Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$61.00$61.00
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$45.66$45.66
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Opti Sales
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Russian Question: Nationalism, Modernization, and Post-Communist Russia Paperback – October 9, 1998
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length366 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRowman & Littlefield Publishers
- Publication dateOctober 9, 1998
- Dimensions5.7 x 0.78 x 9.04 inches
- ISBN-109780847690039
- ISBN-13978-0847690039
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
Review
Allenworth provides a fascinating account of how the process of modernization has affected Russian national identity. ― Democratization
Allensworth is superbly equipped to explain the complexities and nuances of the kaleidoscopic variations of Russian nationalist opinion. -- James George Jatras ― Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 0847690032
- Publisher : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (October 9, 1998)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 366 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780847690039
- ISBN-13 : 978-0847690039
- Item Weight : 1.05 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.7 x 0.78 x 9.04 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,304,701 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,635 in Nationalism (Books)
- #10,293 in Russian History (Books)
- #21,665 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star100%0%0%0%0%100%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star100%0%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star100%0%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star100%0%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star100%0%0%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
After a concise, but informative review of the history of Russian nationalism since the late 18th century, the author provides well-researched presentations and insightful critique of the ideas of Solzhenitsyn, late and post-Soviet Christian nationalism, the pre- and post-Soviet Black Hundreds, emigre, Soviet and post-Soviet National Bolshevism, Zhirinovskii, the Russian neo-Nazis, the post-Soviet nationalist intellectual debate, and post-Soviet reform nationalism. His theoretical basis for dissecting and juxtaposing these varieties is mainly the sociological and anthropological literature on the sources and nature of nationalism, above all on the debate between the "structuralists" (emphasizing the functionality of nationalism), and "primordialists" (emphasizing the constituent role of national identity for human identity). The summary of this debate given as an introduction is worth-reading by itself, and provides Allensworth with some useful theoretical and conceptual tools with which to decipher and interpret the messages of the various Russian nationalist agendas. Allensworth's book can thus be characterized as a good addition to both, the methodology of studying Russian nationalism, and its theoretical comprehension. The quality and breadth of his empirical analysis of post-Soviet Russian nationalism makes it one of the best comprehensive overview of this spectrum in the 1990s available in English today.
In spite of its innovativeness, usefulness and general reliability, the concepts and typologies which Allensworth uses to define, characterize or summarize the various brands of Russian nationalism are not always well-chosen. The theoretical literature on the origins and development of nationalism and its relation to modernization, is by itself not sufficient for capturing the basic distinctions between various right-wing political agendas. Allensworth has, to be sure, provided an important guide to a consistent structuring of political spectra in general and the Russian party-system in particular, by explicitly associating the concept of the "left" with universalism (including internationalism and, in the Russian context, liberalism) and that of the "right" with particularism (pp. 26, 112). However, his few references to some writings on human nature - among them a disputed essay by Nobel Prize winner Konrad Lorenz ("On Aggression") - provide only little guidance on how to further sub-divide in an informative way the right in Russia and elsewhere.
Unfortunately, Allensworth tries to conceptualize the permutations of Russian nationalist ideology without paying much attention to the theoretical literature on ideologies. Whereas he is able to make at least some, partly useful suggestions concerning the differentiation of different types of conservatism (the instrumental vs. content-type), his disregard of the literature on generic and comparative fascism (e.g. Payne, Griffin, Eatwell) confuses his argument about some of his most important cases. When he uses the term, it is not entirely clear whether he refers to Italian Fascism or generic fascism. For instance, it remains in the dark what he exactly wanted to communicate when writing that Nikolai Lysenko's National-Republican Party's less developed racism is "blurring the line between protofascist and proto-Nazi organizations [the latter concerning, above all Alexander Barkashov's Russian National Unity - A.U.] in post-communist Russia." (p. 237) According to the findings of comparativists, there have been elements of racism in Italian Fascist ideology too. Nazism, according to the emerging consensus among theorists, should be conceptualized as a variety of generic fascism. Neither the program of the RNU nor that of the NRPR are "proto-" - i.e. not yet fully developed - ideologies. Both agendas are detailed prescriptions for political action, and how to build a future Russian state.
Equally, it is not clear why one would distinguish between Zhirinovskii's agenda and that of - what Allensworth has conceptualized as - the "national revolutionaries" represented by, above all, the RNU. Zhirinovskii has explicitly spoken of a "national revolution" too. Allensworth misses here an important dividing line within the Russian extreme Right by not explicitly introducing the category of mimetic fascism which could be usefully applied to the RNU. There is little use to give credit to the RNU's claim that its employment of the swastika represents a genuine attempt of reviving either an ancient Orthodox or a Russian pagan symbol (p. 225). The swastika and other related symbols or ideas of the RNU are simply copies from Germany, should be identified as such, and be seen as the most important feature of this organization. Herein (and not in the degree of the RNU's radicalism, as suggested by Allensworth) lies the crucial difference to Zhirinovskii and other Russian fascists who have been more cautious in their usage of non-indigenous elements.
In spite of these and some other confusing conceptualizations, Allensworth's study is an important step forward in the belated scholarly interpretation of one of the more disturbing developments in post-Cold War politics.
