Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
96% positive over lifetime
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Scorpions: The Battles and Triumphs of FDR's Great Supreme Court Justices Hardcover – November 8, 2010
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Paperback, Illustrated
"Please retry" | $11.67 | $1.71 |
Purchase options and add-ons
Four more different men could hardly be imagined. Yet they had certain things in common. Each was a self-made man who came from humble beginnings on the edge of poverty. Each had driving ambition and a will to succeed. Each was, in his own way, a genius.
They began as close allies and friends of FDR, but the quest to shape a new Constitution led them to competition and sometimes outright warfare. Scorpians tells the story of these four great justices: their relationship with Roosevelt, with each other, and with the turbulent world of the Great Depression, World War II, and the Cold War. It also serves as a history of the modern Constitution itself.
- Print length528 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherTwelve
- Publication dateNovember 8, 2010
- Dimensions7 x 2 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-100446580570
- ISBN-13978-0446580571
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Highest ratedin this set of products
Nine Scorpions in a Bottle: Great Judges and Cases of the Supreme CourtPaperback - Most purchasedin this set of products
Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal EstablishmentHardcover
Hugo Black was the first justice to frame originalism as a definitive constitutional theory and to explain why and how he was using it. In this sense, Black was the inventor of originalism.Highlighted by 158 Kindle readers
Roberts’s vote would become known, perhaps inevitably, as the switch in time that saved nine.Highlighted by 112 Kindle readers
Jackson was stating the first principle of constitutional pragmatism: What matters is what works in the real world, not the law on the books.Highlighted by 111 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Twelve; First Edition. first printing (November 8, 2010)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 528 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0446580570
- ISBN-13 : 978-0446580571
- Item Weight : 1.75 pounds
- Dimensions : 7 x 2 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #226,758 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #47 in Courts & Law
- #156 in Lawyer & Judge Biographies
- #213 in General Constitutional Law
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Noah Feldman is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard University as well as a Senior Fellow of the Society of Fellows and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He is a contributing writer for Bloomberg View.
Feldman credit Nina Subin small version.jpg
Before joining the Harvard faculty, Feldman was Cecelia Goetz Professor of Law at New York University School of Law. He was named a Carnegie Scholar in 2005. In 2004 he was a visiting professor at Yale Law School and a fellow of the Whitney Humanities Center. In 2003 he served as senior constitutional advisor to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, and advised members of the Iraqi Governing Council on the drafting of the Transitional Administrative Law or interim constitution. He served as a law clerk to Justice David H. Souter of the U.S. Supreme Court (1998 – 1999). Selected as a Rhodes Scholar, he earned a D. Phil. in Islamic Thought from Oxford University and a J.D. from Yale Law School, serving as Book Reviews Editor of the Yale Law Journal. He received his A.B. summa cum laude in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations from Harvard University in 1992, finishing first in his class.
His new book, "The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President" will be available on October 31, 2017 (Random House) and is available for pre-order here. He is the author of six other books including: Cool War: The Future of Global Competition (Random House, May 21, 2013), the award winning and acclaimed Scorpions: The Battles and Triumphs of FDR’s Great Justices(Twelve, 2010), The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State (Princeton University Press, 2008); Divided By God: America's Church-State Problem and What We Should Do About It (Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2005); What We Owe Iraq: War and the Ethics of Nation Building (Princeton University Press 2004); and After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy (Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2003). He also co-authored two textbooks with Kathleen Sullivan, titled, "Constitutional Law", 19th Edition (Foundation Press, 2016) and "First Amendment Law", 6th Edition (Foundation Press, 2016). He has worked as a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The book is really two stories. The first is about the rise of the Fab Four, their relationship with FDR, with each other, and the pivotal roles they played in advancing New Deal policies. Each of them knew FDR in some capacity prior to his election as President in 1932.
— Frankfurter was the first to capture FDR’s attention. Frankfurter was a progressive and a founding member of the American Civil Liberties Union with a seat at Harvard Law School. From Cambridge, he drafted New Deal legislation and staffed New Deal agencies. Insiders described him as “the most influential single individual in the United States.”
— Born and raised in the Deep South, Black joined the Ku Klux Klan to further his political career. After being elected to the U.S. Senate, he distanced himself from the Klan and gained national attention as head of a Senate subcommittee investigating corporate corruption.
