Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$27.86$27.86
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Decoration House
Save with Used - Very Good
$8.03$8.03
FREE delivery June 12 - 18
Ships from: ThriftBooks-Atlanta Sold by: ThriftBooks-Atlanta
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Save the World on Your Own Time Edition Unstated
Purchase options and add-ons
In Save the World On Your Own Time, Stanley Fish argues that, however laudable these goals might be, there is but one proper role for the academe in society: to advance bodies of knowledge and to equip students for doing the same. When teachers offer themselves as moralists, political activists, or agents of social change rather than as credentialed experts in a particular subject and the methods used to analyze it, they abdicate their true purpose. And yet professors now routinely bring their political views into the classroom and seek to influence the political views of their students. Those who do this will often invoke academic freedom, but Fish argues that academic freedom, correctly understood, is the freedom to do the academic job, not the freedom to do any job that comes into the professor's mind. He insists that a professor's only obligation is "to present the material in the syllabus and introduce students to state-of-the-art methods of analysis. Not to practice politics, but to study it; not to proselytize for or against religious doctrines, but to describe them; not to affirm or condemn Intelligent Design, but to explain what it is and analyze its appeal."
Given that hot-button issues such as Holocaust denial, free speech, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are regularly debated in classrooms across the nation, Save the World On Your Own Time is certain to spark fresh debate-and to incense both liberals and conservatives-about the true purpose of higher education in America.
- ISBN-100195369025
- ISBN-13978-0195369021
- EditionEdition Unstated
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateAugust 11, 2008
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions8.3 x 0.9 x 5.7 inches
- Print length208 pages
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
Review
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; Edition Unstated (August 11, 2008)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 208 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0195369025
- ISBN-13 : 978-0195369021
- Item Weight : 12.3 ounces
- Dimensions : 8.3 x 0.9 x 5.7 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,533,564 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #295 in Educational Philosophy
- #2,227 in Philosophy & Social Aspects of Education
- #60,534 in Unknown
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Stanley Fish is the Davidson-Kahn Distinguished University Professor and a professor of law at Florida International University. He has previously taught at the University of California at Berkeley, Johns Hopkins University, Duke University, and the University of Illinois at Chicago, where he was dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. He has received many honors and awards, including being named the Chicagoan of the Year for Culture. He is the author of twelve books and is now a weekly columnist for the New York Times. He resides in Andes, New York; New York City; and Delray Beach, Florida; with his wife, Jane Tompkins.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This text is a rational and useful counter to accumulated rhetoric which has proposed "Teaching as a Subversive Activity" and "diversity of ideas in the classroom," and universal questioning of all fixed norms. Fish sanely says English teachers should teach English, lawyers law and philosophers philosophy. It is not the job of an English teacher to judge the law or ethics of Macbeth's actions but the quality of the play, or more precisely it is the professor's job to evaluate quality and to teach students to perform this task. Law professors should not advocate laws to be enacted but how to understand and interpret those in effect. Philosophers should evaluate ethical systems not advocate one or another. And so forth.
Fish mentions the difficulties of distinguishing right and good, the difficulties of administration and even diminishing funding streams , but his major point is central: do your job, not someone else's job. I might add, there are plenty of folk willing to save our souls, our health and our society outside academe.
There is one difficulty, the underlying assumption that the University consists solely of the classroom and the lab. The elaborate social service side (Offfice of Student Success, etc) of modern American Universities has a trail of health officers and psychologists, nutritionists, housing, affirmative action, gender equity, financial aide specialists as well as admissions, out-counselers, registrars, and so on and so onwhich is an enterprise in itself and often part of the larger commercial life of the host city. But why criticize what he does not attempt.
This task involves both responsibilities (to show up for class, be prepared, create exams, give feedback on assignments, etc.) and prohibitions (taking on tasks "that belong properly to other agents," including political indoctrination. When we do the latter we open ourselves to legitimate criticism which then threatens the accomplishment of our actual task.
I believe that he argues these points convincingly and also answers the `everything is political, so I'll give my political slant to counterbalance the slant of others' argument.
One of the distinctions that has often been overlooked in the so-called `culture wars' is the distinction between the politically conservative and the academically conservative. The broad brush attacks on leftist professors have often overlooked the fact that many of those individuals are conservative with regard to curriculum, methodology, standards, and so on. Fish, e.g., notoriously tells students that they shouldn't be `expressing themselves' in class because they have nothing to express until they acquire a great deal more knowledge than they presently possess, a point repeated in Save the World on Your Own Time.
The only place where he seems to backslide on his defense of disciplinary distinctiveness and the specificity of tasks is in his implicit defense of Women's Studies, Black Studies, etc. programs. In this book he says that the study of race, class and gender has energized the humanities. At the same time, he says that if the identity-based programs stray from their task of analysis and `academicizing' and become agents of advocacy they should be prohibited from doing so by administrative authorities.
I would have thought that he would argue on behalf of `the study of women' within the disciplines but not for `women's studies' as an administrative and curricular unit, since the expectation of advocacy is nearly always part of such a unit's portfolio. There are several points worth considering here. First, the identity-based programs are overwhelmingly populated by faculty in the humanities, whereas the issues that those programs raise may, in some cases, be more effectively addressed by economists, historians, statisticians and faculty in the life sciences. It is arguable that some of the issues which these programs address were not being addressed in the past, at least not to the degree that their importance would justify. Hence the need for such programs (then). It is now late in the day, however, and issues of race, class and gender pervade the curricula and research agendas of the separate disciplines. John Guillory (who is clearly not politically conservative) has argued that women's studies, black studies, etc. should be research foci, not curricular units. He argues that on several grounds, but one important point that he makes is that anything that is constructed as an alternative to a core, anything that offers a different path than that taken by the vast majority of students (majoring in history, sociology, the biological sciences, etc.) ends up being something `secondary', something with less clout and less authority, something that, ultimately, helps widen the gap between the students who study a traditional curriculum (as defined by the disciplines; Guillory's `traditional' will be very different from Dinesh D'Souza's or Roger Kimball's) and serves to diminish the authenticity of their degrees. Given Fish's respect for the disciplines and their distinctiveness I would have expected a warm embrace of Guillory's argument.
Nevertheless, it is important to identify the proper role of university teachers and Fish does that. This is a subset, of course, of the proper role of a university, which would include the development of new knowledge as well as the dissemination of established knowledge. The development of new knowledge (faculty research) is related to instruction in various ways and forms. The choice of a subject of such research can, of course, be a political act. If a prospective faculty member in the humanities identifies his research foci as the kinds of things which Fish highlights here (genre, literary history, metrics, verse forms, stylistic effects, and so on), that candidate will be immediately and overtly identifying him- or herself as `traditional' and `conservative' (academically and possibly . . . politically?), given the fact that the easily politicized foci of race, class and gender have pervaded the academy, at least until very recently.

