Learn more
No featured offers available
We feature offers with an Add to Cart button when an offer meets our high standards for:
- Quality Price,
- Reliable delivery option, and
- Seller who offers good customer service
Samsung 960 EVO Series - 250GB PCIe NVMe - M.2 Internal SSD (MZ-V6E250BW)
| Digital Storage Capacity | 250 GB |
| Brand | SAMSUNG |
| Special Feature | Portable |
| Hard Disk Form Factor | 2 Inches |
| Hard Disk Description | Nvme |
| Compatible Devices | Laptop, PC |
| Installation Type | Internal Hard Drive |
| Color | Black |
| Hard Disk Size | 250 GB |
| Specific Uses For Product | personal, gaming, business |
About this item
- M.2 (2280) - PCIe 3.0 x4 NVM Express SSD for Client PCs
- V-NAND Client SSD ideal for high-performance tower desktops and small form factor PC’s
- Sequential Read Speeds up to 3200MB/s and Sequential Write Speeds up to 1900MB/s
- Samsung magician software delivers SSD management and automatic firmware updates
- Performance may vary based on system hardware & configuration
Customers frequently viewed
Related products with free delivery on eligible orders
Looking for specific info?
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers are pleased with the computer drive's speed, functionality, and quality. They find it runs smoothly and is a solid performer. Many consider it a worthwhile upgrade and consider it worth the price. Installation is also easy for them.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers are satisfied with the speed of the drive. They mention it's fast, with sequential read and write speeds of 1.8Gbps and 1.4Gbps, respectively. However, some customers report issues with reliability and boot times.
"...were moved to this new 960 EVO and there is a VERY noticeable increase in speed and performance over all compared to the previous Alienware 17 that..." Read more
"...As far as my review of this drive. It’s insanely fast (see screenshot to see how it does on an x99 Taichi with i7-6850k)...." Read more
"...BTW this chip is screaming fast. :)" Read more
"...name of the game for SSDs for a good long time now, making easily the fastest, highest quality SSDs on the market for gamers and businessmen...." Read more
Customers like the drive's performance. It boots up quickly and is fully operational after a simple reboot. While it performs well, it generally caps out at 1GByte/sec random read speed.
"...The EVO is already 3x the speed of the Crucial, and the difference in performance was amazing...." Read more
"...Very nice results, totally satisfied...." Read more
"Pros: - Great performance even among NVMe SSDs - Lower price than MLC NVMe SSDs - Less thermal throttling under load -..." Read more
"...more expensive then competitors and sata SSD's but offers much better performance and reliability." Read more
Customers appreciate the value for money of the computer drive. They find it a good return on investment, an affordable way to have maximum speed, and a worthwhile upgrade. Many consider it a good M.2 SSD and a worthwhile addition to their rig.
"...specs, the newer Crucial is just as fast as the SATA III 850 EVO, but cheaper, much lighter, smaller and twice the storage for less $$$ than the 850..." Read more
"Pros: - Great performance even among NVMe SSDs - Lower price than MLC NVMe SSDs - Less thermal throttling under load -..." Read more
"...Overall the 960 EVO is definitely a worthwhile upgrade if you deal with a lot of large data moving around quickly in applications such as photo or..." Read more
"...I consider this a great return on my investment !!!" Read more
Customers are satisfied with the drive's performance. They find it to be a good product and say it meets their expectations. The drive is described as fast, reliable, and a premium product that meets their expectations.
"...for SSDs for a good long time now, making easily the fastest, highest quality SSDs on the market for gamers and businessmen...." Read more
"Update2: 2.5 years and still working perfectly. Super product. Moved to an external case and then to new pc...." Read more
"...the EVO is not as far out there as the 960 PRO, it's still a premium product and commands a premium price...." Read more
"The best hard drive that I ever have. Faster than sata 3 ssds!..." Read more
Customers find the installation process easy. They say the card is slotted into the computer and screwed down. The cloning operation goes smoothly without any issues, and there's no need to reinstall Windows.
"...The install was quick and easy...." Read more
"The "drive" was a breeze to install. I transferred my OS and had my system up and running in 15 minutes...." Read more
"...Windows 10 boots in about 10 seconds. Installation is trivial if you have a small Phillips screwdriver and a motherboard with an M.2..." Read more
"...Installation was a breeze and no cables to cram in behind my case either...." Read more
Customers appreciate the storage capacity of the computer drive. They say it has more space and is a great storage device for games, large files like archives of weddings, and video editing. The storage speed is amazing, with 2GB per second sequential reads and perfect for video editing. There is plenty of space for future updates and software. The 250GB model is mind-blowingly fast, with 3200 MB/s read and 1500 MB/s writes.
