To buy, select Size
Choose from options to the left

Rothco Vintage Paratrooper Fatigue

4.3 out of 5 stars 502 customer reviews
| 40 answered questions

Price: $17.99 - $93.00
ACU Digital Camo
Select Size Chart Fit: As expected (67%)
67% of customers say this fits as expected.
Too small
37
Somewhat small
33
Fits as expected
549
Somewhat large
79
Too large
111
Is this feature helpful?
Thank you for your feedback.
According to him they are super comfortable, fit great and are really heavy duty.
Built well and fit awesome on body building type body.
Fit just as expected would highly recommend.
Leave a comment (optional)
  • Polyester/Cotton
  • Soft cotton/twill blend construction, Reinforced seat and knees, They feel great and last forever
  • Super soft
  • Generous 8 pockets
  • Zipper fly, two 2' waist tabs
  • Drawstring buttons

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Other Product Promotions:

Product Description

These stylish cargo pants are both comfortable and durable.

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Domestic Shipping: Item can be shipped within U.S.
  • International Shipping: This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
  • ASIN: B018MVVN0Y
  • Item model number: 2187
  • Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (502 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #14,646 in Sports & Outdoors (See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors)
  • Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

By Andrew D. Dedmon on April 21, 2011
Verified Purchase
i purchased these pants in a size larger than i normally wear after reading the product review by nathan peirce. he had stated that the pants fit small and may not wear the way i wanted. two things were evident after taking the pants out of the box; they were of good quality and i ordered the wrong size. i normally wear a large. i purchased the xl and couldn't put them on without them falling off. i sent the originals back for the size i normally wear. purchase these pants in the size you normally wear. if they don't fit the way you want, amazon will refund your money and you can change sizes. my money was refunded and my new "lg" pants are on the way. amazon also provides the shipping cost to return the pants. they will even schedule a UPS pickup from your home. you will have to print the shipping info out from amazon.com and tape it to a shipping box. there is no restocking fee.
Comment 122 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Rothco Size Chart for BDU Pants Waist:
XS 23"-27"
S 27"-31"
M 31"-35"
L 35"-39"
XL 39"-43"
XXL 43"-47"
3XL 47"-51"
4XL 51"-55"
5XL 55"-59"
6XL 59"-63"
7XL 63"-66"

GREAT pants. one and only gripe is the adjustable waist strap has no strength, and will not stay in place. u need a belt with these. unless u fall right on the high side of the sizing.
1 Comment 104 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Size: SmallColor: Woodland Camo
I bought these pants for my son, and he loves them. I got a pair in every color, and this is all he wears. they do not shrink, but we did find they run small in the waist. he is 13, and wears a 29" waist, and we had to get the mens medium. i thought the small would have fit, but it was a very fast exchange with the company. no problems at all. and they tie on the bottom, so the lenghth does not matter. will buy again!! very well made product!!! A+++++++++ THANKS!!
1 Comment 41 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
These pants are comfortable, well made, and extremely tough. I bought one pair to start, olive drab XL. I have a 37" waist (like most dudes, I wasn't totally sure, so I actually measured), and though these pants are more like a 40" or 42" in that size, the side-straps adjust the waistband perfectly. They fit great, look good with any belt (if you wear a belt, which I do), and having eight pockets (side, butt, lower-thigh, and mid-calf) is a great feature.

A lot of folks complain that the legs are too long. Well, that's kind of the point - see those ties on the bottom of the legs? I have size 13 Wide feet, and I often buy shoes a tad large to accommodate these 'boats' I walk around on. Just follow along here . . . Walking in shoes that are a little too big will pull your socks right down your legs until they're bunched at your heel. Now, you might not have this particular problem, but seriously, isn't it annoying when your socks fall down your legs and end up bunched at your ankles? Well guess what? You pull those cords tight (don't worry, they're stretchy, and you won't cut off circulation or restrict movement), tie them off (double-slip works best) about an inch above your "ankle bone" (whatever that little knob is called), and not only will the legs of the pants NOT fall down around the heel of your shoes (to get stepped on and torn up), but your socks are held in place like magic! Also, if you're camping, landscaping, or just generally hanging out in the wilderness, this prevents bugs and other crawlers from getting up the legs of your pants (a big deal here in NY, the deer-tick problem is always a menace).

This is called "blousing" the pants, and before you guys feel all girly for saying the word 'blouse', relax - they do that in the Army and Marine Corps.
Read more ›
2 Comments 28 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Size: X-LargeColor: Black
I really like these pants. They were almost exactly what I was looking for. The only problem I had was the sizing chart was not accurate. Based on the chart I needed an XL, which I felt was too big but I ordered it anyway. I could have fit one and half of me in the XL. But I returned them with a request for a medium and they were resent quite quickly especially since it was right before Christmas. This pair fits just fine. I will be ordering the other pairs that I had selected.
1 Comment 27 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
By B. Proctor on September 8, 2007
Size: X-LargeColor: Woodland Camo
I am normally a size 40-42 waist and the X-Large fit perfectly! The legs were a little long but have ties to keep them from dragging. These pants kept me protected and cool on my hike in the Tennessee mountains in the middle of August! (Yeah, I know I'm crazy!)
Comment 19 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Size: LargeColor: Woodland Camouflage Verified Purchase
First, many here have written reviews, commenting about the size/fit. I am an honest 36/37 waist (for Wrangler jeans, 36 fits me well, as a guide), and I ordered "Size Large". The pants fit very well, with just the proper amount of "looseness" at the waist. The length appears to be equal to a 32" length, and again the fit "just right".

The fabric is also "just right", slightly heavier than, say "Dockers Kahki's", but not as heavy as, say "Wrangler blue jeans". I also like the camo pattern, which is exactly as shown in the picture. Can't say much more, except, I'm seriously considering ordering another pair, but may wait until I wash these several times. If I see any changes after washing, I will update this review, but at this point, I couldn't be more pleased.
Comment 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse