Qty:1
$8.75 + $3.65 shipping
In stock. Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
Sold by Dragonfly Laser

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Santa Claus and reindeer rubber stamp WM P22

5.0 out of 5 stars 4 customer reviews

Price: $8.75 + $3.65 shipping
In stock.
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
Ships from and sold by Dragonfly Laser.
$8.75 + $3.65 shipping In stock. Usually ships within 2 to 3 days. Ships from and sold by Dragonfly Laser.

Product Information

Shipping Weight 4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
ASIN B004QV75S4
Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars 4 customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #257,893 in arts-crafts
#1,463 in Toys & Games > Arts & Crafts > Printing & Stamping

Feedback

Would you like to give feedback on images?
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?


Product Description

Santa and reindeer rubber stamp WM and measures 3x1". Silhouette style. Deep etched.

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See all 4 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
I bought this as to use as an accent on my Christmas cards this year, and it really made the entire card come together! It was perfect for what I needed!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
By Murmaids on November 17, 2012
Verified Purchase
This stamp was jJust what I was looking to use to fly over the Mackinaw Bridge! , ! , great
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Love this!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
great
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse