Amazon Prime includes:
| Prime Benefits |
|
|---|---|
| Award winning movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video | ✓ |
| On demand, ad-free music streaming with Prime Music | ✓ |
| Early access to deals and savings with Prime Exclusives | ✓ |
Buy new:
-15% $15.26$15.26
Delivery Thursday, August 29
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy new:
-15% $15.26$15.26
Delivery Thursday, August 29
Ships from: Amazon.com
Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$7.19$7.19
Delivery Tuesday, September 3
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Save with Used - Good
$7.19$7.19
Delivery Tuesday, September 3
Ships from: Amazon
Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Schools We Need: And Why We Don't Have Them Paperback – August 17, 1999
by
E.D. Hirsch Jr.
(Author)
Sorry, there was a problem loading this page. Try again.
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$15.26","priceAmount":15.26,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"15","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"26","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"S%2F%2FrYwFfU5fxGtThSh%2F50sE5%2Bm6d1prfgauaW5T9TkMaIPFF3ZHmLDYFRsItcUGas%2FInl%2FqlYAsFmY1KJLMWBx%2FYVWIKSffGLc9awr8E3Qbr7sHFTjvYUi3Btw1hhCDbjfxQik0arvU%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$7.19","priceAmount":7.19,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"7","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"19","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"S%2F%2FrYwFfU5fxGtThSh%2F50sE5%2Bm6d1prfpoYHHjdEHKucSRHr9Cd2IlKtqL2NuLVuM18LdVGVelUO1S4UI0YqMHLoepHK5b2BhbvQTVk1%2BAUR90mwYK%2FWuA%2FwHHQ4gGzSYUxrGAwGfjpzL7LXrcohksiTOXBiwsslfODhvmBrSKqEPjdTNA8x8gPGyasa1V1B","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}
Purchase options and add-ons
This paperback edition, with a new introduction, offers a powerful, compelling, and unassailable argument for reforming America's schooling methods and ideas--by one of America's most important educators, and author of the bestselling Cultural Literacy.
For over fifty years, American schools have operated under the assumption that challenging children academically is unnatural for them, that teachers do not need to know the subjects they teach, that the learning "process" should be emphasized over the facts taught. All of this is tragically wrong.
Renowned educator and author E. D. Hirsch, Jr., argues that, by disdaining content-based curricula while favoring abstract--and discredited--theories of how a child learns, the ideas uniformly taught by our schools have done terrible harm to America's students. Instead of preparing our children for the highly competitive, information-based economy in which we now live, our schools' practices have severely curtailed their ability, and desire, to learn.
With an introduction that surveys developments in education since the hardcover edition was published, The Schools We Need is a passionate and thoughtful book that will appeal to the millions of people who can't understand why America's schools aren't educating our children.
For over fifty years, American schools have operated under the assumption that challenging children academically is unnatural for them, that teachers do not need to know the subjects they teach, that the learning "process" should be emphasized over the facts taught. All of this is tragically wrong.
Renowned educator and author E. D. Hirsch, Jr., argues that, by disdaining content-based curricula while favoring abstract--and discredited--theories of how a child learns, the ideas uniformly taught by our schools have done terrible harm to America's students. Instead of preparing our children for the highly competitive, information-based economy in which we now live, our schools' practices have severely curtailed their ability, and desire, to learn.
With an introduction that surveys developments in education since the hardcover edition was published, The Schools We Need is a passionate and thoughtful book that will appeal to the millions of people who can't understand why America's schools aren't educating our children.
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherAnchor
- Publication dateAugust 17, 1999
- Dimensions6.14 x 0.74 x 9.23 inches
- ISBN-109780385495240
- ISBN-13978-0385495240
Frequently bought together

This item: The Schools We Need: And Why We Don't Have Them
$15.26$15.26
In Stock
$14.42$14.42
Get it as soon as Monday, Sep 2
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Try again!
Added to Cart
One of these items ships sooner than the other.
Choose items to buy together.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to KnowPaperback$10.67 shippingGet it as soon as Monday, Sep 2Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
The Knowledge Deficit: Closing the Shocking Education Gap for American ChildrenPaperback$10.33 shippingOnly 18 left in stock (more on the way).
