Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Author
OK
The Roots of Coincidence: An Excursion into Parapsychology Hardcover – January 1, 1972
| Arthur Koestler (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
| Hardcover, January 1, 1972 |
—
| — | — |
|
Mass Market Paperback
"Please retry" |
—
| — | $20.00 |
- Print length159 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRandom House
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 1972
- ISBN-100394480384
- ISBN-13978-0394480381
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : Random House; 1st edition (January 1, 1972)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 159 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0394480384
- ISBN-13 : 978-0394480381
- Item Weight : 13.1 ounces
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,535,849 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Born in Budapest in 1905, educated in Vienna, Arthur Koestler immersed himself in the major ideological and social conflicts of his time. A communist during the 1930s, and visitor for a time in the Soviet Union, he became disillusioned with the Party and left it in 1938. Later that year in Spain, he was captured by the Fascist forces under Franco, and sentenced to death. Released through the last-minute intervention of the British government, he went to France where, the following year, he again was arrested for his political views. Released in 1940, he went to England, where he made his home. His novels, reportage, autobiographical works, and political and cultural writings established him as an important commentator on the dilemmas of the 20th century. He died in 1983.
Customer reviews
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2006
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I admit that the examination of the statistical approach to parapsychology almost bored me to the point of putting the book down. It is well written, but the subject is inherently boring for some of us. It is with the discussion of the classical sort of experiments such as those carried out by the Society for Psychical Research that the book gets really interesting. This is carried on into the comparison of Kammerer's Seriality and Jung-Pauli's Synchronicity. What I found most fascinating of all was the author's speculation on the connections with the Pythagoreans, Neo-Platonists, and the philosophers of the Renaissance (the Harmony of Spheres, the anima mundi, correspondences, and the sympathy of all things.) He goes on to mention the similarity to the underlying Oneness of Christian mystics, Buddhism and Taoism. He even points out the connection to the thoughts of Schopenhauer.
I now see that many profound thoughts that I attributed to others were expressed here first. It would have saved me some time to have read it first. No wonder so many others quote from it.
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2006
I admit that the examination of the statistical approach to parapsychology almost bored me to the point of putting the book down. It is well written, but the subject is inherently boring for some of us. It is with the discussion of the classical sort of experiments such as those carried out by the Society for Psychical Research that the book gets really interesting. This is carried on into the comparison of Kammerer's Seriality and Jung-Pauli's Synchronicity. What I found most fascinating of all was the author's speculation on the connections with the Pythagoreans, Neo-Platonists, and the philosophers of the Renaissance (the Harmony of Spheres, the anima mundi, correspondences, and the sympathy of all things.) He goes on to mention the similarity to the underlying Oneness of Christian mystics, Buddhism and Taoism. He even points out the connection to the thoughts of Schopenhauer.
I now see that many profound thoughts that I attributed to others were expressed here first. It would have saved me some time to have read it first. No wonder so many others quote from it.