— Jackson, from the back country of upstate New York, rose to fame as a superb trial lawyer, despite never having graduated from law school. His increasingly prominent role in the American Bar Association brought him to Washington and the attention of FDR, who appointed him first as solicitor general and then as attorney general.
— Douglas, like Frankfurter, made his name in academic circles, first as a student at Columbia law school and then as a Yale law professor. Intensely ambitious, Douglas was appointed head of the newly formed SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and uncovered considerable Wall Street corruption. He told the management of the New York Stock Exchange that they had to reorganize themselves to his satisfaction or else. “If you produce a plan of reorganization,” he told them, “I’ll let you run the Exchange. But if you just go on horse-trading, I’ll step in and run it myself.”
The second part of the story involves the court, two courts actually, the court of public opinion and the Supreme Court. On trial was New Deal legislation designed to create new jobs for the twenty-five percent of the nation out of work, and the creation of government agencies designed to regulate financial markets. The feeling among many was that the Roosevelt administration had gone too far, with policies that smacked of socialism. In fact, the goal of the New Deal was to preserve market capitalism by regulating its potentially corrupt features, and it acquired a name—liberalism. Socialism and communism called for transfer of the ownership of the means of production to the people, which meant, in effect, the state. Liberals flatly rejected that proposition. They wanted to save capitalism by fixing it. The court of public opinion ruled in favor of the New Deal by reelecting President Roosevelt in 1936 and 1940. The Supreme Court, on the other hand, did not. In a number of 5-4 decisions, the High Court struck down various New Deal policies as unconstitutional. This led to “court packing,” Roosevelt’s threat to increase the size of the court from nine to as many as fifteen justices, in order to make way for new court appointees more favorable to his policies. The Supreme Court got the message: in the next case they ruled in favor of the New Deal.
Hugo Black was the first of Fab Four to be appointed to the Supreme Court, filling a vacancy created by the death of a justice, in 1937. Frankfurter and Douglas were next to fill court vacancies, in 1939; Jackson was the last appointed to the bench, in 1941. In time, every justice on the Supreme Court would be appointed by FDR, and the High Court would become known as the Roosevelt Court. Once the best of friends, as Supreme Court justices the Fab Four soon became rivals and enemies. One of them—Justice Frankfurter—paradoxically, became a judicial conservative. Despite their New Deal heritage, the four did not always agree, but on the important decisions they usually did. The author discuses these cases in detail, but the thrust of their court years, indeed, the thrust of the book, is the case that changed the course of the nation—Brown v. Board of Education. Racial segregation in the South was a blight on America made painfully clear at the close of World War II. Writes the author: “The Nazis’ racial codes became archetypes of the evil character of the Third Reich. By the time the war was over and the overtly racist powers of Germany and Japan had been defeated, it had become increasingly difficult to justify race-based segregation in the United States.”
The case came before the High Court in 1952. The Fab Four, while initially divided on whether this was the right time or not to render a favorable decision, correctly recognized that this would be the most important decision of the Roosevelt Court. Rather than act immediately, they sat on the case for over a year. During that time, Earl Warren was appointed as Chief Justice and he wasted little time in pushing for an immediate and favorable decision. In fact, he wanted a unanimous decision, and spent his first months on the bench getting all the justices to agree—no mean feat. Warren also wrote the ground-breaking decision. The Brown Court decision makes for a fascinating story, not to be missed, and is the culmination of the book. Justices Black, Douglas, Frankfurter and Jackson would go down in American history as among the most influential justices to have ever sat on the bench. The court, meanwhile, would never be the same after Brown, focusing more on decisions that favored the right of minorities and advanced individual freedom. “There is no one way to interpret the Constitution,” writes the author, “and the lives of the greatest justices reflect that reality. Driven by prudence, by principle, by pragmatism, or by policy, the justices at their best make the Constitution their own. Arguing about its true meaning, striving to make sense of its contours and its commands, is the essence of what makes us loyal to it. To interpret the Constitution by its own best light is to be an American.”
