Other Sellers on Amazon
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Follow the Author
Screenwriting: The Sequence Approach Paperback – April 27, 2004
Enhance your purchase
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
About the Author
- Publisher : Continuum; New edition (April 27, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 248 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0826415687
- ISBN-13 : 978-0826415684
- Item Weight : 11.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.55 x 0.6 x 8.39 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #140,014 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The book explores the following four tools used to build anticipation and or tension:
- Telegraphing/Pointing/Advertising: Common examples are appointments and deadlines as well as preparations (ex: packing a suitcase). This also serves the important function of helping orient the audience as to where they are in the journey.
- Dangling cause: Expressions of intent in which the effect is not felt until later. Common examples include warnings, treats, statements of hopes or fears, and predictions.
- Dramatic irony: Occurs when the audience knows more than one (or more) of the characters and is waiting to see what happens when the truth is revealed. Can create suspense or comedy.
- Dramatic tension: Occurs when neither the audience nor the characters know how a problem will be resolved.
Other useful tips:
- “Coincidences that hurt a protagonist tend to work in drama, and are viewed suspiciously if they help.”
- “… it must seem as though what the movie is what happens despite what the characters want or expect.”
- “Human nature being what it is, chances are the man will do the easiest thing first, and only if that fails will he try a more difficult course of action.” Often characters have no other choice, or a choice between the lesser of two evils.
- Try to “smuggle” exposition (background information the audience needs to know) as a subtext of underlying action (arguments where people attack and defend, persuasion, seduction, reassurance) and NOT as an explanation
- Create believability through foreshadowing (which the author refers to as the use of motifs that are later paid-off)
- Audiences occasionally need “recapitulation scenes” to review important information they may have missed that sets up future action
- Character arc = In the face of major challenge, the protagonist must give up her (known) want to obtain her (unknown) true need. Only then will she realize the fundamental truth that is the theme of the story.
- Subplots have three main functions: (a) plot function – to help or hinder the protagonist, (b) thematic function – to show variations on the theme by presenting alternative ways of solving problems, and (c) structural function – to retard/delay the main plot and thereby intensify it
A typical film has 8 sequences (2 in Act I, 4 in Act II, and 2 in Act III) serving the following function:
I. Act I
a. Sequence A
- Open with an exterior long shot or interior close up to orient the audience.
- Hook the audience immediately by rousing curiosity with a puzzle
- Give a sense of what the protagonist’s life would be like if the events that led to the story had not interfered. This includes the “rules of the world” so that the audience knows what is possible, what to hope for, and what to be afraid of.
- End with an instability that forces the protagonist to respond to an inciting incident
b. Sequence B
- Whatever solution the protagonist tries to solve the inciting incident from Sequence A should lead to an even bigger problem that frames the dramatic question that shapes the rest of the film
II. Act II
a. Sequence C
- First attempt to solve the problem that arose at the end of Sequence B
- Note that you can either (a) solve the problem but in the process create a new, bigger problem, or (b) make the old problem even worse
- Here, the protagonist often switches from reluctant hero to driven hero (or vice-versa)
b. Sequence D
- Offer a glimpse of the actual resolution of the dramatic question or its mirror opposite. The protagonist may be able to choose freedom, but does not do so for an important reason.
c. Sequence E
- Opportunity to introduce new characters and/or subplots
d. Sequence F
- Often a low point, but could also be a significant reframing of the main tension
III. Act III
a. Sequence G
- Increasingly high stakes, often at a frenzied pace leading to an all hope is lost moment
b. Sequence H
- Final resolution often triggered by a major twist
- All instability must be conclusively settled and all subplots must be closed. This is the “and they lived happily ever after” part. (Or, unhappily ever after).
I enrolled in the Mini-Movie Method class from ScreenwritingU, after reading partially through this book. I dropped the class because the book is much better. The book avoids the incessant hype, the need to tie it to Joseph Campbell's idea of an heroic journey, and the fixed formula of eight mini-movies.
