Roxy Juniors Basically Long Sleeve Rash Guard

5.0 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

Price: $30.99 - $34.99 & FREE Returns. Details
As expected (57%)
57% of customers say this fits as expected.
Too small
1
Somewhat small
0
Fits as expected
11
Somewhat large
2
Too large
5
Is this feature helpful?
Thank you for your feedback.
Leave a comment (optional)
Select Size Chart
White
  • 92% Polyester, 8% Spandex
  • Imported
  • Hand Wash
  • Long sleeve loose fit style with crew neck design
  • Flat lock stitched
  • Board short loop fastener
To buy, select Size

Product Description

  • Product Dimensions: 1 x 1 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B00FWPLV5G
  • Item model number: ARJWR00030-BJR0
  • Date first available at Amazon.com: January 29, 2014
  • Domestic Shipping: This item is also available for shipping to select countries outside the U.S.
  • International Shipping: This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #146,700 in Clothing (See Top 100 in Clothing)
    • Average Customer Review:
      5.0 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews
    Would you like to give feedback on images?

    Visit Amazon's Roxy Store

    See our full selection, shop by category, discover related brands, and more. Amazon's Roxy Store.

    Customer Questions & Answers

    Customer Reviews

    5 star
    100%
    4 star
    0%
    3 star
    0%
    2 star
    0%
    1 star
    0%
    See both customer reviews
    Share your thoughts with other customers

    Top Customer Reviews

    Size: 8Color: White Verified Purchase
    good
    Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
    Thank you for your feedback.
    Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
    Report abuse
    Size: 16Color: White Verified Purchase
    Nice fit
    Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
    Thank you for your feedback.
    Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
    Report abuse