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
118 global ratings
How customer reviews and ratings work
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on May 1, 2024
This will give you a lot of information. The foundation this book lays gives you a great jumping off point for further research.
Reviewed in the United States on September 11, 2012
The biggest mistake I ever made, was entering a masters program in education - without reading this book first. My passion for science is only rivaled by the education thereof - and in a post science PhD, mid-life crisis, I turned to the latter.
I was aghast that education programs do not adhere to even nominal academic standards, and that success is governed by mimicry alone. As a trained scientist, and critical thinker - I found myself in a world fueled by ideology that is antithetical to education itself. And instead of being rewarded for plunging the literature and constructing rational arguments for assigned 'journal reflections' - my work was deemed 'unacceptable'. Why? Because I routinely found the dogma we were to regurgitate, had already been trounced as utter empirical failures before.
I did my homework, and sadly - the education professors had not. They had never had a student question their methods before, moreover, in a way that made them look like total idiots. Instead of contending with the logical arguments before them - a circus of power abuse ensued. I was marked as a "problem student" - because that was much easier than actually doing their job of understanding the topics they, uh... profess.
I was baffled that the educationists were so removed from their own field! How is that possible? Surely, at an academic institution, professors would at least be aware of dissenting positions and have *some* way of responding to them! Nope. They could not. They could only hurl wild accusations of being "unsafe" around children instead. That is the cost of disagreement in education. And what naive teacher is willing to take that risk? Basically none. But that is moot, because teachers only nod their head with fervor agreement - no matter what is said - to earn a grade, a degree, and ultimately, a letter of recommendation.
Hirsch does a fantastic job of characterizing the education system and firmly places the blame on education programs that are steeped in ideological mysticism and ignorant to empirical reality. As a scientist, I can only condone adherence to the latter - and as a passionate purveyor of education, I can only condone the latter also. Although I had gathered up thousands of references and thought I would write my own book - I discovered that Hirsch had already done so. And he does so beautifully.
I can't recommend this book enough. It is a reasoned and scholarly treatment of something that every American should be concerned about. Teachers do not read this book - because it is not assigned. Administrators do not read this book, because it is not assigned. Parents do read this book, because they care -- and only through their concerted efforts as concerned citizens and insistence upon educating our children with uniform content standards, can we hope to have educated children and a populace competent in the global arena.
I was aghast that education programs do not adhere to even nominal academic standards, and that success is governed by mimicry alone. As a trained scientist, and critical thinker - I found myself in a world fueled by ideology that is antithetical to education itself. And instead of being rewarded for plunging the literature and constructing rational arguments for assigned 'journal reflections' - my work was deemed 'unacceptable'. Why? Because I routinely found the dogma we were to regurgitate, had already been trounced as utter empirical failures before.
I did my homework, and sadly - the education professors had not. They had never had a student question their methods before, moreover, in a way that made them look like total idiots. Instead of contending with the logical arguments before them - a circus of power abuse ensued. I was marked as a "problem student" - because that was much easier than actually doing their job of understanding the topics they, uh... profess.
I was baffled that the educationists were so removed from their own field! How is that possible? Surely, at an academic institution, professors would at least be aware of dissenting positions and have *some* way of responding to them! Nope. They could not. They could only hurl wild accusations of being "unsafe" around children instead. That is the cost of disagreement in education. And what naive teacher is willing to take that risk? Basically none. But that is moot, because teachers only nod their head with fervor agreement - no matter what is said - to earn a grade, a degree, and ultimately, a letter of recommendation.
Hirsch does a fantastic job of characterizing the education system and firmly places the blame on education programs that are steeped in ideological mysticism and ignorant to empirical reality. As a scientist, I can only condone adherence to the latter - and as a passionate purveyor of education, I can only condone the latter also. Although I had gathered up thousands of references and thought I would write my own book - I discovered that Hirsch had already done so. And he does so beautifully.
