours, as opposed to the 2nd I received for my initial studies, and I put that down to my own attitude and acceptance of the new subject in being inherently affiliated with logic and truth, as is the nature of computer science.
The point I'd like to make with this information, is that those who come to this book in search of spiritual solace will very likely find it. In the same way, if one approaches science, religion, or the apparent wisdoms and practices of the new-age movement with an attitude of openness and trust towards "spirituality", then one will feel rewarded with the knowledge gained. However, if one approaches this book out of simple curiosity, or with a background of knowledge of philosophy and psychology that brings a degree of skepticism towards the author's more esoteric answers of religion and spirituality, then the work appears sadly flawed, though not, as some people suggest, to it's utter destruction.
In fact, much of the book is very interesting as it describes accurately, in psychoanalytical terms, what other authors of fiction attempt to illustrate about the nature of the efforts and attitudes of contented adults in civilised western society. To the "lay reader", this gives insights into the benefits of personal discipline; the facets of long lasting stable relationships as opposed to the musings of new-found love; and the well described problems and solutions in overcoming one's own inhibiting beliefs. For this I will credit the author.
Contrarily, in the latter part of the book, M. Scott Peck continues to explain aspects of human endeavour, but engages in a discourse on his views on spirituality and religion. He proposes that all human beings have a religion, that science is a religion, as well as atheism, and spends some considerable effort in describing matters that he considers as being actually miraculous. He appoints as miracles, the abundance of healthy humans despite what he considers the apparent fragility of body and mind. He presents personal anecdotes regarding his own near-death experience and mundane coincidences as the evidence of miracles and shared consciousness, and employs the wonder and improbability of evolution over physical entropy to project to the reader the idea that the world as we know it is governed by what he describes as grace, a mysterious divine power that is in eternal conflict with entropy.
This latter discussion shows the age of the book, since it was written in the late 1970's, and the physics and mathematics of the day were without the computers to create virtual models by which to study such physical manifestations as entropy. In light of this, the author's assertions are highly selective. He describes entropy; the reduction of energy dispersion to a chaotic state, as the final overarching physical attribute of matter. He ignores the fact that molecular compounds combine through electron bonding due to electro-magnetic attraction. In fact, one only has to look at a simple magnet to see that energy, in the form of a magnetic field, can and does indeed have a great deal of order to its form, and is not simply a matter of chaotic entropic dispersal. Not only that, but this process of compound formation gives rise to literally every type of physical matter, each having different levels of combined resilience, e.g. soap, diamonds and amino acids, whose existence are not governed by entropy, but merely affected by it, in terms of their existential longevity.
As with evolution, one of the great mysteries of life is the development of consciousness, yet here the author once again attributes it's existence as another miracle. Asserting that this is a particularly human trait, he goes further to make additional assertions on human evolution, attributing the nature of evil to entropy, going so far as to suggest that human lethargy is in fact entropy manifested as evil, and that it is laziness, and a lack of application of the author's conceptual love and discipline that is the major cause of psychological problems in human beings. As examples, the author then actually uses biblical images; the serpent and apple on the tree of knowledge; the crucifixion of Christ, and the concept of original sin and simply adapts them to suit his reasoning. That the concept of original sin is a later idea, projected onto the Gospels of Genesis by St Augustine and absorbed by Roman Catholicism in the 16th century seems to be idly ignored, so It seems laziness of the mind can also extend to celebrated psychoanalysts.
Also, at no point is there any reference to the nature of suffering that the author's described sentient god is willing to assert, not only on humanity, but on all of nature; with disease, starvation and the cruel predations of all manner, from the microbic virus to the leaping tiger. Quite how that is part of entropic lethargy, and is entirely acceptable to a divine creator is left entirely untouched.
As the book begins to draw to its final chapter, M. Scott Peck actually acknowledges that he cannot fully describe his model for grace, nor does he accurately describe the conditions by which some are capable of attenuating this lackadaisical, evil other than by having the good fortune to be Blessed, perhaps just having loving parents and maybe an effective education, or basically be fortunate enough to be raised as a well adjusted human being and not feel the need to seek the advice of a psychoanalyst.