This book treats sequences in a non-dogmatic way. He starts by explaining the idea behind a movie with eight sequences. But the movies he analyzes do not all have eight sequences. Some have fewer. Some have many more sequences.
The idea of breaking a movie into sequences, each with its own story dynamic of tension that relates to the overall story tension is a very helpful way to work on a movie. You don't have to work in a linear fashion. If you get stuck temporarily on one sequence, you can work on another.
What the book misses is more discussion about crafting and rewriting your sequences. The theory discussion in this book is very brief. Maybe a bare 5% of the book. The author briefly summarizes dramatic theory as it relates to audience interest based on telegraphing, dangling clause, dramatic irony, and dramatic tension. Then on to another brief summary. That a description of the eight typical sequences. The rest of the book is analyses of movies. Well-done analyses. But I think There could have been more discussion about how sequences expand a writer's ability to sustain interest. For example, how the classic three act structure for a movie can be applied to each of the sequences could have been discussed more and illustrated with diagrams.
It's well written, clear, concise enough; but a bit difficult to get my head around. I think this is because the ideas are so insightful and fresh. This is a book that everyone interested in story telling should read at least twice. I can't say enough.
(By the time you think 'maybe I should read this book' you are a long long way from arguing with your middle school friends, "It's a good movie 'cause I like it. It's good.")
One thing worth noting, though, is that if you buy the paperback edition, you may find the print rather small. It's definitely smaller than the print in most of the dead-tree books I own. It doesn't bother me - I'm still pretty young - but if your eyes give you trouble, you may be better served by the Kindle edition so you can enlarge the text.
Top reviews from other countries
But then he offers, as his first example, Toy Story. Which he breaks down into sequences of: 14 mins, 6 mins, 9 mins, 10 mins, 10 mins, 11 mins, 8 mins, 9 mins. I’m not sure maths is one of the guy’s strong points. His logic and argument structures are a bit incoherent too, as in : ‘the resolution of the main tension of a movie is what characterizes the end of the second act’ (p12) - an unusual proposition, most analyses I’ve read put the resolution of a movie in Act III, as Gulino himself then does on p18: ‘the eighth and final sequence almost invariably contains the resolution of a picture.’ Some elaboration is required here as to what resolutions he’s talking about, especially if he wants to challenge orthodoxy. I often get the vague feeling he’s contradicting himself and not quite got it sorted in his own mind. And so far as sequencing is concerned, by page 18 he’s already undermining the case he made in his opening pitch, page 3. So the book’s a bit frustrating and I’m wondering where his supervisor was. However…
Although the analyses of movies Gulino undertakes never quite fit into the original cans he’s proposing for them, the book as a whole makes a strong case for understanding and writing movies in terms of sequences. He patiently breaks down the movies he examines into manageable chunks. His section by section synopses are useful. You can see the bricks of a movie being laid down. His sequencing is clear and fits. There are minor quibbles along the way – is it an ‘accident’ when Woody drives the radio controlled car at Buzz Lightyear and knocks him out the window? I viewed this as murderous intent, from which Woody never quite redeems himself! And why doesn’t Gulino mention how hokey the opening sequence of Air Force One is? But, overall, the repeatedly drilled example he gives of thinking of screenwriting in terms of sequences - each with their own minor drama; a beginning, a middle and an end for us to be carried through - is salutary. The bulk of the book is this analysis of chosen movies in sequential terms. Sure you can do this watching a movie broken into chapters on a DVD’s menu but Gulino helps elaborate the micro structure and objectives of those sequences both in themselves and as part of the rising action in the larger structure of the movie. Sequences are fundamental to movie writing and movie making but also to the spans of our attention in movie watching. Films are written, produced and watched in manageable sequences. The exact temporal length of these sequences is not really the issue.
The theory is light - it's not a complex theory - and assumes the reader is familiar with screenwriting basics. But the real strength here are the many analytical breakdowns of famous and diverse feature films - from Toy Story, to Air Force One and Lawrence of Arabia - analysis from a wide range of work.
Struggling with second acts, structure and plotting? This is a great help, well written.