I can't recommend this book enough. It is a reasoned and scholarly treatment of something that every American should be concerned about. Teachers do not read this book - because it is not assigned. Administrators do not read this book, because it is not assigned. Parents do read this book, because they care -- and only through their concerted efforts as concerned citizens and insistence upon educating our children with uniform content standards, can we hope to have educated children and a populace competent in the global arena.
Reviewed in the United States on December 22, 2007
A long time ago, a well known theorist of education - John Dewey - decried certain "dualisms" in education. Schools, in other words, should not put all of their educational eggs in one basket by focusing either SOLELY on teaching factual recall or SOLELY on teaching students how to think. Schools should do both and avoid the idea that the two can be seperated. Thinking, in Dewey's mind, was dependent on factual knowledge and factual knowledge was useless without a mind trained to think about it.
Hirsch's book is written amongst a steady tide of educational thought that has forgotten this most basic insight. Most educators today believe the primary goal of education to be promotion of critical thinking and creative expression at the expense of fact-b ased instruction, which is often decried as 'mindless repitition of facts.' (In my education classes, I often hear it referred to as the 'three R's' - read, remember, regurgitate.')
In this sense, the thesis of Hirsch's book - that critical thinking and creative expression MUST be accompanied by firm, factual understanding - is a very Deweyan idea. And Hirsch makes a good case, both philosophically and scientifically.
The first half of the book is the more philosophical half. First, Hirsch traces the ideological roots of the 'learning as a social, constructivist enterprise' theory. Owing to the work of a handful of theorists in and around the 1930's, the 'learn from the bottom up' approach (facts first, then higher-order reflection) became replaced by a "bottom down" approach that sees learning as more holistic and constructivistic.
Next, Hirsch shows that by most any measure, these ideas have failed - ever since their inception in the '30's - to produce any improvement in the United State's educational situation. More than that, while these 'reforms' flounder in the public schools, those schools that still hold to a fact-based rigorous educational model - private schools and universities - continue to thrive. So, is it any wonder that we might find reason to question whether these reforms have done more harm than good?
But, as Hirsch points out next, not only are these ideas not questioned within the education establishment, they are simply treated as common sense - even in the light of their repeated failure to deliver on their promises.
AS a masters student in Special Education and a first year teacher, this was a pertinent section for me. I can see the dominance of the constructivist model not only in the school where I teach, but permeating every inch of the Graduate School which I attend. We are taught EXCLUSIVELY in the constructivist approach and the more fact-based approach only comes up when we talk about how things used to be (ah...those draconians!).
Finally, we get to the meat of Hirsch's case. The last third of the book presents the data. While most of the alleged data supporting the constructivist approach boils down to philosophy dressed in the language of science, the data supporting the other, more fact-based approach, consists of numerous studies that independently come to the same conclusion - that fact-based, large-group, disciplined instruction, rather than the more free-form, constructivist, small group approach, wins the day more often than not.
Of course, as I have not done any exhaustive reasearch on this subject, I cannot say that there is NO research to support a constructivist approach. But I can attest that many articles in support of constructivism are thinly veiled philosophizing under the guise of sceintific research, the quality of which would be laughed at in any journal with scholarly standards. (Unfortunately, education journals don't seem to have very high publishing standards.)
My only complaint about this book - and it is a big one - is that Hirsch really should have focused more on the scientific case against a wholly constructivist approach.It may be true that the science supports a more fact-based approach, but, if so, he should rebut it more with science than his own philosophy. Otherwise, he is only doing what he alleges others of doing - being a partisan to philosophy rather than data. If the data is as staggering as he suggests, he shold show it rather than relegate it to the last third of his book.
Be that as it may, this book is sorely needed in an educational world that has been trying the same thing over and over (under new names every few years) only to find that it doesn't work. Perhaps we should take a cue from the schools that are working - private schools, universities, and the pulbic schools of other countries. Of course, if we did that, we might have to admit that Hirsch, and Dewey, are right; education is not worth much without factual rigor.
Hirsch's book is written amongst a steady tide of educational thought that has forgotten this most basic insight. Most educators today believe the primary goal of education to be promotion of critical thinking and creative expression at the expense of fact-b ased instruction, which is often decried as 'mindless repitition of facts.' (In my education classes, I often hear it referred to as the 'three R's' - read, remember, regurgitate.')