In closing the writer begins to slip into dogma: "I have interpreted Christ's saying 'Many are called but few are chosen' to mean that very few choose to heed the call of grace because of the difficulties involved", then a few pages later claims that "the study of theology is a relatively poor method of preparation and, by itself, completely useless", going to claim that such a paradox is an emblem of his previously purported miracle of serendipity.
At the last, he then finishes the book with a lengthy flourished chapter, charged with absolution and encouragement meant to embolden the reader to go forth with Grace into the miraculous world and enjoy their new found higher knowledge to the betterment of humanity.
There is a brief afterword that acknowledges all the praise given to the author (but noticeably, no criticism), and advises the reader seeking psychological therapy on best ways to do so.
So... still here?
For me, since this book presents itself as an advisory, and as good counsel for those in search of spiritual enlightenment, then I feel is necessary to go further than offer a basic critique.
To be blunt, if one is to take baking advice from a baker, then his bread had better be good. It is in this respect that having looked at M. Scott Peck's bibliography and personal life, I find reason to distance myself from his work. That in 2005, he felt compelled to write his personal account of demonic possession and the exorcisms he has personally performed, as well as his catalogue of other books dedicated to those who are in search of enlightenment, leaves me with a sense of a man who is pandering to those who are willing to accept truth as something they should be told, as opposed to something they are capable of accepting and deciding for themselves. To me, faith and spirituality, whatever the denomination, requires that the believer who will appoint himself as preacher, should be able to personally attest to its benefits by their own actions. So to the man himself, a self-confessed philanderer, a divorcee who chooses to drink and smoke marijuana, who lives estranged from two of his own children, I can only offer dubious respect to his professional and academic credentials.
Finally, if I were to offer any advice to the prospective reader, before embarking on this book, first read "Battle For The Mind", by William Sargant. Another highly controversial psychologist, this author at least describes, the processes by which M. Scott Peck seems to make a living, without the veil of piety.
A few people have mentioned they didn't like the religious direction of the final two chapters - the referencing to the bible and God - I was concered that may make the book rather biased and put me off but it was very neutrally done. He talks more of a creator as a sense of a belief, rather than specific religious ideologies.
Also - the print is rather small which was slightly straining. I would invest in a large and hard back copy of this if I bought it again. It's worth it.
It is divided into four parts:
1. DISCIPLINE - Brilliant and a totally different take on what discipline actually is - love.
2. LOVE - Again mind blowing and myth busting take on true love - and the myth of romantic love. This is the longest part of the book and obviously very emotionally challenging to read. If there was a course on love in school, it would look somewhat like this book.
3. GROWTH and RELIGION - The concept that everyone has a religion because everyone has some belief system - even atheists or agnostics. This chapter gives specific examples on how religion can hinder someone's spiritual journey or how it can heal someone's spiritual journey and put them on a fast track. This being the shortest chapter, I wish there were more examples but it has good insights anyway.
4. GRACE: I commend the author's tact in dealing with this subject - of God and grace in terms of the unconscious and consciousness. This part is what deals with the purpose and meaning of life, and how to find it or how to let it come to you- the paradox of life.
Overall, here's my take - if there was one book, just one, to teach us the basics of how to live a life (and not just a living), it would be this book. No school or university can give academic degrees in love, courage and wisdom- this book is the crash course. The book is a series of examples of people in therapy with the author and his insights on their progress or lack thereof and what makes them heal faster or what hinders the healing.
Recommended for - anyone dealing with anxiety, stress, depression, panic attacks, existential crisis, moral dilemmas, etc.
and for - anyone who thinks they are in total control of their life - physical, emotional, spiritual, it might shake up the control aspect a bit, but totally worth it. Everyone needs some therapy if they have survived childhood. ;)
[I bought a paperback copy of the book by Random House, the print and binding are okay, but the fonts are small and it's easy to get lose sight of line while reading.]
The last half of the book sadly (to me) talks too much about God. If this stuff interests you, you'll love it. For me, I don't need to be told that finding grace in life is about actually finding God and religion. Rubbish. But then the book is 40 years old. There are parts too which are sadly of it's age (some questionable views on homosexuality) but if you can understand that it was written in the context of it's time, you can hopefully move past that and still see merit in some parts of the book.