"...Less thermal throttling under load - Varied size ranges (256gb to 1tb) - Small form factor - Less cable clutter..." Read more
"...Even the 250GB model is mind blowingly fast. 3200 MB/s read and 1500 MB/s writes. I thought my EVO 850 sata drive was fast...." Read more
"...- large files like archives of my weddings I keep on a portable hard drive that I backup nightly...." Read more
"...Pros: Almost the fastest storage solution (slower than the PRO version of same name) Very compact..." Read more
Customers are satisfied with the SSD's reliability. They find it stable and fast, with no defects or issues. The HD Sentinel monitor shows it in good health, and the writing speeds are great.
"...competitors and sata SSD's but offers much better performance and reliability." Read more
"...page file will warrant significant latency reductions and improve stability...." Read more
"...The are rock solid and state-of-the-art." Read more
"...EVO SSD are fast and reliable, I purchased two in 2017 and they are reliable and fast! I can say the same thing about the Samsung microSDXC cards!..." Read more
Customers appreciate the small size of the computer drive. They say it's space-saving and mounts directly to the motherboard. Some reviewers mention it's the size of a stick of gum, holds 250 GB, and is fast.
"...newer Crucial is just as fast as the SATA III 850 EVO, but cheaper, much lighter, smaller and twice the storage for less $$$ than the 850 EVO cost..." Read more
"...Would I buy this drive again? Absolutely. The form factor is space saving (no cables) and you're future proofing as other technologies advance to..." Read more
"...If you're willing to spend a few extra bucks for the smaller form factor, and impressive speeds, then this may be the SSD for you." Read more
"...notebook with a spare donor screw available, it will be the right size to clamp it down...." Read more
Reviews with images
1.4 GBs read and 1.3 GBs write connected to PCIe 2.0 x4
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2017Warning: Long Review. Context and experience with SSDs
I recently purchased this device for my newest Alienware 17R4. Now at two months old and the EVO 960 PCI 1TB SSD, almost a month old, the games I had on the Crucial MX300 2TB SATA 2.5 Inch SSD- CT2050MX300SSD1 were moved to this new 960 EVO and there is a VERY noticeable increase in speed and performance over all compared to the previous Alienware 17 that I still own and installed a Samsung 850 EVO 1 TB 2.5-Inch SATA III SSD (MZ-75E1T0B/AM . I have nothing but good things to say about the 850 as I had made it the boot drive/game drive on the previous system. I decided SSDs were the way to go for this new system. So I bought the Crucial 2TB SSD for the open SATA III port and it worked well enough, but some games were suffering severe lag, and I thought it may be the Crucial SSD, as it was a lot thinner and lighter than the Samsung 850 EVO 2.5inch SSD from the previous system. Turns out it was not the drive but the game itself which had been copied straight from the old system onto the new one, though the game had a severe outdoor lag that the game never had on the previous system. The old one has a 4thGen Core i7 2.80GHz overclocked to 3.2GHz, 16GB DDR3 RAM, 2GB Nvidia Geforce GTX 960m. But looking at the specs, the newer Crucial is just as fast as the SATA III 850 EVO, but cheaper, much lighter, smaller and twice the storage for less $$$ than the 850 EVO cost me (it needs a caddy to fit into the drive space available)..
In searching for a replacement drive, this system comes with a 2.5inch drive port (where the Crucial was installed) a boot drive slot for a PCI which currently has a crappy factory 128GB M.2 PCIe SSD which is small and slower by far, another such port where this 960 EVO is now installed, and there is still an open mSATA slot. I plan to replace the boot drive with another one of these same 960 EVOs which will bring my storage to 4TB, the largest I have ever had yet. With the mSATA I'm hoping it will be 5 or 6 TB later. I looked at the Samsung 850 EVO M.2 SATA III, but found it was the same speed as the first SSD on the previous system, though cheaper. It was still more expensive than the Crucial and only 1TB, so I looked into the 960 EVO/PROs, and was surprised how much faster the 960s were compared to the 850 EVO and Crucial SSDs (around 3X faster read/write speeds over both the 2.5inch SATA III and the M.2 SATA III). So I had the choice between the EVO and the PRO, and I saw that the PRO is several hundred dollars more expensive than the EVO for a mere 300MB/s of speed. The EVO is already 3x the speed of the Crucial, and the difference in performance was amazing. Moving 80GB of data used to take about a half hour on the SATA III 850 EVO and Crucial 2TB, now takes 10 minutes or less on the 960 EVO PCIe. This 960 EVO is actually less expensive than the 1TB 850 EVO SATA III I bought in 2015.
