Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Science of Ghosts: Searching for Spirits of the Dead Paperback – June 26, 2012
|New from||Used from|
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
"This is it—the definitive book on ghosts from a scientific perspective, written by the world's foremost science-based ghost hunter. Nickell is the go-to guy for all things paranormal, and with this book he has once again asserted himself as a fair and careful investigator whose conclusions we can trust."
—Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, monthly columnist for Scientific American, and author of The Believing Brain
"In [this] important new book Joe Nickell-the premier skeptical paranormal investigator alive today-explains his expert techniques while presenting various paranormal cases, looking at the actual evidence for the existence of such spirit beings. This is a book that everyone interested in ghostly evidence for the afterlife-believer and skeptic alike-will benefit from reading."
—D. J. Grothe, president, James Randi Educational Foundation
"[Nickell is] the epitome of [a] skeptical investigator...coming to a subject without prejudgment but with an honest desire to find the truth...."
—Kendrick Frazier, editor, Skeptical Inquirer
"[The Science of Ghosts] will find a home in science and new age collections alike, and considers the actual evidence surrounding psychic contacts with 'the other side… a balanced assessment of the evidence for ghosts and hauntings."
"Filled with case studies, this book will interest other fans of ghostly affairs academia."
—Bookviews by Alan Caruba
"This is a well thought out, intelligently written book."
—City Book Review
About the Author
Top Customer Reviews
One interesting thing brought up that I never really thought about myself- why exactly do ghosts wear clothing? Aren't they existing in a different plane of 'spiritual' existence? How then did non-spiritual, material items 'pass on' along with them?
Other, probably even better scientifically based paranormal books exist, (I have two in mind to read), but this book I believe is the only one dealing solely with ghosts/spiritualism. Recommended if the interest in the subject is there.
First, the book tries to cover too much ground. Dozens of cases are discussed, but most in such minimal detail that there's no sense of the scope of the investigation. This is made doubly irritating by the plethora of references to earlier works, many of them by the author, which presumably (I haven't read any of Mr. Nickell's other books) do deal with cases in greater detail. This book reads more like 'The best of Joe Nickell' in which the author cherry-picks his own favorite past cases and gives a few highlights.
Second, there is very little actual science in the book. I appreciate that it is extremely difficult in some cases to prove a negative, but Mr. Nickell offers up various terms as though they are explanations in themselves. To go through some of them: Occam's razor (the simplest answer is most likely to be right) is merely a study in probabilities, not an answer to anything. Extremely simple answers have proven to be wrong- creationism is simple, evolution is extremely complex, but evolution is what actually happened. Arguing through ignorance is a logical issue, not a scientific proposition. Even if someone is arguing through ignorance they might still be right- because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. Waking dreams and fantasy-prone individuals just increase the number of possibilities; indeed, unless it can be proven (and this book doesn't do it) that the purported paranormal experience was a waking dream or the result of a fantasy, suggesting that either of these are the explanation is actually arguing through ignorance.Read more ›
Occasionally he does find a good scientific answer, such as the discovery of an adjacent iron staircase to the MacKenzie house used by cleaning crews at night. I wanted more of those, but they were few and far between. I can't recommend this book to anyone.
In The Science of Ghosts, Nickell dismisses mediums and psychics, as well as various paranormal phenomenon like premonitions, spirit photography, and automatic writing. He also examines, and debunks, several famous hauntings which is what I found most interesting.
Nickell offers a variety of explanations for so-called ghostly experiences. For example, he argues that bedside apparitions are the product of “waking dreams” and that spirits seen during waking hours are mental images briefly projected from the subconscious mind. Other experiences, he argues, can easily be attributed to hallucinations, misperceptions, pranks, or flat-out trickery.
In The Science of Ghosts, Nickell also notes the human propensity to exaggerate or invent spooky stories. He cites several legends in which a tragic figure is said to haunt a castle, lighthouse, or old mansion despite no evidence of the person’s existence or the events said to befall them. All it takes is a creepy legend and the power of suggestion, Nickell says, for people to start seeing ghosts.
On the whole, I enjoyed Nickell’s book even though he refutes the existence of ghosts and refers to paranormal bloggers like myself as “credulous ghost mongers.” Nickell’s arguments raise a lot of interesting points even if they do take the fun out of spooky tales.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
As others have said: annoying due to a self-important author (intrudes himself regarding accomplishments, relationships, etc. Read morePublished on October 14, 2013 by A. Moss
I recieved "The Science of Ghosts" as a gift, as I am interested in the field. However I was greatly disappointed in the lack of science in the work. Read morePublished on February 9, 2013 by William Mayor
Being short on time and basing my decision only on blurbs, I assigned this book to my college freshman seminar on intellectual inquiry. Read morePublished on October 11, 2012 by Tom Carter
Joe Nickell is an abject fool. Though he claims to approach each situation fairly and without bias, it is crystal-clear that he approaches through the glasses of, "I'm absolutely... Read morePublished on October 5, 2012 by Bruce D. Wilner
Joe Nickell's book is very good. It presents a skeptical, yet open minded account of ghost investigation. It is important to emphasize that Mr. Read morePublished on September 26, 2012 by Tiger Ridge
Contradictory to what some of the other reviewers posted, this is an excellent book. Unlike people who believe off of the bat, Nickell investigates these matters to see if there is... Read morePublished on September 5, 2012 by A. Scott