The long-lasting influence over jurisprudence is to be expected since Roosevelt, due to his longevity, was able to name a total of 9 new justices, and this only in 1937 after a protracted battle over the court's insistence on invalidating New Deal legislation. During his efforts to bring the court out of what he termed, "the horse and buggy age" Roosevelt managed to appoint some remarkable individuals who both furthered the liberal ideals of the New Deal and in some cases moved beyond them.
FDR's first nominee was Hugo Black, who though a lawyer, was never a judge. He was selected mainly as a fence-mending gesture. As a senator, his appointment was thought to be easy to win confirmation. Initially he proved to be somewhat controversial due to his past as a member of the Klu Klux Klan. Despite this somewhat despicable past, Black proved to be one of the most outstanding liberal voices insisting on an almost absolutist take on the First Amendment and rediscovered the judicial power of the 14th (despite the insistence of colleagues that the amendment was intended to promote racial equality). His most brilliant decision was Gideon vs. Wainwright, which ensured the right to legal council to all accused of a crime. Black's approach to the law was based on his reading of the constitution and was referred to as "originalism." While this approach enabled him to rule on Brown vs. The Topeka Board of Education to strike down segregation, he rejected the notion that the constitution provided for a right to privacy, established in Griswold vs. Connecticut. Indeed, in subsequent privacy cases, where the doctrine was refined by Justices Douglas, Brennan, and Marshall, Black was adamant in rejecting arguments based on the principle.
Felix Frankfurter was destined to be named to the court, making a fetish over his idealization of Justices Holmes and Brandeis. One wag said that Frankfurter had no children because Holmes did not. Oddly enough for a bastion of the New Deal, Frankfurter originated the doctrine of judicial restraint which was in response to the previous court's insistence on viewing all decisions on the basis on property rights, the very doctrine that struck down many important pieces of New Deal legislation. As such, Frankfurter took a dim view of legislation affecting minority rights, religions practices, and even gerrymandering to restrict the right to vote. For Frankfurter, judicial restraint involved the courts not imposing its will on decisions made by the states and congress and the executive. Useful when in opposition to the court. Not terribly so, when the court was hearing cases involving the rights of others. Frankfurter was, as many of the justices profiled in this work would, able to look the other way when it came to profound decisions such as Brown.
Next to Frankfurter, William O. Douglas was the most well-connected member of the court. His patron was Joseph Kennedy and his reputation was made at Yale's School of Law. His career at the SEC established him as a leading power player in Washington and throughout the 40s, was frequently mentioned as a possible candidate for president or vice president. His personal life eventually led to this becoming a gross unlikelihood. Under the mores of the time, Douglas and his multiple marriages made him unacceptable to a large segment of the population. However, even with a messy personal life, Douglas was an outstanding advocate of personal liberty. However, as he progressed on the court he became more irascible and odious to his colleagues.
Robert Jackson emerged as a country lawyer from up-state New York to be one of the most important solicitor generals in history. As a justice, Jackson assumed a more pragmatic approach to the law that put him in league with Frankfurter and in generally opposition to Black and Douglas. Jackson, as portrayed in this book, comes across as a man of monumental ego, whose best efforts were frequently undone by pride, as occurred when he was presiding over the Nuremberg Trials and he sought to get Herman Goering to incriminate himself. Jackson's doctrine of pragmatism in the law seems to have clouded his perspective, at times leading him to order one of his clerks (future Chief Justice Rehnquist) to prepare a memo arguing the merits of Plessy vs. Furgeson, the notorious 19th century case that established the doctrine of "separate, but equal" as the law of the land.
This book is interesting because it demonstrates on one level just how far an abstact notion will take one. Jackson's pragmatism, Frankfurter's judicial restraint and Black's originalism all lead them into intellectual ox-bows. Douglas, though probably the most brilliant of the "Scorpions" lacked a certain moral clarity by relying on a doctrine that focused on furthering just individual liberty and somewhat indifferent to the civil rights movement or the ideal of equality. In a sense what the author demonstrates is that none of these approaches to the law or being a judge provides a fool-proof guarantee of being on the right side of history. Based on purely a few pages, it is possible that Noah Feldman might think that if the four judges profiled might have lacked the secret to possessing judicial clarity of vision, Earl Warren might be the judge on the right side of history. This reader hopes that he may turn his attention and erudition to this subject at some point.