TL;DR Amazing speed. Perfect for gaming. Buy the 1TB 960 EVO PCIe instead of the 1TB 960 PRO PCIe. The 300 or so MB/s of speed of the PRO is not worth the $120-$150 increased cost. Very happy with the amazing look and performance of my games.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 23, 2017WICKED fast. I have two 1TB units, as well as two 850 Evo 1TB SATA3 6Gbps drives. I do not play games, and use Windows 10 on both systems I have the 960 Evo NVMe and 850 Evo SATA3 drives installed in. I also purchase all my equipment outright; i build, tweak and own it. I also tried out a pair of OCZ RD400 units, and they underperformed for the money.
I shoot/edit commercials in 1080P/2.5K RAW, with Adobe CC and Blackmagic Resolve, so speed matters, but moreso in media/cache/export/previews, so the 960 Evo is simply set up for that purpose, and the SATA3 850 Evo are OS/Program disks. 30 minutes of footage can exceed 120GB of storage at 1080p, and i typically shoot 45-70 minutes of RAW 1080p, plus multiple audio sources to other gear, so it adds up quickly.
With my previous x58 desktop, SSD, and ARECA RAID6, my highest disk speeds were 240MB r/230MB wr sustained on OCZ Vertex3 120GB, and 520MB r/440MB wr on an eight by 1TB 7200RPM disk-based ARECA ARC-1222 RAID6 setup.
The 960 Evo, in both Z270 desktop and Z270 laptop, are an order of magnitude better, averaging 2.9GB r/1.6GB wr sustained performance.
That, coupled with Thunderbolt 3, has saved me easily 2-5 hours of media transfer time per project day between SSD/SD camera/audio box cards/disks. In other words, I got a large chunk of my life back.
I have a desktop I just built in my giant HAF 932 case with an Asus Rog Strix Z270e mobo, GeForce GTX 1080, i7 7700K at 5Ghz, H110i V2, 32GB 3400Mhz DDR4, 4K 60hz 27" IPS display, Thunderbolt 3 PCIe card, 850w PSU, and a very nice 150 watt Klipsche 2.1 desktop audio setup on the HD audio side (broadcast is usually delivered in stereo), as well as a Sony receiver/JBL subwoofer totalling 1020 watts 7.1 setup on the optical side with a 50" 4k UHD HDR television for client review/secret movie night with the GF (it's my company and my office dammit) with Displayport and Optical cable passing through a wall to receiver/HDR UHD TV.
The 850 is my OS/Programs disk, and 960 EVO is media/cache/export/previews disk. Also an ARECA ARC-1222 eight disk RAID6 for mass storage totalling 5.3TB. I have excellent cooling in the HAF 932 case with a side intake fan blowing on the motherboard and hence on the 960 Evo as well to keep it cool, and a front intake fan to help cool the 850 Evo as well; in 2 weeks I've seen no thermal throttling.
This setup replaced an Asus Rampage III Gene x58, i7 980x 6-core at 4Ghz, 24GB 1600Mhz DDR3, GeForce GTX 660 2GB, OCZ Vertex3 120GB boot/OS with the same ARECA ARC-1222 eight disk RAID6 array which was also media/cache/export/previews.
Laptop setup is approximately 268% faster than previous x58 desktop, new desktop is approximately 325% faster, due to faster processor/RAM. Data transfer speeds due to thunderbolt 3 to thunderbolt 3 is rediculous... Coming from average of 30Mbps to 1.5GBps is a world of difference.
My x58 machine was not compatible with the NVMe 960 Evo, could not work with Thunderbolt 3, and even the SATA3 and USB3.0 it had were only marginally better than USB2.0 and SATAII speeds for data transfer, and sometimes worse. 24GB of RAM was adequate, and the i7 980x 6 core processor at 4Ghz was actually quite capable; I now use the i7 980x/Rampage III Gene and 24GB RAM, and Vertex 3 SSD as a home desktop/media center PC.