In this sense, the thesis of Hirsch's book - that critical thinking and creative expression MUST be accompanied by firm, factual understanding - is a very Deweyan idea. And Hirsch makes a good case, both philosophically and scientifically.
The first half of the book is the more philosophical half. First, Hirsch traces the ideological roots of the 'learning as a social, constructivist enterprise' theory. Owing to the work of a handful of theorists in and around the 1930's, the 'learn from the bottom up' approach (facts first, then higher-order reflection) became replaced by a "bottom down" approach that sees learning as more holistic and constructivistic.
Next, Hirsch shows that by most any measure, these ideas have failed - ever since their inception in the '30's - to produce any improvement in the United State's educational situation. More than that, while these 'reforms' flounder in the public schools, those schools that still hold to a fact-based rigorous educational model - private schools and universities - continue to thrive. So, is it any wonder that we might find reason to question whether these reforms have done more harm than good?
But, as Hirsch points out next, not only are these ideas not questioned within the education establishment, they are simply treated as common sense - even in the light of their repeated failure to deliver on their promises.
AS a masters student in Special Education and a first year teacher, this was a pertinent section for me. I can see the dominance of the constructivist model not only in the school where I teach, but permeating every inch of the Graduate School which I attend. We are taught EXCLUSIVELY in the constructivist approach and the more fact-based approach only comes up when we talk about how things used to be (ah...those draconians!).
Finally, we get to the meat of Hirsch's case. The last third of the book presents the data. While most of the alleged data supporting the constructivist approach boils down to philosophy dressed in the language of science, the data supporting the other, more fact-based approach, consists of numerous studies that independently come to the same conclusion - that fact-based, large-group, disciplined instruction, rather than the more free-form, constructivist, small group approach, wins the day more often than not.
Of course, as I have not done any exhaustive reasearch on this subject, I cannot say that there is NO research to support a constructivist approach. But I can attest that many articles in support of constructivism are thinly veiled philosophizing under the guise of sceintific research, the quality of which would be laughed at in any journal with scholarly standards. (Unfortunately, education journals don't seem to have very high publishing standards.)
My only complaint about this book - and it is a big one - is that Hirsch really should have focused more on the scientific case against a wholly constructivist approach.It may be true that the science supports a more fact-based approach, but, if so, he should rebut it more with science than his own philosophy. Otherwise, he is only doing what he alleges others of doing - being a partisan to philosophy rather than data. If the data is as staggering as he suggests, he shold show it rather than relegate it to the last third of his book.
Be that as it may, this book is sorely needed in an educational world that has been trying the same thing over and over (under new names every few years) only to find that it doesn't work. Perhaps we should take a cue from the schools that are working - private schools, universities, and the pulbic schools of other countries. Of course, if we did that, we might have to admit that Hirsch, and Dewey, are right; education is not worth much without factual rigor.
Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2009
I now have better insight into my own frustrations with the public schools. My children, fortunately, have educated parents who supplement their classroom 'learning'. The schools have, unfortunately, bored them with a disconnected curriculum that doesn't even come close to challenging them.
Hirsch provides insight into how we got into this mess and what we need to do to fix the problem. This is a must-read book if you care about your own children and about the future of our country.
Hirsch provides insight into how we got into this mess and what we need to do to fix the problem. This is a must-read book if you care about your own children and about the future of our country.
Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2007
There are printing errors on pages 121, 124, and 132 of the paperback edition - including repeated and truncated sentences, misplaced quotes, and truncated paragraphs. I have contacted the publisher, and advise others to check before they purchase. I found the same errors on three paperback copies, from three retailers, in two states.
I love the premise of this book, and have found a clean, hardcover copy without errors.
I love the premise of this book, and have found a clean, hardcover copy without errors.
Reviewed in the United States on November 1, 2013
A must read for the education community, parents and school stakeholders. I highly recommend this book to any one that wants to see the lies we have been made to believe.
Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2015
A thoroughly researched, thoughtfully organized, balanced, and, unfortunately timeless dissection of many of the underlying issues that plague education. Hirsch's analyses are worth discussing and re-reading.