I also have a brand new MSI GT73VR Titan Pro 4K 7RF i7 7820HK running at 4.3Ghz, GTX 1080, 4K G-Sync, 32GB 2400MHZ DDR4 RAM, Thunderbolt 3 laptop for mobile work, which replaced a very old Inspiron which was simply used to transfer media on site. I keep the laptop plugged in, and elevated about 2 inches from any table/surface with custom fan curves for clean, cool air intake, and added my own thermal pads to the 960 Evo and 850 Evo just in case, and I see no thermal throttling there as well.
In the Titan Pro laptop, 850 Evo is OS/Programs, with 960 Evo set as media/cache/export/previews, same as the desktop, and now i can happily and easily edit on site/set, show clients raw footage vs quick edited preview, edit/batch RAW photos with presets from Photoshop I built on desktop/laptop after having calibrated the screens, work on it at home, and transfer the entire project via Thunderbolt 3 astoundingly fast when i get back to the office, and back to the laptop before i leave.
Overall, the 960 Evo easily embarasses anything out there, including VERY pricey PCIe RAID setups with high end ARECA RAID controllers (borrowed an ARECA ARC-1880xi (?) With multidisk HDDs, then SSDs... disappointed.)
If you have the capital and you use it for work or gaming, it's a no-brainer. These NVMe drives put SATA SSDs and HDDs firmly in the grave, and I won't bother buying anything else SATA related at this point; SATA is dead.
Latency, spin up time, 3.5"/2.5"/1.8" size disks, and slow sustained performance are a thing of the past.
Sadly, for you gamers, per MSI Afterburner, these systems only produce 59.9FPS in solitaire at 4k resolution on 60hz G-Sync 4k displays and a Samsung 4k 60Hz gaming-capable low latency 8000 series tv, which I attribute to the weak GTX 1080 graphics cards in them. You may have better luck with less demanding games like Far Cry Primal, GTAV, or Hitman, which my interns tell me stay locked at 60FPS on the same machines I just bought/built when they so generously stay after hours to 'quality test' the equipment for me, but it's certainly not the 960 Evo's bogging them down ;)
Top reviews from other countries
-
PedroReviewed in Brazil on July 18, 20185.0 out of 5 stars Excelente produto!
Capacity: 500GBVerified PurchaseProduto excelente. Ótima compra, envio rápido.
-
Christian GerauerReviewed in Germany on April 11, 20195.0 out of 5 stars Superschnelle Lieferung
Artikel wie beschrieben, rasche Lieferung, funktioniert einwandfrei alles.
-
Edgar PoeReviewed in Mexico on August 22, 20175.0 out of 5 stars El futuro NVMe.
Capacity: 250GBVerified PurchaseEs el primer disco ssd de este tipo que compro, la verdad estaba un poco escéptico por la velocidad que promete, pero sin dudas es lo mas rápido que he experimentado en lectura y escritura, cumple con los 3,200MB/s lectura y 1,500MB/s escritura, lo utilizo para complementar mi ssd que tengo en mi Pc de escritorio.
Obviamente recomiendo instalar su S.O. en el ssd NVMe y un par de videojuegos dependiendo de la capacidad que compren.
Pros:
Velocidad.
Diseño.
Consumo eléctrico.
Solo montarlo y esta listo para utilizarse.
Contras:
Precio.
-Samsung cuenta con herramientas muy útiles para Clonar S.O. y una para revisar el estado de tus ssd's entre otras.
-Revisen que su Tarjeta madre tenga el puerto para este tipos de discos sin duda lo vale.
Llego en perfectas condiciones y en el tiempo estimado.
DalReviewed in the United Kingdom on July 13, 20195.0 out of 5 stars It's a bit expensive
It's a bit expensive but my research tells me it was worth it. To be honest, I don't use it to load games, just OS. I think the reason is that for the price I'd rather not wear it out... I'm probably being too protective over it - I'm in a dilemma. I just use my 10TB HDD for everything other than OS critical stuff.
One person found this helpfulReport
Sneaky_ninjaReviewed in India on July 1, 20185.0 out of 5 stars Worth the value
Capacity: 250GBVerified PurchaseThe performance of the SSD is phenomenal. Booting time for Windows 10 is under 10 seconds. Using it for analysis and photo editing. Response time is as low as possible.
The price shown on amazon app was higher than the actual product price. Invoice from retailer was of the original price, its just that Amazon was showing higher discount, since price was bloated by +5k. So it feels a bit misguided and I question the "discounts" during the sale now on.
With that said packaging and product deliver is satisfactory.
Install the Samsung magician software once you install the ssd. It tweaks yhe performance.